text:
[in n out employee pay]

Employees at In-N-Out Burger start at a higher-than-average salary of at least $13 an hour.
 Adam Lau/AP
-   IN-N-OUT BURGER PAYS ITS EMPLOYEES REALLY WELL.
-   STORE MANAGERS EARN AN AVERAGE YEARLY SALARY OF MORE THAN $160,000, MORE THAN WHAT THE TYPICAL TECH WORKER IN SILICON VALLEY MAKES FOR THE YEAR.
-   HIGH WAGES FOR FAST-FOOD WORKERS CAN LEAD TO INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY, LESS EMPLOYEE TURNOVER, AND BIGGER PROFITS IN THE LONG RUN.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a secret sauce to In-N-Out Burger's success. It pays employees really well.

The West Coast burger sensation pays store managers an average yearly salary of more than $160,000, which is about triple the industry average, according to the latest California Sun newsletter. There is no college degree or previous management experience required.

To put this into perspective, tech workers in Silicon Valley earn on average $114,654 for the year, according to a survey from hiring platform Dice.

"In-N-Out is just eons above everybody else," Saru Jayaraman, an advocate for restaurant workers in the Bay Area and director of the Food Labor Research Center at UC Berkeley, told California Sun's Mike McPhate. "On wages and benefits, they really are the best large chain."

Employees start at a higher-than-average salary of at least $13 an hour and have the opportunity to advance to six figures as a store manager. A typical architect in California makes about $112,000 a year, while a lawyer rakes in $117,000, according to jobs site Indeed.

[]

Employees at In-N-Out Burger say they're more satisfied than others at tech giants like Google and Microsoft.
 Melia Robinson/Business Insider
The burger chain offers benefits including 401(k) plans, paid vacation, and dental and vision coverage for part- and full-time employees — a rarefied package in the fast-food industry. In a Glassdoor ranking of the best places to work in 2018, In-N-Out earned the No. 4 spot and beat out tech giants like Google and Microsoft. It was the only restaurant chain in the top 50.

Denny Warnick, vice president of operations at In-N-Out, told California Sun that paying employees well has always been part of the company culture.

 In 1948, Harry and Esther Snyder opened the first In-N-Out in a Los Angeles suburb with quality service as a central focus. "Paying their associates well was just one way to help maintain that focus, and those beliefs remain firmly in place with us today," Warnick told California Sun.

It's not an act of charity, according to Jayaraman. Her research shows that paying employees well leads to better productivity, less employee turnover, and bigger profits.

In-N-Out is growing. The burger chain recently announced it's opening a distribution center in Colorado, which could allow it to expand beyond the West Coast. All stores must be located close to these hubs because of the company's strict policy of serving food fresh, not frozen.

Loading
Something is loading.
[]

More: BI Innovation In-N-Out Burger Fast Food Industry Salaries
Chevron icon
It indicates an expandable section or menu, or sometimes previous / next navigation options.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is remarkable about the pay packages of In-N-out burgers?

answer: In-n-out burgers offer generous salaries, bonuses and benefits, which are standard in big companies, however in this case they are paying them to employees who work in a fast food joint. Part of the explanation offered is that the employees who work there would be happy with such compensation, hence increased productivity, less employee turnover and, subsequently, bigger profits.

answer: The fast-food restaurant pays its workers really well. Store managers earn $160,000 per annum more than the average architect, lawyer or Silicone Valley tech worker. New employees start on $13 per hour. Managers don't need a college degree or previous management experience. They can work their way up the ranks.

text: Grammatical typo gives the wrong context.

refinement: The fast-food restaurant pays its workers really well. Store managers earn $160,000 per annum, this is more than the average architect, lawyer or Silicone Valley tech worker. New employees start on $13 per hour. Managers don't need a college degree or previous management experience. They can work their way up the ranks.

answer: Are is the fringe benefits.

text: does not answer the question

refinement: In-n-out burgers offer generous salaries, bonuses and benefits, which are standard in big companies, however in this case they are paying them to employees who work in a fast food joint. Part of the explanation offered is that the employees who work there would be happy with such compensation, hence increased productivity, less employee turnover and, subsequently, bigger profits.

answer: In-N-Out Burger pays employees better than many other businesses in the fast-food industry. Store managers get a much higher salary, with no previous management experience required. In addition, benefits such as 401(k) plans, paid vacation, and dental and vision coverage are offered to all employees. These factors contribute to In-N-Out's status as the No. 4 best place to work in 2018.

answer: In-N-Out pays its employees well, especially when compared to the tech industry, where average salaries are lower. This leads to greater productivity and better employee retention.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why does in-N-out burger pay such high wages?

answer: It appears to be a slow-and-steady-wins-the-race strategy. Better pay leads to better productivity and less turnover, so ultimately more profits.

answer: In-N-Out pays its employees really well in order to maximize productivity, employee turnover, and profits. High wages encourage employees to stay focused, resulting in increased efficiency.

answer: According to the vice president of operations paying employees well is part of the company culture. It helps employees to remain focused. Management believes that high wages pay dividends in the long run as productivity improves in part because of better employee turnover.

answer: Paying employees well can lead to better productivity and less employee turnover, says Jayaraman

answer: In-N-Out pays high wages to attract and retain skilled workers and maximizes productivity. High wages can lead to increased productivity, lower turnover rates, and increased profits.


split: test

text:
Champagne, chardonnay and second-rate vodka. The descent into Vanity Heights was a perfect contradiction. Darcy’s den was full of promises. The promises of allure, freedom, revelry. The promises of power and powder, regret, addiction. But the promise that Vanity Heights fulfilled best was not Darcy’s own. It was the promise flashed upon the television, upon the computer screen, canonised on the glossed pages of magazines. The expectations of how teenager life should be; the expectations, up until this night, crushed by education and responsibility. This was the promise that led Darcy’s guests down the stairs. Down the stairs into Vanity Heights.

The house had transformed into a delinquent ballroom. The girls dropped as low as their heels would allow; their men watched through the haze. Darcy was a dragon. A pink dragon, breathing about the toxic smoke of his habit. He was perched upon his barstool throne, positioned strategically in the centre of the room, when she arrived.
“Celeste!” he exclaimed, prancing over to her, a stick of addiction in one hand and a glass of hobby in the other. She gave a long hug, a short conversation and an expected question. With a customary smile, Darcy gave to her an expected bottle of answer.

The party raved on, yet the revelry was muted by the brick wall that barricaded Celeste from the action. The rhythmic dripping of the basin tap was the only music Celeste had, yet she chose to reapply her face instead of dancing. She wanted to dance, though, and she knew Darcy would be waiting for her, so she rushed through her routine. She clasped onto her 50mL glass friend, already thrice-used, even though she had been in the bathroom only five minutes.
        The drink was downed within seconds of being poured; the liquid sunk to her stomach. She could feel the warm tendrils, cooing words of friendship, branching through her chest, her stomach and finally, finally, back up to drown her mind; pulling her further from the world and closer to her weekend friends.
        Six doses later, to finish the bottle, and she was ready to join them.

No one ever really knew why she was there. Good school, great grades, aspirations of business and law. Nevertheless, she was soon jiving and twisting and dropping on the floor, with Darcy and other men: around them and in their laps; their hands hoping to get in hers.  Her beholder lay seemingly dormant in her stomach; though its dark tendrils were tightening, strengthening their grip on Celeste, controlling her like a puppet with tangled strings. She thought the overseer a friend, a protector, but her body knew better.

Celeste mapped her escape as soon as she felt it. Up the stairs, out of Vanity Heights, past the kitchen, into the garden bed just by the backdoor. She pushed through the crowd. Darcy saw her leave; he knew why, but he didn’t follow.  He never did. By the time she reached the stairs, the beast had revealed itself. A kraken, furious as red, limbs thrashing about inside of her, fighting desperately for an escape. Tentacles of fear, doubt, regret, disappointment.
‘No,’ she thought once more, ‘I shouldn’t be disappointed.’ She knew she wasn't wasting her life; she was just having a little to drink. She wasn’t reckless and irresponsible; she was just a normal teenager. She was just having fun, she has earned it, she would stop after tonight, leave her alone. Her stomach was having none of that, though. She made a mistake by trying to fly the stairs two at a time. Her feet tangled and she fell, the first wave of expel surging from her, onto the steps above.

