text:
The FBI's counterintelligence investigation into whether Trump campaign officials had improper contacts with Russia was triggered by information the bureau obtained about George PapadopoulosGeorge Demetrios PapadopoulosFlynn spurs questions of who Trump might pardon next Not treason, not a crime — but definitely a gross abuse of power Tale of two FBI cases: Clinton got warned, Trump got investigated MORE, a former adviser to the campaign, according to the memo released Friday by House Intelligence Committee Republicans.

Allies of President Trump[]Donald TrumpBiden and Harris named Time's 2020 'Person of the Year' US to sanction Turkey over Russian defense system: report Federal government executes Brandon Bernard despite last-minute appeals MORE have claimed the Russia probe began with the so-called Steele dossier that was paid for in part by Hillary Clinton[]Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonBette Middler blasts McConnell: 'How did he win with an 18% approval rating?' Hillary Clinton: Republicans that 'humor' Trump election claims 'have no spines' Trump leaves mixed legacy on veterans affairs MORE and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). That would mean the Russia investigation itself — and by extension, special counsel Robert Mueller[]Robert (Bob) MuellerBarr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel CNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting MORE’s probe — was launched from political opposition research.

But the memo states that FBI agent Pete Strzok opened the investigation in July 2016 based on "information" about Papadapoulos, rather than the dossier.

The New York Times has previously reported that Papadapoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton before the hack of the DNC became publicly known. The Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadapoulos had said, according to the Times.

Papadopoulos has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and is cooperating with special counsel Mueller’s investigation.

Still, the revelation that Strzok, who sent text messages disparaging Trump, launched the original investigation into the Trump campaign will further fuel debate over political bias at the FBI.

Strzok and Lisa Page, who is a lawyer at the FBI, exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump. Strzok and Page, who were having an affair, were both on Mueller’s special counsel team at one point before being reassigned last year

Strzok was also a central figure in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email arrangement. Republicans, citing text messages between Strzok and Lisa Page, have said the FBI determined ahead of time to give Clinton an election year pass.

The memo released by Republicans on Friday, which was authored by staffers for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes[]Devin Gerald NunesBiden's Cabinet a battleground for future GOP White House hopefuls Overnight Defense: Trump loyalist to lead Pentagon transition | Democrats ask VA for vaccine distribution plan | Biden to get classified intel reports Ex-Nunes aide linked to Biden conspiracy theories will lead Pentagon transition MORE (R-Calif.), also criticizes the FBI’s use of the Steele dossier in a warrant application.

After the counterintelligence investigation began, the memo states, the FBI used the Steele dossier, in part, to obtain surveillance warrants for Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, who is not related to Lisa Page.

Then-FBI Director James Comey[]James Brien ComeyTrump's self-pardon would clash with his impeachment The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Mastercard - Dem leaders back smaller COVID-19 relief bill as pandemic escalates Trump blasts special counsel Durham for moving too slowly MORE sought and received a warrant to spy on Carter Page in October 2016, the document states.

The surveillance applications typically involve several layers of authentication. Justice Department lawyers must show probable cause that the target of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant is acting as an agent of a foreign power.

The memo asserts that the FBI hid details about the origins of the dossier from the surveillance court. The memo also states that there is “not evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between [Carter] Page and Papadopoulos.”

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What exactly made the FBI convinced of foreign interference in the United States' 2016 election?

answer: Information from an Australian diplomat.

text: It is omitted what the information was: Papadopoulos had said that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

refinement: Information from an Australian diplomat that Papadopoulos had said to him that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

text: It is omitted that the Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said.

refinement: The Australian government tipped off the FBI that Papadopoulos had said to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

answer: Information the FBI obtained about former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos spurred the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into whether campaign officials had improper contacts with Russia. The FBI used the Steele dossier, in part, to obtain surveillance warrants for Trump ally Carter Page.

text: It is not quite relevant that the FBI used the Steele dossier. I would delete the last sentence.

refinement: Information the FBI obtained about former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos spurred the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into whether campaign officials had improper contacts with Russia.

text: It was omitted that the information was that Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton.

refinement: Information the FBI obtained about former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that he said to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton spurred the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into whether campaign officials had improper contacts with Russia.

answer: It was because of the information provided by the Australian government about Papadopoulos.

text: It is omitted what the information was: Papadopoulos had said to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

refinement: It was because of the information provided by the Australian government that Papadopoulos had said to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

answer: George Papadopoulos' comments in an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton is what made the FBI begin investigating possible improper contact between Trump campaign officials and Russia. This inquiry was not based on the Steele dossier, unlike previous claims.

text: It is omitted that the Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said.

refinement: George Papadopoulos' comments in an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton is what made the FBI begin investigating possible improper contact between Trump campaign officials and Russia. The Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said. This inquiry was not based on the Steele dossier, unlike previous claims.

text: 'to' instead of 'in'.

refinement: George Papadopoulos' comments to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Hillary Clinton is what made the FBI begin investigating possible improper contact between Trump campaign officials and Russia. The Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said. This inquiry was not based on the Steele dossier, unlike previous claims.

answer: It opened an investigation based on Papadopoulos' claim, which evidently lead to the firing of being a major figure in Hillary Clinton's official campaign.

text: 'which evidently lead to the firing of being a major figure in Hillary Clinton's official campaign.' makes no sense. Papadopoulos was one of the major figures in Trump's campaign.

refinement: It opened an investigation based on Papadopoulos' claim.

text: It is omitted that information was that Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton before the hack of the DNC became publicly known. The Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said.

refinement: It opened an investigation based on Papadopoulos' claim that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton. Papadopoulos said that to an Australian diplomat, and the Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadopoulos had said.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Prior to obtaining any information from the Australian government, was the FBI ever planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election?

answer: There has already been a preliminary investigation, based on some unknown information about Papadopoulos.

text: FBI was never planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election prior to obtaining any information from the Australian government.

refinement: FBI was never planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election prior to obtaining any information from the Australian government.

answer: No, the investigation started when an Australian ambassador informed the FBI about Papadopoulos' bragging.

answer: No. Based on the passage, the FBI investigation started based on information the bureau obtained about George Papadopoulos. Therefore, prior to obtaining any information from the Australian government, the FBI was not planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election.

answer: No, the outlet was coordinated by the Steele Dossier.

text: It is irrelevant that the outlet was coordinated by the Steele Dossier.

answer: No, the FBI was not planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election before obtaining information from the Australian government. The investigation was triggered by information obtained on George Papadopoulos, a former adviser to the campaign.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What there any personal vendetta involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign and its links with Russia?

answer: Former FBI agent Peter Strzok was a central figure to the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email arrangement, and he lead the investigation into Trump campaign officials. His text messages (together with his mistress) were disparaging of Trump before and during the investigation. Despite personal biases, it would seem it was the right decision to place Strzok on the investigation team.

text: It is irrelevant.

refinement: Former FBI agent Peter Strzok was a central figure to the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email arrangement, and he lead the investigation into Trump campaign officials. His text messages (together with his mistress) were disparaging of Trump before and during the investigation.

text: 'in' instead of 'to'.

refinement: Former FBI agent Peter Strzok was a central figure in the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email arrangement, and he lead the investigation into Trump campaign officials. His text messages (together with his mistress) were disparaging of Trump before and during the investigation.

answer: The FBI secretly investigated the Trump campaign with a team made up of Trump critics. He team concluded that there was Russian interference in the elections and found evidence that the campaign collaborated with Russian operatives. The dossier on which the investigation was based was paid for in part by Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

text: It is irrelevant

text: It is omitted that former FBI agent Peter Strzok was a central figure in the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email arrangement, and he lead the investigation into Trump campaign officials. His text messages (together with his mistress) were disparaging of Trump before and during the investigation.

refinement: Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump.

answer: There seems to be, considering a few FBI officers who were involved in the investigation were also involved in a disparaging conversation about Trump during his campaign.

answer: There is evidence of personal vendetta involved in the investigation into Trump's campaign and its links with Russia; namely against Trump advisor George Papadopoulos. FBI agent Peter Strzok reportedly began the investigation of the Trump campaign based on information he obtained about Papadopoulos, rather than the Steele dossier, which Trump supporters have claimed was politically motivated.

text: It is irrelevant.

text: It is omitted that Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump.

refinement: Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump.

answer: There does not appear to be any personal vendetta involved in the investigation into the Trump campaign and its links with Russia. The investigation was launched based on information about George Papadopoulos, not the Steele dossier. The dossier was used in obtaining a warrant for Carter Page, but the memo asserts there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos.

