text:
I think that people are inherently good. I strongly believe in the Golden Rule. I treat others as I would like to be treated: Holding doors open for those that I sense would have trouble. Giving up my seat to those that look as though they might need it: men, women, and the elderly. Being considerate! Saying thank you, and you're welcome! Thinking of others before myself. Writing "thank you" letters when appropriate. Not being mean to animals (perhaps excluding snakes and spiders unless they keep to themselves). I had always helped, and it felt good. But slowly, I began to notice things were changing. I still wanted to help others, but it was getting more difficult as I was passing the 3/4 of a century mark. I would tell my friends (just kidding) that I couldn't associate with people that old. When did I get this old? I have children over 50 and grandchildren over 20. Has society changed? Are its members less caring? I have heard this.

I went to a take-out pizza establishment last week. Going in, I held open the door for a young lady who said "thank you", and when I entered, she insisted that I order before she did. The place was busy with little space to stand. When I picked up my order, I had to squeeze my way to the door as there was not much room, and I was having some trouble walking. As I got to the door, it opened. Automatic I thought. I looked down to find a boy of about ten holding it for me and smiling. "Did I look that feeble?" I thought. I said thank you, and he was smiling as he said "your welcome." No one had told him to do it. He was on his own. I think it made him feel good! Someone had taught him manners. It feels good to help others.

Another pizza place I go to has a flight of stairs to overcome. Going up is not a problem, but going down with a pizza in hand is. One of the young employees asked if she could help. I said "sure". I went ahead, got in the car, and she handed it through the car window to me, all-the-while sporting a wide grin. Thanks, I said. You are welcome, she replied. Every time I get pizza and she is working, she immediately says "I'll give it to you through the window." I think it makes her feel as good as it does me!

When I go to the grocery store, I buy 2-3 weeks of food because I don't know when I will have the energy again(pain when walking, but getting better). The box boys or girls will always ask if they can empty the shopping cart for me. Then they bag the groceries and ask if they can help me load them into the car. I always ask them if they can go home with me and unload them and put them away too. They smile, we joke. I ask them if they are still in school and where they are attending. They are always friendly. I say thank you and they say "you're welcome".

When did I get old? I stopped playing competitive softball at 70 due to some injuries, but I received a call from one of my softball friends saying that he is forming an 80-year old competitive team and would like me to play on the team. It was nice of him to ask, and I do think he meant it. As soon as I get rid of my pain, I will start slowly working out again. My mind says yes, but my body isn't so sure. I am "bird-walking"----getting off the subject now, so must get back on point.

I had an appointment with a pain clinic. I knew the area well but had never seen the medical office. I had the address, but could not find any numbers on the buildings. My car does not have GPS(2002 model), and I was ten minutes late for the meeting. I had to park across the street in a dirt parking lot. The street had moderate traffic, but I managed to get across. The curb must have been at least 18-24 inches high. It seemed like an insurmountable wall, but by holding on to the front of a parked car, I managed to get up. Now there were four steps to climb and a heavy door to open. At the top of the stairs was a man of about 35 years old. He had tattoos on his arms and neck, and smiled at me and politely opened the door. I said thanks. I was told that other patients would have to be seen before me, and the wait might be an hour or more. I decided not to wait. I would go to the car, call my private doctor, tell him my pain situation and see if he would give me a shot for the it.

As I left the pain center, the tattooed man stood at the base of the steps. He smiled again and asked me if I needed any help. Was he waiting for me to leave so he might mug me? I wobbled down the 4 steps and said no thank you, my car is just across the street. He said, "You don't look as though you can go that far". "If you give me your keys, I will go over and get it for you." I thought, "Sure, then you will drive the car away." My car was a 15-year old Hyundai SUV. I didn't trust him even though he had opened a door for me and smiled at the same time. Surely, he had devious intentions. "This doesn't look good," I thought. So, I said, "I can make it." He backed off but watched as I tried to negotiate the 18 in curb. There was no car for me to grab for balance. He began to approach me again, and I began to sweat. There was no one else nearby. He put one arm around my waist and proceeded to lift me off the ground. Then, oh so gently, moved me off the curb and onto the street 18 inches below. "I hope this helps," he said with a smile. "I'll watch as you cross the street", he said still smiling. I felt bad that I had jumped to conclusions and again said "thanks".

I called my doctor whose office was 10 minutes away. His nurse told me that the doctor said to come in, and he wanted to know if she could give me the shot. I said that would be fine, but I will have a lot of trouble getting out of the car much less getting around to the office as the parking was in the back. He worked from the house that he had turned into his office. He was the only doctor that worked there. I had known him and his nurse for 25 years. She was cute and always in a good mood. She came to the back, needle in hand, had me open the driver's side door, had me pull one side of my pants down an inch exposing my left hip, and with great joy jammed the needle in it.

"This doesn't look good!," I said smiling. "People might get the wrong idea!" She laughed, I smiled. This didn't look good, but neither did the fellow with the tattoo. This was all about people that I had met recently and the good that they had done, and how it feels to help others.

title: [MF] THIS DOESN'T LOOK GOOD...

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about strangers?

answer: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. They are considerate and treat others as they would like to be treated. They are also kind to animals. The narrator believes that people would be kind to strangers as well. They are also kind to strangers. They are kind to the employees of the pizza place, the grocery store and the pain clinic. They are also kind to the tattooed man who helps them up the stairs.

text: The response contains repetitive and unnecessary information that should be removed.

refinement: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. They are considerate and treat others as they would like to be treated. They are also kind to animals.

answer: The author describes being in a library arranging to have books stiched. A man came from behind her, introducing himself as a librarian and offering to help. Then he courteously offered her his phone number in case there's anything she needs from their side. A shelter told the author that night there's someone who lives near the shelter and invites the homeless for Christmas dinner, and when she gets back the bathroom odor is the least of her problems. A woman was coming back from synagogue, and when she opened her car door, a man helped in giving her his gloves and scarf. Then he handed her a basket of food. Having a traffic accident, the driver and passenger met as strangers and after exchanging details, they went on a long journey of life together. A doctor smoothed the process while explaining her procedure to a patient. A man holds the door for everyone, just like his grandmother would do.

text: The response does not include any relevant information from the passage, and is in fact only stating false information.

refinement: The narrator believes that people are inherently kind. The narrator treats others with kindness and consideration, and hopes that others reciprocate those good deeds.

answer: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. They are considerate and treat others as they would like to be treated. They are also kind to animals. The narrator believes that people would be kind to strangers as well. They are also kind to strangers. They are kind to the employees of the pizza place, the grocery store and the pain clinic.

text: The response contains unnecessary information.

refinement: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. They are considerate and treat others as they would like to be treated. They are also kind to animals.

answer: The author describes being in a library arranging to have books stiched. A man came from behind her, introducing himself as a librarian and offering to help. Then he courteously offered her his phone number in case there's anything she needs from their side. A shelter told the author that night there's someone who lives near the shelter and invites the homeless for Christmas dinner, and when she gets back the bathroom odor is the least of her problems. A woman was coming back from synagogue, and when she opened her car door, a man helped in giving her his gloves and scarf. Then he handed her a basket of food. Having a traffic accident, the driver and passenger met as strangers and after exchanging details, they went on a long journey of life together. A doctor smoothed the process while explaining her procedure to a patient. A man holds the door for everyone, just like his grandmother would do.

text: Same response as response 2

refinement: The narrator believes that people are inherently kind. The narrator treats others with kindness and consideration, and hopes that others reciprocate those good deeds.

answer: Strangers are seen in a positive light. They still "help" others. The author even says they have preconceptions or concerns when they see a tattooed person doing a good deed. However, once #35246;they get over their hang-ups/misconceptions, it's clear how gratifying it is to do good deeds for others.

text: The highlighted portion is incoherent.

refinement: Strangers are seen in a positive light. They still "help" others. The author even says they have preconceptions or concerns when they see a tattooed person doing a good deed.

text: The highlighted sentence is too specific of a statement. It misconstrues an anecdote in the story to exemplify the narrator's entire worldview.

refinement: Strangers are seen in a positive light. They still "help" others. Though everyone may have preconceived notions of how people are based on their looks or character, the narrator still tries to treat everyone how they would like to be treated: with kindness and respect.

answer: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. He treats others as he would like to be treated. He always thanks and says "you're welcome". He has also learned to be considerate and think of others before himself. He also believes that if you teach someone manners, they will be more likely to use them. It seems that the narrator has noticed that people are less caring as he ages.

text: The highlighted sentence misconstrues a statement the narrator makes. The passage states that the narrator has heard that society has changed and that people are less caring, but it is not stated whether or not the narrator believes in this statement.

refinement: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. He treats others as he would like to be treated. He always thanks and says "you're welcome". He has also learned to be considerate and think of others before himself. He also believes that if you teach someone manners, they will be more likely to use them.

answer: The narrator believes that people are inherently good. He treats others as he would like to be treated. He always thanks and says "you're welcome". He has also learned to be considerate and think of others before himself. He also believes that if you teach someone manners, they will be more likely to use them.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about "kids these days?"

answer: No answer

answer: It the text refer to a different type of kids?

text: The passage does not answer the question.

refinement: The passage does not answer the question.

answer: The author feels that kids these days are different than they used to be. They are more helpful and considerate towards others.

text: The passage does not answer the question.

refinement: The passage does not answer the question.

answer: No answer

answer: The article does not mention "kids these days."

answer: No answer

answer: No answer


split: test

text:
Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted on Friday that "powerful people are trying to bribe the President into war” with Iran.

