text:
Maybe most surprising in the Justice Department’s subpoenas of phone records from The Associated Press was how wide the Obama administration cast its net: 20 phone lines, used by up to 100 reporters.

But fishing expeditions, it turns out, are how the Justice Department does a lot of its investigative work in the post-9/11 world, and despite President Obama’s vows to protect press freedom here and push for it abroad, journalists are getting caught in the administration’s dragnet.

“In the 30 years since the [Justice] Department issued guidelines governing its subpoena practice as it relates to phone records from journalists, none of us can remember an instance where such an overreaching dragnet for news gathering materials was deployed by the department, particularly without notice to the affected reporters or an opportunity to seek judicial review,” the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, which represents more than 40 major news organizations, wrote in a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

Expressing outrage over the heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department, Bruce Brown, the committee’s executive director, and Gregg Leslie, its legal defense director, said the Obama administration is redefining the country’s long-standing constitutional commitment to freedom of the press.

The Justice Department sought the AP’s phone records in an investigation into who leaked information that embarrassed the administration last year, exposing that it had been working to thwart a terrorist attack at a time when officials said they had no specific knowledge of any plots.

The AP isn’t the only press organization that has come under target.

On Monday news reports said the Justice Department seized phone records and emails sent to a private account of Fox News’ chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, in an investigation into a 2009 story about U.N. sanctions and North Korea’s nuclear program.

In court filings, the department even said Mr. Rosen may have aided and abetted in a crime by trying to pry the information, which was classified, from his source.

The Justice Department even tracked Mr. Rosen’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a 2010 affidavit for a search warrant, first reported by The Washington Post.

“We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter,” said Michael Clemente, Fox News’ executive vice president of news. “In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally defend his right to operate as a member of what up until now has always been a free press.”

The affidavit filed by FBI agent Reginald Reyes said there was “probable cause” to believe that Mr. Rosen, who was identified only as “the reporter,” has violated a provision in U.S. law prohibiting unauthorized disclosure of defense information. Mr. Reyes then labeled Mr. Rosen a possible “co-conspirator” in seeking access to two days’ worth of emails.

The government is prosecuting a State Department adviser Stephen Kim, a North Korea analyst, for revealing secrets to the news organization. He is awaiting trial. No charges have been filed against Mr. Rosen.

Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, quickly condemned the action taken to determine Mr. Rosen’s sources, and blamed the White House for creating a culture where it can occur.

“We must insist that federal agents not use legitimate investigations as an excuse to harass journalists they deem unfriendly to the president or the administration,” he said in a statement. “We shouldn’t even have to ask if our government would do such a thing, but unfortunately, as the unfolding IRS scandal shows, this White House has created a culture where we do.”

AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt said the government’s conduct has had a chilling effect on news-gathering, with sources unwilling to contact reporters for fear of legal exposure.

The White House press corps aggressively questioned White House spokesman Jay Carney on Monday about whether Mr. Obama believed Mr. Rosen may have committed a crime by publishing the story on North Korea.

One reporter asked Mr. Carney how the U.S. differs from other countries that monitor their media and quash press freedoms.

Mr. Carney said repeatedly that he could not comment on the “ongoing investigation.”

He said the president is a “strong defender of the First Amendment,” but he must balance that commitment against national security interests and is “insistent that we protect our secrets, that we protect classified information.”

“We take very seriously the leaks of classified information because leaks can endanger the lives of men and women in uniform and other Americans serving overseas for our country,” Mr. Carney said.

The Justice Department released a statement Monday arguing that “leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools.”

Federal guidelines require that a subpoena “should be narrowly drawn as possible, it should be directed at relevant information regarding a limited subject matter and should cover a reasonably limited time period.”

In the AP’s case, the Justice Department obtained records from 20 phone lines used by 100 reporters, including a line in the House of Representatives press gallery, in an attempt to find out who leaked details of a successful CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an airliner bomb plot on the one-year anniversary of the May 2, 2011, killing of Osama bin Laden.