text: It is incorrect that there is no personal vendetta involved in the investigation into the Trump campaign and its links with Russia.

refinement: Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump. The investigation was launched based on information about George Papadopoulos, not the Steele dossier. The dossier was used in obtaining a warrant for Carter Page, but the memo asserts there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos.

text: It is irrelevant that the investigation was launched based on information about George Papadopoulos, not the Steele dossier; the dossier was used in obtaining a warrant for Carter Page, but the memo asserts there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos.

refinement: Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump.


split: test

text:
	I stare down at my arm. It’s so pale and unblemished. I slowly lift up my razor blade. I can feel it’s cold anticipation, ready to tear my skin apart, which is exactly what it’s going to do. I drag it across my flesh in a long slow drag. I watch as the warm crimson spreads. My arm, my clothes, -nothing remains dry. Why do I do this to myself? I keep saying that I’m going to stop.
	Suddenly there is a knock at my door. I panic. I wrap a dirty cloth around my arm and run into the hotel closet. “Get out here right now you little bitch.” I can already tell who it is from their voice. My drug dealer. As I’m crouching in the closet I try to slow my breathing, but my heart jumps when the door is kicked in. There’s a tiny hole in the closet door, and I lean forward to put my eye to it. I can see he’s brought company. They’ve moved into another area of my hotel room, possibly the kitchen. I close my eyes as I strain to hear them, but by the time I open my eyes I’m too late. I feel a searing hot rod force its way into the back of my skull. I can’t stop screaming, and that attracts the rest of the men.
	I have no choice but to obey. I come out of the closet quietly while they tie me up.  I try to remain calm, but I falter as the boss begins to talk. “Guess what Sabrina? I woke up today and I found all my drugs and money gone. You’re the last person I’ve sold to in days. What did you do with them?
	I have no idea what he’s talking about. He’s probably high right now. But then I suddenly remember something. The razor blade on my bed. At the current moment they have me tied up, lying face down on the floor. I look up at him and use my most innocent voice. “I didn’t do it, but I know who did. But right now I’m a little uncomfortable. You can keep me tied up, but please let me lie down on the bed. “
	“Why should I care if you’re comfortable or not?”
“Because otherwise I’m going to say a thing.”
	“I guess I’ll just have to beat it outta ya.”
I smile a cocky grin. “You already poked out one of my eyes and I haven’t said anything yet.” I hear him curse under his breath as he throws me onto the bed.  Within seconds I find the razor blade and start to cut at the rope that imprisons me. I’m done quickly and he doesn’t even notice.
	“Quite stalling and tell me something already.”
“Oh, I’ll tell you something.”
	“what’s that?”
“you’re going to die.”
I throw my razor, quick and sleek, and watch as his red crimson spills out. His goonies have seen enough, and bolt for the door.  They think they’re going to get away, but they’re not. I grab the two closest things on the end table next to my bed, a pen and a vase. I sprint out my door and quickly catch them in the parking garage. The first assailant makes the mistake of turning around to look at me, and I smash the vase into his face, sending a million shards of glass into his eyes, flesh, and even mouth. I grab a piece before it hits the ground and I kill him like I did his boss, by slicing his throat. This whole time his buddy has just been standing there, watching me kill him. Once his friend is done it’s only me and him, and he has my full attention. I take my pen and jab it into his right eye, just like the one that got damaged on my own face less than five minutes ago. I quickly pluck the pen back out and sink it into his heart, and let his body drop. I don’t care about the mess, let the staff clean it up.

title: I just thought this up. it's my first story. Sorry if it's to gory/bloody/graphic

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Sabrina's relationship with the man that enters her hotel room?

answer: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. She has stolen his drugs and money and he is trying to get it back. He comes to her room looking for the person who stole his drugs.

text: He thinks that she stole his drugs and money, because she is the last person he sold to in days. But she has no idea what he is talking about and suspects that he is high. Remove the third sentence, it is a duplication of the final sentence. Include money in the final sentence as well.

refinement: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. He comes to her room looking for the person who stole his drugs and money.

text: The drug dealer pokes her in the eye to get her out of the closet and to encourage her to tell him the truth. He also abuses her verbally. Include these observations in the response.

refinement: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. He comes to her hotel room looking for the person who stole his drugs and money. The drug dealer pokes her in the eye to get her out of the closet and to encourage her to tell him the truth. He also abuses her verbally.

answer: Sabrina is the last person the drug dealer sold to in days. She is in the closet when the drug dealer enters her hotel room. He questions her about his missing drugs and money. She has no idea what he is talking about. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money and kidnaps her.

text: The drug dealer and his goonies kick in the door to gain access to her hotel room, and abuse her verbally and physically. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money. Change the tone of the response to reflect the aggressive nature of the encounter.

refinement: Sabrina is the last person the drug dealer sold to in days. She is in the closet when the drug dealer kicks down the door to her hotel room. He verbally and physically abuses her and accuses her of stealing his drugs and money. She has no idea what he is talking about. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money and kidnaps her.

text: Remove the final sentence of the response, it repeats some information.

refinement: Sabrina is the last person the drug dealer sold to in days. She is in the closet when the drug dealer kicks down the door to her hotel room. He verbally and physically abuses her and accuses her of stealing his drugs and money. She has no idea what he is talking about.

answer: Sabrina is the last person the drug dealer sold to in days. She is in the closet when the drug dealer enters her hotel room. He questions her about his missing drugs and money. She has no idea what he is talking about.

text: The drug dealer and company kick in the door to gain access to her hotel room, pokes her in the eye with a hot rod and calls her a derogatory name. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money. Change the tone of the response to reflect the violent relationship between Sabrina and the man that enters the hotel room.

refinement: Sabrina is the last person the drug dealer sold to in days. She hides in the closet when the drug dealer and his company kick in the door to her hotel room. He pokes her in the eye with a hot rod, abuse her verbally and accuses her of stealing his drugs and money. She has no idea what he is talking about.

answer: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. She has stolen his drugs and money and he is trying to get it back.

text: He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money, but she has no idea what he is talking about. Change the wording of the final sentence to reflect that she has no idea who stole his drugs and money.

refinement: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money, he is trying to get it back.

text: Include the violent nature of the relationship between Sabrina and the drug dealer. He calls her names, and pokes out her eye, he ties her up and threatens her.

refinement: Sabrina has a drug addiction. She's been buying drugs from the man that enters her room, and he has been selling them to her. He accuses her of stealing his drugs and money, he is trying to get it back. He calls her names, and pokes out her eye, he ties her up and threatens her.

answer: Sabrina is a drug addict who uses the razor blade to cut her arm. The man that enters her hotel room is her drug dealer. He tells her that he woke up and found all his drugs and money gone. He asks her what she did with them. Sabrina does not know what he is talking about but she remembers the razor blade on her bed.

text: Remove the references to Sabrina's self-harming behavior and the razor blade used to accomplish this. It does not have bearing on the question.

refinement: Sabrina is a drug addict, the man that enters her hotel room is her drug dealer. He tells her that he woke up and found all his drugs and money gone. He asks her what she did with them. Sabrina does not know what he is talking about.

text: The man calls her a derogatory name, and pokes out her eye with a searing hot rod, he ties her up and threatens her. Include the violent nature of the relationship between Sabrina and the drug dealer.

refinement: Sabrina is a drug addict, the man that enters her hotel room is her drug dealer. He tells her that he woke up and found all his drugs and money gone. He asks her what she did with them. Sabrina does not know what he is talking about. The man calls her a derogatory name, and pokes out her eye with a searing hot rod, he ties her up and threatens her.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Sabrina's childhood?

answer: No answer

answer: The story doesn't mention Sabrina's childhood

answer: No answer

answer: No answer


text:
Published on

Thursday, August 01, 2019

by

[President Donald Trump shakes hands with Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)]

The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees this week, a major victory in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's years-long effort to reshape the nation's courts and drag them further to the right for decades to come.

The breakneck speed with which McConnell has ushered young—and often unqualified—right-wing judges through the Senate confirmation process "should send shockwaves across the nation," the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights tweeted Wednesday.

"Republicans are counting on these judges to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state, and also to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect people from corporate power."
—Marge Baker, People for the American Way

But the rapid confirmation of Trump's judicial picks this week has largely flown under the radar as America's cable networks and newspapers have been dominated by coverage of the 2020 Democratic presidential debates.

Kristine Lucius, executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference, issued a statement singling out Texas district court nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr, who she said are "hostile to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights."

