text:
[]

EPA administrator Scott Pruitt, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, and the president in happier times.Handout/Planet Pix via ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the _Mother Jones Daily_ newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Today is beyond nuts. The president’s lawyer has admitted that the president paid off a porn star to keep her quiet during the campaign and has been lying about it ever since. He also admitted that the president fired the FBI director because he had refused to publicly state that the president wasn’t under investigation. He also thinks that pretty much everyone in the Justice Department should be fired in order to bring the current investigation of the president to a halt. And they should probably all be investigated themselves. Oh, and we also learned that the president’s bagman/fixer has been under a wiretap for at least the past several weeks, which might explain some of the panic emanating from the White House. _[UPDATE: It was a pen register, not a wiretap. In other words, just a record of incoming and outgoing calls, not recordings of conversations.]_

Meanwhile, the president’s most corrupt underlings are engaged in a brutal war of all-against-all. Over at the _Atlantic_, Elaina Plott reports that an aide to Scott Pruitt tried to push a damaging story about Ryan Zinke in order to get the spotlight off of Pruitt’s own massive corruption problems:

  In the last week, a member of Pruitt’s press team, Michael Abboud, HAS BEEN SHOPPING NEGATIVE STORIES ABOUT ZINKE TO MULTIPLE OUTLETS, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the efforts, as well as correspondence reviewed by _The Atlantic_….THE STORIES WERE SHOPPED WITH THE INTENTION OF “TAKING THE HEAT OFF OF PRUITT,” the sources said.

  ….Abboud alleged to reporters that AN INTERIOR STAFFER CONSPIRED WITH FORMER EPA DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF KEVIN CHMIELEWSKI TO LEAK DAMAGING INFORMATION ABOUT THE EPA, as part of a rivalry between Zinke and Pruitt. The collaboration, Abboud claimed, allowed the Interior staffer to prop up Zinke at the expense of Pruitt, and Chmielewski to “get back” at his former boss.

  ….IT IS UNCLEAR THE EXTENT TO WHICH PRUITT WAS AWARE OF THESE EVENTS. Even so, the message from PPO, according to the senior official, was: “Basically, y’all are in trouble.” A White House official with knowledge of the events added: “ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SCOTT PRUITT DID WOULD SURPRISE ME.” Heather Swift, a spokeswoman for Interior, and Raj Shah, a spokesman for the White House, both declined to comment.

In case you’re confused, the story is that Zinke planned to leak damaging information about Pruitt. So Pruitt then leaked _that_ story in order to damage Zinke.

As for whether Pruitt was aware of these events, give me a break. Hell, it was probably his idea. Pruitt is now at the center of so many corruption allegations that I can’t even keep track of them, and his defense for every one of them has been that it was somebody else’s fault and he had no idea what was going on. Nobody with two brain cells to rub together believes him. Why believe him this time?

But wait. I forgot. Let’s get back to the president for a minute. The president’s lawyer _also_ said that he opposed having the president talk to the special counsel because he didn’t want the president walking into a perjury trap. But a perjury trap only works if the target has done something wrong and gets blindsided during an interview. That’s how Ken Starr bagged Bill Clinton. It _doesn’t_ work if either (a) the target has done nothing wrong or (b) the target knows a perjury trap is coming. Since Donald Trump insists he’s done nothing wrong and his lawyer has obviously warned him about a perjury trap, then he should have nothing to worry about.

Just a wild guess here, but I’m thinking that Trump has not only done something wrong, but he’s done so many things wrong that he can’t even keep them straight. Thus a perjury trap remains a live possibility.

Anyway, it’s kind of funny that Republicans are so disturbed by perjury traps these days. They seemed to think they were great fun back in 1998.

Oh, and one other thing. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who was so affronted at being called a liar at the WHCD last weekend, has been lying about Stormy Daniels all along too. Or maybe Trump has been lying to her. Who knows? In any case, she’s refusing to comment about it. I think this is probably a smart move.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe the main point being discussed in this article.

answer: The main point being discussed in this article is that the president's lawyer has admitted that the president paid off a porn star to keep her quiet during the campaign and has been lying about it ever since.

text: It should be mentioned that the main point is to discuss the news of corruption in the Trump administration revealed by the president's lawyer.

refinement: The main point being discussed in this article is to discuss the news of corruption in the Trump administration revealed by the president's lawyer. The lawyer has admitted that the president paid off a porn star to keep her quiet during the campaign and has been lying about it ever since.

answer: The author points out hypocrisy for Republicans in regards to the news about President Trump hiring a lawyer to cover up his affairs, his firing of the FBI director (which these actions have nothing to do with), and how this appears to be causing a war amongst Trump's cabinet members.

answer: The main point being discussed in this article is that the president's lawyer has admitted that the president paid off a porn star to keep her quiet during the campaign and has been lying about it ever since. He also admitted that Trump fired the FBI director because he refused to publicly state that the president wasn’t under investigation.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What did the president's lawyer cousel the president?

answer: Not to talk to the special counsel because he doesn't want the president to walk into a perjury trap.

text: This should be a full sentence.

refinement: The president's lawyer suggested the president not to talk to the special counsel because he doesn't want the president to walk into a perjury trap.

answer: Not to talk to the special counsel.

answer: To not talk to the special counsel because he didn't want the president walking into a perjury trap.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What occupation must the president's lawyer have in today's time?

answer: It must be someone who is well versed in legal matters and can handle the president's case in court.

text: This isn't an occupation. It would just be better to point out that the question is confusing, as the president's lawyer is already a lawyer.

refinement: The question is confusing, as the president's lawyer is already a lawyer.

answer: It must be someone who is well versed in legal matters and can handle the president's case in court.

answer: The president's lawyer must be a lawyer.


split: test

text:
DAVENPORT
As Michael sat there on the kerb outside work contemplating life I wondered why he even bothered coming in anymore. The building where myself and Michael worked had once been full of life and noise but now the place was silent, it was a call centre where the phones hadn’t rung for 2 years. The paint on the walls was cracked and peeling in places, the carpet had seen better days and most of the windows were shattered, but still every day Michael arrived at 8:30 sat on the kerb had a cigarette then came in and sat at his desk and started typing away on his  broken pc.
Now you might be thinking Narrator, what are you doing there? Well I have to get here early to make sure everything is in order for when Michael arrives, sounds like a miserable existence I know but it makes me happy that I can prolong his delusion for a while, at least one person should be happy in this post apocalyptic nightmare.

 MICHAEL
A few years ago I remember thinking if I lost my job my life would be ruined, I would loose my house my car, maybe even my girlfriend. It’s strange how one truly horrible day can put everything into perspective. The world has always been a violent place and always will be that’s not the problem, the problem is that stupid posh cunts who wouldn’t lay a finger on you in person have access to nuclear weapons, the same men who if you pushed them in a pub would cower away into a corner without saying a word become billy big bollocks when they have nuclear fire to back them up. I thought we were lucky at first we had been sparred the fire and brimstone, only to live in the fucking nuclear winter. Oh well enough thinking about the past I have somewhere to be  and another truly horrible day to endure.
   I arrived at the building at 8:30 as I do every day sat on the kerb outside and had a fag I looked up and saw Davenport smiling down at me. The crazy bastard still thought the call centre was running and the world hadn’t gone to shit. The Building where me and davenport had worked had been a shit hole before the rest of the world had caught up but now the windows were smashed (my handy-work) the paint is peeling worse than before and the carpet was well and truly fucked. But davenport still clings to the past, when he would help me out when I got stuck on calls, grass me up to the boss when I snuck out for a fag and all our friends weren’t dead!
So I come here every day to prolong his delusion, so at least one person can live in ignorance, however I might have to kill him today I’ve not ate in a while and he’d probably kill himself anyway once he re-joined the rest of us in reality

title: [SF] Delusion

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why does Michael plot to kill Davenport?