The U.S. attorney’s office for the District of Columbia also defended its actions, arguing that before it approved the FBI’s search warrant, it had “exhausted all reasonable non-media alternatives for collecting this evidence.”

Mr. Leslie said the fishing expedition through reporters’ emails and phone records is the most expansive he has ever seen, although there were more limited instances of the Justice Department and other law enforcement agencies intruding into reporters’ private news gathering since the 1970s.

In fact, he said, there seems to be a 10-year cycle of the government treading on the First Amendment. In 1980, the Justice Department seized six months of phone records of a New York Times reporter in Atlanta following major leaks to the press on the Abscam investigation. The outrage over that action led to changes in attorney general guidelines on subpoenas to the press for testimony and evidence to cover telephone records.

In 1991, the Treasury Department showed up on the doorstep of a reporter demanding to know his sources after he published an article in Corporate Financier magazine citing non-public documents.

The investigation extended to include the telephone records of the Alicia Patterson Foundation, which awarded the reporter a fellowship for 1992.

In 2001, phone records for a different AP reporter covering an FBI investigation of senators was the focus of a secret subpoena.

“Every 10 years, [the Justice Department] has to learn the lesson, it seems,” Mr. Leslie said.

_• This article is based in part on wire service reports._

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

question: What does Bruce Brown express his outrage over?

answer: The Justice Department's subpoena of phone records from The Associated Press in an investigation into who leaked information that embarrassed the Obama administration.

answer: He is outraged over the heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department in issuing subpoenas of phone records from the Associated Press.

answer: The heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department.

answer: The Obama administration's actions in the AP phone records case.

text: "The Obama administration's actions in the AP phone records case." - it's more of "the heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department" than the Obama administration's actions per se. Needs a rewrite.

refinement: The heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department in handling the AP phone records case.

text: "AP" - add what "AP" stands for

refinement: The heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department in handling the Associated Press (AP) phone records case.

question: What does Michael Clemente claim?

answer: According to the passage, Michael Clemente, the executive vice president of news at Fox News, claims that the Obama administration is "redefining the country's long-standing constitutional commitment to freedom of the press."

text: "redefining the country's long-standing constitutional commitment to freedom of the press." - it wasn't Michael Clemente who said this, but Bruce Brown and Gregg Leslie from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Brown is the executive director, while Leslie is the legal defense director. Needs a complete rewrite.

refinement: Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter.

answer:
A. Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press.

B. Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press.

C. Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press.

D. Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press.

text: "Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press." - while this is part of the answer, the model presented an A - D list of the same answers.

refinement: Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press.

text: "Fox News will defend James Rosen's right to operate as a member of the press." - this is more of a statement than a claim. Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter.

refinement: Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter.

answer: Michael Clement, executive vice president of the news states that he's outraged that James Rosen, correspondent for Fox News, was named as a criminal co-conspirator in trying to pry classified information from his source. Clemente says that he was just doing his job.

text: "Michael Clement" - last name is missing an "e" (Clemente)

refinement: Michael Clemente, executive vice president of the news states that he's outraged that James Rosen, correspondent for Fox News, was named as a criminal co-conspirator in trying to pry classified information from his source. Clemente says that he was just doing his job.

text: "executive vice president of the news" -  doesn't mean anything without Fox News. Also, remove "the" before "news"

refinement: Michael Clemente, Fox News' executive vice president of news, states that he's outraged that James Rosen, correspondent for Fox News, was named as a criminal co-conspirator in trying to pry classified information from his source. Clemente says that he was just doing his job.

text: Add an "a" in "correspondent"

refinement: Michael Clemente, Fox News' executive vice president of news, states that he's outraged that James Rosen, a correspondent for Fox News, was named as a criminal co-conspirator in trying to pry classified information from his source. Clemente says that he was just doing his job.

text: "Michael Clemente, Fox News' executive vice president of news, states that he's outraged that James Rosen, a correspondent for Fox News, was named as a criminal co-conspirator in trying to pry classified information from his source. Clemente says that he was just doing his job." - this is more of a statement than a claim. Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter. Rewrite this summary.

refinement: Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter.