"Additionally, neither one would even state that the bedrock civil rights decision _Brown v. Board of Education_ was correctly decided," said Lucius, referring to the 1954 Supreme Court decision that ruled racial segregation of public schools unconstitutional.

Brown and Starr were just two of seven Trump judicial picks confirmed by the Senate on Wednesday.

"Senate Republicans will stop at nothing to stack the courts with partisan judges who will push their radical agenda through at any cost," Lucius said. "In doing so, they are not only degrading our courts, but also endangering our democracy."

It is unclear whether McConnell will succeed in pushing through all 19 of the judges he set out to confirm before the Senate breaks for recess at the end of the week, but progressives said the Kentucky Republican nevertheless did a lot of damage in just a few days—without much resistance from the Democratic Party.

  Yesterday, the Senate confirmed one of these lifetime judicial picks who wouldn't say #BrownvBoard was correctly decided 87-1. (Thanks @SenBlumenthal!)

  Today, Democrats let another be confirmed by voice vote--not even bothering to insist on a roll-call vote.

  SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

  Never Miss a Beat.

  GET OUR BEST DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.

  Where is the floor? https://t.co/xmC5ICzZ7k

  — Christopher Kang (@cdkang76) July 31, 2019

Marge Baker, executive vice president of progressive advocacy group People for the American Way, said in a statement Thursday that the "judges confirmed by the Senate this week include a number of alarming, narrow-minded elitists—including but not limited to nine nominees who would not say that they agreed with the Supreme Court's ruling in _Brown v. Board of Education_."

"Republicans are counting on these judges to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state," said Baker, "and also to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect people from corporate power."

McConnell and Trump's ongoing transformation of the nation's judiciary received very little attention during the two Democratic presidential debates this week.

In an interview on _MSNBC_ Thursday, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, who was on the debate stage in Detroit Wednesday night, accused Senate Democrats of not doing everything in their power to stop Trump's judicial picks because they want to leave town for August recess.

"They've approved his judge selections so they can go on recess," said Inslee.

"These are lifetime appointments," Inslee added. "Stopping Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump from putting these conservative judges on the bench is more important than their vacation, frankly."

  Gov. Inslee hits Senate Dems for supporting Trump judges: "We have to stop giving him a pass. They've approved his judge selections so they can go on recess. These are lifetime appointments ... It's more important than their vacation, frankly." pic.twitter.com/I0mloQB3sz

  — Demand Justice (@WeDemandJustice) August 1, 2019

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. COMMON DREAMS IS NOT YOUR NORMAL NEWS SITE. WE DON'T SURVIVE ON CLICKS. WE DON'T WANT ADVERTISING DOLLARS. WE WANT THE WORLD TO BE A BETTER PLACE. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. WITHOUT YOUR SUPPORT WE SIMPLY DON'T EXIST.

PLEASE SELECT A DONATION METHOD:

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the main news event.

answer: 13 of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees were confirmed as part of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's effort to reshape the nation's court for years to come.

text: The answer omits the major outcry about Democrat senators failing to oppose the confirmation of the judges.

refinement: 13 of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees were confirmed as part of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's effort to reshape the nation's court for years to come. The article features Gov. Jay Inslee who states that Democratic senators aren't opposing the picks just so that they can go on recess.

text: The problem with the judges should be mentioned.

refinement: 13 of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees were confirmed as part of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's effort to reshape the nation's court for years to come. The article features Gov. Jay Inslee who states that Democratic senators aren't opposing the picks just so that they can go on recess. Marge Baker and Kristine Lucius stated that these judges will dismantle the civil rights hard-fought-over for the last six decades like reproductive rights, voting rights, LGBTQ equality, etc.

answer: The Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominations this week, quickly pushing through unqualified candidates hostile to a range of civil and human rights protections.

text: The answer omits the major outcry about Democrat senators failing to oppose the confirmation of the judges.

refinement: The Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominations this week, quickly pushing through unqualified candidates hostile to a range of civil and human rights protections. Gov. Jay Inslee states that Democratic senators aren't opposing the picks just so that they can go on recess.

answer: The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 out of President Donald Trump's 19 lifetime judicial nominees in a matter of days, and progressives are worried about the effect this will have on the country's future. Some of the confirmed judges have been criticized for not agreeing with Brown v. Board of Education, a 1954 Supreme Court decision which ruled segregation of public schools unconstitutional.

text: The answer omits the major outcry about Democrat senators failing to oppose the confirmation of the judges.

refinement: The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 out of President Donald Trump's 19 lifetime judicial nominees in a matter of days, and progressives are worried about the effect this will have on the country's future. Some of the confirmed judges have been criticized for not agreeing with Brown v. Board of Education, a 1954 Supreme Court decision that ruled segregation of public schools unconstitutional. Gov. Jay Inslee stated that Democratic senators aren't opposing the picks just so that they can go on recess.

answer: Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees this week.

answer: The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees this week. The confirmations were done at breakneck speed in the last weeks before the Senate breaks following a voice vote with little opposition from Democrats. In mainstream media the news has been overshadowed by the 2020 Democratic presidential debates. Two of the candidates that have been confirmed would not say they agreed with the bedrock civil rights decision Brown v. Board of Education. The Republicans hope that the new judges will help to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality and shred the New Deal.

text: Dismantling reproductive rights, marriage equality, and shredding the New Deal is what the Progressives fear the Republicans will do. The Republicans made no statement corroborating the framing favored by the Progressives.

refinement: The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed 13 of President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees this week. The confirmations were done at breakneck speed in the last weeks before the Senate breaks following a voice vote with little opposition from Democrats. In mainstream media the news has been overshadowed by the 2020 Democratic presidential debates. Two of the candidates that have been confirmed would not say they agreed with the bedrock civil rights decision Brown v. Board of Education. The Progressives fear that the new judges will help to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality and shred the New Deal.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the views of the opposing sides.

answer: Republicans are counting on these judges to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state and to use the courts to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect the people from corporate power. They believe the Democrats are letting Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump do this to consolidate their power and are counting on the voters to stop them. The Democratic Party, in some cases, appears to be acquiescing.

text: The Republicans are stated to believe Democrats are letting McConnell and Trump do their thing to consolidate their power, which is made up.

refinement: Republicans are counting on these judges to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state and to use the courts to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect the people from corporate power. The Democratic Party, in some cases, appears to be acquiescing.

text: There's no direct quote from the Republicans stating they want to dismantle civil rights, etc. The Progressives fear that the Republicans will do those things.

refinement: The Progressives fear that these judges will dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state and use the courts to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect the people from corporate power. The Democratic Party, in some cases, appears to be acquiescing.

text: The answer should explicitly mention that there's no quote or view expressed from a Republican or any other right-winger in the article.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. The Progressives fear that these judges will dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state and use the courts to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect the people from corporate power. The Democratic Party, in some cases, appears to be acquiescing.

text: The Democrats' acquiescing is irrelevant.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. The Progressives fear that these judges will dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state and use the courts to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect the people from corporate power.

answer: Texas district court nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr are considered "hostile to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights."  The Senate Democrats have allowed the approval of the two Texas district court nominees.

text: The Senate Democrats' actions are irrelevant.

refinement: Texas district court nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr are considered "hostile to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights."

text: The answer should explicitly mention that there's no quote or view expressed from a Republican or any other right-winger in the article.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. Texas district court nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr are considered "hostile to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights."

text: Merge Baker's fears aren't mentioned in the answer.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. Texas district court nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr are considered "hostile to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights." Merge Baker thinks that the judges will help Republicans "dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state, and also to shred the New Deal and regulations that protect people from corporate power."

answer:
The Republican-controlled Senate has been confirming Trump's judicial picks at breakneck speed, which progressives say is part of the ongoing effort to drag the nation's courts further to the right for decades to come. The speed with which these judicial picks are being pushed through the Senate has largely gone under the radar, overshadowing coverage of the 2020 Democratic presidential debates.