answer: Michael is going hungry and there's nothing to eat. They have been alone for so long, and Davenport doesn't live in the present; he lives in delusion.

answer: He's hungry.

text: It is omitted that Michael also wants to end Davenport's delusions.

refinement: Michael is hungry and also because he wants to end Davenport's delusions about the world they live in.

answer: To end his delusions about a job that will never come

text: It is omitted that Michael wants to kill him to end his delusions.

refinement: To end his delusions about a job that will never come and also because Michael is hungry and he hasn't eaten in a while.

answer: Michael plots to kill Davenport in order to end his delusional view of the post-apocalyptic world they inhabit. When Michael ponders the state of the world, he sees the violent destruction and death, and feels that no one deserves to live in such a state of misery and lies. By killing Davenport, Michael wants to provide him a quick and painless end, so that at least one person can have some measure of peace.

text: It is omitted that Michael is also hungry.

refinement: Michael plots to kill Davenport in order to end his delusional view of the post-apocalyptic world they inhabit. When Michael ponders the state of the world, he sees the violent destruction and death, and feels that no one deserves to live in such a state of misery and lies. By killing Davenport, Michael wants to provide him a quick and painless end, so that at least one person can have some measure of peace. And also because Michael is hungry and hasn't eaten anything in a while.

answer: Michael plans to kill Davenport in order to end his delusion about the functioning of the call center. Michael wants to face reality and not sustain Davenport's hopeless fantasy.

text: It is omitted that Michael also mentions that he is hungry.

refinement: Michael plans to kill Davenport in order to end his delusion about the functioning of the call center. Michael wants to face reality and not sustain Davenport's hopeless fantasy. And also because Michael is hungry and hasn't eaten in days.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What happened to the world?

answer: The bomb (one of either) didn't kill everyone; "something else terrible" happened [likely particle effects of the bombs raining fire from space] and plunged the world into nuclear winter.

answer: The world became post-apocalyptic after a nuclear war.

answer: Nuclear war erupted, and the places that are still standing are suffering the nuclear winter.

answer: The world changed drastically due to a nuclear disaster. A lot of the infrastructure is in ruins, the building is structurally unsound and the appliances in the building are outdated.

answer: The world became post-apocalyptic due to nuclear warfare.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the deluded one between Michael and Davenport?

answer: It seems Davenport is the one who clings to the past.

text: It is omitted that Michael also is delusional.

refinement: It seems Davenport is the one who clings to the past. Michael also is delusional.

answer: Both are deluding themselves about keeping the other's delusion for their happiness.

answer: Michael is implied to be deluded as he is confined to a delusion of his past - calling himself a survivor, while sooner or later he is also implied to lose his life through starvation.

text: It is omitted that Davenport is also delusional.

refinement: Michael deluded as he is confined to a delusion of his past - calling himself a survivor, while sooner or later he is also implied to lose his life through starvation. Davenport on the other hand is also deluded about keeping Michael's delusion for his happiness.

answer: Davenport is the deluded one between Michael. He thinks that the call centre is functioning despite its dire condition. Michael, on the other hand, acknowledges the grim reality of what really happened to the world.

text: It is omitted that Michael is also deluded.

refinement: Davenport and Michael both are deluded are keeping the other's delusion for their happiness.

answer: Davenport is the deluded one. Michael is aware of the ruined state of the call centre and the broken world around him, whereas Davenport clings to the past and ignores the harsh reality around him.

text: It is omitted that Michael is also deluded.

refinement: Davenport and Michael both are deluded about keeping the other's delusion.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What were Michael and Davenport's jobs?

answer: Unclear.

text: It is incorrect that this information is unclear.

answer: Information not found.

text: It is incorrect that this information is not provided.

answer: Michael and Davenport worked at a call centre.

answer: Michael and Davenport worked at a call centre.

answer: They were call center personnel.

question: Write a ~4 sentence summary.

answer: Michael arrives at the job where he and another worker used to work every day. Now the building is destroyed and empty, and Michael still clings to the past. The Narrator comes in early to keep up the delusion for Michael, but may have to kill him today because he hasn't eaten in a while.

answer: In a post-apocalyptic world of nuclear winter, Michael goes to the building he worked in and goes through the motions he would've while working. Davenport makes sure Michael can keep up this charade so that at least one person can be happy. Michael only does these things because he thinks Davenport is deluded and wants to make sure at least one person can be happy. However, Michael has started to plot about killing Davenport because he hasn't eaten anything in a while.

answer: Michael continues to come into work every day even though the place has been abandoned for years. He dedicates himself to maintaining a sense of normalcy, even though the world has crumbled around him. Davenport, one of his coworkers, deludes himself into thinking their job is still operational. Amidst the rubble and decay, Michael continues to visit for the sake of maintaining an optimistic outlook even though he might have to kill his coworker to stay alive.

answer: Narrator and Michael both work at a call center. Michael is now the only one who goes to work every day, despite the fact the phones haven't been ringing in years. Narrator thinks by going to work Michael is finding some happiness by bringing his to reality back to the point that the change of circumstances seems normal. Davenport left for work as usual, ignoring the fact that the world has disintegrated.

text: There is no evidence that Davenport left work as usual.

refinement: Narrator and Michael both work at a call center. Michael is now the only one who goes to work every day, despite the fact the phones haven't been ringing in years. Narrator thinks by going to work Michael is finding some happiness

answer:
Michael continues to attend Michael's job, long after there are no jobs to be had there. The narrator lives in an abandoned, broken building, simply to get on with his perilous daily survival. It is implied much time has passed since the events of the story, and the narrator thought it better to stop his friend from learning the irreversible changes in the world.

It is implied that the posh men in charge of the world are to blame for the destruction, and it has been two years since the last phone call to the center.

text: This response is not related.

text: Answer missing.

refinement: Michael and Davenport both come to their office even though the place has been abandoned long ago. They live in a post-apocalyptic world during a nuclear winter. The two of them are deluding themselves about keeping the other's delusion for their happiness.


text:
LACIE KANERAHTAHSÓHON BURNING is a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multi-disciplinary artist raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada. Burning is currently based out of Vancouver, British Columbia where they are completing a Bachelor of Fine Arts at Emily Carr University of Art and Design[1]

Their work incorporates themes of their upbringing, including their cultural and political background. Being a multidisciplinary artist, Burning's work combines elements of photography, video, installation, and sculpture to focus on Indigenous politics and identity from a Haudenosaunee perspective.[2] Burning has been nominated for various awards in celebration of their work such as the New Generation Photography Award[3] and was the runner-up to the 2020 Philip B. Lind Emerging Artist Prize.[4]

Art Practice/Career

Lacie Burning's art is rooted in their upbringing, experiences, and identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. Burning’s art portrays a Haudenosaunee perspective and grapples with Indigenous relationships to land, representation and “the gaze.”[5] Burning incorporates traditional materials and fabrics, such as black velvet from traditional Mohawk regalia and practices such as beading and mask-making within their multi-media approach.[6]