answer: He claims that the Justice Department is redefining the country's long-standing constitutional commitment to freedom of the press.

text: "He claims that the Justice Department is redefining the country's long-standing constitutional commitment to freedom of the press." - it wasn't Michael Clemente who said this, but Bruce Brown and Gregg Leslie from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Brown is the executive director, while Leslie is the legal defense director. Needs a complete rewrite.

refinement: Clemente's claim was the "downright chilling" fact that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter.

question: Who is Mr. Carney?

answer: Mr. Carney is the White House spokesman.

answer: Mr. Carney is the White House spokesman.

answer: Mr. Carney is the White House spokesman.

answer: Jay Carney is the White House press secretary.

text: "Jay Carney is the White House press secretary." - this statement is technically correct, but "press secretary" was not the term used in the passage and seems like it was pulled from an external source. Use the original designation for Mr. Carney.

refinement: Jay Carney is the White House spokesman.

question: What does the Justice Department cite to justify its subpoenas of phone records from the Associated Press?

answer: The Justice Department claims that the subpoenas are necessary to protect national security, as leaks of classified information can endanger lives.

answer: The Justice Department cites national security interests and the need to protect classified information.

answer: The Department says that "leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools.”

answer: The Justice Department cites national security interests and the need to protect classified information.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: The Obama administration has been accused of overreaching in its investigations into leaks, including targeting journalists' phone records and emails. This has led to accusations of chilling press freedoms and comparisons to countries that suppress media.

text: "investigations into leaks" - has to be more definitive. Add "involving classified information"

refinement: The Obama administration has been accused of overreaching in its investigations into leaks involving classified information, including targeting journalists' phone records and emails. This has led to accusations of chilling press freedoms and comparisons to countries that suppress media.

text: "This has led to accusations of chilling press freedoms" - the word "chilling" is out of place here. Rephrase the sentence to add "heavy-handed tactics that target"

refinement: The Obama administration has been accused of overreaching in its investigations into leaks involving classified information, including targeting journalists' phone records and emails. This has led to accusations of chilling, heavy-handed tactics that target press freedoms and comparisons to countries that suppress media.

text: Add one more sentence to meet the 3-sentence summary requirement.

refinement: The Obama administration has been accused of overreaching in its investigations into leaks involving classified information, including targeting journalists' phone records and emails. This has led to accusations of chilling, heavy-handed tactics that target press freedoms and comparisons to countries that suppress media. The White House defended the investigations, citing leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to national security and endanger the lives of men and women in uniform, as well as Americans serving overseas.

answer: The Justice Department, under President Obama, subpoenaed the phone records from the Associated Press in an attempt to find out who leaked details of a successful CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an airliner bomb plot. Some argue the subpoenas are heavy-handed. The article covers both sides of the arguement.

text: "under President Obama" - replace with "under the Obama administration"

refinement: The Justice Department, under the Obama administration, subpoenaed the phone records from the Associated Press in an attempt to find out who leaked details of a successful CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an airliner bomb plot. Some argue the subpoenas are heavy-handed. The article covers both sides of the arguement.

text: "arguement" - fix the spelling

refinement: The Justice Department, under the Obama administration, subpoenaed the phone records from the Associated Press in an attempt to find out who leaked details of a successful CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an airliner bomb plot. Some argue the subpoenas are heavy-handed. The article covers both sides of the argument.

text: "Some argue the subpoenas are heavy-handed. The article covers both sides of the argument." - there is enough information available to point out the two parties in this argument. Rewrite to include the press and the White House.

refinement: The Justice Department, under the Obama administration, subpoenaed the phone records from the Associated Press in an attempt to find out who leaked details of a successful CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an airliner bomb plot. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press argues the subpoenas are heavy-handed. The White House, meanwhile, defended the investigations, citing leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to national security and endanger the lives of men and women in uniform, as well as Americans serving overseas.

answer: The Obama administration has been accused of violating the First Amendment rights of journalists by subpoenaing their phone records. The administration has defended its actions by saying that it is necessary to protect classified information.