Progressives say that these judicial picks include "alarming, narrow-minded elitists" who are hostile to civil rights and would dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state. Republicans, on the other hand, are hoping these judges will carry out their radical agenda, and believe they need to get confirmed in order to have lasting impact.

text: The overview of the first paragraph is irrelevant.

refinement: Progressives say that these judicial picks include "alarming, narrow-minded elitists" who are hostile to civil rights and would dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state. Republicans, on the other hand, are hoping these judges will carry out their radical agenda, and believe they need to get confirmed in order to have lasting impact.

text: The answer fictitiously claims that the Progressives' fears are what the Republicans claim. It's not.

refinement: Progressives say that these judicial picks include "alarming, narrow-minded elitists" who are hostile to civil rights and would dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state.

text: The answer should explicitly mention that there's no quote or view expressed from a Republican or any other right-winger in the article.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. Progressives say that these judicial picks include "alarming, narrow-minded elitists" who are hostile to civil rights and would dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state.

answer: With their control of the Senate, the Republicans hope to reshape the nation's court and drag them further toward the right for decades to come. The Democrats did not give major opposition to the confirmations. This irks progressive right groups like the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and People of the American Way. They feel that the new judges are hostile to progressive agendas, narrow-minded and elitist and both have an issue with two of the confirmations not confirming the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education. The Washington Governor even feels that they were confirmed so the Democrats could go on vacation and for no other reason.

text: The overview given in the first three sentences is irrelevant.

refinement: They feel that the new judges are hostile to progressive agendas, narrow-minded and elitist and both have an issue with two of the confirmations not confirming the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education. The Washington Governor even feels that they were confirmed so the Democrats could go on vacation and for no other reason.

text: The Washington Governor's thoughts are irrelevant to the question.

refinement: They feel that the new judges are hostile to progressive agendas, narrow-minded and elitist and both have an issue with two of the confirmations not confirming the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

text: "They" refers to the Progressives, which should be explicit in the answer.

refinement: The Progressives feel that the new judges are hostile to progressive agendas, narrow-minded and elitist and both have an issue with two of the confirmations not confirming the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

text: The answer should explicitly mention that there's no quote or view expressed from a Republican or any other right-winger in the article.

refinement: There's no direct view or quote from the Republicans in the article. The Progressives feel that the new judges are hostile to progressive agendas, narrow-minded and elitist and both have an issue with two of the confirmations not confirming the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

answer: The Republican majority in the Senate is continuing to move forward with Trump's effort to remake the nation's judiciary according to their right-wing agenda, while Democrats argue that they should be doing more to stop this effort in its tracks. Progressives fear that Trump's judges will dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, the separation of church and state, the New Deal, and regulations that protect people from corporate power.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the role of Kristine Lucius in the news.

answer: Kristine Lucius is the executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference. According to the passage, she criticized Senate Republicans for getting through young, unqualified conservative judges too quickly. She also said the judges are likely to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state.

text: The answer omits Lucius' criticism that two of the judges wouldn't state that they agreed with the Brown v. Board of Education 1954 Supreme Court decision that ruled racial segregation of public schools unconstitutional.

refinement: Kristine Lucius is the executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference. According to the passage, she criticized Senate Republicans for getting through young, unqualified conservative judges too quickly. She also said the judges are likely to dismantle reproductive rights, marriage equality, and the separation of church and state. Finally, she says that two of the judges wouldn't state that they agreed with the Brown v. Board of Education 1954 Supreme Court decision that ruled racial segregation of public schools unconstitutional.

answer: Kristine Lucius is executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She criticized the Senate's speedy confirmation of Republican-nominated judges, including those who state they do not subscribe to the 1954 Supreme Court decision that found racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. Some Senators had alleged that the Democratic Party was purposefully letting the confirmation process go through to facilitate an August recess, while others asserted that halting the process was more important than taking time away from work.

text: The allegations about the Democrats are irrelevant.

refinement: Kristine Lucius is executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She criticized the Senate's speedy confirmation of Republican-nominated judges, including those who state they do not subscribe to the 1954 Supreme Court decision that found racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.

text: The answer omits Lucius' fears.

refinement: Kristine Lucius is executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She criticized the Senate's speedy confirmation of Republican-nominated judges, including those who state they do not subscribe to the 1954 Supreme Court decision that found racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. She thinks the two of the judges are hostile to voting, LGBTQ equality, reproductive, and immigrant rights.

answer: Kristine Lucius is the executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. In a statement on Thursday, she called attention to two of the Trump judicial picks and singles out their hostility to voting rights, LGBTQ equality, reproductive rights and immigrant rights.

answer: Lucius is the executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She singled Texas district nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr out in a statement regarding their hostility toward voting rights, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights. Lucius also spoke about the fact neither of those two judges would state that the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education was correct. Lucius holds that the Republican Senate is stacking to court with partisan judges who will push their agenda through at any cost. This will degrade the American courts and endanger their democracy.

answer: Kristine Lucius is identified in the piece as the Hoe for Policy and Government Affairs for the Leadership Conference. Without a public position, Lucius is quoted as making public statements about the Trump's reported gambit to swift through Trump judicial nominees through the Senate.

text: The answer is complete nonsense.

text: The answer is empty.

refinement: Lucius is the executive vice president for policy and government affairs at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She singled Texas district nominees Jeffrey Brown and Brantley Starr out in a statement regarding their hostility toward voting rights, reproductive rights, and immigrant rights. Lucius also spoke about the fact neither of those two judges would state that the bedrock civil rights decision in Brown v. Board of Education was correct. Lucius holds that the Republican Senate is stacking to court with partisan judges who will push their agenda through at any cost. This will degrade the American courts and endanger their democracy.


text:
KALAVATI DEVI (born 1965) is an Indian mason who became an award-winning toilet builder in Kanpur. She transformed her own community by installing a 50-seat toilet and then moved to other communities. She has helped build 4,000 toilets improving the lot particularly for women and children. In 2019 she was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India).

Life

Devi was born in the 1960s and her background is in Sitapur.[1] She came to Kanpur when she was 14 to marry Jairaj Singh who was 18. One of her husband's jobs was to work as a floor cutter for a non-profit group called Shramik Bharti.[2]

They lived in Kanpur and she was disgusted by people defecating in the street. She said it was a “living hell” and that she intended to improve the cleanliness of her area.[3] Her husband was supportive and, when she decided that she was going to build toilets in her area, he went with her to meet Shramik Bharti. They were keen on the idea of building a 10–20 seat facility. Local corporations were approached and they offered to find 200,000 rupees if she could raise 100,000. She tried, and she did raise a good sum and more importantly enthusiasm for the idea. Eventually there was a 50-seat facility.[4] thumb|left|President Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Nari Shakti Puraskar to her She had found her role, but she wanted to do more than fund raise and organise so she decided to become a mason and Shramik Bharti found funds to assist her training.[5]

Both her husband and son-in-law died leaving her as the sole wage earner who had to provide for her daughter and two grandchildren.[6] In 2015 she was working in the shanty town of Rakhi Mandi where 700 families lived without a single toilet. Devi offered to help and persuaded WaterAid to help fund some toilets. The local community were unwilling to give land or finances as they were happy with their lot and they feared that there must be a secret agenda to the offer of help.[7] This was despite the open sewers, children and adults having to defaecate in the street and anecdotal talk of assaults and a rape.[8] She went out to build the toilets having to walk some days in pouring rain for 5 km after taking two bus rides.[9] [Prime Minister Narendra Modi with the Nari Shakti Awardees on International Women's Day in 2020. Devi is front, far left but one] On International Women's Day in 2020 she took over the Indian Prime Minister's Twitter account. She was one of what the Prime Minister nicknamed the “magnificent seven” who tweeted in his name that day.[10] Seven were chosen to tweet but the awardees were Padala Bhudevi, Bina Devi, Arifa Jan, Chami Murmu, Nilza Wangmo, Rashmi Urdhwardeshe, Mann Kaur, Kaushiki Chakroborty, Avani Chaturvedi, Bhawanna Kanth, Mohana Singh Jitarwal, Bhageerathi Amma, Karthyayani Amma and Devi.[11] Her work was recognised when the President Ram Nath Kovind awarded her one of twelve Nari Shakti Puraskar awards. The awards were made on International Women's Day in New Delhi.[12]

History

Kalavati Devi won the award as a woman mason building toilets. Another woman Sunita Devi had won the same award for similar work, the year before, for her work in Jharkhand.[13]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

title: Kalavati Devi

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe what was Devi's inspiration to build toilets.

answer: Kalavati Devi was motivated by disgust at seeing people defecating in the streets and an unquenchable need to improve the lot particularly for women and children. She became a mason with assistance from Shramik Bharti, and succeeded in persuading WaterAid to help fund toilets in a slum community where people had resisted change. She won the highest award for women in India for her work. Devi's motivation was to help improve the lives of those around her.