The Reflection Series

The _Reflection Series_ is Burning’s most notable photography series exploring land-body reciprocity. The _Reflection Series_ was inspired by Burning’s witnessing of a land claims conflict (the [[Grand River land dispute|“Caledonia Standoff”]]) at Kanonhstaton in Six Nations of the Grand River Territory, Ontario, in 2006.[7] Burning’s experience with this conflict at age 12 spurred their political awakening and awareness of the fraught race relations between reserves and the communities that surround them.[8] The _Reflection Series_ ultimately explores the relationship between settlers and Indigenous peoples and what it means for Indigenous peoples to assert their presence on their traditional land. For the series, Burning asked themselves, “What do I look like—what does it look like—when I assert my sovereignty over the land as a [Kanien’kehá:ka] person in Caledonia?”[9] The central figure in _Reflection Piece_, who adorns a mask of mirror shards, presents an answer to this question of assertions of sovereignty through a vulnerable lens using traditional images such as masks, and juxtaposing this with the fragility of the mirrors.[10] Burning describes it as “the realization that unsettling our territories is a process that Indigenous peoples must take responsibility for alongside settlers by acknowledging internalized colonialism, reflecting upon it and actively wanting to change it.”[11] Praised by fellow artists The _Reflection Series_ has been described by Cree-Métis-Saulteaux artist Lindsay Nixon as “the haunting of a genderless ghost body, a protest on the lands that taught Burning resistance, and a disruption of the supposedly clear idea of what it means to be an Indigenous person assuredly enacting sovereignty over their lands.”[12]

Exhibits

Burning’s art has been featured in a variety of exhibits across Canada. In 2016, Burning was invited to feature their work at the Mohawk Institute for the Mush Hole Project.[13] The Mohawk Institute is a former residential school, that members of Burning’s family attended. For the Mush Hole Project, Burning displayed two of their works: _Story Time_ and _Who Will Be my Witness_.[14] explores intergenerational trauma and themes of resurgence and resistance in Indigenous cultures in the face of genocidal acts such as residential schools.[15] The installation features an audio recording of residential school survivor Irene Favel speaking about her experience in a Saskatchewan school.[16] _Story Time_ was originally displayed in NE:ETH: Going Out of the Darkness in 2013 in conjunction with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, where it received acclaim in Canadian Art Magazine.[17] _Who Will Be my Witness_ is a performance and installation piece intended to promote healing within survivors and their descendants through audience engagement. The piece encourages spectators to write on the wall of the residential school and “show positivity” towards those impacted by the residential school system and its legacy.[18]

In 2018, Burning’s work was a featured exhibition in the CONTACT Photography Festival. Their exhibit _Forward Facing_ explores the intersections within Indigenous identities through photo, video, craft, and installation practices. Forward Facing was created in collaboration with fellow artists Dayna Danger and Jade Nasogaluak Carpenter.[19]

Curatorial

Lacie Burning has also engaged in curatorial work. They collaborated with scholar June Scudeler on the exhibition “Unsettling Colonial Gender Boundaries” for the 2017 Queer Arts Festival.[20] This exhibition explores Indigenous experiences of gender and sexuality and brings intersectional Queer-Indigenous experiences and Two-Spirit media art to the forefront.[21] Burning and Scudeler commissioned media works and performances from artists Thirza Cuthand (Cree), Chandra Melting Tallow (Siksika), Raven Davis (Anishinaabek), and Kent Monkman (Swampy Cree) for the exhibition.[22]

Awards and Recognitions

Burning’s work has been praised by the art community through various awards celebrating its unique themes and multi-disciplinary approach. Burning was the runner-up in the 2020 Philip B. Lind Emerging Artist Prize and was awarded $1000 as a recognition of their achievement.[23] The Lind Prize is an annual award given to an emerging artist based in British Columbia working in mediums of film, photography, or video.[24] Burning was also long-listed for the New Generation Photography Award in 2020.[25] The New Generation Photography Award, established in 2017 as a partnership between the National Gallery of Canada and Scotiabank, is annually given to three artists under 30 working in lens-based art.[26] As of April 2020, the 2020 winners have yet to be announced.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

title: Lacie Burning

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where does Lacie Kanerahtahsohon Burning come from?

answer: Lacie Burning is a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multidisciplinary artist raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Inclusion of information that is not relevant to answering the question.

refinement: Lacie Burning was raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Missing coverage on where Burning is currently based.

refinement: Lacie Burning was raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada, and is currently based in Vancouver, British Columbia.

answer: Southwestern Ontario is where Lacie Kanerahtahsohon Burnings is from.

text: Answer could be phrased more clearly with better syntax

refinement: Lacie Kanerahtahsohon Burnings is from Southwestern Ontario.

text: The passage states that Burning is from Southern Ontario, not Southwestern Ontario (and it's not obvious from the passage alone that they could have been from the Southwest)

refinement: Lacie Kanerahtahsohon Burnings is from Southern Ontario.

text: Missing detail about Burning's origins

refinement: Lacie Kanerahtahsohon Burning is from Southern Ontario, and was raised on Six Nations of the Grand River. They are currently based out of Vancouver, British Columbia

answer: Burning is a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multi-disciplinary artist raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada. She lives in Vancouver, British Columbia. Burning is Haudenosaunee.

text: Incorrect details about Burning's ethic background and pronouns.

refinement: Burning is a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multi-disciplinary artist raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada. They in Vancouver, British Columbia.

text: Inclusion of details not relevant to answering the question.

refinement: Burning was raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada. They in Vancouver, British Columbia.

answer: She is a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multi-disciplinary artist raised from Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Incorrect pronouns

refinement: They are a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega multi-disciplinary artist raised from Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Inclusion of detail not relevant to answering the question

refinement: They were raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Missing detail about where Burning currently lives.

refinement: They were raised on Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada, and currently live in Vancouver, British Columbia.

answer: Lacie Burning comes from Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada.

text: Missing detail of where Burning is currently based.

refinement: Lacie Burning comes from Six Nations of the Grand River in Southern Ontario, Canada. They currently live in Vancouver, British Columbia.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What informs Burning's career?

answer: Burning's work is grounded in their identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega person. Their art grapples with Indigenous relationships to land, representation and "the gaze." The _Reflection Series_ explores land-body reciprocity, prompted by Burning's witnessing of a land claims conflict in Kanonhstaton in Six Nations of the Grand River Territory, Ontario at age 12. Burning's curatorial work includes the exhibition “Unsettling Colonial Gender Boundaries.” Overall, they create art that explores Indigenous experiences.

answer: Emotional constructs of acculturation, the mythology and emotional baggage of colonization, and the place of white settler colonialism in 21st century emotional and environmental actionability.

text: Practical detail of how Burning's work is informed is missing.

refinement: Emotional constructs of acculturation, the mythology and emotional baggage of colonization, and the place of white settler colonialism in 21st century, emotional and environmental actionability. Specifically, their work comes from their identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person, and explores indigenous relationships with land and with white settlers that took over the land.

answer: Lacie Burning's art is rooted in their experiences, cultural and political background, and identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. Burning's practice examines the relationship between settlers and Indigenous people and what it means for Indigenous peoples to assert their sovereignty over traditional land. The _Reflection Series_ is Burning's most notable work which explores this relationship from a Kanien'kehá:ka perspective. Burning has received awards and recognition for their work.

text: The last sentence is irrelevant to the answer

refinement: Lacie Burning's art is rooted in their experiences, cultural and political background, and identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. Burning's practice examines the relationship between settlers and Indigenous people and what it means for Indigenous peoples to assert their sovereignty over traditional land. The _Reflection Series_ is Burning's most notable work which explores this relationship from a Kanien'kehá:ka perspective.

answer: Burning's art is from a Haudensounee perspective. They are indigenous and queer. Their perspective grapples  with indigenous relationship to land, representation and "the gaze." Burning uses traditional materials.

text: Specific detail about Burning's perspective and views towards indigenous relationships are missing.

refinement: Burning's art is from a Haudensounee perspective, using their identity as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. Their perspective grapples  with indigenous relationship to land, representation and "the gaze." Their most notable photography series, The 'Reflection Series', explores the relationship between settles and Indigenous peoples, and what it means for Indigenous peoples to assert their presence of their traditional land.

answer: Burning's career is rooted in their upbringing, upbringing and experiences as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. While you might imagine this would make them isolated and without context, Burning has explicitly walked the path towards political and art illuminating they are a Haudenosaunee person and embraced this aspect of their identity.