Whilst the beast had once been considered friend, it had no more. It escaped her again, covering her hair, clothes, face. She tried to pull herself further up the stairs, but the sickly purple tentacles constricted about her and dragged her down; down, down, down, back into Vanity Heights.
‘Vile guardian’, she cried, ‘noxious saviour, foul beast, nefarious raper; first friend, now foe. Always, foe’.
The stench accompanying her disgrace engulfed her wholly, yet the contents of her stomach continued to emerge, again and again, onto the step where her head now resigned to lay.
‘Never again,’ she sobbed, she promised to herself, her parents, her schoolwork.
‘Never again,’ she promised, but Celeste’s promises were made to be broken and it was already too late. She lay shattered upon the stair case, empress turned peasant; her knight in glass armour had left her and once more she had nothing. The world around her spun, and sank, and faded to black.

title: Vanity Heights

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe Celeste in action.

answer: She is a girl who does well at school and wants to go into business and law. She goes to a party with her friends at a house known for drinking. She does not want to drink, but her friends give her a bottle of vodka and she drinks it. She gets drunk, goes to the bathroom and pours herself more vodka. She drinks six bottles at once and goes outside where she falls and then vomits.

answer: She is a girl who does well at school and wants to go into business and law. She goes to a party with her friends at a house known for drinking. She does not want to drink, but her friends give her a bottle of vodka and she drinks it. She gets drunk, goes to the bathroom and pours herself more vodka. She drinks six bottles at once and goes outside where she falls and then vomits. She tries to escape the party, but the kraken beast inside her drags her back.

answer: Celeste is a girl who is good at school, has great grades and wants to be a lawyer. She goes to a party with Darcy, who is a bad influence on her. Celeste drinks six bottles of alcohol, and when she leaves the party to vomit, she trips and falls.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why did Celeste leave the ballroom so quickly?

answer: She was drunk and wanted to go home so she could be alone.

text: She ran because she had to throw up.

refinement: She was drunk and about to throw up so she ran outside, but didn't make it, she threw up all over the steps and herself.

answer: She was drunk and wanted to go home so she could be alone.

text: She ran because she had to throw up.

refinement: She was drunk and about to throw up so she ran outside, but didn't make it, she threw up all over the steps and herself.

answer: She was drunk and needed to vomit.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How would Celeste's life be if she had no regret about enjoying herself and did not care for the beast?

answer: Celeste would not want to escape, she would just enjoy herself.

answer: It is implied that she would have had a great time at the party and would have enjoyed herself a lot more.

answer: Celeste would not want to escape, she would just enjoy herself and the beast would be satisfied.


text:
It was called Zulu. A cheap-ass, sun-faded, rusted-over excuse of an amusement park stuck just outside a notorious ghetto right off the freeway.

No shit. Zulu.

I kid you not; the motif was *jungle adventure*. Fiberglass lions and gorillas lurching about. Man-sized tribal masks announcing the park rules. Plastic trees and a couple of pock-marked rubber crocodiles floating in the unnatural electric blue water of a concrete pool. Are you ready for the mascot? Yes, you got it - a saucer-eyed, cartoon pygmy with a bone through its nose and hair like it just stuck it's dick in an electrical outlet. Cutouts of Zinger-Zu in front of every ride telling kids how tall they had to be....

So egregious, it soared right over "unacceptably offensive" and landed square on "ironically acceptable kitsch." And it was located in Dallas County, Texas, so that helped.

Virgil had been born into the ghetto that sprawled behind the zig-zag shadows of Zulu's dilapidated roller coasters. As a very young child, that park represented the promise of magic, adventure and mystery. Of course, money being money, he'd never been allowed to visit during those innocent years; and you grow up fast in the ghetto, so by the time Virgil actually did get to pass through the wrought iron gates for a sample of jungle paradise, he was already too old to believe in voodoo or hippopotamuses. No, as a pre-teen and teenager, he went to Zulu exclusively to buy weight and sell dime-bags to suburbanites from Fort Worth.

He'd never had the chance or, later, the inclination to ride a single ride.

\*\*\*

Older now, Virgil had lived 35 years, married twice, and had four kids. He stood six foot two inches, still trim at two hundred pounds. He had a good job in the city; a respectable house in the suburbs. His current girlfriend was able to trick him into church on Sunday mornings because she knew how to handle him on Saturday nights. If he wasn't careful, she'd become #3.

He was driving down the freeway with his youngest son, Wayne, and the child made a curious noise when they passed the almost illegibly weathered sign for "Zulu! Live the Adventure!"

"What?" Virgil asked his boy.

"Zulu...," the child said. "Zoo?"

"Nah." Virgil laughed. "But good guess. Hey, you know...."

Virgil checked the mirrors and exited the freeway. "You want to live the adventure, little man?"

\*\*\*

Wayne's mother was crazy. Not quite rising to the level of court mandated institutionalization, but Virgil figured that was only more bizarre road-rage incident away. Nevertheless, for all her batshit inclinations, she was very smart. Once she'd told Virgil that her IQ had been tested in the genius level. And he believed her. But, really, what did it matter if you could mentally convert ounces to grams or recite poetry from memory if you couldn't buy a dress without getting into a vicious fight with the saleslady, knocking over the window display, and getting chased out of the mall by a team of rent-a-cops?

Virgil was well rid of that situation; but he enjoyed spending time with their child. The boy seemed to have acquired his mother's intelligence, with none of the insanity. Virgil supposed it was bad form to pick favorites, but of all his children, Wayne was the only one he actively troubled himself to spend time with. All the others were dropped off by mandate; but Virgil would go out of his way to pick up Wayne and gladly hold on to him an extra couple of hours or even an entirely unscheduled day when the situation called for it.

Wayne was Virgil's little man. He was a calm, thoughtful, observant and sharp child. His soft, brown eyes took in everything, then his brow would furrow or his smile would widen depending on the situation, and then he'd react in a delightfully mature and appropriate manner. It gave Virgil a sense of peace and rightness, walking hand in hand with his little man.

Just as they did passing through the gates of the Zulu amusement park together; Virgil having purchased two tickets to spend some time reliving his past and sharing the experience with his son.

\*\*\*

"I used to come here pretty much every night when I was a teen," Virgil told Wayne. They were strolling down the market street, past the arcade, souvenir shops, and overpriced food stands. All the buildings were in need of paint and repair - the wood beam facades were chipped and rutted, sporting plenty of graffiti, and the roofs that were supposed to be thatched with palm-leafs had large bare sections of corrugated metal shining through. "It hasn't changed much," Virgil said, sadly.

As they continued through the park, Virgil would offer to take Wayne on some of the rides - Voom Voom Vulture! Zambizi Zinger! Python Plunge! - but the boy judiciously shook his head to the negative. It wasn't fear, just common sense. Everything looked so rickety and sketchy; even if the cabs didn't fall off their disintegrating rails, it certainly didn't look like much fun to be jerked around in those rusty metal buckets for three minutes of bad track.

"How about go-karts?" Virgil suggested. Wayne considered this for a moment and then smiled.