Ocasio-Cortez quoted a tweet by Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold which linked to an article he co-wrote entitled, “A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who urges a hard-line U.S. approach to Iran spent 26 nights at Trump’s D.C. hotel.”  The report details that the Iraqi sheik stayed at a very expensive suite in Trump's D.C. hotel after urging the Trump administration to take a "hard-line" against Iran.

Iran’s foreign minister on Monday again threatened the United States over what he describes as an “economic war” launched by Washington against Tehran.

Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Monday that the U.S. “cannot expect to stay safe” after launching its economic war.

He directly blamed President Donald Trump for the ongoing tensions between Washington and Tehran.

Zarif said: “Mr. Trump himself has announced that the U.S. has launched an economic war against Iran. The only solution for reducing tensions in this region is stopping that economic war.”

Zarif’s comments came during a news conference with visiting German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, who had traveled to Tehran in an effort to ease tensions.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who places pressure on the Trump administration to go to war with Iran?

answer: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who urges a hard-line U.S. approach to Iran stays in one of Trump's D.C. hotels.

text: Unnecessary information is included

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who stayed in one of Trump's D.C. hotels.

text: "A wealthy Iraqi sheikh" is mentioned in the second paragraph

answer: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who urges a hard-line U.S. approach to Iran spent 26 nights at Trump's D.C. hotel. Therefore, powerful people are trying to bribe the Trump administration into war with Iran.

text: Unnecessary information is included

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who spent 26 nights at Trump's D.C. hotel.

text: "A wealthy Iraqi sheikh" is mentioned in the second paragraph

answer: Calculating it would only be one of the most powerful people in the region, a wealthy Iraqi sheikh who insists on a hardline view against Iran.

text: Unnecessary information is included

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who insists on a hardline view against Iran.

text: Important information is missing

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who spent 26 nights at Trump's D.C. hotel.

text: "A wealthy Iraqi sheikh" is mentioned in the second paragraph

answer: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh.

text: Some information is missing.

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who spent 26 nights at Trump's D.C. hotel.

text: "A wealthy Iraqi sheikh" is mentioned in the second paragraph

answer: Powerful people are trying to bribe the President into war with Iran.

text: This answer is very vague.

refinement: A wealthy Iraqi sheikh who spent 26 nights at Trump's D.C. hotel is trying to bribe the President into war with Iran.

text: This answer is included in the first sentence.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is to blame for the ongoing tensions between Washington and Tehran?

answer: President Donald Trump.

text: Important information is missing.

refinement: President Donald Trump, according to Iran's foreign minister.

text: This information is included in the fifth paragraph.

answer: President Donald Trump is responsible for the ongoing tensions between Washington and Tehran. Mohammad Javad Zarif has blamed Trump directly, saying that Trump has announced that the U.S. has launched an economic war against Iran.

text: Too much information is included.

refinement: President Donald Trump is responsible for the ongoing tensions between Washington and Tehran, according to Mohammad Javad Zarif.

text: This information is included in the fifth paragraph.

answer: President Donald Trump. The foreign minister of Iran directly blamed Trump for the tensions, saying Trump himself has announced that the U.S. has launched an "economic war" against Iran.

text: This information is included in the fifth paragraph.

answer: It is unclear who is the cause for tensions; nonetheless, the tension is resolved by pulling out of an economic war against Iran.

text: The article clearly states the answer.

refinement: President Donald Trump, according to Iran's foreign minister.

answer: Mohammad Javad Zarif directly blames Donald Trump, the then President of the USA.

text: This information is included in the fifth paragraph.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the solution to reducing tensions in Iran?

answer: The Iraqi sheik suggests stopping the economic war.

text: The wrong person is included in this statement.

refinement: Zarif. Iran's foreign minister, suggests stopping the economic war.

text: "Stopping the economic war" is mentioned in the sixth paragraph.

answer: The solution to reducing tensions in Iran would be for the United States to stop its economic war against Iran.

text: Some minor information is missing.

refinement: The solution to reducing tensions in Iran would be for the United States to stop its economic war against Iran, according to Iran's foreign minister.

text: The solution is mentioned in the sixth paragraph.

answer: According to Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif, the US needs to stop its "economic war."

text: The solution is mentioned in the sixth paragraph.

answer: The only solution according to Mohammad Javad Zarif is to stop the current economic war.

text: The solution is mentioned in the sixth paragraph.

answer: The solution to reducing tensions in Iran is for the U.S. to stop its economic war against Iran.

text: Some minor information is missing.

refinement: The solution to reducing tensions in Iran is for the U.S. to stop its economic war against Iran, according to Iran's foreign minister.

text: The solution is mentioned in the sixth paragraph.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who visited Tehran to ease tensions?

answer: German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas

text: This answer is mentioned in the last paragraph.

answer: German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas visited Tehran to ease tensions.

text: This answer is mentioned in the last paragraph.

answer: Heiko Maas visited Tehran in an effort to ease tensions.

text: Some minor information is missing.

refinement: German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas visited Tehran in an effort to ease tensions.

text: This answer is mentioned in the last paragraph.

answer: German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas.

text: This answer is mentioned in the last paragraph.

answer: German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas visited Tehran in an effort to ease tensions.

text: This answer is mentioned in the last paragraph.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: In a recent tweet, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggested that powerful people in the government are trying to persuade President Donald Trump into starting a war with Iran. Ocasio-Cortez cites a Washington Post article about an Iraqi sheikh who stayed in a very expensive suite at Trump's D.C. hotel while urging the administration to take a hard-line stance against Iran. Iran's foreign minister has said that Trump himself has already announced an "economic war" against Iran, and the only solution in reducing tensions in the region is to end this economic war.

answer: Ocasio-Cortez states that powerful people are trying to bribe the president into war, which seems to be with Iran. She suggests that the usual arguments are unpopular, citing Trump's economic war against Iran.

text: Major information is missing

refinement: Ocasio-Cortez states that powerful people are trying to bribe the president into war, which seems to be with Iran. She cites a Washington Post article about an Iraqi sheikh who stayed in a very expensive suite at Trump's D.C. hotel while urging the administration to take a hard-line stance against Iran. Iran's foreign minister has said that Trump himself has already announced an "economic war" against Iran, and the only solution in reducing tensions in the region is to end this economic war.

answer: An article from The Washington Post discussed the possible bribery of President Trump with a wealthy Iraqi sheik, to take either a hard-line or an unfavorable approach on Iran. The report went on to say that for weeks the sheik had been staying at Trump's D.C. hotel (located in Washington DC) and that he sent out Tweets in favor of a hard-line Iranian approach and diplomacy.

text: Some information is missing.

refinement: An article from The Washington Post discussed the possible bribery of President Trump with a wealthy Iraqi sheik, to take either a hard-line or an unfavorable approach on Iran. The report went on to say that for weeks the sheik had been staying at Trump's D.C. hotel (located in Washington DC) and that he sent out Tweets in favor of a hard-line Iranian approach and diplomacy. Iran's foreign minister has said that Trump himself has already announced an "economic war" against Iran, and the only solution in reducing tensions in the region is to end this economic war.

answer: US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on her Twitter account that powerful people are attempting to bribe President Trump into war with Iran. She is referencing an article by Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold which outlines how an Iraqi sheik who urged Trump's administration to take a hard-line against Iran stayed at a luxury suite in Trump's D.C. hotel. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has also accused Trump of launching an economic war against Iran, further escalating hostility between the two countries.

text: Minor information is missing.

refinement: US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on her Twitter account that powerful people are attempting to bribe President Trump into war with Iran. She is referencing an article by Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold which outlines how an Iraqi sheik who urged Trump's administration to take a hard-line against Iran stayed at a luxury suite in Trump's D.C. hotel. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has also accused Trump of launching an economic war against Iran, further escalating hostility between the two countries. Zarif calls for an end to the economic war against Iran.

answer: This article states that a wealthy Iraqi sheikh is placing pressure on President Donald Trump to go to war with Iran. Iran states that ending the current economic war with America will decrease tensions in the region.

text: Major information is missing.

refinement: In a recent tweet, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggested that powerful people in the government are trying to persuade President Donald Trump into starting a war with Iran. Ocasio-Cortez cites a Washington Post article about an Iraqi sheikh who stayed in a very expensive suite at Trump's D.C. hotel while urging the administration to take a hard-line stance against Iran. Iran's foreign minister has said that Trump himself has already announced an "economic war" against Iran, and the only solution in reducing tensions in the region is to end this economic war.


text:
For school we have to write a short story. I started writing but now I don't know what direction to take it in! Any ideas would be great!