text: Inclusion of detail that doesn't answer the question.

refinement: Burning's career is rooted in their upbringing, upbringing and experiences as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person.

text: Missing coverage around Burning's art and perspective

refinement: Burning's career is rooted in their upbringing, upbringing and experiences as a Kanien'kehá:ka and Onöñda'gega Indigiqueer person. In particular, their work explores Indigenous relationship to land, representation and "the gaze", including real-life land conflicts that inspire the 'Reflection Series', that delves into the relationship between settles and Indigenous peoples.


text:
There was once an old homeless man who lived on the corner of fifth and first, in a frigid alleyway that resembled underground Bangkok. Cluttered with heaps of trash and feces from the locals. It was nicknamed The Devil’s Taint by the crack-addicts that dwelled in its air of despair.
	 This old man was a heron addict has been for 12 years since he lost his job as a news anchor. Wife left him for the best man at their wedding, DeMarcus. She took the kids to Costa Rica so they would forget he ever existed. Yeah his life was in a real shitter. He would try to fix himself up and get his life straight. Every time he tried a black lab would come to keep him company, but would leave if he picked up a needle. The dog reminded him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. Happiness…

	Today’s the first of June, and the homeless man was ready for his Katabasis. He’s been preparing for weeks by now. The sun begins its descent down the horizon, and with its departure, arrived a familiar face. The black lab he adored. The dog approached him and laid its head on his lap, then fell asleep. With a smile on his face, he looked at the heavens and somehow felt at peace. Time passed, hours to days, days to weeks, and weeks to months. It was around December when the tailored man came.
	The tailored man was in his mid 30’s, a stunning doppelganger to the homeless man’s past. He was in a rush when he scurried past the old man and the dog. Stunned the tailored man turned around to observe the dog. A joyous smiled appeared on his face. He turned to the old man with delight and asked, “How much for this dog?”
	Startled the old man replied, “He’s not for sale.”
	“How about $1,000,” protested the tailored man?
	“No,” the old man yelled.
	“$10,000,” the tailored man rebuttal.
	“No,” the old man yelled infuriated.
	The tailored man got down on his knees and begged, “Please I’ll give you a millionaire dollars this dog.”
	“Why do you want this dog so bad,” the old man asked?
	‘You see when I was a boy I had a dog named Maverick, who was a black lab. He looked exactly like that dog over there. One day my mother got sick of him and decided to let him go in the woods. I cried for weeks because I lost the only person who understood me. And now here I am looking at a clone of him. So please Sir, I’m begging sell me your dog.”
	The Old man contemplated whether or not to give up the dog. It was a symbol for everything he once had, but with the money he could get it all back.  Thoroughly thought through he decided to sell the dog. The tailored man’s faced lighted up like a virgin who was about to lose his virginity to a cheerleader. He signed a check, handed it over to the old man and left feeling whole again. As for the old man he started over again.
	Cleaned up and fresh out of rehab he invested his money into nanotechnology, which turned him into a Billionaire. He lived in 10-acre mansion with a 3-acre yard, Olympic sized ground pool and Jacuzzi. He had a trophy wife with a bust of a goddess, and trophy cars to match. This old man had it all, except the dog. The only true serenity he had in his life. Now he’s the tailored man. The empty tailored man.

title: False Smile

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about life in rehab?

answer: No answer

answer: There is no detai

text: The story does not describe life in rehab.

refinement: The story does not describe life in rehab.

answer: No answer

answer: The story gives no views on life in rehab.

text: Rather 'facts' than 'views'.

refinement: The story gives no facts on life in rehab.

answer: No answer

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about the old homeless man?

answer: The old man is a heron addict, a news anchor who lost his job to DeMarcus. His life went downhill since his wife left him and their kids.

text: It is not stated where he worked.

refinement: The old man is a heron addict, a news anchor who lost his job. His life went downhill since his wife left him and their kids.

text: 'and took their kids' instead of 'and their kids'.

refinement: The old man is a heron addict, a news anchor who lost his job. His life went downhill since his wife left him and took their kids.

text: 'heroin' instead of 'heron.

refinement: The old man is a heroin addict, a news anchor who lost his job. His life went downhill since his wife left him and took their kids.

text: It is omitted that he has a dog that he sells and becomes rich. However, that does not make him happy as he misses his dog.

refinement: The old man is a heroin addict, a news anchor who lost his job. His life went downhill since his wife left him and took their kids. He has a dog that he sells and becomes rich. However, that does not make him happy as he misses his dog.

text: It is omitted that he invests his money into nanotechnology and becomes a billionaire and stops using drugs. However, that does not make him happy as he misses his dog.

refinement: The old man is a heroin addict, a news anchor who lost his job. His life went downhill since his wife left him and took their kids. He has a dog that he sells and becomes rich. He invests his money into nanotechnology and becomes a billionaire and stops using drugs. However, that does not make him happy as he misses his dog.

answer: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years since his wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog he calls "the Fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger". He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). One day, the dog disappeared for months and just as he is about to give up reporting for good, it arrived as expected. The next time he saw it, a guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly hands it to him. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is not stated when his wife left him.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog he calls "the Fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger". He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). One day, the dog disappeared for months and just as he is about to give up reporting for good, it arrived as expected. The next time he saw it, a guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly hands it to him. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is not stated that he calls the dog "the Fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger" but that the dog reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). One day, the dog disappeared for months and just as he is about to give up reporting for good, it arrived as expected. The next time he saw it, a guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly hands it to him. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: 'The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. ' instead of 'One day, the dog disappeared for months and just as he is about to give up reporting for good, it arrived as expected'.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. The next time he saw it, a guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly hands it to him. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: 'The next time he saw it' makes no sense here. I would delete it.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly hands it to him. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is omitted that he sells the dog sells it for a million dollars.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. A few years later, more money in hand, he gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is not said when he gets into rehab.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. He gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. He then goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is inaccurate that he goes back to living in his old home, the alleyway where he used to be poor.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. He gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a three-pool and a Jacuzzi. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: It is not stated that he has three pools, but one.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. He gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a pool and a Jacuzzi. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life."

text: Rather 'the man's dog was the only true serenity he had in his life' than 'he homeless man "had lost the only true serenity he had in his life'.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heron and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. He gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a pool and a Jacuzzi. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man's dog was the only true serenity he had in his life.

text: 'heroin' instead of 'heron'.

refinement: The old man is addicted to heroin and once lost his job as a news anchor. He has been homeless begging on the streets for 12 years. His wife left him for the best man of their wedding. The homeless man also has a dog that reminds him of the fortune he once had and lost at a snap of a finger. He is days away from his katabasis (i.e. rock bottom). The dog, who disappeared months ago, arrives just the man is about to give up. A guy comes in to ask for the dog and the man reluctantly sells it for a million dollars. He gets into rehab. A billionaire now, he lives in a 10-acre mansion and has a pool and a Jacuzzi. One of the last lines of the story states that the homeless man's dog was the only true serenity he had in his life.

answer: The old man is a heron addict, a news anchor who lost his job to DeMarcus. His life went downhill since his wife left him and their kids.

answer: The old homeless man is a heron addict who lost his job as a news anchor after his wife left him for the best man at their wedding. The old man seems to be in a steady state, though; he's been collecting trash for months and his diet has made a massive contribution to his psychotic eyes (similar to a rat who has been neglected for years). His black lab has been trying to instill a sense of purpose in him, to no avail.

text: It is not stated that the old man seems to be in a steady state, though; he's been collecting trash for months and his diet has made a massive contribution to his psychotic eyes (similar to a rat who has been neglected for years); his black lab has been trying to instill a sense of purpose in him, to no avail.

refinement: The old homeless man is a heron addict who lost his job as a news anchor after his wife left him for the best man at their wedding.