"Okay," he agreed. "Go-karts sound good."

title: [RF] Lets try this again

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the plot of the story.

answer: Virgil is a 35-year-old man who grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu, an amusement park. He never had the chance to visit the park as a child, but he did go there as a teenager to buy and sell drugs to suburbanites. He is now a respectable man with a good job and a house in the suburbs. He takes his son, Wayne, to Zulu, and they go on a go-kart ride.

text: The summary of the plot should show more context as opposed to just showing content. The main plot of the passage revolves around the fact that Virgil is making his relationship with his son work. So the summary needs to focus on that point more. The summary should have more about their interaction.

refinement: Virgil is a 35-year-old man who grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu, an amusement park. He has been divorced twice, and among his children, Wayne is his favorite. A curious turn of events has Virgil taking Wayne to Zulu, where the child wisely avoids all the dangerous looking rides and happily agrees to ride the go-karts.

answer: Virgil is a 35 year old man who lives in the suburbs with his girlfriend and four children. He takes his youngest son, Wayne, to Zulu, an amusement park he used to frequent as a teenager. Wayne's mother is crazy. Wayne is a smart, thoughtful, observant, and sharp child. Virgil takes him on the go-karts.

text: The summary of the plot should show more context as opposed to just showing content. The main plot of the passage revolves around the fact that Virgil is making his relationship with his son work. So the summary needs to focus on that point more. The summary should have more about their interaction.

refinement: Virgil is a 35-year-old man who grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu, an amusement park. He has been divorced twice, and among his children, Wayne is his favorite. A curious turn of events has Virgil taking Wayne to Zulu, where the child wisely avoids all the dangerous looking rides and happily agrees to ride the go-karts.

answer: Virgil is a 35 year old man who lives in the suburbs with his girlfriend and four children. He takes his youngest son, Wayne, to Zulu, an amusement park he used to frequent as a teenager. Wayne is a smart, thoughtful, observant, and sharp child. Virgil takes him on the go-karts.

text: The summary of the plot should show more context as opposed to just showing content. The main plot of the passage revolves around the fact that Virgil is making his relationship with his son work. So the summary needs to focus on that point more. The summary should have more about their interaction.

refinement: Virgil is a 35-year-old man who grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu, an amusement park. He has been divorced twice, and among his children, Wayne is his favorite. A curious turn of events has Virgil taking Wayne to Zulu, where the child wisely avoids all the dangerous looking rides and happily agrees to ride the go-karts.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize Virgil's relationship with the Zulu amusement park.

answer: Virgil had been born into the ghetto that sprawled behind the zig-zag shadows of Zulu's dilapidated roller coasters. As a very young child, that park represented the promise of magic, adventure and mystery. He'd never had the chance or, later, the inclination to ride a single ride. He had a good job and a respectable house in the suburbs. He was driving down the freeway with his youngest son, Wayne, and the child made a curious noise when they passed the almost illegibly weathered sign for "Zulu! Live the Adventure!" Virgil checked the mirrors and exited the freeway. "You want to live the adventure, little man?"

text: There should be more context instead of just pasting what is in the passage. Zulu's place in Virgil's life evolves over time and the summary show that in full.

refinement: As a child, Zulu seemed fun and magical but was otherwise unreachable for Virgil. When he became a teen, he only did drug deals in the location and did not seem to care much for it. As an adult, Virgil saw Zulu for the run-down place that it is and he likes that his son Wayne has enough sense to realize that quickly.

answer: Virgil had been born into the ghetto that sprawled behind the zig-zag shadows of Zulu's dilapidated roller coasters. As a very young child, that park represented the promise of magic, adventure and mystery. He'd never had the chance or, later, the inclination to ride a single ride. He had a good job and a respectable house in the suburbs.

text: There should be more context instead of just pasting what is in the passage. Zulu's place in Virgil's life evolves over time and the summary show that in full.

refinement: As a child, Zulu seemed fun and magical but was otherwise unreachable for Virgil. When he became a teen, he only did drug deals in the location and did not seem to care much for it. As an adult, Virgil saw Zulu for the run-down place that it is and he likes that his son Wayne has enough sense to realize that quickly.

answer: Virgil grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu. He never got to visit the park as a child because he was too old to believe in voodoo or hippopotamuses. As a teenager, he went to Zulu to buy weight and sell dime bags to suburbanites from Fort Worth. He never rode a single ride. Now, he takes his son to Zulu to relive his past.

text: A bit more detail with him and Wayne in Zulu would bring the narrative summary full circle.

refinement: Virgil grew up in the ghetto behind Zulu. He never got to visit the park as a child because he was too old to believe in voodoo or hippopotamuses. As a teenager, he went to Zulu to buy weight and sell dime bags to suburbanites from Fort Worth. He never rode a single ride. As an adult, Virgil saw Zulu for the run-down place that it is and he likes that his son Wayne has enough sense to realize that quickly.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize Virgil's relationship with Wayne's mother.

answer: Virgil's relationship with Wayne's mother was not the best. He left her because she was crazy. Wayne's mother was smart and she told Virgil that her IQ was in the genius level.

answer: [rewrite]

text: Needs to answer the question.

refinement: He finds her crazy. He has a child with her, but he is separated from her.

answer: Virgil's relationship with Wayne's mother is complicated. He was rid of her for her insanity, but he enjoyed spending time with their child.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize Virgil's relationship with Wayne.

answer: Virgil and Wayne are father and son. When Wayne was a baby, Virgil left Wayne's mother. He is now a grown man and has four other children. Wayne's mother is crazy, but Virgil loves her because she's smart. Virgil takes the time to go out of his way and pick up Wayne even if it means he has to be late at work or miss a movie with his current girlfriend. He particularly likes spending time with Wayne.

answer: Virgil and Wayne are father and son. When Wayne was a baby, Virgil left Wayne's mother. He is now a grown man and has four other children. Wayne's mother is a bit unhinged, but Virgil loves her because she's smart. Virgil takes the time to go out of his way and pick up Wayne even if it means he has to be late at work or miss a movie with his current girlfriend. He particularly likes spending time with Wayne.

answer: Virgil is Wayne's father. He enjoys spending time with Wayne, who is a calm, thoughtful and observant child. He finds it relaxing to walk hand in hand with him.


text:
JONATHAN MCCOLLUM, Associate Professor of Music at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi.[1] He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.[2]

Music Scholarship

McCollum is especially known for theoretical contributions to the historiography of global music (historical ethnomusicology), and research studies into both the music of Armenia and the music of Japan, particularly Zen Buddhist ritual and shakuhachi flute tradition.

As a musicologist, McCollum has contributed extensively to academic journals, encyclopedias, and music reference works, including most recently the _Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Popular Music_, the _Sage International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture_, and the _New Grove Dictionary of Musical Instruments_. He has also worked as a consultant for the Armenian Library and Museum of America, the Smithsonian Institution, and _Folkways Alive!_ of the Canadian Centre for Ethnomusicology at the University of Alberta.

McCollum is the author of _Armenian Music: A Comprehensive Bibliography and Discography_ (Scarecrow Press, 2004)[3][4][5] and has contributed to many other volumes. He is currently developing a book on music of the Vikings with David Hebert, with whom he co-edited an earlier book,_Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology_ (Lexington Books, 2014), and edits a book series for Rowman and Littlefield press,[6] The Lexington Series in Historical Ethnomusicology: Deep Soundings.[7]

Music Performance

McCollum holds the specialized Shihan 師範 (Master’s) license in shakuhachi performance and teaching,[8] with the professional name (natori) “Kenzen (研禅)” earned primarily through studies under _Dai Shihan_ (Grand Master) Michael Chikuzen Gould.[9]

As a professional performer, McCollum has also contributed to virtual instrument sample libraries; he is the shakuhachi player for Stealth Wind software (on Unearthed Sampling’s Kontakt platform), which is widely used by professional soundtrack composers for videos and films.[10]

He also works as a professional trombonist. McCollum is a Hoshi (Dharma Holder) at Clare Sangha in Baltimore and is the founding teacher of the Chester River Sangha, Zen Buddhist communities in the White Plum Asanga.[11]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5] According to _Music References Review Quarterly_, McCollum’s book _Music: A Comprehensive Bibliography and Discography_ is “the most important English-language resource for Armenian music to date,” and a review in _Choice_ describes it as “exceptionally good on history … well organized and indexed”.

[6]

[7]

[8] McCollum, Jonathan (2018). Embodying History and Pedagogy: A Personal Journey into the Dokyoku Style of Japanese Shakuhachi. In David G. Hebert (Ed.), _International Perspectives on Translation, Education and Innovation in Japanese and Korean Societies_. Cham: Springer, p.255-278.