The men gathered around the table were yelling at each other. They all dressed in the finest suits and each had an air of self-entitlement. The room was barren except for a large oak wood table the stood elegantly in the center. Chairs circled the table and a few had been knocked over when the men had stood up to yell. The room was well lit with a large window that nearly took up an entire wall. The large window provided the room with natural light so there were no lights in the room. There were three doors in the room, two of them led to a different tower of the hotel. The third was a large decorative door with intricate gold plated designs carved in the door. This conference room was on the last floor of the hotel before the hotel split into two different towers. The hotel itself was a large hotel in Chicago, one of the best. Known for its extreme luxury and quality service, many major corporations and business meetings of the extremely wealthy were held here because of its top-notch service. The room was painted a light yellow with a mirror that hung over a fireplace. There were old paintings from the 1600’s that covered the walls and gave the room an elegant museum-like feel.
	The men were in the middle of yelling when the large door swung open and the room went quite. The men who weren’t already standing quickly stood up a man walked slowly towards the head of the table. The man stood at the head of the table, looking around the room at who was presented before him.
“Take a seat.” The man said and the men in front of him quickly sat down again. “I would like to introduce myself. My name is Anthony Kane.”
	The alarm went off on the clock and the rooms lights dimmed on. Stephen sat up and turned off his alarm clock. He sat upright on his bed for a minute with his hair disheveled before he swung his legs out from under the comforters and put his feet in his slippers. His apartment was in downtown Chicago on the top floor penthouse. His blinds opened automatically every morning to wake him up. His room was very spacious and modernly designed with grey walls and white carpet. On the wall opposite his bed there was a walk in closet that he used to keep his expensive suits. As he stood up and walked out of the room, he picked up the robe that was lying on the armchair by the door. He walked down the corridor into the kitchen. He cooked and left food for his wife and kids to have when they woke up.
Stephen’s phone rang as he took the elevator down. He didn’t recognize the number and when he picked up, he didn’t recognize the voice. The caller told him to go to a very important meeting that was taking place at one of the nicest hotels in the area. The caller assured him that it was just a regular business meeting. The caller then told Stephen a serious of numbers that he scribbled on a post it. He was confused on what the meeting was about and when he asked any of his coworkers at the firm he worked at what the meeting was, none of them knew.
	Stephen showed at the hotel at exactly 2 pm just like that caller had said. He went to the front desk and told the receptionist the series of numbers.
“Follow me,” the receptionist walked around the counter and went to the elevator. They took the elevator up to the 5th floor. “This is as far as I can go. Go down the hall, take a right and go into the room at the end.” The receptionist closed the elevator door and left him alone in the corridor.
	In the room, people were already seated around the large table and were quiet. As he picked the only empty seat in the room, he realized he didn’t recognize a single person in the room. The people in the room were all men with really expensive, luxurious suits. Everyone in the room looked extremely wealthy. They sat quietly and after a few minutes of silence people started to talk and soon people were arguing about baseball. They argued and stood up and yelled at each other. The yelling ceased when the large doors swung open. A man walked in slowly and stood at the head of the table. He looked around the room at all the faces and people. The man wore a black suit with a gold tie. He had numerous large, extravagant rings on his fingers.
“I would like to introduce myself. My name is Anthony Kane.” He spoke softly yet powerfully.

title: Help me with this short story!

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the figure who silences the meeting?

answer: The man who comes into the room and silences the meeting is Anthony Kane. He comes in wearing a black suit with a gold tie. He stands at the head of the table and addresses the men in the room. He introduces himself as Anthony Kane, and then goes on to silence the meeting by speaking softly yet powerfully.

text: The gold rings should be added in here.

refinement: The man who comes into the room and silences the meeting is Anthony Kane. He comes in wearing a black suit with a gold tie. He also wears numerous rings on his fingers. He stands at the head of the table and addresses the men in the room. He introduces himself as Anthony Kane, and then goes on to silence the meeting by speaking softly yet powerfully.

answer: Anthony Kane.

text: Add a description of him.

refinement: Anthony Kane. He comes in wearing a black suit with a gold tie. He also wears numerous rings on his fingers. He stands at the head of the table and addresses the men in the room. He introduces himself as Anthony Kane, and then goes on to silence the meeting by speaking softly yet powerfully.

answer: The figure who silences the meeting is Anthony Kane. He walks into the room and stands at the head of the table. He signals for the meeting to come to order and when people start yelling, he speaks calmly and authoritatively, causing the arguing to stop.

text: Describe what he is wearing.

refinement: The figure who silences the meeting is Anthony Kane. He walks into the room and stands at the head of the table. He signals for the meeting to come to order and when people start yelling, he speaks calmly and authoritatively, causing the arguing to stop. He comes in wearing a black suit with a gold tie. He also wears numerous rings on his fingers.

answer: One of the men wearing new expensive suit.

text: The text should mention his name is "Anthony Kane."

refinement: The man who comes into the room and silences the meeting is Anthony Kane. He comes in wearing a black suit with a gold tie. He also wears numerous rings on his fingers. He stands at the head of the table and addresses the men in the room. He introduces himself as Anthony Kane, and then goes on to silence the meeting by speaking softly yet powerfully.

answer: The meeting is commanded by one mysterious person. His name is Anthony Kane. He appears to be incredibly powerful, and has the ability to silence disputes. He speaks softly but has a commanding persona.

text: Describe him more.

refinement: The meeting is commanded by one mysterious person. His name is Anthony Kane. He appears to be incredibly powerful, and has the ability to silence disputes. He speaks softly but has a commanding persona. He wears a black suit with a gold tie and has numerous large, extravagant rings on his fingers.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What are the people arguing about before Anthony Kane enters?

answer: The men are fighting about baseball. They speak loudly and yell at each other. When Kane enters they fall silent.

answer: The people were arguing about baseball before Anthony Kane enters the room.

answer: It appears they're arguing about baseball.

answer: The men are arguing about baseball before Anthony Kane enters the room. Some of them have gotten up to yell at each other, knocking over chairs in the process. The men argue because they each have an air of self-entitlement and think they are entitled to better treatment than the others. They argue until Anthony Kane enters and everyone goes quiet upon his entrance.

text: There is no causation here. This line should be eliminated.

refinement: The men are arguing about baseball before Anthony Kane enters the room. Some of them have gotten up to yell at each other, knocking over chairs in the process. They argue until Anthony Kane enters and everyone goes quiet upon his entrance.

answer: Baseball

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the protagonist of this story?

answer: The protagonist of this story is Stephen.

text: Describe him more.

refinement: The protagonist of this story is Stephen, an office worker who lives in Chicago.

answer: Stephen Ackerman, a banker for one of the richest banks in Chicago

text: It is not clear from the text he is a banker

refinement: Stephen, a corporate office worker in Chicago

answer: Stephen is. We see the meeting twice in the story. Once it comes from the standpoint of a third-person omniscient narrator. Then it comes from the standpoint of a third-person limited narrator, Stephen.

text: Tell us he is an office worker

refinement: Stephen is. We see the meeting twice in the story. Once it comes from the standpoint of a third-person omniscient narrator. Then it comes from the standpoint of a third-person limited narrator, Stephen. He is an office-worker who lives in Chicago.

answer: Stephen Kelley

text: No evidence his name is Kelly.

text: Tell us more about what kind of person he is

refinement: Stephen, an office worker who lives in Chicago.

answer: The protagonist of this story is Stephen.

text: Tell us who he is.

refinement: The protagonist of this story is Stephen, and office worker who lives in Chicago.


text:
The Democrats need a unifier. It could be the Vermont Socialist.

-   Nov. 30, 2019

[Senator Bernie Sanders at an October campaign rally in Queens.]

Credit...Christopher Lee for The New York Times

The Democratic Party needs a nominee, but right now it has a train wreck instead. The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests. The woman who was supposed to become the front-runner on the basis of her policy chops is sliding in the polls after thoroughly botching her health care strategy. The candidate rising in her place is a 37-year-old mayor of a tiny, not-obviously-thriving city.

Meanwhile several seemingly electable alternatives have failed to catch fire; the party establishment is casting about for other options; and not one but two billionaires are spending millions to try to buy delegates for a brokered convention … which is a not-entirely-unimaginable endgame for the party as it prepares to face down Donald Trump.

The state of the Democratic field reflects the weaknesses of the individual candidates, but it also reflects the heterogenous nature of the Democratic coalition, whose electorate has many more demographic divisions than the mostly white and middle-class and aging G.O.P., and therefore occasionally resembles the 19th-century Hapsburg empire in the challenge it poses to aspiring leaders.