text: It is not said when his wife left him.

refinement: The old homeless man is a heron addict who lost his job as a news anchor. His wife left him for the best man at their wedding.

text: 'heroin' instead of 'heron'.

refinement: The old homeless man is a heroin addict who lost his job as a news anchor. His wife left him for the best man at their wedding.

text: It is omitted that he has a dog that he sells to a man for a million dollars.

refinement: The old homeless man is a heroin addict who lost his job as a news anchor. His wife left him for the best man at their wedding. It is omitted that he has a dog that he sells to a man for a million dollars.

text: It is omitted that he is not happy now as he misses his dog.

refinement: The old homeless man is a heroin addict who lost his job as a news anchor. His wife left him for the best man at their wedding. It is omitted that he has a dog that he sells to a man for a million dollars. However, he is not happy now as he misses his dog.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the connection between the young tailored man and the old homeless man?

answer: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The real twist is that the old man let him have the dog. It isn't stated, but the old man definitely regretted selling Maverick.

answer: The young tailored man is upset after learning about what happened with his Maverick.

text: It is omitted that the young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had.

refinement: The young tailored man is upset after learning about what happened with his Maverick. The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had.

text: 'The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had.' instead of 'The young tailored man is upset after learning about what happened with his Maverick.' as it is unclear and not very informative.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had.

text: It is omitted that the old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had. The old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man.

text: It is omitted that the old man is not happy now as he misses his dog.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had. The old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man. However, the old man is not happy now as he misses his dog.

answer: The young tailored is upset after learning about what happened with his Maverick.

answer: The two were in fact the same person.

text: It is incorrect that they are the same person.

text: It is omitted that the young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had.

text: It is omitted that the tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had; the old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had. the old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man.

text: It is omitted that the old man is not happy now as he misses his dog.

refinement: The young tailored man mimics the lifestyle the old man once had. The tailored man wants the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he once had. the old man sells the dog for a million dollars to the man. However, the old man is not happy now as he misses his dog.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the text say about the significance of the black labrador?

answer: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, the dog's new keeper stops and talks to him. The man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. He tells the homeless man that the black lab is a symbol for everything he ever had, and the man wants to feel whole again. The homeless man sells the dog for $10,000, which, combined with the inheritance left by his late wife, helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: It is not stated that the man is the dog's new keeper.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. He tells the homeless man that the black lab is a symbol for everything he ever had, and the man wants to feel whole again. The homeless man sells the dog for $10,000, which, combined with the inheritance left by his late wife, helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: It is omitted that the tailored man wants to buy the dog as the dog looks like the dog he had.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. He tells the homeless man that the black lab is a symbol for everything he ever had, and the man wants to feel whole again. The homeless man sells the dog for $10,000, which, combined with the inheritance left by his late wife, helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: 'He tells the homeless man that the black lab is a symbol for everything he ever had, and the man wants to feel whole again.' is not stated.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. The homeless man sells the dog for $10,000, which, combined with the inheritance left by his late wife, helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: He sells the dog for a million dollars.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. The homeless man sells the dog for $1,000,000, which, combined with the inheritance left by his late wife, helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: It is inaccurate that he got an inheritance from his late wife.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. The homeless man sells the dog for $1,000,000, which helps him get clean and pay for a luxury rehab.

text: It is not stated that the rehab was luxurious.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. The homeless man sells the dog for $1,000,000, which helps him get clean and pay for rehab.

text: It is not stated that the old man is not happy as he misses his dog.

refinement: The homeless man needs the black lab to keep him company while his life fades into despair. The black lab reminds the narrator of his past and happiness. One day, a man stops to talk about the dog for a few minutes and tells the homeless man about Maverick, his black lab who he once had to let go in the woods. The man wants to buy the homeless man's dog as the dog looks like the dog he had. The homeless man sells the dog for $1,000,000, which helps him get clean and pay for rehab. However, the old man is not happy as he misses his dog.

answer: The black labrador is significant because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth.

text: It is omitted who had a similar dog in his youth.

refinement: The black labrador is significant to the tailored man because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth.

text: It is omitted that the dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.

refinement: The black labrador is significant to the tailored man because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth. The dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.

answer: The black labrador is significant because it reminds the protagonist of the dog that belonged to him in his youth.

answer: The old man befriends a black labrador during his stint as a homeless addict. The dog turns up at his side everytime he tries to get his life straight but eventually schedules to leave after he coughs blood into a palm. The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost. However, there is the pricey build-up that when the guy who bears a striking resemblance to the older man approaches and offers $1,000 (and $10,000) dollars for the dog, the old man holds his ground. The old man mulls it over and a decision is made for the dog to be sold only for the money. The man died in the process but the money enabled him to start over.

text: The answer is totally inaccurate.

text: It is omitted that the black labrador is significant to the tailored man because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth.

refinement: The black labrador is significant to the tailored man because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth.

text: It is omitted that the dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.

refinement: The black labrador is significant to the tailored man because it resembles the dog that belonged to him in his youth. The dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.

answer: The old man befriends a black labrador during his stint as a homeless addict. The dog turns up at his side everytime he tries to get his life straight but eventually schedules to leave after he coughs blood into a palm. The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost. The old man holds his ground for the dog not to be sold. The man does sell the dog for money so that he can start off again.

text: It is not stated that the old man befriends a black labrador during his stint as a homeless addict.

refinement: The dog turns up at his side everytime he tries to get his life straight but eventually schedules to leave after he coughs blood into a palm. The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost. The old man holds his ground for the dog not to be sold. The man does sell the dog for money so that he can start off again.

text: It is not stated that the dog eventually schedules to leave after he coughs blood into a palm.

refinement: The dog turns up at his side everytime he tries to get his life straight. The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost. The old man holds his ground for the dog not to be sold. The man does sell the dog for money so that he can start off again.

text: It is not that relevant that the dog turns up at his side every time he tries to get his life straight

refinement: The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost. The old man holds his ground for the dog not to be sold. The man does sell the dog for money so that he can start off again.

text: 'The old man holds his ground for the dog not to be sold. The man does sell the dog for money so that he can start off again.' is not that relevant.

refinement: The dog looks like it could be the one he had when he was younger, who the man later lost.

text: 'the tailored man' instead of 'he'.

refinement: The dog looks like it could be the one the tailored man had when he was younger, who he later lost.

text: It is omitted that the dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.

refinement: The dog looks like it could be the one the tailored man had when he was younger, who he later lost. The dog is significant to the old homeless man as the dog is the only true serenity he had in his life.


text:
[Columnist image]

It is becoming increasingly more difficult to imagine a scenario that sees Los Angeles Kings defenceman Slava Voynov back in the NHL – ever. According to _Los Angeles Times_ reporter Nathan Fenno, who was in the courtroom today for Voynov’s preliminary hearing, it was alleged that the defenceman choked, kicked and punched his wife. Effectively, the allegation is that he laid a beating on her.

Back on October 20, Voynov was suspended indefinitely with pay following his arrest on suspicion of domestic violence. At that time, the Police Department of the City of Redondo Beach issued this press release indicating that a female could be heard “screaming” and “crying” and that, later that night, Voynov accompanied the alleged victim to the hospital where he was arrested on suspicion that he inflicted the harm.

DISTURBING EVIDENCE OF A BEATING

Here are some of the more disturbing allegations raised in Court today as reproduced from Fenno’s Twitter timeline:

- Redondo Beach police officer: Voynov's wife had laceration over left eye, blood streaming, red marks on neck.

- Officer says Voynov's wife said he struck her in the face with his fist.

- Officer: Voynov pushed wife to ground multiple times, kicked her repeatedly while on ground, chocked her three times.

- Officer: Voynov pushed her into flat-screen TV where she cut her face.