text: Missing one sentence to meet the 3-sentence requirement.

refinement: The Obama administration has been accused of violating the First Amendment rights of journalists by subpoenaing their phone records. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press wrote a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. expressing outrage over the heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department. The administration has defended its actions by saying that it is necessary to protect classified information.

answer: The Justice Department subpoenaed phone records from The Associated Press in an investigation into who leaked information that embarrassed the administration. The Justice Department is also investigating Fox News' chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, for a 2009 story about U.N. sanctions and North Korea's nuclear program. The Justice Department is also investigating a State Department adviser, Stephen Kim, for revealing secrets to the news organization.

text: "The Justice Department is also investigating Fox News' chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, for a 2009 story about U.N. sanctions and North Korea's nuclear program. The Justice Department is also investigating a State Department adviser, Stephen Kim, for revealing secrets to the news organization." - this investigation is one and the same. Rewrite to merge the two.

refinement: The Justice Department subpoenaed phone records from The Associated Press in an investigation into who leaked information that embarrassed the administration. The Department is also investigating Fox News' chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, for a 2009 story about U.N. sanctions and North Korea's nuclear program that involved State Department adviser, Stephen Kim, who was accused of revealing secrets to the news organization.

text: Add a sentence to meet the 3-sentence requirement.

refinement: The Justice Department subpoenaed phone records from The Associated Press in an investigation into who leaked information that embarrassed the administration. The Department is also investigating Fox News' chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, for a 2009 story about U.N. sanctions and North Korea's nuclear program that involved State Department adviser, Stephen Kim, who was accused of revealing secrets to the news organization. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press wrote a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. expressing outrage over the heavy-handed tactics of the Justice Department.


split: train

text:
ROBERT VICOT (born 29 October 1931) is a French former professional football defender.[1] He played for Ivry sur Seine, Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville, Toulon and SO Le Lavandou.

Vicot coached SO Le Lavandou, Châteauroux, Paris SG, Rouen, Paris FC, Gabon and Béziers.[2]

[1] http://www.psg.fr/fr/Club/6020001/Entraineurs

[2] France - Trainers of First and Second Division Clubs

title: Robert Vicot

question: How many teams did Robert Vicot coach?

answer: Robert Vicot coached six teams.

text: The answer is incorrect

answer: Vicot coached 7 different teams.

answer: According to the passage, Robert Vicot coached SO Le Lavandou, Châteauroux, Paris SG, Rouen, Paris FC, and Gabon. Therefore, he coached five teams.

text: The answer is incorrect

answer: Robert Vicot coached two teams: SO Le Lavandou and Rouen.

text: The answer is incorrect

question: List the teams Robert Vicot played for?

answer: Ivry sur Seine, Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville, Toulon, and SO Le Lavandou.

answer: Ivry sur Seine, Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville, Toulon, SO Le Lavandou

answer: Ivry sur Seine, Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville, Toulon, and SO Le Lavandou.

answer:
1. Ivry sur Seine
2. Bazar de l'Hotel de Ville
3. Toulon
4. SO Le Lavandou

question: Which position did Robert Vicot play?

answer: He was a defender.

text: A little more information perhaps

answer: Defender.

text: A little more information

answer: Defender

text: More info

answer: According to the passage, Robert Vicot was a professional football defender.

question: Which divisions did Robert Vicot coach?

answer: He coached first and second division clubs.

answer: According to the passage, Robert Vicot coached professional football teams in the First and Second Divisions.

text: too wordy

refinement: Robert Vicot coached professional football teams in the First and Second Divisions.

answer: He coached in the first and second division.

text: Add clubs

refinement: He coached first and second division clubs.

answer: Robert Vicot coached in the first and second divisions.

text: Add clubs

refinement: Robert Vicot coached first and second division clubs.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: Robert Vicot is a French former professional football defender.

text: Too little info

refinement: Robert Vicot is a French former professional football defender who played for seven teams and coached first and second division clubs.