[9]

[10]

[11]

title: Jonathan McCollum

question: When was McCollum born?

answer: Jonathan McCollum was born in the year 1968.

text: This isn't found in the text to my left.

answer: That information can't be found

answer: That information can't be found

answer: Based on the information given, it is not possible to determine when McCollum was born.

question: Where does McCollum work as a professor?

answer: Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland

text: JONATHAN MCCOLLUM, Associate Professor of Music at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi.

answer: Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland

text: JONATHAN MCCOLLUM, Associate Professor of Music at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi.

answer: Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland.

text: JONATHAN MCCOLLUM, Associate Professor of Music at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi.

answer: Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland

text: JONATHAN MCCOLLUM, Associate Professor of Music at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi.

question: What is McCollum the founding Chair of?

answer: McCollum is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology.

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: The Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: The Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology.

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: The Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

question: What country's music is McCollum known for working on?

answer: Armenia.

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: McCollum is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: Armenia

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: McCollum is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

text: He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Jonathan McCollum is an Associate Professor of Music at Washington College, an ethnomusicologist, and a performer on the Japanese shakuhachi. He is also known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: Jonathan McCollum is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi. He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: Jonathan McCollum is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi. He is the founding Chair of the Historical Ethnomusicology section of the Society for Ethnomusicology, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia.

answer: Jonathan McCollum is an ethnomusicologist and performer on the Japanese shakuhachi, and is known for his work on the music of Armenia. He is also a professional trombonist, and a Dharma Holder at Clare Sangha in Baltimore.


text:
AFTAB HUSSAIN (born 17 November 1997) is a Hong Kong cricketer.[1] In November 2019, he was named in Hong Kong's squad for the 2019 ACC Emerging Teams Asia Cup in Bangladesh.[2] He made his List A debut for Hong Kong, against Bangladesh, in the Emerging Teams Cup on 14 November 2019.[3] Later the same month, he was named in Hong Kong's squad for the Cricket World Cup Challenge League B tournament in Oman.[4]

In February 2020, he was named in Hong Kong's Twenty20 International (T20I) squad for the 2020 Interport T20I Series against Malaysia.[5] He made his T20I debut for Hong Kong, against Malaysia, on 20 February 2020.[6]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

title: Aftab Hussain

question: Who is Aftab Hussain?

answer: a Hong Kong cricketer

text: I made it a complete sentence.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer who was recently named in the Hong Kong squad for the Cricket World Cup Challenge League B tournament.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer.

question: What was Aftab Hussain born?

answer: Aftab Hussain was born on 17 November 1997.

answer: 17 November 1997

text: I corrected for grammar.

answer: According to the passage, Aftab Hussain was born in Hong Kong.

answer: 17 November 1997

text: I corrected for grammar.

question: When did Aftab Hussain make his List A debut?

answer: Aftab Hussain made his List A debut in November 2019.

answer: Aftab Hussain made his List A debut in November 2019.

answer: November 2019

text: I corrected for grammar.

answer: 14 November 2019

text: I corrected to make it a complete sentence.

question: When did Aftab Hussain make his T20I debut?

answer: Aftab Hussain made his T20I debut against Malaysia on 20 February 2020.

answer: Aftab Hussain made his T20I debut on 20 February 2020.

answer: Aftab Hussain made his T20I debut on 20 February 2020.

answer: 20 February 2020

text: I corrected to make it a complete sentence.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer who has been selected to play in the upcoming ACC Emerging Teams Asia Cup and the 2020 Interport T20I Series against Malaysia.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer.

answer: Aftab Hussain is a Hong Kong cricketer who was named in Hong Kong's squad for the 2019 ACC Emerging Teams Asia Cup in Bangladesh.


text:
Bishop STEPAN SUS (; born 7 October 1981) is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019.

Life

[Fr. Stepan Sus is giving a press conference in the funds of the Sts Peter and Paul Garrison Church in Lviv in 2013] Bishop Sus was born in family of Yaroslav and Oksana (née Bodnar) Sus in Lviv, but grew up in the neighbouring village Chyshky in Pustomyty Raion. After graduation of the school education in Chyshky and the historical-philosophical lyceum run by the Order of Saint Basil the Great in Buchach, he joined the Theological Seminary in Lviv, simultaneously studying in the Ukrainian Catholic University (1999–2006).[1] After graduation he was ordained as priest on June 30, 2006.[2]

He continued his study in the University of Lviv with magister in the philosophy degree and in the Catholic University of Lublin with magister in the pastoral theology degree. During 2006–2011 he worked as a military chaplain in Lviv and from 2011 until his bishop's appointment in 2019 was parish priest in the Saints Peter and Paul Garrison Church in Lviv.[3]

On November 15, 2019, he was confirmed by Pope Francis as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia, Ukraine and Titular Bishop of Zygris. He was consecrated as bishop by Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk and other hierarchs of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in the Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ in Kyiv on 12 January 2020.[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

title: Stepan Sus

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Bishop Stepan Sus?

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch.

text: "Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch" - is incomplete. Add missing details: "as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019"

refinement: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019.

answer: Bishop Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch, and he was confirmed as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia on November 15, 2019.

text: Add: "as Titular Bishop of Zygris" after "heirarch"

refinement: Bishop Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch as Titular Bishop of Zygris and was confirmed as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia on November 15, 2019.

answer: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch.

text: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch - is incomplete. Add missing details: "as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019"

refinement: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019.

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch who was confirmed as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia on November 15, 2019.

answer: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch.

text: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch - is incomplete. Add missing details: "as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019"

refinement: He is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia since 15 November 2019.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When was consecrated as bishop?

answer: On January 12, 2020.

answer: 12 January 2020

answer: January 12, 2020.

answer: On January 12, 2020.

answer: He was consecrated as bishop on January 12, 2020.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where did he attend seminary?

answer: He attended the Theological Seminary in Lviv.

answer: Lviv

answer: He attended the Theological Seminary in Lviv.

answer: He attended the Theological Seminary in Lviv.

answer: He attended the Theological Seminary in Lviv while simultaneously studying in the Ukrainian Catholic University.

text: "while simultaneously studying in the Ukrainian Catholic University." - unnecessary information that can be deleted.

refinement: He attended the Theological Seminary in Lviv.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where was his first bishop's appointment?

answer: His first appointment as bishop was as parish priest in the Saints Peter and Paul Garrison Church in Lviv.

text: "His first appointment as bishop was as parish priest in the Saints Peter and Paul Garrison Church in Lviv." - is incorrect. He was confirmed by Pope Francis as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia, Ukraine.

refinement: He was confirmed by Pope Francis as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia, Ukraine.

answer: Kyiv-Galicia, Ukraine.

text: "Kyiv-Galicia, Ukraine" - Complete the answer

refinement: Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia of Kyiv-Galicia, Ukraine.

answer: The first bishop's appointment was in the Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv-Galicia, Ukraine

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus has been appointed Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia, Ukraine.

answer: The Titular Bishop of Zygris was appointed as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia.

text: "The Titular Bishop of Zygris" - while Bishop Sus also holds this title, it is inappropriate to use it to start the sentence. Change to "Bishop Sus"

refinement: Bishop Sus was appointed as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch, appointed as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv-Galicia on November 15, 2019. He was consecrated on January 12, 2020.

text: Went over the 1-summary sentence requirement but the extra detail is important so no refinement is necessary.

refinement: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch, appointed as Titular Bishop of Zygris and Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv-Galicia on November 15, 2019. He was consecrated on January 12, 2020.