- Officer: Voynov's wife required eight stitches to close wound above left eye.

- Officer: "There's bruising, red marks, scratches on the victim's neck."

- At Voynov's home, the officer noted blood all over bedroom, including covering comforter and a bloody handprint on floor.

- Lead prosecutor Frank Dunnick: "there's evidence to suggest prior domestic violence" involving Voynov.

Fenno added that while he could only “catch quick glimpses of photos of the injuries to Voynov's wife” and there was “lots of blood.”

VOIDING OF CONTRACT, PRISON & DEPORTATION FOR VOYNOV

Voynov is facing a number of legal issues. Firstly, he could be deported. In the United States, the crime of domestic violence can lead to serious immigration consequences for defendants who are not U.S. citizens. Under a federal U.S. law called the _Immigration and Nationality Act_, a non-citizen can be ordered deported if he is convicted of domestic violence.

Voynov is also facing jail time. He was charged under Section 273.5 of the _California Penal Code_ for willfully inflicting corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition upon a person. The charge can either be a felony or the less serious misdemeanor. The type of charge depends on a number of factors, including the severity of the injuries sustained and whether the defendant has a history of violence.

In this case, Voynov was charged with a felony. As a result, he is facing up to four years in state jail with an additional five years if he inflicted great bodily injury. If he had been charged with a misdemeanor, he would have been facing up to one year in county jail.

There is also a risk that Voynov’s contract could be voided (or terminated) by the NHL. The NHL CBA at Article 18-A.2 provides Commissioner Gary Bettman with very broad disciplinary powers when dealing with off-ice conduct that is “_DETRIMENTAL TO OR AGAINST THE WELFARE OF THE LEAGUE OR THE GAME OF HOCKEY_”. Among the punishments the Commissioner may impose is the termination of a player’s contract.

The voiding of Voynov’s contract would most certainly be challenged by Donald Fehr and the NHLPA. However, terminating Voynov’s contract would not be unreasonable if the evidence is deemed reliable. Ray Rice changed everything. Indeed, the dramatically altered landscape surrounding domestic violence may force the hand of the league. And the CBA gives Bettman the power to take action (although the NHLPA would argue there are limits to that power).

Only time will tell. For now, expect the NHL to do nothing and await the disposition of the criminal proceedings. Voynov will remain suspended indefinitely. Once the criminal proceedings wrap up, the NHL will make its decision. While things look exceedingly bleak for Voynov, they could get a lot worse should the photographs featuring his wife’s injuries leak to the public.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What are the downsides Voynov faces for beating his wife?

answer: He could be deported, face jail time, and also his contract could be voided by the NHL.

answer: He could be deported, he could be charged with a felony, he could be facing jail time, and his contract could be voided.

answer: He could be deported, he could be charged with a felony, and his contract could be voided.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about vigilante justice?

answer: No answer

answer: The article does not mention anything about vigilante justice.


text:
Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when ABC News reporter Jon Karl pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” Mulvaney added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

  "To be clear, what you described is a quid pro quo" -- Here's Mick Mulvaney casually admitting that Trump held up aid to Ukraine as leverage to get the Ukrainian government to investigate the 2016 election pic.twitter.com/ylz7BKEmKd

  — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) October 17, 2019

Foreign policy negotiations often demand trading a move by one country with a policy change by the other. President John F. Kennedy resolved the Cuban Missile Crisis with the Soviet Union by agreeing to remove U.S. nuclear missiles from Turkey in exchange for the USSR pulling its nuclear missiles from Cuba.

What makes Trump’s exchange different is that the “favor” he asked of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was a personal, political benefit. The insertion of personal gain is what makes it corrupt.

Mulvaney claimed that the Trump administration was withholding aid from Ukraine to coerce the country into investigating a supposed Democratic National Committee email server and alleged “corruption” in the 2016 election ― not former Vice President Joe Biden, one of Trump’s top political rivals heading into 2020. (Mulvaney’s claim is incomplete and misleading: Trump brought up both the DNC server and Biden in his call with Ukraine’s president.)

When Karl asked why the U.S. stopped the aid, Mulvaney said that Trump thought it was unfair that the European Union wasn’t doing more to help Ukraine.

Then Mulvaney referenced a debunked conspiracy theory that claims the DNC’s physical “server” is missing in a cover-up and that Crowdstrike, a private cybersecurity company hired to investigate Russia’s hack of the DNC’s servers, is framing Russia for election interference.

“Did [Trump] also mention to me in the past the corruption that related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that,” Mulvaney told the reporter. “But that’s it, and that’s why we hung up the money.”

As The Daily Beast reported last year, the DNC’s so-called “server” is actually a system of 140 servers and none of the DNC’s machines are missing.

Speaking to reporters, Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska denounced efforts to “hold up” foreign aid for political reasons.

“You don’t hold up foreign aid that we had previously appropriated for a political initiative,” Murkowski said in response to questions about Mulvaney’s press conference.

  “You don’t hold up foreign aid that we had previously appropriated for a political initiative,” Murkowski says when asked about Mulvaney comments today

  She also says it’s not appropriate to hold G7 at Trump Doral

  — Igor Bobic (@igorbobic) October 17, 2019

Hours after the news conference, Mulvaney walked back his admission that the U.S. withheld Ukranian aid for political gain.

In a lengthy statement, he said the opposite of his earlier remarks: “There was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukranian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election.”

Mulvaney also wrongly blamed the media for “misconstruing” and putting a spin on the comments he made during the news conference, which was televised and streamed live to the public.

_Paul Blumenthal contributed reporting._

_This article has been updated with Mulvaney’s later comments denying he had said there was a quid pro quo over political help._

RELATED COVERAGE

-   Mick Mulvaney Walks Back Admission Of Quid Pro Quo In Trump's Ukraine Call
-   GOP Senator Breaks With White House Over Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
-   John Bolton Instructed Aide To Warn White House Lawyers About Rudy Giuliani: Reports
-   White House Adviser Considered EU Ambassador A National Security Risk: Report

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Mulvaney's statements regarding the foreign aid to Ukraine?

answer: Mulvaney claimed that the Trump administration withheld the aid from Ukraine in order to coerce the country into investigating a supposed Democratic National Committee email server and alleged "corruption" in the 2016 election ― not former Vice President Joe Biden, one of Trump's political rivals heading into 2020. Mulvaney said that Trump thought it was unfair that the European Union wasn't doing more to help Ukraine, prompting the U.S. to halt the aid.

text: The response leaves out critical information.

refinement: Mulvaney claimed that the Trump administration withheld the aid from Ukraine in order to coerce the country into investigating a supposed Democratic National Committee email server and alleged "corruption" in the 2016 election ― not former Vice President Joe Biden, one of Trump's political rivals heading into 2020. Mulvaney said that Trump thought it was unfair that the European Union wasn't doing more to help Ukraine, prompting the U.S. to halt the aid. Hours later, Mulvaney claims the opposite, that "there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukranian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election.”

answer: Mulvaney said, in a live stream, that the foreign aid was kept from Ukraine unless they launched an investigation into the DNC servers. He called it a "quid pro quo" initially but later on, he contradicted his earlier statements - saying the media misconstructed his statements.

answer: Mulvaney admitted that President Trump withheld foreign aid to Ukraine in order to get their help in the US election. Mulvaney alleged that the withholding of aid was a quid pro quo. Mulvaney later walked back his allegations after receiving criticism.

answer: Mick Mulvaney, Acting White House chief of staff for the Trump administration, admitted to ABC News reporter Jon Karl that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine's help in the U.S. election. Mulvaney said in response "We do that all the time with foreign policy." Rep. Mulvaney later added, “We do that all the time with foreign policy. There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. … That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

text: The response repeats itself.