_[__Listen to “The Argument” podcast every Thursday morning, with Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg and David Leonhardt.__]_

The theory of the Kamala Harris candidacy, whose nosedive was the subject of a withering pre-mortem from three of my colleagues over Thanksgiving, was that she was well suited to accomplish this unification through the elixir of her female/minority/professional class identities — that she would embody the party’s diversity much as Barack Obama did before her, and subsume the party’s potential tensions under the benevolent stewardship of a multicultural managerialism.

That isn’t happening. But it’s still reasonable for Democratic voters to look for someone who can do a version of what Harris was supposed to do, and build a coalition across the party’s many axes of division.

And there’s an interesting case that the candidate best positioned to do this — the one whose support is most diverse right now — is the candidate whom Obama allegedly promised to intervene _against_ if his nomination seemed likely: the resilient Socialist from Vermont, Bernie Sanders.

Like other candidates, Sanders’s support has a demographic core: Just as Elizabeth Warren depends on very liberal professionals and Joe Biden on older minorities and moderates, Bernie depends intensely on the young. But his polling also shows an interesting better-than-you-expect pattern, given stereotypes about his support. He does better-than-you-expect with minorities despite having struggled with them in 2016, with moderate voters and $100K-plus earners despite being famously left-wing, and with young women despite all the BernieBro business.

This pattern explains why, in early-state polling, Sanders shows the most strength in very different environments — leading Warren everywhere in the latest FiveThirtyEight average, beating Biden in Iowa and challenging him in more-diverse Nevada, matching Pete Buttigieg in New Hampshire and leading him easily in South Carolina and California.

Now, I have stacked the argument slightly, and left out a crucial axis of division where Sanders does worse than you expect: He struggles badly with his fellow Social Security recipients, the over-65. This weakness and Biden’s strength with these same voters are obvious reasons to doubt the case for Bernie as the unifier, Bernie as the eventual nominee.

Especially since Sanders has thus far ignored my advice (I know, the nerve) that he reassure skeptics by telling them that he has a record as a dealmaker, that he can moderate on certain issues, so they can feel safe supporting him even if they aren’t ready for the revolution.

But still: If you are a wavering Democrat concerned about both party unity and ultimate electability, about exciting all the diverse factions of your base while also competing for the disaffected, both the relative breadth of Bernie’s primary coalition and his decent polling among non-voters and Obama-Trump voters are reasons to give him another look.

That decent polling, I suspect, reflects a sense among voters drawn to populism that Bernie is different from not only the more centrist candidates — latecomers Michael Bloomberg and Deval Patrick especially, but Buttigieg as well — but also from his fellow left-winger, Warren, who has fully embraced the culture-war breadth of the new progressivism while Sanders remains, fundamentally, an economic-policy monomaniac.

He’s still a social liberal, of course, and he isn’t _in_ the culturally conservative/economic populist quadrant where so many unrepresented voters reside. But for the kind of American who is mostly with the Democrats on economics but wary of progressivism’s zest for culture war, Sanders’s socialism might be strangely reassuring — as a signal of what he actually cares about, and what battles he might eschew for the sake of his anti-plutocratic goals. (At the very least he’s no more radical on an issue like abortion than a studied moderate like Mayor Pete.)

This is why, despite technically preferring a moderate like Biden or Amy Klobuchar, I keep coming back to the conservative’s case for Bernie — which rests on the perhaps-wrong but still attractive supposition that he’s the liberal most likely to spend all his time trying to tax the rich and leave cultural conservatives alone.

_The Times is committed to publishing_ _a diversity of letters_ _to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some_ _tips__. And here’s our email:_ _letters@nytimes.com__._

_Follow The New York Times Opinion section on_ _Facebook__,_ _Twitter (@NYTOpinion)_ _and_ _Instagram__, join the Facebook political discussion group,_ _Voting While Female__._

question: Who is the Vermont Socialist?

answer: Bernie Sanders.

answer: Bernie Sanders

text: No answer given

answer: The Vermont Socialist is Bernie Sanders.

question: What is the main argument being put forth by this article?

answer: The article is arguing that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party.

text: The English isn't great

refinement: The main argument of the article is that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party.

text: The answer is incomplete

refinement: The main argument of the article is that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party because he is able to unify disparate parts of the party and appeals to a number of constituencies.

answer: The author argues that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to unify the Democratic Party.

text: The answer is incomplete

refinement: The main argument of the article is that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party because he is able to unify disparate parts of the party and appeals to a number of constituencies.

answer: The main argument of this article is that Senator Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to unify the Democratic Party, given his broad support across different demographics.

answer: The Democratic Party needs a unifier.

text: This is an incomplete answer

refinement: The Democratic Party needs a unifier and that person is Bernie Sanders because of his broad appeal.

question: What are the problems with the front-running candidate?

answer: The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

text: The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

answer: The front-running candidate is too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

text: The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

answer: He is too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

text: The front runner is a woman

refinement: She is too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests.

answer: The front-running candidate is struggling in the polls, and is seen as either too old or too inexperienced to lead the Democratic Party. Additionally, the candidate has been criticized for botching their health care strategy.

text: The piece does not mention lack of experience as a problem.

refinement: The front-running candidate is struggling in the polls and is seen as too old or too inexperienced t lead the Democratic Party. Additionally, the candidate has been criticized for botching their health care strategy.

question: What are the candidates running for?

answer: The candidates running for the Democratic nomination in the 2020 presidential election.

text: Grammatical error

refinement: The candidates are running for the Democratic nomination in the 2020 presidential election.

answer: For the Democratic Party nomination.

text: Not fully answered

refinement: For the Democratic Party nomination in the US Presidential elections.

answer: The Democratic Party's nomination for the 2020 presidential election.

answer: The Democratic Party

text: The answer is incomplete

refinement: The Democratic Party nomination for the 2020 Presidential election.

question: When was this article published?

answer: November 30, 2019

text: No answer given

answer: November 30, 2019

answer: The article was published on November 30, 2019.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: The author argues that Senator Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to unify the Democratic Party, given his diverse support base and his ability to appeal to voters who are wary of the party's more progressive elements.

answer: This article argues that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party nomination. This is because in addition to his demographic core of the young, he also does better than would be expected with minorities, moderate voters, and young women. He also poses less of a threat to the culturally conservative, since he is likely to focus more on economic policies than on waging a culture war.

text: The summary could be improved grammatically

refinement: This article argues that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for the Democratic Party nomination. In addition to his youthful demographic core, he also does better you would expect with minorities, moderate voters, and young women. He poses less of a threat to the culturally conservative since he is likely to focus more on economic policies than on waging a culture war.

answer: The Democratic Party needs a nominee, but right now it has a train wreck instead. The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests. The woman who was supposed to become the front-runner on the basis of her policy chops is sliding in the polls after botching her health care strategy.

text: This is a copy and paste job

refinement: The Democratic Party needs a nominee, but right now it has a train wreck instead. The front-runner seems too old for the job and is poised to lose the first two primary season contests. The woman who was supposed to become the front-runner on the basis of her policy chops is sliding in the polls after botching her health care strategy.

answer: The author argues that the Democratic Party needs a unifier, and that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to fill this role.

text: This summary is a little lacking in detail

refinement: The author argues that the Democratic Party needs a unifier and Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to fill the role. In addition to his young demographic core, he also does better than would be expected with minorities, moderate voters, and young women. He poses less of a threat to the culturally conservative, since he is likely to focus more on economic policies than on waging a culture war.


text:
Women who are not entirely straight or gay tend to have slightly higher levels of psychopathic traits and a more casual attitude towards sex, according to new research published in the journal _Evolutionary Psychological Science_. The study also provides more evidence that bisexuality is a distinct sexual orientation in women.

“I was mainly interested in this topic because certain patterns seemed to be accruing in the academic literature regarding bisexual individuals, and bisexual women in particular. Bisexual women differ in some important ways––such as personality, sex drive, and relative openness to casual sex––from both their heterosexual and their lesbian counterparts,” said Scott W. Semenyna of University of Lethbridge, the corresponding author of the study.

“My specific interest in the overlap between sexual orientation, Dark Triad traits (psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism), and sociosexuality sprang from two key findings. First, bisexual women report elevated sociosexuality (i.e., greater comfort with, desire for, and engagement in uncommitted sexual activity) compared to both heterosexual or lesbian women. Second, bisexual women report slightly lower levels of two personality traits––honesty/humility, and conscientiousness––than other sexual orientation groups.”

“These personality traits have both been related to higher levels of Dark Triad traits, and also greater sociosexuality,” Semenyna told PsyPost. “These past findings suggest that female sexual orientation may share some unique relationships with both personality, and sexuality related variables, and I wanted to dig deeper into those potential connections.”

The researchers found that bisexual women tended to score higher on measures of sociosexuality and psychopathy than strictly heterosexual and lesbian women.

The findings were based on two surveys of a total of 1,093 female students at a Midwestern Canadian University. The study utilized the Kinsey scale of sexual attraction, which ranges from exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual. In the very middle of the scale are individuals who are mostly heterosexual, equally heterosexual and homosexual, and mostly homosexual.