answer: Robert Vicot is a former professional football defender who played for Ivry sur Seine, Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville, Toulon and SO Le Lavandou. He coached SO Le Lavandou, Châteauroux, Paris SG, Rouen, Paris FC, Gabon and Béziers.

text: Too much information and more than one sentence

refinement: Robert Vicot is a former professional football defender who played for seven teams and coached first and second division clubs.

answer: Robert Vicot was a French professional football defender who played for several clubs, as well as coaching several teams.

text: Can add more information without using more words

refinement: Robert Vicot was a French professional football defender who played for seven clubs, and coached first and second division teams

answer: Robert Vicot is a French former professional defender and coach.

text: In what sport

refinement: Robert Vicot is a French former professional football defender and coach.


text:
Thirty-one years, one day, twenty hours and forty minutes my husband and I have been married. Not starting from when we exchanged ceremonious “I Do’s” at the altar on a heady summer day in 1980; no, starting from midnight that night, sipping cheap white wine in a cheap beige dress, the first day of my new life, the beginning of three long decades that would result in me waiting in the cold outside our favourite restaurant, a day after our anniversary, ten minutes late for the reservation.

The sun was still lingering around the clouds on the horizon. It was the latest I had seen it all summer; especially in London. Not a single car passed and only the occasional pedestrian stepped on the other side of the street, but I still didn’t notice Joseph until he was standing by my side. It was something you got used to, depending on your relationship with him of course. I stubbed my cigarette into the ground and turned to him, staring with quiet but clear indignation. From the look of Joe you wouldn’t place him in his profession, let alone think he was one of the best. He was skinny, but not tall, content to wearing pullover hoodies and expensive trainers. Hardly appropriate wear. Apart from his wrinkled face and white hair, you’d think him juvenile if his stern eyes didn’t demand respect. He spoke with a deep rumble, betraying his age with a rasping echo, making everything sound intensely morbid. It was depressing for a moment that this man was almost ten years younger than me.

“Your husband’s debts have been settled, Mrs McMahon.” It was a cold way to tell me Felix had just been murdered, even for him. “Perhaps we should go inside.”

“You’re late, our table’s probably gone by now.”

“My apologies, Mrs McMahon.”

“*Miss*.”

title: Something I wrote a few years ago and just tidied. Feedback appreciated!

question: Who is Felix?

text: There is no answer.

answer: He seems to be the narrator's husband.

text: It is clear he is the narrator's husband.

answer: Felix is the husband of the main character. He has just been murdered, and the main character is informed of this by her debt collector, Joseph.

text: '“Your husband’s debts have been settled, Mrs McMahon.” It was a cold way to tell me Felix had just been murdered, even for him.' support the answer.

answer: It is implied that Felix is the narrator's husband.

text: It's clear that Felix is the narrator's husband.

refinement: It is implied that Felix is the narrator's husband.

question: Why doesn't Joseph's attire fit his profession?

answer: Since he brings news of Felix's death, his profession seems to be a dark one. Wearing hoodies and trainers doesn't convey an "agent of darkness" look.

text: 'From the look of Joe you wouldn’t place him in his profession, let alone think he was one of the best. He was skinny, but not tall, content to wearing pullover hoodies and expensive trainers. Hardly appropriate wear. Apart from his wrinkled face and white hair, you’d think him juvenile if his stern eyes didn’t demand respect' supports the answer.

text: There is no answer.

refinement: Joseph is a hitman, and his appearance does not fit the stereotypical image of a hitman.

answer: Joseph is a hitman, and his appearance does not fit the stereotypical image of a hitman. He is not tall or muscular, and he prefers to wear casual clothing like hoodies and trainers. This makes him seem more like a juvenile than a professional killer.

text: 'From the look of Joe you wouldn’t place him in his profession, let alone think he was one of the best. He was skinny, but not tall, content to wearing pullover hoodies and expensive trainers. Hardly appropriate wear. Apart from his wrinkled face and white hair, you’d think him juvenile if his stern eyes didn’t demand respect' supports the answer.

answer: He wears pullover hoodies and expensive trainers.

text: It could be more specific.