refinement: Mick Mulvaney, Acting White House chief of staff for the Trump administration, admitted to ABC News reporter Jon Karl that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine's help in the U.S. election. Mulvaney said in response "We do that all the time with foreign policy." Rep. Mulvaney later added, “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. … That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

text: The response leaves out critical information.

refinement: Mick Mulvaney, Acting White House chief of staff for the Trump administration, admitted to ABC News reporter Jon Karl that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine's help in the U.S. election. Mulvaney said in response "We do that all the time with foreign policy." Rep. Mulvaney later added, “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. … That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.” Hours later Mulvaney backtracked and claimed "there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukranian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election.”

answer: Mulvaney admitted that President Trump withheld foreign aid toUkraine in order to sway the country's investigation into the 2016 election. Mulvaney claims there was no quid pro quo, but admitted that Trump had brought up the DNC server and Joe Biden in his call to Ukraine's president.

text: The response could use clearer wording.

refinement: Mulvaney admitted that President Trump withheld foreign aid to Ukraine in order to sway the country's investigation into the 2016 election. Later Mulvaney claims there was no quid pro quo, but had previously admitted that Trump had brought up the DNC server and Joe Biden in his call to Ukraine's president.


text:
I turned my palms so that they were face down. I was wrapped from the waist down in the white sheets of a bed. I felt like a twig. I looked at the smiling doc. My vision was surprisingly clear. Beyond the doc, the room boasted blue curtains, white walls and bright lights - as one should expect, I assume at least, from a hospital room.

The doc sported black hair, two lovely pearly earrings and a pair of eyes. I smiled back. I was definitely on something. I can’t tell what, but my mouth crinkles seemed to buzz as muscles contracted. It was a weird feeling. My mind wondered easily. Almost as easily as my eyes. I remember looking at the wall clock and following the ticking motion of the hands. At the time, they had a nice movement to them. I likened that motion to the sway of smoke or the flapping of a flame.

I was told by the lovely doc to embrace my new heart in a language comprised of factoids and the occasional medical vignette.

“It’s a technologically sound device and very new indeed”.

“135 beats per minute and far more efficient than the real thing. Breath taking, really”.

After the doc’s description about how terrific my new heart is, I had a little coughing fit. I can only put the cough down to the dustiness of the room’s air. The odd thing was that my heart rate stayed exactly the same. Now, not having experienced this before, I must say it is a feeling of peculiarity. It was at this moment that I realised my case was quite luxurious. I would never have to worry again about becoming light headed from lying down too long and nor would I have to worry about attending anymore of Minnie’s god awful Pilates classes. A minor miracle.

I remember having a little lapse form my bliss. How would Minnie respond? And the kids? Joseph had only just managed to graduate and, well, Kayla’s kids now have to deal with an even less capable Gramps. Fantastic. Thinking about all this was all fine and dandy, but I soon realised that the most pressing issue was to work out how I was going to navigate Minnie’s “I told you so” moment.

“Listen to me, you’re too old for this”.

“40 years. It’s going to kill you”.

Minnie’s concerns are always the same. I never take them to heart. I know she means well. But, my god, that woman can complain and she now had a fair point. I looked back at the doctor still mumbling away. I concluded apologising was the best bet. I needed to play the victim card to my advantage. Minnie isn’t that heartless. She’s come around.

I tuned back to the doc. I was told that there are two battery packs built into my chest. All externally rechargeable, of course. When one pack dies out, the second pack kicks in and it becomes paramount that the previous one is recharged. If I fail this procedure, I die; with both battery packs empty there is simply nothing to power the circulation of my blood, to transport my oxygen and to keep me alive.

The doctor smiled again. I must say, by now, I remember beginning to feel a little restless. I was starting to come around. My eyes darted down towards the doctor’s blouse, to the chest pocket of her white coat and then to the little white pen that popped out.

It was then that I realised I now had no heart and all I really wanted was a cigarette.

title: Heart.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Explain what the narrator is and has become.

answer: The narrator is a man who has had a heart transplant. He has become a man without a heart.

text: The narrator now has a mechanical heart. He's not a man without one.

refinement: The narrator is a man who has had a heart transplant, receiving a new mechanical heart. He has become a man without a heart, metaphorically speaking.

answer: He has become a cyborg. He has a new mechanical heart.

answer: He has become a cyborg. He has a new heart.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the plot twist.

answer: The narrator is told that the heart he has been given is a technologically sound device and very new. He is told that it is 135 beats per minute and more efficient than the real thing. He is also told that he has two battery packs in his chest and that if he fails to recharge them, he will die. He realizes that he now has no heart and all he really wants is a cigarette.

text: There is no plot twist.

answer: The narrator is currently in a hospital having recently received a new heart. The narrator is being told about the new heart and how fantastic it is. However, the narrator starts to feel restless. The narrator looks at the doctor's blouse, to the chest pocket, and then to the white pen that popped out. It is then that the narrator realizes he now has no heart and all he really wanted was a cigarette.

answer: The narrator is currently in a hospital having recently received a new heart. The narrator is being told about the new heart and how fantastic it is. However, the narrator starts to feel restless. The narrator looks at the doctor's blouse, to the chest pocket, and then to the white pen that popped out. It is then that the narrator realizes he now has no heart and all he really wanted was a cigarette. The narrator is told that he will die without the battery packs.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the narrator's relationship with Minnie.

answer: Minnie is the narrator's wife. She is concerned about the narrator's health and the narrator does not take her seriously.

text: The answer should mention the narrator's decision to play the victim card.

refinement: Minnie is the narrator's wife. She is concerned about the narrator's health and the narrator does not take her seriously. He decides to play the victim card and knows that Minnie will come around, she's not heartless.

text: The answer should mention the heart transplant to give context.

refinement: Minnie is the narrator's wife. She is concerned about the narrator's health and the narrator does not take her seriously. Now, Minnie has a real point since the narrator just received a new mechanical heart transplant. He decides to play the victim card and knows that Minnie will come around, she's not heartless.

answer: Minnie is the narrator's wife. She is concerned about the narrator's health and the narrator does not take her seriously.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the plus side of the narrator's situation, and the negative side.

answer: The narrator's new heart is a technologically sound device and very new. It is 135 beats per minute and far more efficient than the real thing. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes.

text: The answer gets stuck repeating the same thing over and over.

refinement: The narrator's new heart is a technologically sound device and very new. It is 135 beats per minute and far more efficient than the real thing. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes.

text: The answer omits the negative side.

refinement: The narrator's new heart is a technologically sound device and very new. It is 135 beats per minute and far more efficient than the real thing. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes. One negative thing is that the narrator now has to manage his wife's "I told you so" since her complaints about his health came true. However, the more severe drawback concerns the batteries of the narrator's new heart. There are two, and if both of them run out, the narrator will die without a beating heart to pump blood.

answer:
The narrator's new heart is a technological device that is 135 beats per minute, and is more efficient than the real thing. The narrator is also relieved that they will never have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long. The narrator also feels relieved that they will never have to worry about attending Minnie's Pilates classes.

The narrator's biggest concern is how Minnie will respond to the news. She is always concerned that the narrator is too old for this, and that it will kill him.

answer: The narrator's new heart is a technologically sound device and very new. It is 135 beats per minute and far more efficient than the real thing. The narrator's new heart is going to allow him to live longer because he won't have to worry about becoming lightheaded from lying down too long or attending Minnie's Pilates classes.


text:
“Daisy….”a soft voice whispered in the dim light.

Daisy looked around, startled.

“Whoever you are, go away.” Daisy said trying to place the voice. It was so familiar….

“Not a chance. You’re stuck with me now and you won’t be able to ignore me anymore” he hissed.

“I h-haven’t been ignoring you. I’m just very….”

“LIAR! You know you can’t lie to me, Daisy.”