text: It is irrelevant that she became a mason with assistance from Shramik Bharti, and succeeded in persuading WaterAid to help fund toilets in a slum community where people had resisted change; she won the highest award for women in India for her work; Devi's motivation was to help improve the lives of those around her.

refinement: Kalavati Devi was motivated by disgust at seeing people defecating in the streets and an unquenchable need to improve the lot particularly for women and children.

text: a missing comma after 'lot'.

refinement: Kalavati Devi was motivated by disgust at seeing people defecating in the streets and an unquenchable need to improve the lot, particularly for women and children.

answer: The inspiration for Devi to build toilets was a disgust and frustration with people defecating in the streets. She saw it as a living hell for the people living there and wanted to improve their conditions. She gathered funds and encouraged local companies to donate money for building toilets. She started building toilets herself, even learning how to be a mason to make this happen. Her inspiration was to provide dignity and sanitation for the people in her community.

text: It is irrelevant that she gathered funds and encouraged local companies to donate money for building toilets. She started building toilets herself, even learning how to be a mason to make this happen.

refinement: The inspiration for Devi to build toilets was a disgust and frustration with people defecating in the streets. She saw it as a living hell for the people living there and wanted to improve their conditions. Her inspiration was to provide dignity and sanitation for the people in her community.

text: an unnecessary article

refinement: The inspiration for Devi to build toilets was disgust and frustration with people defecating in the streets. She saw it as a living hell for the people living there and wanted to improve their conditions. Her inspiration was to provide dignity and sanitation for the people in her community.

answer: Devi was disgusted by people defecating in the street. She described living in Kanpur with dirty streets a living hell. She was determined to improve the cleanliness of her area. With the support of her husband, she was able to build toilets in the area.

text: It is irrelevant that with the support of her husband, she was able to build toilets in the area.

refinement: Devi was disgusted by people defecating in the street. She described living in Kanpur with dirty streets a living hell. She was determined to improve the cleanliness of her area.

answer: She was disgusted by the people in the streets who were defecating in public and she wanted to improve the state of cleanliness in her area.

answer: Devi was disgusted by people in India defecating in the street, she wanted to build a toilet for her area as living there as a woman was dreadful.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe some of the honors and awards that have been given to Kalavati Devi.

answer: Nari Shakti Puraskar in 2019, at the age of 54.

text: It is omitted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

refinement: Nari Shakti Puraskar in 2019, at the age of 54. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

answer: In 2019, Kalavati Devi was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar, one of twelve given by the President of India to women who have made a positive difference in their communities. Devi is an Indian mason who built 50-seat toilets in Kanpur and helped to build 4,000 toilets improving conditions especially for women and children. Devi has done this despite facing challenges from local communities who were unwilling to cooperate due to fears that there must be a hidden agenda. Her outstanding work has been recognised at the national level with this important award.

text: It is irrelevant that Devi is an Indian mason who built 50-seat toilets in Kanpur and helped to build 4,000 toilets improving conditions especially for women and children; Devi has done this despite facing challenges from local communities who were unwilling to cooperate due to fears that there must be a hidden agenda.

refinement: In 2019, Kalavati Devi was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar, one of twelve given by the President of India to women who have made a positive difference in their communities. Her outstanding work has been recognised at the national level with this important award.

text: It is omitted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

refinement: In 2019, Kalavati Devi was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar, one of twelve given by the President of India to women who have made a positive difference in their communities. Her outstanding work has been recognised at the national level with this important award. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

text: 'recognized' instead of 'recognised'

refinement: In 2019, Kalavati Devi was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar, one of twelve given by the President of India to women who have made a positive difference in their communities. Her outstanding work has been recognized at the national level with this important award. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

answer: Kalavati Devi has been awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India). She was given this award for her work as a mason building toilets in Kanpur. Other women who won the same award in previous years include Sunita Devi. Kalavati Devi is recognized for her work improving the cleanliness of her community and the lot particularly for women and children.

text: It is omitted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

refinement: Kalavati Devi has been awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India). She was given this award for her work as a mason building toilets in Kanpur. Other women who won the same award in previous years include Sunita Devi. Kalavati Devi is recognized for her work improving the cleanliness of her community and the lot particularly for women and children. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

text: a missing comma after 'lot'.

refinement: Kalavati Devi has been awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India). She was given this award for her work as a mason building toilets in Kanpur. Other women who won the same award in previous years include Sunita Devi. Kalavati Devi is recognized for her work improving the cleanliness of her community and the lot, particularly for women and children. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

answer: In 2019 she was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India).

text: It is omitted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

refinement: In 2019 she was awarded the Nari Shakti Puraskar (the highest award for women in India). Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven.

answer: Kalavati Devi was given many awards and honors for her hard work of building toilets. Prime Minister Narendra Modi nicknamed her one of the magnificent seven. Her work was also recognized by President Ram Nath Kovind, who awarded her one of twelve Nari Shakti Puraskar awards.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe some of the difficulties Devi had to overcome to help her community and build toilets.

answer: Devi's husband and son-in-law died, which left her as the sole wage earner to provide for her daughter and her two grandchildren. Devi faced more difficulties as the local community was unwilling to give land or finances to her. Devi has offered to help the shanty town of Rakhi Mandi but the local community refused. The local community though there was a secret agenda to the offer to help. Devi also had to walk in pouring rain on days, up to 5 km after taking two bus rides.

answer: When she first tried to help her area, she faced both gender discrimination and blackmail. Locals resisted giving funds, and simply denied she needed financial help because they said she had a ”secret agenda.” The shanty town of Rakhi Mandi also had a history of siting feces within the area, and Devi had to walk in the rain to find land on which to build the necessary toilets.

text: It is not stated that she faced both gender discrimination and blackmail.

refinement: Locals resisted giving funds, and simply denied she needed financial help because they said she had a ”secret agenda.” The shanty town of Rakhi Mandi also had a history of siting feces within the area, and Devi had to walk in the rain to find land on which to build the necessary toilets.

text: It is not stated that Devi had to walk in the rain to find land on which to build the necessary toilets, but that she went out to build the toilets having to walk some days in the pouring rain for 5 km after taking two bus rides.

refinement: Locals resisted giving funds, and simply denied she needed financial help because they said she had a ”secret agenda.” The shanty town of Rakhi Mandi also had a history of siting feces within the area, and Devi went out to build the toilets having to walk some days in the pouring rain for 5 km after taking two bus rides.

answer: Kalavati Devi faced a lot of resistance from the community in Kanpur where she was based when she began her work to build toilets. The community members were reluctant to donate land or funds for sanitation projects, fearing there was some hidden agenda behind it. Despite rain, she persisted in building toilets, both overcoming initial opposition and overcoming various challenges in the process. Despite difficulties, Devi persisted and she was eventually recognized for her work when she won the Nari Shakti Puraskar award.

answer: Devi faced countless difficulties in her efforts to improve cleanliness in her community. She faced skepticism from those who did not believe she had any kind of agenda or did not trust that water would be provided with the toilets she proposed. She also had to walk long distances in inclement weather to get to her building sites. Additionally, she has to deal with the death of her husband and son-in-law, who were crucial to her success. Through all these hardships she has now received the Nari Shakti Puraskar for her work in providing toilets and improving conditions for women and children in Kanpur.

text: It was not stated that she faced skepticism from those who did not believe she had any kind of agenda or did not trust that water would be provided with the toilets she proposed. It was stated that the local community thought there was a secret agenda.

refinement: Devi faced countless difficulties in her efforts to improve cleanliness in her community. She faced skepticism from those who believed there was a secret agenda behind the project. She also had to walk long distances in inclement weather to get to her building sites. Additionally, she has to deal with the death of her husband and son-in-law, who were crucial to her success. Through all these hardships she has now received the Nari Shakti Puraskar for her work in providing toilets and improving conditions for women and children in Kanpur.

text: 'the cleanliness' instead of 'cleanliness'.

refinement: Devi faced countless difficulties in her efforts to improve the cleanliness in her community. She faced skepticism from those who believed there was a secret agenda behind the project. She also had to walk long distances in inclement weather to get to her building sites. Additionally, she has to deal with the death of her husband and son-in-law, who were crucial to her success. Through all these hardships she has now received the Nari Shakti Puraskar for her work in providing toilets and improving conditions for women and children in Kanpur.

answer: She found the lack of toilets in other areas discouraginh and helped design the plans for their construction. The people in her husband's community were not cooperative with her hunger venture to embellish the sanitation in their area.

text: It is irrelevant that she found the lack of toilets in other areas discouraging and helped design the plans for their construction

refinement: The people in her husband's community were not cooperative with her hunger venture to embellish the sanitation in their area.

text: It is omitted that the local community thought there was a secret agenda behind her plan.

refinement: The people in her husband's community were not cooperative with her hunger venture to embellish the sanitation in their area because they thought there was a secret agenda behind her plan.

text: It is omitted that Devi also had to walk in the pouring rain on days, up to 5 km after taking two bus rides.

refinement: The people in her husband's community were not cooperative with her hunger venture to embellish the sanitation in their area because they thought there was a secret agenda behind her plan. She went out to build the toilets having to walk some days in the pouring rain for 5 km after taking two bus rides.


text:
He stared at the floor. He had nothing better to do. He could have picked up a magazine or disappeared into his cell phone, but he didn’t want to risk making eye contact with anyone. He wasn’t feeling up for idle chit\-chat.