“The big-picture take away from this study is that sociosexuality shares a curvilinear (inverted-U) relationship with female sexual orientation,” Semenyna explained. “Heterosexual and lesbian women don’t tend to differ from one another in their relative caution towards uncommitted sexual activity. Women towards the middle of the sexual orientation spectrum, especially those who are ‘moderately bisexual,’ are somewhat less cautious about uncommitted sexual activity.”

“Alongside these shifts in sociosexuality are shifts in some Dark Triad personality traits, particularly psychopathy,” Semenyna told PsyPost. “These shifts are subtle, only about as large as typical sex differences in the traits, but they’re interesting. (Men typically score higher in all Dark Triad traits, as well as interest in casual sex, than do women.)”

“Primarily such evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that female bisexuality and female homosexuality are the result of different developmental processes. If female bisexuality and homosexuality were simply the result of the same underlying developmental processes, one would expect that any differences between heterosexual and bisexual women in personality or interest in casual sex would be even larger when comparing heterosexual and lesbian women.”

“Instead, what we observe is that lesbian and heterosexual women don’t differ in these variables, despite drastic difference in who they are sexually attracted to,” Semenyna said. “On the other hand, bisexual women are higher in these traits than heterosexual or lesbian women, while being attracted to some degree to both males and females.”

The study does have some limitations.

“While research into female sexuality and women’s sexual orientation has grown in the last few decades, we are in desperate need of more data to bridge the substantial gaps in our understanding,” Semenyna remarked.

“The biggest caveat in the present study is that the sexual orientation differences in psychopathy have not yet been replicated. The study adds support to other findings that bisexual women are more interested in casual sex, and engage in it more often (often with men). Other aspects of the study require replication, ideally by independent researchers.”

“The other caveat is that this study was conducted on an extremely WEIRD sample (i.e., Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic). It’s unclear whether these differences apply only to university students, if similar differences may exist in the general population, or what possible cross-cultural variation exists in these patterns,” Semenyna said.

“The cross-sectional nature of the study also prevents any causal connections from being drawn. First we have to establish these potential differences as reliable, then we have to interpret why these difference may exist and what they mean. In short, this study is an extremely small thread in a large tapestry that is slowly being woven, but is far from complete.”

Semenyna also emphasized that the study should not be misinterpreted as an attack on bisexuality or bisexual women.

“I’ve seen certain criticisms online of the study that it suggests that bisexual women are ‘slutty,’ or that we are trying to paint bisexual women in a negative light. Essentially the research is being accused of being ‘biphobic,'” he explained.

“I think this is unfortunate for several reasons. The first of which is that the purpose of science is to investigate and understand, and report results regardless of how well they fit our preconceptions and preferences. Scientific investigation of sexual minorities is an important step towards greater understanding, and ultimately greater acceptance.”

“The second reason is that I don’t see anything inherently wrong with people being comfortable with and pursuing casual sexual behavior, and having the freedom to do so. The sexual orientation differences in sociosexuality, as well as psychopathy, are only about as large as the typical sex differences found in these traits, with men on average scoring slightly higher than women on average,” Semenyna said.

“To suggest that these differences in sociosexuality or psychopathy paint bisexual women in a negative light is to simultaneously smear men, who similarly score higher than heterosexual women on these traits. To view normal variation (i.e., diversity) in human personality and sexual behavior as somehow problematic is ultimately counterproductive to both scientific progress on these topics, and social acceptance.”

The study, “Not Straight and Not Straightforward: the Relationships Between Sexual Orientation, Sociosexuality, and Dark Triad Traits in Women“, Charlene F. Belu, Paul L. Vasey, and P. Lynne Honey.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize what the article has to say about Dark Triad personality traits.

answer: According to the article, Dark Triad personality traits include psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. Psychopathy tends to lead to sociopathic traits as well. People who are more sociosexually oriented tend to be higher in Dark Triad personality traits. Additionally, the same sex differences between men and women that exist in sociosexuality are also present in Dark Triad personality traits.

text: The article never claims that psychopathy leads to sociopathy.

refinement: According to the article, Dark Triad personality traits include psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. People who are more sociosexually oriented tend to be higher in Dark Triad personality traits. Additionally, the same sex differences between men and women that exist in sociosexuality are also present in Dark Triad personality traits.

text: The answer should elucidate the similarities between bisexual women and men. The answer's attempt to do so is confusing.

refinement: According to the article, Dark Triad personality traits include psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. People who are more sociosexually oriented tend to be higher in Dark Triad personality traits. The surveys show that bisexual women and heterosexual men score similarly in these traits, slightly higher than heterosexual or lesbian women.

answer: The article is based off of a study that is investigating the relationship between personality and sexual orientation. It found that bisexual women report slightly lower levels of two personality traits-honesty/humility, and conscientiousness-than other sexual orientation groups. It has also been previously related that there is an overlap between sexual orientation and Dark Triad personality traits, such as psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism.

answer: According to the article, Dark Triad personality traits include psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. Psychopathy tends to lead to sociopathic traits as well. People who are more sociosexually oriented tend to be higher in Dark Triad personality traits.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about sociosexuality?

answer: Sociosexuality is the comfort and desire for uncommitted sexual activity. Bisexual women report elevated sociosexuality compared to both heterosexual or lesbian women. Sociosexuality shares a curvilinear relationship with female sexual orientation.

text: The answer should mention that men also score higher in sociosexuality by a similar degree to bisexuals.

refinement: Sociosexuality is the comfort and desire for uncommitted sexual activity. Bisexual women report elevated sociosexuality compared to both heterosexual or lesbian women. Sociosexuality shares a curvilinear relationship with female sexual orientation. On a related note, bisexual women and men score similarly highly in sociosexuality.

answer: Sociosexuality is a term that describes a person's comfort with, desire for, and engagement in uncommitted sexual activity. Bisexual women report elevated sociosexuality compared to both heterosexual and lesbian women.

answer: Sociosexuality is the comfort and desire for uncommitted sexual activity. Bisexual women report elevated sociosexuality compared to both heterosexual or lesbian women.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about how bisexual women compare to bisexual men?

answer: No answer

answer: No answer


text:
- Scream
- A golem with several questions

I don't think it's at all a spoiler for me to say... Good job, Kevin! You knocked that golem right out of the building! Yeah!

What? You don't think Kevin did that? But Kevin's a hero! A bloody icon!

Well, FINE, then! I guess we'll find out on Wednesday!

And no, I totally didn't reuse that "Ashley?!" panel, don't be ridiculous. I mean, if I HAD, it would have been perfectly valid, as it would make totally clear that this is Ashley's scene catching up with Elliot and Magus's, but I TOTALLY redrew it from scratch*.

* Nope

- EGS:NP in spite of clever girl velociraptors

question: Who knocked the golem out of the building?

answer: Kevin knocked the golem out of the building.

text: In the passage it states that in conversation, Kevin knocked the Golem out of the building.

answer: The main character, Kevin, was responsible for knocking the golem out of the building.

answer: It was Kevin who knocked the golem out of the building.

question: Did the author reuse the "Ashley?!" panel?

answer: Yes, the author reused the "Ashley?!" panel.

answer: For the sake of their own argument against the use of that panel, the author uses this panel to prove their point.

answer: no it was drawn from scratch

text: This is an incorrect response.

refinement: Yes, the author did reuse the "Ashley" panel.

question: When will the readers find out the truth?

answer: The readers will know the truth on Wednesday, when the next comic is available.

answer: on Wednesday.

text: Making this response into a proper sentence would be beneficial.

refinement: The readers will find out the truth on Wednesday.

answer: The readers will find out the truth on Wednesday.

question: Does the golem have questions?

answer: This information can't be found.

text: This response is not accurate.

refinement: This information is found in the second statement where it says, a golem with several question, appears.

text: According to the passage, in the second statement, it is said that "a golem with several questions."

answer: This information can't be found.

text: This response is inaccurate because in the passage it states there is a golem with several questions.

refinement: This information can be found where it says there is a golem with several questions.

answer: Yes, the golem has several questions.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: This EGS:NP features art of clever girl velociraptors, who are up to some mischievous shenanigans.

answer: It seems that the EGS:NP characters have found themselves amid a pack of Velociraptors - clever girls, at that! The repercussions and results of such a meeting will be evident next Wednesday.

text: The summary seems to be taking into inference that there is a pack of Velociraptors, which doesn't necessarily have to be the case.

refinement: It seems that the EGS:NP characters have found themselves in a chaotic situation- clever girls, at that! The repercussions and results of such a meeting will be evident next Wednesday.

answer: The author congratulates Kevin on defeating the golem, and tells their readers that they can find out what happens on Wednesday. The author claims they didn't reuse a panel, but later admits to it.

answer: In spite of all of Clever Girl's cunning, the EGS:NP gang managed to escape her and the raptor pack this week.

text: This summary seems to be taking events out of order and putting them into a sentence. The summary can be deemed inaccurate.

refinement: The EGS:NP gang managed to escape her and the raptor pack this week.

answer: This EGS:NP has something to do with clever girl velociraptors - but it's hard to tell exactly what. Whatever it is, it looks like it's sure to be amusing!

answer: Looks like the EGS:NP characters will be dealing with velociraptors again, despite the fact that one of the characters might be pretty clever. Can they outsmart the raptors this time?

text: This response sounds more like an advertisement than a summary.

refinement: Looks like the EGS:NP characters will be dealing with velociraptors again, despite the fact that one of the characters might be pretty clever.


text:
The FBI's counterintelligence investigation into whether Trump campaign officials had improper contacts with Russia was triggered by information the bureau obtained about George PapadopoulosGeorge Demetrios PapadopoulosFlynn spurs questions of who Trump might pardon next Not treason, not a crime — but definitely a gross abuse of power Tale of two FBI cases: Clinton got warned, Trump got investigated MORE, a former adviser to the campaign, according to the memo released Friday by House Intelligence Committee Republicans.