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus was named the Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv-Galicia on November 15, 2019. He was consecrated as bishop on January 12, 2020.

text: Went over the 1-summary sentence requirement but the extra detail is important so no refinement is necessary.

refinement: Bishop Stepan Sus was named the Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv-Galicia on November 15, 2019. He was consecrated as bishop on January 12, 2020.

answer: Bishop Stepan Sus is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic hierarch.

answer: Stepan Sus is a bishop in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church based in Kyiv.

answer: This article is about Stepan Sus, a bishop.

text: Add more details about Sus being a bishop.

refinement: This article is about Stepan Sus, who was confirmed by Pope Francis as Curial Bishop of Ukrainian Catholic Major Archeparchy of Kyiv–Galicia, Ukraine, and Titular Bishop of Zygris on November 15, 2019.


text:
The question of what to include in the case against President Trump is at the heart of a new book by Norm Eisen, a lawyer working with House Democrats in the impeachment effort.

[House Democrats initially drew up 10 articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump last year, according to a new book to be published next week.]

Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

-   July 22, 2020

WASHINGTON — The House Judiciary Committee staff initially drew up 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump last year, alleging a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors before the case was whittled down to his interactions with Ukraine, according to a book to be published next week.

The staff members, working for Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and the committee chairman, drafted a sweeping indictment of Mr. Trump charging him with, among other things, obstructing the Russia investigation, authorizing hush money for women to cover up sexual affairs, illegally diverting money to his border wall and profiting personally from his office.

In the end, House Democratic leaders privately rejected prosecuting the president for those other actions, according to the book, calculating that such an expansive set of accusations would cost them votes even among Democrats by seeming to go too far and thus potentially sink the whole impeachment effort. The internal debate came down to whether to include a third article claiming obstruction of the special counsel investigation but Speaker Nancy Pelosi vetoed it.

The decision to pursue a narrower case has long posed one of the most perplexing what-if counterfactuals of the entire impeachment and trial of Mr. Trump: What would have happened if House Democrats had thrown everything they had against the president rather than stick to just his campaign to pressure Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals? Would a broader case have been more compelling as some Democrats argued or be viewed as overreach as the leaders of the impeachment drive concluded?

The new book by Norman L. Eisen, a former White House official and ambassador who served as a lawyer for Mr. Nadler, is the first inside account to emerge from only the third impeachment of a president in American history. Nearly six months after the Senate acquitted Mr. Trump, Mr. Eisen in effect is trying to appeal the verdict to the higher court of public opinion as the election approaches and therefore titled his book, “A Case for the American People.”

Mr. Eisen offers tantalizing details from the committee’s own investigation of the president that did not make it into the final impeachment articles, including testimony reinforcing the suspicion that Mr. Trump had a heads-up from Roger J. Stone Jr. about a pending WikiLeaks release of Democratic emails stolen by Russian agents.

Mr. Eisen likewise elaborates on a previously reported idea to offer a $50 million penthouse to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia as part of a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. According to Mr. Eisen, Michael D. Cohen, the president’s former personal lawyer, revealed “that he had discussed it with Trump, who liked the idea and thought it was funny,” though it never materialized.

The question of what to include in the case against Mr. Trump is at the heart of Mr. Eisen’s book. As a former ethics counsel to President Barack Obama, Mr. Eisen describes joining the “resistance” to Mr. Trump early in 2017 when he was outraged at the new president’s refusal to cut ties with his company, meaning he would profit from foreign powers that did business with the Trump Organization. Mr. Eisen helped bring lawsuits accusing Mr. Trump of violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution before joining Mr. Nadler’s staff early in 2019 hoping to pursue impeachment.

Mr. Eisen discloses that the committee staff members drafted nine articles of impeachment against Mr. Trump in August 2019, even before the Ukraine episode came to light. They would have charged the president with colluding with Russia even though the special counsel Robert S. Mueller III reported that he did not find enough evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy, reasoning that Mr. Trump knowingly benefited from Moscow’s intervention in the 2016 election and that proving a statutory violation was not necessary for impeachment.

They also would have charged Mr. Trump with obstructing Mr. Mueller’s investigation, obstructing congressional investigations, engaging in the hush money scheme carried out by Mr. Cohen, dangling pardons to keep potential witnesses against him quiet, usurping the power of Congress both by spending money on his border wall and by imposing tariffs without authorization, targeting his adversaries with the power of his office and violating the emoluments clause.

The committee staff members, assuming that Mr. Trump would take other objectionable action, then added a placeholder 10th article titled, “The Next High Crime.” Just weeks later, the president’s Ukraine pressure campaign came to light and filled that slot.

As the investigation into the Ukraine matter proceeded, however, House Democratic leaders opted to focus largely on that after concluding that some Democrats in conservative districts would not support a kitchen-sink prosecution.

“I would have loved to have gotten all the articles,” Mr. Eisen said in an interview on Wednesday. “There would have been no benefit to doing it because there was no consensus for doing it.”

Barry Berke, another lawyer for Mr. Nadler, said on Wednesday that there was a serious debate about how broad the articles should be. “I will tell you, it was not an easy question,” he said. “It was more a question of what should be charged than what could be charged.”

By December, after hearings, Mr. Nadler ultimately presented Ms. Pelosi and other leaders with just three articles, one claiming abuse of power by enlisting a foreign power to tarnish Democrats, another claiming obstruction of the House investigation into the matter and a third claiming obstruction of Mr. Mueller’s inquiry.

Ms. Pelosi ruled out the Mueller article, deeming it a bridge too far. But Mr. Nadler fought for permission to insert language into the remaining two articles stating that the actions were part of a broader pattern, in effect referring to the other uncharged offenses.

“We had to simplify it, but we did reference all of it through the pattern language that we got into both of the articles,” Mr. Nadler said in an interview. “You couldn’t deal with 10 articles. Two were complex enough.”

Ashley Etienne, the speaker’s communications director, said Ms. Pelosi was sensitive to Democrats in conservative districts who were most at risk if the impeachment backfired politically. “It was the front-liners who had a big impact on the speaker,” she said. “Their point from the beginning was: Get rid of Mueller, keep it simple. The strongest case was the Ukraine case.”

By keeping the charges narrowly focused, House leaders won the support of nearly every Democrat for impeachment in December. But they won no Republicans in the House and only one in the Senate, Mitt Romney of Utah. Critics have said Democrats mishandled the matter by focusing too narrowly on Ukraine, which did not resonate enough to create a popular groundswell that would convince Republican senators to remove Mr. Trump from office.

In his own recently published book, John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser, confirmed that Mr. Trump directly linked his suspension of military aid for Ukraine to his demand for help tarnishing Democrats — testimony Democrats would have loved to have had. Mr. Bolton did not testify in the House because he said he wanted a judge to rule first on whether he should disobey a White House order to keep silent; he later offered to testify during the Senate trial but Republican senators blocked any witnesses.

Mr. Bolton, in his book, accused House Democrats of “impeachment malpractice” by limiting their inquiry to the Ukraine matter and moving too quickly for their own political reasons. He offered other examples of where the president in his view improperly subordinated foreign policy to his own political needs.

In his book, Mr. Eisen reports that House Democrats made a final attempt to get Mr. Bolton’s account before the senators during the last weekend of the trial by inviting him to submit a written affidavit. Mr. Bolton refused, Mr. Eisen writes, insisting he would appear only under Senate subpoena.

In the interview, Mr. Eisen said Mr. Bolton could have changed the dynamics of the trial had he agreed. “That could not only have blown open the door to Bolton testifying but other witnesses,” he said. “When he faults the House for not going broad, he’s faulting himself.”