Daisy burst into tears.

“Oh shut up. You can be such a baby sometimes.”

“W-what are you going to do to me?” Daisy asked while trying to control her sobs.

“I’m not going to DO anything to you. I just want to help you fill in the gaps.”

“What gaps?”

“The ones in your memory. For example, can you remember what you had for breakfast yesterday?”

“Of course! I had…. Uh…”

He chuckled.

“Daisy, Daisy, Daisy. You had oatmeal with sliced bananas on top.”

“I knew that! Shut up!”

“Do you remember Louis?”

“You mean my husband of four years? Yeah, like I could ever forget him.”

“Then you must remember what you did to him, right?”

Daisy could hear the smirk in his voice, and scrunched her face trying to sift through her memories. She couldn’t stand this bastard knowing more than her.

“I… I haven’t done anything to him.”

“Oh really? Absolutely nothing? Hah! Clearly you need me more than you know. You can’t remember anything.”

This time he laughed out loud, not even bothering to hide his contempt.

“There’s nothing to remember. You’re just fucking with me. Shut up!”

Daisy turned away, resolved to end this conversation.

“Let’s play a little game. I’m going to describe an event, and you’re going to try to remember it.”

Daisy stayed resolutely silent.

“Do you remember yesterday morning? It was a pretty uneventful day. Louis had breakfast with you and then left for work. Do you remember that, Daisy?”

Daisy nodded slightly, still trying not to engage.

“Do you remember how you burnt his toast?”

“I’m always doing things like that. Louis didn’t mind though.”

“And the bruise on your arm?”

“This little thing?” Daisy poked at it. “I was cleaning up and I dropped a dish. I must’ve hit my arm while picking it back up.”

Even Daisy could hear the uncertainty in her voice.

“Louis was so worried about it, too. He gave me an ice pack, and told me he loved and that he was sorry. I’m so lucky to have a man like him in my life.”

Silence. Daisy ran her answer through her head over and over, trying to see if there were any gaps or mistakes.

“And the stitches two months ago?”

“Another case of my notorious clumsiness. Louis was having some fun, and threw a glass at me…. I mean to me. I didn’t catch it and somehow managed to break it on top of that. I sliced open my hand on one of the pieces.  I needed twelve stitches.”

Daisy started laughing at herself.

“Louis was so nice after that! He visited me at the hospital every day, and gave me the most beautiful flowers. He kept saying over and over that he loved me and that he was sorry. He was always so sorry for my clumsiness…”

More silence. He studied Daisy for a bit, and in a gentler tone said, “See, this game isn’t that hard. Now let’s skip to the end of yesterday.”

“Let’s see, Louis came home from work; I fixed him dinner; he ate it; we watched TV; and then went to bed…. You’re right this game is easy.”

He let out a low, cool chuckle, any tenderness gone in a flash.

“Wrong! That’s not what happened last night. You’re omitting one crucial detail. Do you want another go? Maybe use a lifeline?”

“Uh, I can’t remember anything else…”

“And that’s what I’m here for. To help you…” his voice became more and more serpentine.

“The first part of your memory is spot on: you made him dinner, and he ate, and then watched TV. The last part, however, is a lie.”

“What do you mean?”

“Louis never made it to bed. Do you wanna know why?”

“No. You’re lying! He went to bed!”

“He never went to bed because he’s dead! You killed him!”

“No! No… I would never do that! I’m a good person. Louis loved me! Why would I murder him?”

“Bull shit! You’ve been planning this ever since you became extremely ‘clumsy’. You chose a knife because it made no sound, and you could watch the life drain from his body by your hand. You knew that slitting his throat would be both painful and silent. So you took your chef’s knife and walked into the living room. You went silently behind him and started stroking his hair. He moaned softly and you quickly drew his face up towards yours as if to kiss him. But instead of a kiss you drew the knife across his throat. He bled more than you thought he would, but it was worth it to see that look of understanding cross his face. He knew he was dying and that you had killed him!”

“NO no no no no no no…”

Daisy started rocking back and forth.

“You didn’t count on me though, did you? You planned everything so carefully, and once it was over, your mind neatly erased any memory of it. Except me. I’ll always be here, Daisy. That voice inside your head, forcing you to remember what you’ve done to me!”

And he started to laugh. Slowly at first but building into something maniacal and menacing. Daisy suddenly realized why the voice was so familiar, and broke down in tears again. She retreated to the corner, grabbed her knees, and continued to rock, mumbling no under her breath over and over.

*****

Behind the one way mirror the doctor looked at the woman in the corner of the cell and said, “Where did you find her?”
“She was wandering the streets downtown. She seemed to be talking to herself so I called the cops and just wanted to make sure she got some help. I’m glad they put her here with you. She seems safer in here.”
“She seems to have suffered some sort of mental break. She has injuries consistent with long term abuse and there was some blood on the clothes she came in with. So far she’s been unresponsive and I don’t know if we’ll ever find out who she is. Thank you for your help Mr…” the doctor glances down at the police report, “Tully.”

title: [MS] Daisy Tully

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about the name of Daisy's doctor?

answer: No answer

answer: The doctor's name is never mentioned.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Daisy's relationship with Louis?

answer: Daisy and Louis have been married for four years. Daisy is clumsy and has a habit of injuring herself. Louis is always very sorry for her clumsiness and always visits her at the hospital. Daisy loves Louis and thinks he is a good person.

text: Daisy and Louis are no longer married since Louis is dead. "have" should be "had".

refinement: Daisy and Louis had been married for four years. Daisy is clumsy and has a habit of injuring herself. Louis is always very sorry for her clumsiness and always visits her at the hospital. Daisy loves Louis and thinks he is a good person.

text: It's implied that Louis harms Daisy. Daisy remembers it as being clumsy because she's in denial.

refinement: Daisy and Louis had been married for four years. The story implies that Louis is abusive towards Daisy. Daisy loves Louis and thinks he is a good person.

text: Daisy calls herself a good person, not Louis.

refinement: Daisy and Louis had been married for four years. The story implies that Louis is abusive towards Daisy. Daisy loves Louis.

text: It's omitted that Daisy seemed to have killed Louis.

refinement: Daisy and Louis had been married for four years. The story implies that Louis is abusive towards Daisy. Daisy loves Louis. Daisy ends up killing Louis by stabbing him after planning to kill him.

answer: Daisy and Louis are married and have been together for four years. Daisy always made mistakes and did something terrible by accident. One day, she accidently cut Louis' throat.

answer: Daisy and Louis have been married for four years. Daisy is clumsy and has a habit of injuring herself. Louis is always very sorry for her clumsiness and always visits her at the hospital. Daisy loves Louis and thinks he is a good person. Louis is dead.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about the voice in Daisy's head?

answer: The voice in Daisy's head is the one who is forcing her to remember what she has done to him. The voice is so familiar to Daisy because it is the voice of her husband, Louis. Daisy killed him.

text: It's omitted that the voice says that he will always be in Daisy's mine.

refinement: The voice in Daisy's head is the one who is forcing her to remember what she has done to him. The voice is so familiar to Daisy because it is the voice of her husband, Louis. Daisy killed him, and Louis tells her he will always be in her mind.

answer: The voice in Daisy's head is a man who has been murdered by Daisy. He is haunting Daisy, forcing her to remember what she has done to him.

answer: The voice in Daisy's head is the one who is forcing her to remember what she has done to him. The voice is so familiar to Daisy because it is the voice of her husband, Louis. Daisy killed him.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Daisy's motives in killing Louis?

answer: No answer

text: There is an answer to this question. It seems implied that Daisy killed Louis because he's abusive, and had been planning to kill him for some time.

refinement: The story seems to imply that Daisy killed Louis due to his abusive behavior, and had planned the murder.

answer: She has been planning the murder for a while.