Allies of President Trump[]Donald TrumpBiden and Harris named Time's 2020 'Person of the Year' US to sanction Turkey over Russian defense system: report Federal government executes Brandon Bernard despite last-minute appeals MORE have claimed the Russia probe began with the so-called Steele dossier that was paid for in part by Hillary Clinton[]Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonBette Middler blasts McConnell: 'How did he win with an 18% approval rating?' Hillary Clinton: Republicans that 'humor' Trump election claims 'have no spines' Trump leaves mixed legacy on veterans affairs MORE and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). That would mean the Russia investigation itself — and by extension, special counsel Robert Mueller[]Robert (Bob) MuellerBarr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel CNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting MORE’s probe — was launched from political opposition research.

But the memo states that FBI agent Pete Strzok opened the investigation in July 2016 based on "information" about Papadapoulos, rather than the dossier.

The New York Times has previously reported that Papadapoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton before the hack of the DNC became publicly known. The Australian government tipped off the FBI to what Papadapoulos had said, according to the Times.

Papadopoulos has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and is cooperating with special counsel Mueller’s investigation.

Still, the revelation that Strzok, who sent text messages disparaging Trump, launched the original investigation into the Trump campaign will further fuel debate over political bias at the FBI.

Strzok and Lisa Page, who is a lawyer at the FBI, exchanged private text messages during the campaign that were disparaging of Trump. Strzok and Page, who were having an affair, were both on Mueller’s special counsel team at one point before being reassigned last year

Strzok was also a central figure in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email arrangement. Republicans, citing text messages between Strzok and Lisa Page, have said the FBI determined ahead of time to give Clinton an election year pass.

The memo released by Republicans on Friday, which was authored by staffers for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes[]Devin Gerald NunesBiden's Cabinet a battleground for future GOP White House hopefuls Overnight Defense: Trump loyalist to lead Pentagon transition | Democrats ask VA for vaccine distribution plan | Biden to get classified intel reports Ex-Nunes aide linked to Biden conspiracy theories will lead Pentagon transition MORE (R-Calif.), also criticizes the FBI’s use of the Steele dossier in a warrant application.

After the counterintelligence investigation began, the memo states, the FBI used the Steele dossier, in part, to obtain surveillance warrants for Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, who is not related to Lisa Page.

Then-FBI Director James Comey[]James Brien ComeyTrump's self-pardon would clash with his impeachment The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Mastercard - Dem leaders back smaller COVID-19 relief bill as pandemic escalates Trump blasts special counsel Durham for moving too slowly MORE sought and received a warrant to spy on Carter Page in October 2016, the document states.

The surveillance applications typically involve several layers of authentication. Justice Department lawyers must show probable cause that the target of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant is acting as an agent of a foreign power.

The memo asserts that the FBI hid details about the origins of the dossier from the surveillance court. The memo also states that there is “not evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between [Carter] Page and Papadopoulos.”

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What exactly made the FBI convinced of foreign interference in the United States' 2016 election?

answer: Information about George Papadopoulos, a former adviser to the Trump campaign.

answer: Information about George Papadopoulos, a former adviser to the Trump campaign, who told an Australian diplomat that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton.

answer: The article does not answer the question.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Prior to obtaining any information from the Australian government, was the FBI ever planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election?

answer: It is not stated.

answer: The article does not say anything about the FBI not being planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election.

answer: No, the FBI was never planning to investigate any Russian threat to the election.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What there any personal vendetta involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign and its links with Russia?

answer: Yes, Strzok, the FBI agent who opened the investigation, sent text messages that were disparaging of Trump.

text: This doesn't necessarily mean there was a personal vendetta. It would be better to use speculative terms.

refinement: It's possible there was a personal vendetta. Strzok, the FBI agent who opened the investigation, sent text messages that were disparaging of Trump.

answer: No, it started with the FBI is investigating a crime.

answer: It is not stated.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Did the FBI really believe Trump would pardon himself?

answer: No. The article does not say that, but it does say that allies of Trump have made the claim.

text: The text does not say allies of Trump have made the claim. This should be omitted.

answer: No, it appears they were only speculating.

answer: No, it appears they were only speculating.


text:
Devyn wrapped her arms tightly around her sister’s arm while staring fearfully at the man. She pulled her sister back to try to hide her from him  but he was already staring at the two of them with narrowed eyes.

“That’s the guy who murdered that group of people! They couldn’t find evidence that found him guilty but everyone knows he did it!” She rambled on quickly while tugging on her sister’s arm who was only staring at the man curiously.

“Really? I didn’t know,” she said while tilting her head.

Her sister glared fiercely at her. “How could you not know?! It was all over the news!” She yelled before squealing and pulling her sister forcefully causing Rachel to spill some of her drink. “He’s coming this way!”

Josh and Sana raised an eyebrow from the scene Devyn was creating before they followed Rachel’s gaze.

Josh smirked and stood up but Sana scooted all the way to the wall of the building with fear in her eyes.

“There you are! Where have you been?” Josh slung an arm around the man’s shoulder who was glaring down at Rachel as she began to eat some of the mozzarella sticks nonchalantly. “Ladies, this is my best friend Pierce. You probably already know who he is.”

“We’ve met before,” Rachel spoke up as she looked up at the two men. “I didn’t know who he was at the time.”

“That would explain why you aren’t scared,” Josh snickered and Pierced visibly tensed up; his jaw clenching and he sent a glare at Rachel who was only staring at him with curiosity.

“How are you not scared?” Devyn exclaimed looking at Josh with disbelief before squeaking and hiding behind her sister when Pierce merely look at her.

Josh began to noogie Pierce’s hair that was style in a long black ponytail, grinning widely as he did. “I’ve known him since he was little! He wouldn’t do such a thing!”

Sana and Devyn stared at the two in disbelief while Rachel stared at her drink with content before a looming figure rose up behind the two men.

“You two.” The looming figure growled in a low voice as Demie slammed both of their heads together forcefully. “How many times have I told you two to stop terrorizing my new customers?” He picked them up by the collars of their jackets and glared at them with fire in his eyes.

“I wasn’t doin’ anything to them!” Josh argued back but with one glance from the bartender he swallowed his voice.

“The girl didn’t order a drink the when i first took their orders.”

Josh gave him a shaky smile as he began to sweat nervously, stammering over his words as he tried to explain the situation but Demie was already looking at Pierce.

“You need to stop making them fear for their lives, so behave yourself or I’m kicking you out,” he threatened and Pierce averted his gaze from him while nodding.

Demie dropped the two on the floor without a care before looking at the girls with a kind smile who were staring at him with a mixture of relief and fear. “As long as I’m here they won’t do anything to you. Here or outside of the bar.” He looked to Sana who had been watching Josh as he sat on the ground still shaking. “Would you like a new drink?”

She looked from the drink to Josh who was slowly standing up and rubbing the sore spot on his butt. She didn’t feel dizzy or sick, so at least he was respectable.

“No, I’m fine.” She gave him a smile and he nodded.

“If you need anything else, including getting rid of these two, just come up to the bar,” he offered before leaving them to themselves.

Josh cursed quietly as he slowly sat back down in his seat while Pierce dusted himself off, still standing by the booth instead of sitting or leaving.

“He doesn’t have to be so rough,” Josh grumbled as he fixed his leather jacket.

“It seems like you two cause a lot of trouble,” Sana causing Josh to smirk and give her wink making her roll her eyes.

“I am trouble.”

Pierce continued to stare at Rachel who was still eating. His stare was making Devyn’s skin crawl so much she could not bare it any longer.

“Can you move? I need to use the bathroom,” Devyn tapped Rachel on the shoulder and she nodded, standing up beside Pierce who was watching her like a hawk. Devyn quickly left the booth and rushed to the bathroom before Rachel looked at Pierce unafraid.