The carpet was depressing and he was having trouble labeling its color. It was unmistakably gray, but not entirely. There was a subtle tinge of brown laid overtop, like some sort of gloomy overcoat. Embedded in the mysterious shade were thin, tan stripes that raced horizontally across the floor.

The carpet now has his attention. He continued to stare at it intently, determined to brand the gray with brownish hue.

As he moved his head closer he noticed the fibers were woven from a variety of colors like, red, blue, and yellow. But as he pulled his head back he no longer saw the colorful strands. Instead, the colors blended together into the murky, grayish\-brown he was having trouble classifying.

To pass the time he experimented with this nearsighted phenomenon by calculating how far he had to dip his head until the colored fibers became visible. After a few dips and withdraws, he determined he had to lower his head to about chest height before he could see anything but gray with a sad smear of brown.

It was at that moment he also realized how foolish he must have looked to the others in the room. Normal people were occupied with their Instagram feed or a 6\-month old issue of Consumer Digest.

Why couldn’t I just be normal, he thought. Why couldn’t I be anywhere, but here, he thought. He picked his head up and rearranged his shoulders.

Now he stared at the administrator who was seated behind a sliding glass window. The glass window was closed and the administrator had his head down. Thank God, he thought, no eye contact.

Behind the administrator was a large, Master Edwards clock. It sat high enough that even if the administer were to sit upright, the entire clock face would still be visible to anyone on the other side of the sliding glass. Whoever mounted the clock must have considered the possibility that the administrator could obstruct the view of the clock face while sitting upright and therefore placed it at the appropriate height. These were his thoughts while he waited.

“Mr. Blocker?”

He heard his name, but didn’t move. He maybe thought he’d only imagined someone calling his name and didn’t want to appear anxious, so he sat still.

“Mr. Blocker? Are you Mr. Blocker?” the attendant called out. She was standing in an open doorway in the far righthand corner of the room. She was looking directly at him. Finally, he made eye contact with someone.

“This way please.”

He rose to his feet and stuffed his hands in his trouser pockets. He took his first steps toward the door, feeling a bit defeated by the carpet. He was still unclear on its color.

The attendant lead him down a white corridor. The walls were white. The ceiling was white. The floor was white, linoleum tile. The lighting was soft, fluorescent white. He decided to stop focusing on the color white and let his mind drift to something more pleasant, the lining of his trouser pockets.

He’d always been quite satisfied with the navy suit he was wearing. The shoulders fit him perfectly. The taper of the legs was trimming and made him look taller. But the lining of the trouser pockets is what pleased him most. The lining was a soft silky material that felt fine and glossy when he rubbed it between his thumb and forefinger.

“Right in here please”, the attendant directed. Her arm was outstretched, half of it inside of another room. This room was his room. This room was where he was supposed to go. He was sure of it. Not because the attendant declared it so, but because it felt right. He pulled his hands out of his pockets and entered.

In the middle of the room was a large desk. It appeared to be very old and extremely heavy. Probably oak, he thought. Behind the desk sat a man with wire\-frame glasses. The man was staring at a computer screen. The man was at least twice his age. He could see the glare of the screen almost entirely in the man’s glasses.

“Please Mr. Blocker. Have a seat.”

He did as he was told and took a seat in a chair on the opposite side of the desk.

“Mr. Blocker, we are going to have to make a very difficult decision today.”

He sat in his seat and listened.

“It’s my opinion that further treatments are not going improve your health.”

He extended his chin and began to nod his head. Not to appear as if he was listening, but to communicate that he understood the weight of the declaration the man in glasses had just made.

“You’ve been fighting this…we’ve been fighting this for almost ten years. After five surgeries and countless rounds of chemotherapy there has been only very little progress. Of course, we could continue treatment, but your quality of life would rapidly deteriorate and the burden of cost would fall entirely on your next of kin. I sincerely believe it would be best to begin getting your affairs in order. As of today, I would estimate that you may have only a few months left.”

He sat silently with his chin still pointed toward the man with glasses. He thought about his wife. He thought about his daughters and their children. He thought about his parents who had passed many, many years ago. He thought about the white corridor with the white ceiling, the white, linoleum tiles and the white, fluorescent lights. He thought about the lining of his trouser pockets. He thought about the carpet.

“Taupe!”

“I’m sorry Mr. Blocker. I don’t understand,” said the man with glasses.

“Gray mixed with a tinge of brown. Taupe.” he replied.

He couldn’t think of anything else to say. Instead he furrowed his brow, dipped his head, and regarded the taupe carpet with a newfound sense of familiarity and confidence.

He felt more comfortable now, having identified the mysterious color that had been eluding him. So, he lifted his hands to his face, covered his eyes with his sweat palms, and began to cry.

title: [RF] Taupe

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about how the narrator handles his impending death?

answer: He cries, which is what he tells himself is normal in these circumstances and not a sign of giving up.

text: There is no indication that the narrator tells himself that crying is normal in the circumstances.

text: Further detail could be included about the narrator's thought process.

refinement: Initially, he sits silently as he thinks about his family. His thoughts drift to other mundane things, including the color of the carpet. Having identified the color as taupe, he says this aloud to the doctor. He then breaks down in tears.

answer: He wonders if he merits being told he has limited time left when he's worked hard all his life, but he thinks the news won't change anything. He cries, which is what he tells himself is normal in these circumstances and not a sign of giving up.

text: There is no indication that the narrator tells himself that crying is normal in the circumstances, nor that he wonders if he merits being told he has limited time left.

text: Further detail could be included about the narrator's thought process.

refinement: Initially, he sits silently as he thinks about his family. His thoughts drift to other mundane things, including the color of the carpet. Having identified the color as taupe, he says this aloud to the doctor. He then breaks down in tears.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about mental illness?

answer: The man seems to suffer from schizophrenia. He cannot stop staring at the floor, at the time where the story takes place, the carpet. He is found in an institution after a mental breakdown from not being in control of his own life. He isn't able to distinguish what is a hallucination and what isn't. He seems to get lost in it and feels a sense of panic. When he yells, he is mistaken thinking "I'm sorry Mr. Blocker. I don't understand."

text: The story does not say anything specific about mental illness and the answer's suggestion the main character suffers from schizophrenia is completely unfounded. At best, the main character appears to be a little obsessive in his attempts to identify the color of the carpet, but much of the answer is untrue.

refinement: The story does not say anything explicit about mental illness.

answer: No answer

text: It should be made clear that the story does not say anything explicit about mental illness.

refinement: The story does not say anything explicit about mental illness.

answer: The man seems to suffer from schizophrenia. He cannot stop staring at the floor, at the time where the story takes place, the carpet. He is found in an institution after a mental breakdown from not being in control of his own life. He isn't able to distinguish what is a hallucination and what isn't. He seems to get lost in it and feels a sense of panic.

text: The story does not say anything specific about mental illness and the answer's suggestion the main character suffers from schizophrenia is completely unfounded. At best, the main character appears to be a little obsessive in his attempts to identify the color of the carpet, but much of the answer is untrue.

refinement: The story does not say anything explicit about mental illness.


text:
JANINE AUSTIN CLAYTON is an American ophthalmologist. She is the NIH associate director for research on women’s health and director of the Office of Women's Health. Clayton was previously the deputy clinical director of the National Eye Institute.