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why did the House Judiciary Committee staff initially draw up 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump?

answer: The House Judiciary Committee staff drafted 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump due to their outrage at the president's refusal to cut ties with his company, meaning he would profit from foreign powers that did business with the Trump Organization. However, House Democratic leadership ultimately decided to focus on President Trump's interaction with Ukraine rather than the entire scope of his potential wrongdoings. This decision was made in order to appeal to a wider array of Democratic voters. This included limiting the charges to just three articles and excluding those related to possible obstruction of special counsel Robert S. Mueller's investigation.

answer: The staff members drew up a charge of the president's high crimes and misdemeanors in order to pursue the case.

answer: The House Judiciary Committee staff initially drafted 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump, alleging a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors. The committee staff eventually settled on three articles of impeachment after concluding that some Democrats in conservative districts would not support a broad prosecution, likely because it would not win enough votes.

answer: House Democrats initially drew up articles of impeachment against President Trump to charge him with a wide variety of high crimes and misdemeanors. The President was also seemingly committing potential crimes with hush money.

answer: They were alleging a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors. Some of the charges included obstructing the Russia investigation and authorizing hush money for women to cover up sexual affairs.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Mr.Eisen?

answer: Mr. Eisen is a former White House official, ambassador, and lawyer for Representative Jerrold Nadler.

answer: Mr. Eisen is a lawyer working with House Democrats in the impeachment effort.

answer: Norman L. Eisen is a former White House official and ambassador who was working with House Democrats in the impeachment effort. In his new book he gives an inside account of the impeachment process.

answer: Norman L. Eisen is a former White House official and ambassador who was a lawyer for Representative Jerrold Nadler and helped prepare an initial set of 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump.

answer: He is a former White House official and ambassador and his new book will be addressing what Democratic leaders initially drafted 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump last year. He was also a lawyer for Mr. Nadler, the House Judiciary Committee chair.

text: The model's sentence is not well structured here, '...and his new book will be addressing what Democratic leaders initially drafted 10 articles...' is confusing.

refinement: He is a former White House official, and ambassador and his new book will be addressing how the Democratic leaders initially drafted ten articles of impeachment against President Trump last year. He was also a lawyer for Mr. Nadler, the House Judiciary Committee chair.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe the "narrower case" and what makes it narrower.

answer: The narrower case pursued by House Democrats in their impeachment of President Trump consisted of three articles focused largely on the president's pressure campaign on Ukraine. House leaders opted for this narrower case after concluding that some Democrats in conservative districts would not support a more expansive approach. The narrower case was determined by deciding which alleged crimes would be most compelling and address what House Democrats felt would resonate with the public.

answer: House Democrats initially drafted 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump accusing him of a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors. However, before the case went to trial, House Democratic leaders decided to narrow the focus to just Trump's campaign to pressure Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals. This was done due to concern about lack of consensus among Democrats in conservative districts, and the fear that a more expansive case would be viewed as overreach. Thus, the narrower case pursued was based on abuse of power by enlisting a foreign power, obstruction of investigations, and obstruction of the Mueller inquiry.

text: The model does not make use of punctuations at the right angles in the answers here, '... against President Trump accusing him of a wide...' and here '...in conservative districts,...'

refinement: House Democrats initially drafted ten articles of impeachment against President Trump, accusing him of a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors. However, before the case went to trial, House Democratic leaders decided to narrow the focus to just Trump's campaign to pressure Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals. This was due to concern about the lack of consensus among Democrats in conservative districts and the fear that a more expansive case would be viewed as overreach. Thus, the narrower case pursued was based on abuse of power by enlisting a foreign power, obstructing investigations, and obstruction of the Mueller inquiry.

answer: The narrower case was whittled down to Trump's interactions with Ukraine, according to Eisen's book.

text: The model does not describe what the narrower case is about. It does not directly answer the question asked.

refinement: the narrower case was a decision by the committee to cut down on the initial ten articles they had against him and narrow them down to his crimes regarding his campaign interactions with Ukraine, his obstruction of mueller's inquiry and obstruction of investigations.

answer: Mr. Nadler did not pursue all the articles against President Trump, but he still included some of them. The book says that Mr. Trump "obstructed Mr. Mueller's investigation, engaged in the hush money scheme carried out by Mr. Cohen, abused power, obscured the rule of law, and targeted his adversaries with the power of his office".

text: '...engaged in the hush money scheme carried out...' the model omits a hyphen in between hush money.

refinement: Mr. Nadler did not pursue all the articles against President Trump, but he still included some of them. The book says that Mr. Trump "obstructed Mr. Mueller's investigation, engaged in the hush-money scheme carried out by Mr. Cohen, abused power, obscured the rule of law, and targeted his adversaries with the power of his office."

answer: The narrower case implied charging Trump with obstruction of the Senate investigation into the pressure campaign against Ukraine, thereby smuggling in the unadded charges for all the other crimes President Trump committed too.

text: The model's answer fails to mention the initial ten articles gathered by House Democrats to impeach Trump and how it became a narrower case when the committee decided to cut it down to three.

refinement: House Democrats initially drafted ten articles of impeachment against President Trump, accusing him of a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors. However, before the case went to trial, House Democratic leaders decided to narrow the focus to just Trump's campaign to pressure Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals. This was due to concern about the lack of consensus among Democrats in conservative districts and the fear that a more expansive case would be viewed as overreach. Thus, the narrower case pursued was based on abuse of power by enlisting a foreign power, obstruction of investigations, and obstruction of the Mueller inquiry.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What did Michael D. Cohen reveal, according to Eisen?

answer: Michael D. Cohen, the president's former personal lawyer, revealed that he had discussed a penthouse for President Putin in Moscow with the president, who thought it was funny and liked the idea.

answer: According to Eisen, Michael D. Cohen revealed that he had discussed with Trump the idea of offering a $50 million penthouse to Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in exchange for building a Trump Tower in Moscow.

answer: He revealed that President Trump liked the idea of offering a $50 million penthouse to President Putin of Russia as part of a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Trump found the idea funny.

answer: According to Eisen, Cohen revealed that he had discussed a proposed penthouse for Vladimir V. Putin in Moscow as part of a potential Trump project with Trump, who thought the idea was funny.

answer: That he discussed a penthouse for Mr. Putin with Trump, who thought it was a funny idea.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What countries are mentioned in this document?

answer: The countries mentioned in this document include the United States of America, Russia, Ukraine, and China.

text: China is not mentioned in the article.

refinement: The countries mentioned in this document include the United States of America, Russia, and Ukraine.

answer: Ukraine, Russia, US

answer: Russia and Ukraine.

text: The model omits the U.S as part of the countries mentioned since the article centers entirely on what occurred in the country during President Trump's impeachment.

answer: Russia, Ukraine, and America

answer: Ukraine and Russia.

text: The US was omitted.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How did Trump obstruct Mueller's investigation?

answer: That information can't be found in the document.

answer: The article that would have charged Trump with obstructing Mueller's investigation alleges that Trump endeavored to hinder or impede the special counsel's investigation, specifically by firing former FBI director James Comey and directing White House aides to lie to investigators, among other actions.

text: The model outsourced its answer.

refinement: The article that would have charged Trump with obstructing Mueller's investigation alleges that Trump endeavored to hinder or impede the special counsel's investigation, specifically by firing former FBI director James Comey and directing White House aides to lie to investigators, among other actions.

answer: This is stated in the Senate trial.

text: It is not stated in the article. How does the model know this?

refinement: That information cannot be found in the article.

answer: The Committee staff members drafted nine articles of impeachment against Trump including allegations that he obstructed Mueller's investigation. In the end, House Democrats decided to focus their impeachment efforts on Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine.

text: The model's answer does not directly answer the question. It's referring to the Trump impeachment process.

answer: Trump gave his former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, $50 million penthouse to build the Trump Tower in Moscow.

text: The model's answer is inconsistent with the question asked.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Former White House Ethics Counsel Norman L. Eisen details the decision made by House Democrats to pursue a narrower case against President Donald Trump, rather than including more allegations of high crimes and misdemeanors. House Democrats ultimately focused on Trump's interactions with Ukraine, rather than a broader case, reasoning that some Democrats in conservative districts would not support a kitchen-sink prosecution. Despite the narrower case, House Democrats won no Republicans in the Senate and only one in the House. Critics argue that Democrats mishandled the matter by focusing too narrowly on Ukraine.

text: The summary is over two sentences long, and the model uses inappropriate punctuation marks here, '...House Democrats ultimately focused on Trump's interactions with Ukraine, rather than...'

refinement: Former White House Ethics Counsel Norman L. Eisen details the decision made by House Democrats to pursue a narrower case against President Donald Trump, rather than including more allegations of high crimes and misdemeanors. House Democrats ultimately focused on Trump's interactions with Ukraine rather than a broader case, reasoning that some Democrats in conservative districts would not support a kitchen-sink prosecution.