“Do you wan to sit with us?”

“I’m leaving,” he said shortly before walking towards the door despite Josh’s protests. He left the bar, letting the door slam loudly yet no one else in the bar seemed to notice or care except for Demie who did not want the glass to break.

“Was it something I said?” Rachel asked Josh as she sat back down but he shook his head and shrugged.

“I don’t know, but I should go after him.” He stood up and went to leave before looking back at Sana with a smirk to which she sent him an questioning look. “I don’t have a phone number anymore since I gave you mine. Can I have yours?”

She stared at him deadpanned, looking unamused on the outside but laughing happily at the cheesy pickup line on the inside. “Fine.” She gave him her phone number and he placed the napkin in his pocket before flashing her fingers guns with a wide grin.

“I’ll see you around Dollface.” He winked before leaving the bar quickly and leaving the two girls by themselves.

“He doesn’t seem that bad,” Rachel smiled at Sana who bit her lip to stop herself from smiling.

“I just hope i don’t regret giving him my number.”

title: [FN] Demie's Pt. 2

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the text say about Pierce?

answer: Pierce is a man who is friends with Josh. He is a murderer, but Josh says he is a good guy. He is a tall man with a long black ponytail. He is a bit of a jerk to the girls, and he seems to have a thing for Rachel. Demie threatens to kick him out of the bar if he doesn't stop scaring the girls.

answer: Pierce is a man who is friends with Josh. He is a murderer, but Josh says he is a good guy. He is a tall man with a long black ponytail. He is a bit of a jerk to the girls, and he seems to have a thing for Rachel.

answer: Pierce is the best friend of Josh. He is a tall man with a long black ponytail. He has a reputation for being a murderer, but Josh says that he would never do something like that.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Rachel?

answer: Rachel is Devyn's older sister. She's not afraid of Pierce, the man who murdered a group of people. She doesn't mind sitting near him, and she even gives him her phone number.

answer: Rachel is Devyn's sister. She is very curious about the man who murdered a group of people. She doesn't seem scared of him, even though her sister is. She is eating mozzarella sticks at the bar. Demie intervenes and saves the girls.

text: The last sentence is unnecessary

refinement: Rachel is Devyn's sister. She is very curious about the man who murdered a group of people. She doesn't seem scared of him, even though her sister is. She is eating mozzarella sticks at the bar.

answer: Rachel is Devyn's sister. She is very curious about the man who murdered a group of people. She doesn't seem scared of him, even though her sister is. She is eating mozzarella sticks at the bar.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about why Pierce acts so creepy?

answer: The reason for his behavior is that he is a serial killer.

text: The story doesn't say why Pierce is acting so creepy

refinement: The story doesn't say why Pierce is acting so creepy

answer: No answer


text:
The view was beautiful. The white foam of the waves crashing on the far away land, the small boats floating by, powered by their engines and battling against the storm. The wind was ripping at my coat, the collar of my small spring jacket fanning out and slapping me in the face. My hands were gripping onto the railing, white knuckle, ignoring the stabbing pain of the cold from the metal. The cars behind me were roaring on, ignoring everything that was happining around them. They were trying to get home in time to their wives and settle in for dinner before the storm potentially cut the power. Their little kids so happy to see their daddy or mummy.

Every now and again someone would walk by, looking at me with a look of puzzlement and confused as they considered what I could possibly be up to. One woman stopped and gave me a card with her number on it, saying if I needed a call to call her. I merely laughed and said I wasn't going to jump, I was just admiring the breathtaking view.

A police officer stopped at one point, flashing his lights and hitting the siren, causing my skin to jump. The officer clasped his hand on my shoulder and asked if I was going to jump. I feigned happiness, promising I wouldn't. His name was Officer Medel, or Danny as he wanted me to call him. He waved his partner off, telling him to drive around and he'd call him when he was ready.

He leaned against the railing, pulling his jacket up to prevent his skin from touching the freezing metal. After a few moments of silence I spoke up. "The view is truly stunning, isn't it?" Danny nodded, his face stern and hard. "You're going to jump, aren't you?" I paused. I didn't want to lie. I didn't want to have to pretend anymore. I looked away from him, and back out to the open water where a water-taxi was struggling against the stronger waves. "I'm considering it." "Why? Out of all the beautiful vistas such as this, spread across the world and beyond, why would you ever want to jump and leave it all behind?"

I was unsure how to respond. I opened my mouth more than once, trying to explain, but never able to find the right words. After a moment, he clasped a hand on my shoulder, squeezed, and started to walk away. He stopped a moment, turning back, and saying "Just keep considering. Be wary of the choice you're going to make."

The rain started soon. Pelting hard rain, smashing into the metal beams of the bridge and making a sound that emulated a basic instrument. I couldn't help but smile. He was right. The world was certainly beaitful, and there was so much to offer but it still wasn't enough. I swing both legs over the railing, making sure the watertight baggie was zipped in my pocket, and let go of the railing. As I was falling I heard the dancing sound of the metal and closed my eyes.

title: Considerations

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Is the main character going to jump?

answer: No, he only thinks about jumping. The police officer sees him standing there and talks to him.

text: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

refinement: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

answer: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

answer: No, they decided to jump.

text: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

refinement: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

answer: The character is considering jumping off the bridge—though it is unclear whether or not they will actually do it.

text: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

refinement: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

answer: Based on the passage, the main character is considering jumping off the bridge.

text: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

refinement: They debate about it, but in the end they do.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why does the main character want to commit suicide?

answer: The main character is considering suicide because they feel that the world doesn't offer enough. They feel that no matter how much beauty there is, it doesn't match the pain they feel inside them. They also feel that some things are just too difficult to deal with.

answer: Information not found.

text: Final paragraph info found

refinement: The main character is considering suicide because they feel that the world doesn't offer enough. They feel that no matter how much beauty there is, it doesn't match the pain they feel inside them. They also feel that some things are just too difficult to deal with.

answer: The main character wants to commit suicide because they cannot find a reason to stick around in the face of uncertainty. The view from the bridge is beautiful, but it is not enough to convince them to change their mind and reconsider their choice. They feel empty inside and feel that there is nothing left for them in this world.

text: The world is not enough

refinement: The main character is considering suicide because they feel that the world doesn't offer enough. They feel that no matter how much beauty there is, it doesn't match the pain they feel inside them. They also feel that some things are just too difficult to deal with.

answer: It's not clear.

text: Final paragraph reason given

refinement: The main character is considering suicide because they feel that the world doesn't offer enough. They feel that no matter how much beauty there is, it doesn't match the pain they feel inside them. They also feel that some things are just too difficult to deal with.

answer: The world is not enough and he is considering leaving everything behind.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who comes up and talks to the narrator?

answer: An officer approached the narrator and asked if the narrator was going to jump.

answer: An officer (Detective Medel) stops his car.

answer: An officer stops at the narrator and asks if the narrator is going to jump. The narrator confirms that he is considering it.

answer: The narrator is thinking about jumping off the bridge, a police officer talks to them about it.

answer: One of the cops.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the narrator admire that makes them reconsider their death?

answer: The narrator admires the view of the water and the small boats working their way through the stormy conditions. It is this view, coupled with the apparent emptiness of ending their life, which has created the desire within the narrator to reconsider their death.

answer: The views

answer: The view of the water and the floating boats in a stormy sea.

answer: The overwhelming natural beauty of the stormy ocean water. The narrator is taken aback by how magnificent the ocean looks in its strength and darkness, and they feel compelled to consider whether their own life is worth continuing in spite of the pain or emptiness they may be experiencing.

answer: The beautiful view.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: The story is about a young person who sits atop a bridge contemplating suicide. Many people try to stop them. Then, finally, although the world is beautiful, they decide to kill themselves.

answer: A man admires the view as he contemplates suicide. An officer pulls up and admonishes him for thinking such things even as the man says he's not about to jump. Just before the man lets go, the officer's words of encouragement ring in his mind: Be wary of the choice.

answer: The view from the bridge is breathtaking, but the protagonist is considering jumping. Officer Medel comes over to inquire about the situation and the protagonist tells him that she is considering jumping. Officer Medel tells her to consider carefully before making a final decision. The rain starts to come down hard and the protagonist decides to let go and jump.

answer: The protagonist walks across a bridge to admire the view. A police officer spots them and confronts them. After a brief conversation the protagonist gets ready to jump as the officer walks back to his car, stopping to say, "Be wary of the choice you're going to make."

answer: The view from a bridge looks breathtaking, but its beauty doesn't keep the narrator from considering jumping. A police officer stops to check on them, and the narrator admits they are considering jumping. The rain starts as they swing their legs over the railing and prepare to jump. They ultimately decide not to, and instead discuss why they are considering suicide.


text:
EDDY SABARA (17 February 1927 – September 1995) was an Indonesian civil servant and military officer. He was the Governor of Southeast Sulawesi for twelve years between 1966 and 1978, and held acting governor positions in four other provinces due to his position in the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Early life