Early life and education

Clayton is a native of Washington, D.C. and attended Catholic school.[1][2] In 1984, she received an undergraduate degree in natural sciences with honors from Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences at Johns Hopkins University.[3] During her undergraduate studies, she took dance classes at Peabody Institute, volunteered at the Johns Hopkins Hospital neonatal unit, and worked for the psychology department. She was a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha.[4] Clayton earned a medical degree from Howard University College of Medicine. She completed a residency in ophthalmology at the VCU Medical Center. Clayton completed fellowship training in cornea and external disease at the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins Hospital and in uveitis and ocular immunology at National Eye Institute (NEI).[5]

Career

Clayton was the deputy clinical director at NEI. She was appointed associate director for research on women’s health at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and director of the Office of Research on Women’s Health at NIH in 2012. Clayton has strengthened NIH support for research on diseases, disorders, and conditions that affect women. She is the architect of the NIH policy requiring scientists to consider sex as a biological variable across the research spectrum, a part of NIH’s initiative to enhance reproducibility, rigor, and transparency. As co-chair of the NIH Working Group on Women in Biomedical Careers with NIH Director Francis Collins, Clayton also leads NIH’s efforts to advance women in science careers.[6]

Research

A board-certified ophthalmologist, Clayton’s research interests include autoimmune ocular diseases and the role of sex and gender in health and disease. Clayton has a particular interest in ocular surface disease and discovered a novel form of disease associated with premature ovarian insufficiency that affects young women, setting the stage for her interest in rigorous, thoughtful exploration of the role of sex and gender in health and disease. She is the author of more than 80 scientific publications, journal articles, and book chapters. Her clinical research has ranged from randomized controlled trials of novel therapies for immune-mediated ocular diseases to studies on the development of digital imaging techniques for the anterior segment.[7]

Awards and honors

Clayton has received several awards and has been recognized as a leader by her peers. She received the Senior Achievement Award from the Board of Trustees of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in 2008, was selected as a 2010 Silver Fellow by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, and won the European Uveitis Patient Interest Association Clinical Uveitis Research Award in 2010. In 2015, she was awarded the American Medical Women’s Association Lila A. Wallis Women’s Health Award and the Wenger Award for Excellence in Public Service. Clayton was granted the Bernadine Healy Award for Visionary Leadership in Women’s Health in 2016. She was also selected as an honoree for the Woman’s Day Red Dress Awards and the American Medical Association’s Dr. Nathan Davis Awards for Outstanding Government Service in 2017.[8]

Personal life

Clayton and her husband, Robert Clayton met their sophomore year at Johns Hopkins University. They dated through the end of the junior years before parting ways. They resumed a long-distance relationship their first year of graduate school. Robert Clayton is a lawyer. He founded a family law firm in Los Angeles in 2000. They married on April 11, 2008 and reside in North Potomac, Maryland.[9]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

title: Janine Austin Clayton

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Clayton's children?

answer: No answer

answer: No answer

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What part of Clayton's education most affects her research?

answer: Since Clayton's research interests center around autoimmune ocular diseases, it is probably safe to say that her residency and fellowship training in ophthalmology.

answer: Her undergraduate studies.

text: needs to specify which part of her undergraduate studies apply to her research

refinement: Since Clayton's research interests center around autoimmune ocular diseases, it is probably safe to say that her residency and fellowship training in ophthalmology.

answer: Her undergraduate studies, dance classes at Peabody Institute, volunteering at the Johns Hopkins Hospital neonatal unit, and working for the psychology department. She was a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha.

text: Her research is not related to the content in the response.

refinement: Since Clayton's research interests center around autoimmune ocular diseases, it is probably safe to say that her residency and fellowship training in ophthalmology.


text:
TAIPEI -- California-based Applied Materials, the world's top chip and display equipment maker, has ordered staff to halt all deliveries and servicing for China's biggest LED chip maker, who was named on a red flag list recently issued by the U.S. government.

Xiamen San'an Optoelectronics is one of at least three Chinese customers of Applied Materials who were identified on the U.S. government's "unverified list," people with knowledge of the situation told Nikkei Asian Review. While the list does not embargo dealings with these entities, it requires American companies to treat them with caution. U.S. suppliers can no longer use existing licences to sell them products or service installed equipment, but have to reapply for new ones. San'an Optoelectronics is also the world's biggest LED chipmaker by revenue and listed in Shanghai.

Xi'an Jiaotong University, one of China's top 15 colleges, and a unit of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the country's top research agency, are also Applied Materials customers named on the unverified list, which was published on April 11, a supply chain source familiar with the move said. Some 37 Chinese companies and research institutions were named on the list, as well as seven organizations in Hong Kong, four in the United Arab Emirates, two in Malaysia and one in Indonesia.

The U.S. government's move marks another setback to the companies and research institutions who are crucial to China's ambitions to become a global tech superpower.

Applied Materials supplies almost all the world's leading semiconductor and panel manufacturers. Market leaders such as Intel, Samsung Electronics, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, and China's national display champion BOE Technology Group could not make products without the company's tool and services.

As an industry leader in advanced tools for the critical semiconductor industry, Applied Materials' decision to immediately stop all business with those on the list could influence other U.S. vendors, as well as those outside the country, industry sources told Nikkei.

On April 12, Applied Materials sent a notice to all staff involved with the named companies that they should "immediately stop all pending and future equipment delivery, and cease all service activities at their sites," according to the notice obtained by Nikkei. The U.S. chip tool giant also demanded that staff, contractors and other personnel immediately withdraw from the sites of those companies, the notice said.

The notice warned that failure to follow this compliance could lead to significant violations of U.S. trade law.

The company's actions come just weeks after Applied Materials' CEO Gary Dickerson traveled to China in late March to attend SEMICON China, one of the industry's biggest events and an important showcase for Chinese technology ever since Beijing made chip industry development a top policy priority in 2014.

At the event, Dickerson made his first clear and public statement about the U.S.-China trade tensions which have hit the chip industry hard. "The strained relationship between China and the U.S. can put decades of economic growth at risk," Dickerson said. He also warned it would be "a lose-lose proposition" if the world's two biggest economic powers were unable to get along.

Applied Materials generated some 26% of its revenue from China, its biggest market, in the most recent quarter ending Jan. 27. The U.S. company did not immediately respond to a request for comments. San'an also did not respond to the request for comments.

China's commerce ministry spokesman Gao Feng last week hit back at the new unverified list, saying the U.S. move could harm Chinese companies' reputation and disrupt normal trade activities. Beijing said it objected to the abuse of national security and export control rules and demanded the U.S. withdraw the new curbs as soon as possible.

Akin Gump, an international law firm, warned companies in a research note that they would have to respond to the requirements of the unverified list. "As a result of this development, U.S. and non-U.S. companies and others should update their internal control program screens to ensure compliance with the new requirements," the research note said.

Harry Clark, a partner with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Washington, told Nikkei that being added to the unverified list does not mean a broad ban on U.S. exports and re-exports to the entity, but it would need to obtain extra licences and file additional reports if dealing with such entities. It also applies to foreign persons.

"My firm advises clients to be especially careful to ensure that any export or re-export involving an unverified list entity is scrupulously compliant with the regulation," Clark said.

_Nikkei staff writer Lauly Li contributed to this report._

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the purpose of the U.S red flag list?

answer: The U.S red flag list is a list of Chinese companies and research institutions that the U.S government has identified as having connections to the Chinese government. The list is not a ban on trade with the entities, but it requires American companies to treat them with caution.

text: The first sentence is not stated.

refinement: The list is not a ban on trade with the entities, but it requires American companies to treat them with caution.

text: It is omitted that some 37 Chinese companies and research institutions were named on the list, as well as seven organizations in Hong Kong, four in the United Arab Emirates, two in Malaysia, and one in Indonesia.

refinement: The list is not a ban on trade with the entities, but it requires American companies to treat them with caution. Some 37 Chinese companies and research institutions were named on the list, as well as seven organizations in Hong Kong, four in the United Arab Emirates, two in Malaysia, and one in Indonesia.

answer: The U.S red flag list is a list of people and organizations that the U.S government has placed on a red flag list. This means that some restrictions are placed on trade with these organizations.

answer: The U.S red flag list is a list of people and organizations that the U.S government has placed on a red flag list. This means that some restrictions are placed on trade with these organizations. The list is for entities that are considered a threat to national security.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why is China a threat to the US economically?

answer: China is a threat to the US because of their global ambition to become a tech superpower.

answer: The article doesn't say anything about China being a threat to the US economically.

answer: They have taken over a lot of the manufacturing and production of technology.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How does the Chinese company feel about being red listed?

answer: The Chinese company feels that the U.S. move could harm Chinese companies' reputation and disrupt normal trade activities.