answer: Norm Eisen, who drafted the case for impeachment against President Trump, lists the raw account of the House Judiciary Committee rejecting to include more political objectives in the case as it could cost them the support of the Democrats. The Senate Democrats and House Democratic leaders thought that those would be too risky.

text: Why is the model shortening Norman Eisen's first name to 'Norm?'

refinement: Norman Eisen, who drafted the case for impeachment against President Trump, lists the raw account of the House Judiciary Committee rejecting to include more political objectives in the case as it could cost them the support of the Democrats. The Senate Democrats and House Democratic leaders thought that those would be too risky.

answer: This post reports about the House Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Congress approval to impeach Mr. Donald Trump in 2020. This was because the House democrat's thought President Trump was harming the country.

text: How was the president harming the country? The model does not detail the specifics as stated in the article.

refinement: This post reports about the House Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Congress's approval to impeach Mr. Donald Trump in 2020. This was because the House democrat's thought President Trump was harming the country through his actions by obstructing the Russia investigation, authorizing hush money for women to cover up sexual affairs, illegally diverting money to his border wall, and profiting personally from his office.

answer: At the time of the document, Norm Eisen, a lawyer working with the House Democrats in the effort to impeach President Trump, was releasing a book that gives an inside account of the impeachment effort. The document discusses some of the claims inside the book.

text:
The model shortens Norman Eisen's first name to 'Norm.'
'The document discusses some of the claims inside the book.' such as?

refinement: At the time of the document, Norman Eisen, a lawyer working with the House Democrats, released a book that gives an inside account of the impeachment effort against President Trump. The document discusses some of the claims inside the book, such as the decision made by House Democrats to pursue a narrower case against President Donald Trump, rather than including more allegations of high crimes and misdemeanors.

answer: Essentially, House Democrats initially drafted 10 articles of impeachment against President Trump before narrowing their focus to his pressure on Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals. They ended up choosing to focus on just that one article in order to reach bipartisan consensus, but some Democrats regret that decision now, as the case was weaker and didn't resonate with the public.

text: The model's sentence structure is flawed and slightly wordy here, 'Essentially...,' '...in order to...' and here, '...They ended up choosing...'

refinement: House Democrats initially drafted ten articles of impeachment against President Trump before narrowing their focus to his pressure on Ukraine to incriminate his Democratic rivals. They decided to focus on just that one article to reach bipartisan consensus, but some Democrats regret that decision now, as the case was weaker and didn't resonate with the public.


text:
There has never been a sharp distinction between the public and private faces of DONALD TRUMP, who described Atlanta as “crime-infested” online and called African countries “shitholes” behind closed doors. Both sides are about the same, when he is away from the teleprompter and going off script. There is only so much filter that can be removed when there’s hardly any filter to start with. Still, it was somewhat shocking to see Trump talking openly Thursday about something he has so far kept private: imposing the death penalty for people caught dealing drugs. “Some countries have a very, very tough penalty—the ultimate penalty,” Trump said wistfully at a White House summit on the opioid crisis. “And, by the way, they have much less of a problem.”

We’ve seen this one coming: In April, Trump called President RODRIGO DUTERTE to praise his bloody crackdown on drugs in the Philippines, which has reportedly killed as many as 12,000 people. “I just wanted to congratulate you because I am hearing of the unbelievable job on the drug problem,” he said, referring to Duterte’s extrajudicial, state-sanctioned murder program. “Many countries have the problem, we have a problem, but what a great job you are doing and I just wanted to call and tell you that.” The idea apparently stuck with Trump: Last week, Axios reported that Trump has continued privately raising the possibility of executing drug dealers, as Singapore does. “He says that a lot,” one source recalled. “He says, ‘When I ask the prime minister of Singapore do they have a drug problem [the prime minister replies,] ‘No. Death penalty.’”

Senior adviser KELLYANNE CONWAY essentially confirmed the report when she clarified that Trump was merely referring to bringing capital murder charges against high-volume dealers of drugs like fentanyl, which, she pointed out, “are so lethal in such small doses.” On Thursday, Trump brought the idea out into the open, suggesting that the United States adopt “the ultimate penalty” for drug dealers.

The president’s comments fit a pattern of authoritarian rhetoric, from calling Democrats “treasonous” for not applauding his State of the Union address to pressuring the Department of Justice to prosecute his political opponents. But they also suggest a looser, less controlled Trump as the president has grown increasingly frustrated with the shackles his chief of staff, JOHN KELLY, has imposed on him. The chains began to break last month, as Kelly’s authority was rocked by allegations of domestic abuse involving his second-in-command, ROB PORTER. The scandal created a domino effect in the White House that fueled tensions between Kelly and JARED KUSHNER over Kushner’s security clearance and was a factor in the resignation of HOPE HICKS, one of Trump’s closest confidants.

The silly season has, in turn, fed a bumper crop of crazy coming out of the Oval. Trump is reportedly considering firing National Security Adviser H.R. MCMASTER, whom he also resents, and on Thursday bucked the advice of his National Economic Adviser GARY COHN and announced tariffs on steel and aluminum, causing the stock markets to plunge. For months, Trump’s senior staff had slow-walked his enthusiasm for a trade war. This week, he decided he would act unilaterally. “Trade wars are good, and easy to win,” Trump tweeted Friday morning, as the Dow Jones dropped another 350 points. This is what it looks like when the president stops being nice and starts getting real.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize everything relating to the author's opinion of Donald Trump.

answer: The author describes Trump as having a public and private face, and that there is only so much filter that can be removed when there's hardly any filter to start with. The author also describes Trump as an authoritarian, and that he is growing increasingly frustrated with the shackles his chief of staff, John Kelly, has imposed on him.

text: The response includes extraneous information not useful for the task. Trump's frustrations are not the authors opinion.

refinement: The author describes Trump as having a public and private face, and that there is only so much filter that can be removed when there's hardly any filter to start with. The author also describes Trump as an authoritarian.

answer: The author points out the hypocrisy of Trump's claims to be tough on crime and drug dealers while also criticizing him for his public attitude towards minorities and political opponents. They call Trump's consideration of the death penalty for drug dealers authoritarian and conclude that his behavior is not to be taken seriously.

answer: The author describes Trump as having a public and private face, and that there is only so much filter that can be removed when there's hardly any filter to start with. The author also describes Trump as an authoritarian, and that he is growing increasingly frustrated with the shackles his chief of staff, John Kelly, has imposed on him. The author is critical of Trump's proposal to impose the death penalty for drug dealers.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the role of Donald Trump's staff in the article.

answer: Trump's staff has been trying to keep him in check and keep him from making rash decisions. His chief of staff, John Kelly, has been especially successful at this. However, this month, Kelly's authority was rocked by allegations of domestic abuse involving his second-in-command, Rob Porter. This caused tensions between Kelly and Jared Kushner over Kushner's security clearance. Hope Hicks, one of Trump's closest confidants, resigned.

answer: His chief of staff, John Kelly, has been imposing shackles on Trump. Kelly's authority was rocked by allegations of domestic abuse involving his second-in-command. The scandal caused a domino effect in the White House that fueled tensions between Kelly and Jared Kushner. This week, Trump decided to act unilaterally.

answer: His chief of staff, John Kelly, has been imposing shackles on Trump. Kelly's authority was rocked by allegations of domestic abuse involving his second-in-command. The scandal caused a domino effect in the White House that fueled tensions between Kelly and Jared Kushner. This week, Trump decided to act unilaterally. Trump is also considering firing McMaster.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about the presidential election?

answer: No answer

answer: No answer


text:
_STOREFRONT HITCHCOCK_ is a 1998 American concert film featuring Robyn Hitchcock and directed by Jonathan Demme. It was conceived as “a document not a documentary”,[1] and the performance was shot in New York City in December 1996, in an abandoned used clothing store on 14th street.[2] Over the course of the performance, simple props and set pieces are varied, such as a bare lightbulb and a tomato sculpture, and occasionally a passerby on the street glances in.[3]

Jonathan Demme met Hitchcock after Demme attended a live show, and offered to direct a live performance video for a song, which was then revised to be a full concert.[4] Demme was inspired to film in the storefront setting by a Hungarian theatre group, Squat Theatre, who operated in New York City in the 70s and 80s and typically performed in a storefront against a large plate glass window facing the street.[5]

Demme subsequently cast Hitchcock in small roles in two other films, _The Manchurian Candidate_ and _Rachel Getting Married_, and used one of his songs in _The Truth About Charlie_.[6]

Setlist

All songs composed by Robyn Hitchcock.