Sabara was born in Kendari, then part of Dutch East Indies, on 17 February 1927. His father was a municipal police officer. Sabara was the last of seven siblings, and he began his education in Kendari before moving to Makassar for further education until 1946, where he attended school with future Indonesian nationalist figure Robert Wolter Monginsidi.[1][2][3]

Career

Military service

After completing his education in Makassar, Sabara joined a group of youths from Sulawesi who left for Java to fight in the Indonesian National Revolution, as the South Sulawesi campaign of Raymond Westerling was raging in Makassar and its vicinity.[4][5] Once in Java, Sabara joined a battalion in the nationalist government, having been before grown an interest in the military due to watching KNIL drills as a child.[6] In 1948, he was a first lieutenant in command of a reserve company which was about to be deployed to Sulawesi when his unit was attacked and disarmed by Communist militias during the Madiun Affair. Sabara was imprisoned and was apparently about to be executed before Army units from the Siliwangi Division defeated the Communists and freed Sabara's unit.[7] During his time in Java, he also enrolled in the Magelang Military Academy.[8]

After the revolution, he commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region, eventually becoming commander of its Regional Training Regiment by 1965. During his time at Hasanuddin, he participated in the campaign against Andi Aziz's rebellion. He had also commanded a reserve brigade during Operation Trikora in 1962.[9][10]

Governor and civil servant

On 14 October 1966, he was appointed as acting governor of Southeast Sulawesi, before being made full governor for two terms starting in 1967.[11][12] The previous civilian governor and the first elected governor of the province, La Ode Hadi, was forced to leave his position in 1966 before he had held it for two years following a wave of demonstrations during the transition to the New Order, allowing the popular Sabara (at that time a lieutenant colonel) to take over.[13]

Southeast Sulawesi was very sparsely populated at the start of his tenure, with little to no government budget, and Sabara opted to relocate locals (mostly nomadic farmers) alongside resettlement areas where roads were planned.[14] According to Sabara in a 1983 interview with _Tempo_, his wife initially believed that his appointment to Southeast Sulawesi was an exile of sorts.[15] He also drew in migrants from densely populated Java and Bali. Despite a lack of existing traffic at the time, he lobbied for the central government to fund key roads, especially between Kendari and Kolaka, believing that the road would attract agricultural settlers.[16] During his governorship, he also served in the People's Consultative Assembly as a regional representative.[17]

He was initially intended to serve just one term, and after its expiry in 1973 a lack of replacement candidates resulted in his term initially being extended by several months, and later a second term.[18] After the conclusion of his governorship in 1978, he was assigned in 1979 to the Ministry of Home Affairs as inspector general, and later became the director general of the ministry's regional autonomy directorate.[19] During his time there, he became acting governors for Jambi (1979),[20] Central Sulawesi (25 November 1980 – 1981),[21] and Aceh (15 March – 27 August 1981),[22] During his temporary governorships of Aceh and Central Sulawesi, he had encountered political gridlocks in the provincial legislatures during their attempt to appoint a definitive governor.[23]

In 27 October 1981, he was also again appointed acting governor of Southeast Sulawesi, the eighth time he was sworn in as Governor.[24][25][26] Afterwards, he was once more appointed as acting governor of Central Kalimantan (7 October 1983 – 23 January 1984).[27] Due to this track record, he was known by journalists as being the “acting governor specialist” in the early 1980s.[28][29] During his time in the ministry, he also revived the deputy governor position, based on his own experience as governor where a lack of a deputy often caused issues especially with the provincial legislature.[30] He was awarded with the Star of Mahaputera, 3rd class (_Bintang Mahaputera Utama_) during his time as inspector general.[31] In 1984, he was also appointed into the Supreme Advisory Council.[32]

He died in September 1995, due to his heart disease and kidney-related complications. He was buried in Jakarta.[33] At the time of his death, he held the rank of major general.[34]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

title: Eddy Sabara

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize Sabara's military duties.

answer: Sabara was an Indonesian military officer, who served in combat in the National Revolution and the campaign against Andi Aziz. Later, he commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region before serving as Governor of Southeast Sulawesi. Sabara also served as acting governor in several provinces due to his post in the Ministry of Home Affairs.

text: His tenure as governer is not relevant to the question.

refinement: Sabara was an Indonesian military officer, who served in combat in the National Revolution and the campaign against Andi Aziz. Later, he commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region.

text: The answer doesn't mention his early military career.

refinement: After completing his education, Sabara joined a group of youths who left for Java to fight in the Indonesian National Revolution. He was imprisoned while serving as first lieutenant in command of a reserve company, and also enrolled in the Magelang Military Academy. Sabara was an Indonesian military officer, who served in combat in the National Revolution and the campaign against Andi Aziz. Later, he commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region.

answer: In 1948, Sabara was made the first lieutenant in command of a reserve company. He was about to be deployed to Sulawesi when his unit was attacked and disarmed by Communist militias during the Madiun Affair. He was then imprisoned and thought he would be killed before Army units from the Siliwangi Division defeated the Communists and freed Sabara's unit. This was while he was enrolled in the Magelang Military Academy. After the revolution, he commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region and became commander of its Regional Training Regiment. He also commanded a reserve brigade in Operations Trikora and played active roles in the campaign against the rebellion of Andi Aziz.

answer: He joined the military in 1946 to fight in the Indonesian National Revolution. He became a first lieutenant of a reserve company in 1948, and his unit was captured by communists. The army units from the Siliwangi Division barely managed to save them before their execution. He commanded units within the Hasanuddin Military Region after the revolution and became commander of the Regional Training Regiment in 1965. He fought against the Andi Aziz's rebellion during that time. He was in command of a reserve brigade during Operation Trikora in 1962, which was his final military operation before becoming a governor.

answer: Sabara was arrested by Communist militias and was threatened with execution before his unit was freed by other government forces. He also commanded a reserve brigade during Operation Trikora in 1962. Sabara was assigned as a commanding officer within the Hasanuddin Military Region where he worked against rebels. Sabara would later become the commander of the Regional Training Regiment by 1965.

answer: Sabara was an Indonesian military officer who fought in the National Revolution. He subsequently commanded units and was appointed governor of Southeast Sulawesi multiple times.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize Sabara's civilian service.

answer: Upon graduating from the Magelang Military Academy, he enrolled in the military and served as an Indonesian military officer. He also served as a regional representative in the People's Consultative Assembly after his period of service.

text: His role as governer of Southeast Sulawesi should be mentioned.

refinement: Upon graduating from the Magelang Military Academy, he enrolled in the military and served as an Indonesian military officer. He was appointed acting governor of Southeast Sulawesi in 1966 before being made full governor in 1967. He also served as a regional representative in the People's Consultative Assembly after his period of service.

text: His military service is not relevant.

refinement: He was appointed acting governor of Southeast Sulawesi in 1966 before being made full governor in 1967. He also served as a regional representative in the People's Consultative Assembly after his period of service.

text: Should mention his Ministry of Home Affairs role.

refinement: He was appointed acting governor of Southeast Sulawesi in 1966 before being made full governor in 1967. After his governorship ended, he became inspector general of Ministry of Home Affairs and then director general of the regional autonomy directorate. He also served as a regional representative in the People's Consultative Assembly after his period of service.

answer: Sabara joined a group of youths from Sulawesi who went to Java to fight in the Indonesian National Revolution. He joined the army, rising to lieutenant colonel. Sabara became an elected governor in South Sulawesi. Sabara helped to restart the role of the deputy governor after noticing his experience as a governor lacked someone to handle the role effectively. Sabara performed the role of governor numerous times. After managing to start a return to normality after the settlement of part of the island, Sabara was promoted to major general and helped to restart the concept of "acting governor specialist" after surviving political gridlocks.

answer: While Sabara was never an elected official, he served civilian duties in his late military life. These began with his appointment as governor of Southwest Sulawesi in 1966, which he served for two terms. He managed to draw migrants from dense populations in Java and Bali after his petitions to the central government for roads to attract agricultural settlers. He became the inspector general of the Ministry of Home Affairs before becoming the director-general of the ministry's regional autonomy directorate. He became acting governor for several different districts, gaining a reputation for being the "acting governor specialist" in the 1980s. He was appointed to the Supreme Advisory Council in 1984.

answer: Sabara was an Indonesian civil servant whose career primarily consisted of acting as governor in several provinces due to his position in the Ministry of Home Affairs. This occurred eight times during the course of his career, and during his time in the ministry Sabara revived the role of deputy governor. He also obtained the Star of Mahaputera, 3rd class, during his time there. He died in 1995 due to complications from heart disease and kidney-related issues.

answer: Sabara served as Governor of Southeast Sulawesi for twelve years, and also acted as a temporary governor for four provinces. He was appointed to the Ministry of Home Affairs as inspector general in 1979, and acted as temporary governor for three provinces. He died in 1995.