answer: The Chinese company did not respond to requests for comments.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the consequence of Xiamen San'an Optoelectronics being redlisted?

answer: The company will not be able to use its existing licenses to sell products or service installed equipment.

text: It is omitted that they have to reapply for new ones.

refinement: The company will not be able to use its existing licenses to sell products or service installed equipment. They have to reapply for new ones.

answer: The world's top chip and display equipment maker, Applied Materials has ordered their staff to halt all deliveries and servicing for the Chinese company, Xiamen San'an Optoelectronics. Xiamen San'an Optoelectronics is one of at least three Chinese customers of Applied Materials who were identified on the U.S. government's "unverified list."

answer: The world's top chip and display equipment maker, Applied Materials has ordered their staff to halt all deliveries and servicing for the Chinese company.


text:
DOGPATCH LABS is a startup hub located in the CHQ building, in the heart of the Silicon Docks, supporting the startup ecosystem through incubation and acceleration programmes, educational events and a tech community of over 500 members from 100+ startups.[1][2][3] In 2019 it was listed as Crunchbase’s “top 10 incubators around the world you need to know”.[4]

It is a member of a global network of 50 startup hubs supported by Google For Startups[5] and winner of its Global Citizenship Award in 2017[6] and its Global Diversity & Inclusion Award in 2018.[7] Visitors have included The Duke & Duchess of Sussex[8] and also The King & Queen of the Netherlands in recognition of Dogpatch's mission to accelerate the development of Ireland's entrepreneurial ecosystem.[9]

Partners include Unilever, Google For Startups, Alltech, ESB, Ulster Bank, Pivotal, CHQ, and Hannover Re.[10]

Alumni include Irish tech unicorn Intercom[11] and provides the global headquarters for CoderDojo,[12] the volunteer-led movement of free computer programming clubs. Dogpatch actively supports other social technology initiatives such as ChangeX, HackAccess, PyLadies, Social Innovation Fund and others.[13][14]

History

Dogpatch Labs launched in the CHQ Building in early 2015 with an initial 13,500 sq feet, through a partnership with Neville Isdell & Mervyn Greene.[15] Their contribution has enabled the mission-driven entrepreneurial hub's rapid evolution since 2015.[16]

In mid 2015, the space had 25 companies with 150 desks, with a 60/40 Irish/International split, with tenants including Udemy, Twilio, ChangeX and others.[17]

In November 2015, the space expanded by 8,000 sq ft with an event space and meeting rooms in the 200 year old vaults below the CHQ Building.[18] Three months after launching, Dogpatch Labs had hosted 80 events in The Vaults, consisting mostly grassroots meetups (hosted free of charge) and had welcomed over 4,000 people.[19]

In November 2016, Dogpatch Labs expanded for the third time, reaching a total of 40,000 sq ft of space, by adding an “Urban Garden” and private office space on its mezzanine floor. Dogpatch Labs was then home to 40+ companies, and hosting 200 tech events and 5,000 attendees per year.[20]

In December 2018, structural works would allow for an additional 100 people to hot-desk from the space. The community was now a residence to more than 80 companies and 400 members on its three levels.[21]

Awards & Recognitions

Dogpatch Labs is a member of a global network of 50+ startup hubs supported by Google For Startups and winner of its Global Citizenship Award in 2017[22] and its Global Diversity & Inclusion Award in 2018.[23][24]

Visitors have included The Duke & Duchess of Sussex and also The King & Queen of the Netherlands in recognition of Dogpatch's mission to accelerate the development of Ireland's entrepreneurial ecosystem.[25][26]

In 2019 it was listed by Crunchbase as one of the ‘top 10 incubators around the world you need to know’.[27] Other notable speakers include Vint Cerf, one of the “Fathers of the Internet”[28] and Sridhar Ramaswamy.[29]

The Managing Director of Dogpatch Labs, Patrick Walsh, was awarded the Guaranteed Irish Tech Hero title in 2017 for his “significant contribution to the tech industry in Ireland” and for having “contributed greatly to establishing Ireland as leading startup hub”.[30]

In 2015 it welcomed former Taoiseach Enda Kenny to launch Ireland's “Enterprise 2025” strategy[31] & in 2019 the then Taoiseach Leo Varadkar launched the ‘Future Jobs Ireland’ initiative, recognizing that Dogpatch Labs is “Ireland’s largest start-up hub and is a keystone in our technology ecosystem”.[32]

First Fridays for Startups

Dogpatch Labs hosts on a monthly basis an ecosystem event called First Fridays for Startups, a “platform where members of the Irish startup ecosystem come together on a regular basis, enabling them to learn, connect and grow”. Powered by Google For Startups, the programme is designed, executed and hosted by Dogpatch Labs, and includes: 1-to-1 curated mentoring, networking, lightning talks and a keynote, as well as free hotdesking for the day.[33][34]

In its first year, 170 startups received over 160 hours of mentoring in 400 sessions, and the event was attended by 500+ attendees and 100+ mentors and speakers.[35]

Previous speakers include:

-   Peter Coppinger, founder of Teamwork.com[36]
-   Nora Khaldi, co-founder of Nuritas[37]
-   David Hunt, co-founder of Cainthus[38]

[1]

[2]

[3]  Startup Hub|website=Dogpatch Labs|language=en|access-date=2019-11-15}}

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]  BusinessPost.ie|last=Reporter|first=Post|website=www.businesspost.ie|access-date=2019-11-15}}

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

title: Dogpatch Labs

question: Where is Dogpatch Labs located?

answer: According to the passage, Dogpatch Labs is located in the CHQ building, which is in the Silicon Docks/Docklands area of Dublin.

answer: Dogpatch Labs is based in the CHQ building in the Silicon Docks, Ireland.

answer: Dogpatch Labs is located in the CHQ building in the Silicon Docks in Dublin.

question: What companies have been a part of Dogpatch Labs?

answer: Business Post and entrepreneur

text: Unclear where it got this from

answer: Dogpatch Labs is home to more than 80 startups. Companies that have been a part of the hub include Intercom, Twilio, Udemy, ChangeX, Cainthus, Teamwork, and many others.

text: Not quite accurate

answer: Notable alumni include Irish tech unicorn Intercom.

text: Add one more

refinement: Notable alumni include Irish tech unicorns Intercom and CoderDojo.

question: When was Dogpatch Labs launched?

answer: Dogpatch Labs launched early 2015.

answer: In early 2015.

answer: Dogpatch Labs launched in early 2015.

question: What is "First Fridays for Startups"?

answer: Dogpatch Labs hosts an ecosystem event every month called First Fridays for Startups. The program is designed, executed, and hosted by Dogpatch Labs and includes one-on-one mentoring, meeting other startups, and great talks.

answer: Dogpatch Labs hosts on a monthly basis an ecosystem event called "First Fridays for Startups," a "platform where members of the Irish startup ecosystem come together on a regular basis, enabling them to learn, connect and grow" which includes 1-to-1 curated mentoring, networking, lightning talks and a keynote, and free hotdesking.

answer: "First Fridays for Startups" is a monthly event where members of the Irish startup ecosystem come together to learn, connect, and grow.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Dogpatch Labs is a hub located in Dublin, Ireland that facilitates entrepreneurship in the tech industry. They hosted 170 startups in their first year, introducing over 160 hours of mentoring and 450+ speakers and encouraging industry collaboration.

answer: Dogpatch Labs, more commonly known as 'DTLA' is an Irish startup hub located in the CHQ building, in the Silicon Docks. It focuses on educating people on what it is to be an entrepreneur, hosting tech events with luminaries and political figures alike.

answer: Dogpatch Labs, located in the CHQ building in the heart of the Silicon Docks, is a startup hub that offers support for incoming businesses through incubation, acceleration, educational, and tech community programs. Dogpatch Labs has partnered with over 100 startups, such as Irish tech unicorn Intercom and CoderDojo.

answer: Dogpatch Labs, located in the CHQ Building, supports startup startups through incubation and acceleration programs, educational events, and tech communities. It is listed by Crunchbase as the "top 10 incubators" out there.

answer: Dogpatch Labs is a startup hub located in the CHQ Building, in the heart of the Silicon Docks, just outside of the main city center of the city of Dublin. It offers programs and events to support the startup ecosystem through incubation and acceleration programs, educational events and a tech community of over 500 members from 100+ startups.

answer: Dogpatch Labs is a startup hub and incubator located in the CHQ building in the hear of the Silicon Docks, Ireland. They host over 100+ startups and is a member of a global networks of 50 startup hubs supported by Google For Startups.