1.  “Devil's Radio”
2.  “1974”
3.  “Filthy Bird”
4.  “Let's Go Thundering”
5.  “I'm Only You”
6.  “Glass Hotel”
7.  “I Something You”
8.  “The Yip! Song”
9.  “I Am Not Me”
10. “You and Oblivion”
11. “Airscape”
12. “Freeze”
13. “Alright Yeah”
14. “No, I Don't Remember Guildford”

Personnel

-   Robyn Hitchcock - vocals, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, harmonica
-   Tim Keegan - guitar, vocals
-   Deni Bonet - violin

Release

The film premiered at the SXSW Film Festival on March 19, 1998.[7] It was funded by Orion Pictures just before it declared bankruptcy and was bought by MGM, and did not receive the hoped-for distribution or promotion in the United States.[8] In Hitchcock's words, “when MGM kind of unzipped their stomachs to see what they'd swallowed, they pulled out Orion, and they cut open Orion's stomach. And inside Orion's stomach was wriggling Storefront Hitchcock, a little kind of minuscule million-dollar project that MGM wasn't particularly interested in.”[9] In fact in its original US release it only played in one theater in New York City, Film Forum, for one week starting in November 18, 1998.[10]

The film was released on DVD in 2000 by MGM.

Reception

Dennis Harvey in _Variety_ said that Hitchcock's “rich, supple voice shines, and his seemingly impromptu between-song patter suggests a pleasing form of mild insanity” also saying that “the songs are the real attraction here, and they provide a good overview of a large personal catalog.”[11] Stephen Holden in The New York Times wrote that the film “captures the sensibility of this smart, quirky folk-rocker in the most appealing possible light”,[12] while Scott Tobias in The A.V. Club wrote that “Demme's relaxed, ego-free direction is a reminder that the quirky humanist behind Melvin And Howard and Married To The Mob hasn't lost his touch”, and “his clean, elegant compositions enhance the intimacy of the performance”.[13] However Douglas Wolk of the Village Voice described it as a “simple but nicely presented document of a middling Hitchcock solo performance”, complaining that “the set list dips generously into his lamest recent material”.[14]

Soundtrack

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

title: Storefront Hitchcock

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize everything relating to Jonathan Demme's filmography.

answer: Jonathan Demme met Robyn Hitchcock after the director attended a concert and offered to direct a film on Hitchcock. Later on, he would direct the concert film Storefront Hitchcock where Hitchcock performed. Demme subsequently cast Hitchcock in small roles in two other films and used one of his songs in The Truth About Charlie.

answer: Demme met Robyn Hitchcock after the director attended a concert and offered to direct a film on Hitchcock. He directed a live performance video. Hitchcock and Demme subsequently worked together on a few other projects.

answer: Jonathan Demme, the director of this movie, also directed two other film: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. His artistic talents have been used on a few more occasions because a song, Hoover Old Start, by Robyn Hitchcock was featured in the film The Truth About Charlie. He also cast Hitchcock in a small role (presumably as himself) in another film. Jonathan Demme had no direct involvement in his first two films or the song, but Hitchcock liked Demme's style and subsequently invited him to film his performance on the side of a concert.

text: The last sentence is incoherent

refinement: Jonathan Demme, the director of this movie, also directed two other film: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. His artistic talents have been used on a few more occasions because a song, Hoover Old Start, by Robyn Hitchcock was featured in the film The Truth About Charlie. He also cast Hitchcock in a small role (presumably as himself) in another film.

text: The song used in The Truth About Charlie isn't named

refinement: Jonathan Demme, the director of this movie, also directed two other film: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. His artistic talents have been used on a few more occasions because a song by Robyn Hitchcock was featured in the film The Truth About Charlie. He also cast Hitchcock in a small role (presumably as himself) in another film.

text: "films"

refinement: Jonathan Demme, the director of this movie, also directed two other films: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. His artistic talents have been used on a few more occasions because a song by Robyn Hitchcock was featured in the film The Truth About Charlie. He also cast Hitchcock in a small role (presumably as himself) in another film.

answer: Jonathan Demme first met Robyn Hitchcock after attending a live show that Robyn Hitchcock was performing in. Demme then offered to direct a live performance video for a song, which was then to become the full concert from Storefront Hitchcock. Hitchcock starred in Demme's two other films: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. Demme used one of Hitchcock's songs for The Truth about Charlie.

text: Hitchcock had small roles in the other films, and we can't conclude that those two were Demme's only other films

refinement: Jonathan Demme first met Robyn Hitchcock after attending a live show that Robyn Hitchcock was performing in. Demme then offered to direct a live performance video for a song, which was then to become the full concert from Storefront Hitchcock. Hitchcock had small roles in two of Demme's other films: The Manchurian Candidate and Rachel Getting Married. Demme used one of Hitchcock's songs for The Truth about Charlie.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize everything relating to the performance featured in the film.

answer: On set, simple props like lights and set pieces are arranged. After the song performance is over, passers-by on the street occasionally glance in. There are several other small performances by other actors during the film.

text: The passers-by glance in not necessarily after the performance

refinement: On set, simple props like lights and set pieces are arranged. Passers-by on the street occasionally glance in. There are several other small performances by other actors during the film.

text: Nothing is said about other performances

refinement: On set, simple props like lights and set pieces are arranged. Passers-by on the street occasionally glance in.

answer: It was conducted in an abandoned used clothing store with only the most minimal props and set pieces, such as a bare lightbulb and a tomato sculpture.

answer: On set, simple props like lights and set pieces are arranged. After the song performance is over, passers-by on the street occasionally glance in.

answer: The performance of Storefront Hitchcock features Robyn Hitchcock and features simple props and set pieces. It was shot in the abandoned used clothes store on 14th Street, New York City.

answer: The performance of Storefront Hitchcock features Robyn Hitchcock and features simple props and set pieces.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Hitchcock as a musician?

answer: Demme documented Hitchcock's minimalistic performance, shot inside a storefront. It features his songs, most notably "1974", "The Sky is Full of Space", "You and Oblivion", and "1974". The performances were praised. Hitchcock was also described as having a rich and supple voice, self-amusing between song patter, and being a smart and quirky folk-rocker in the most favorable light.

text: The list of songs is unnecessary and inaccurate

refinement: Demme documented Hitchcock's minimalistic performance, shot inside a storefront. The performances were praised. Hitchcock was also described as having a rich and supple voice, self-amusing between song patter, and being a smart and quirky folk-rocker in the most favorable light.

answer: Hitchcock released an album in 1996. He sustained a second, critical hit 18 years on. He describes himself as a quirky humanist.

text: Completely inaccurate response

text: Provide a response

refinement: Hitchcock's performance in the film was praised, with a reviewer saying his "rich, supple voice shines, and his seemingly impromptu between-song patter suggests a pleasing form of mild insanity" and that Hitchcock's songs are the real attraction of the film.

answer: Hitchcock released an album in 1996. He sustained a second, critical hit 18 years on. He describes himself as a quirky humanist. He says that all of his songs are his autobiographical story of surviving his childhood turmoil, noting that one song does not properly reflect the entirety of his experience.

answer: Hitchcock is a musician. He performs onstage.

answer: No answer

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Hitchcock's career during the 1980s?

answer: No answer

answer: Hitchcock's career in the 1980s is not discussed in this article.

answer: No answer

answer: No answer