refinement: He wears pullover hoodies and expensive trainers. Joseph is a hitman, and his appearance does not fit the stereotypical image of a hitman.

question: Why isn't the narrator more upset at the death of Felix, who seems to be her husband?

answer: It's not clear if Felix is her husband.

text: Incorrect.

answer: The narrator seems to be more upset about the fact that her husband was late for their dinner reservation than the fact that he has been murdered. She seems to be more concerned with the fact that they may have lost their table than the fact that her husband has died. This could be because she has been used to dealing with her husband's criminal activities and is not surprised by his death. Alternatively, it could be because she does not have a particularly close relationship with her husband and is not particularly upset by his death.

text: 'The narrator seems to be more upset about the fact that her husband was late for their dinner reservation than the fact that he has been murdered. She seems to be more concerned with the fact that they may have lost their table than the fact that her husband has died.' is incorrect.

refinement: This could be because she has been used to dealing with her husband's criminal activities and is not surprised by his death. Alternatively, it could be because she does not have a particularly close relationship with her husband and is not particularly upset by his death.

text: It is not implied that her husband was a criminal.

refinement: It could be because she does not have a particularly close relationship with her husband and is not particularly upset by his death.  Alternatively, she may be expecting the news.

text: There is no answer.

refinement: It is not stated. Maybe she was expecting the news.

answer: It's not explained in the story. There's no indication that they had a problematic marriage either.

text: It is implied that she might be expecting the news.

refinement: It's not explained in the story. There's no indication that they had a problematic marriage either.

question: Who is the reservation for?

answer: The reservation is for Mrs. McMahon and her husband.

text: Not for her husband, but for Joseph.

refinement: The reservation is for Mrs. McMahon and Joseph.

answer: It seems to be for the narrator and Joseph.

answer: The reservation is for Mrs. McMahon.

text: It is omitted it is for Joseph as well.

text: There is no answer.

refinement: The reservation is for Mrs. McMahon and Joseph.

question: Write a ~5 sentence summary.

answer: The passage is about a woman who is waiting for her husband to arrive at a restaurant. The woman is angry because her husband is late and she is worried that their table will be gone. The woman's husband arrives and tells her that her husband's debts have been settled.

text: Completely incorrect.

refinement: Starting from the first day of their marriage, the narrator and her husband were married for a touch over three decades. A day after their anniversary, she waits in front of their favorite restaurant. Joseph appears, wearing a hoodie and trainers; his dark profession is only betrayed by his eyes - not his seemingly juvenile clothes. "Your husband's debts have been settled," he says coldly. He addresses her as "Mrs.", to which she only replies, "Miss."

answer: Starting from the first day of their marriage, the narrator and her husband were married for a touch over three decades. A day after their anniversary, she waits in front of their favorite restaurant. Joseph appears, wearing a hoodie and trainers; his dark profession is only betrayed by his eyes - not his seemingly juvenile clothes. "Your husband's debts have been settled," he says coldly. He addresses her as "Mrs.", to which she only replies, "Miss."

answer: The narrator is waiting outside a restaurant for her husband, Joseph, to arrive. She is smoking a cigarette when he arrives. He tells her that her husband, Felix, has been murdered. They go inside the restaurant.

text: Completely incorrect.

refinement: Starting from the first day of their marriage, the narrator and her husband were married for a touch over three decades. A day after their anniversary, she waits in front of their favorite restaurant. Joseph appears, wearing a hoodie and trainers; his dark profession is only betrayed by his eyes - not his seemingly juvenile clothes. "Your husband's debts have been settled," he says coldly. He addresses her as "Mrs.", to which she only replies, "Miss."

answer: The protagonist is reflecting on her marriage, which has lasted 31 years. In the opening scene, she is informed that her husband's debts have been settled, and that he has been murdered.

text: She is informed that her husband's debts have been settled not in the opening scene but at the end.

refinement: The protagonist is reflecting on her marriage, which has lasted 31 years. She is informed that her husband's debts have been settled, and that he has been murdered.

text: It is omitted that she is not surprised by the news.

refinement: The protagonist is reflecting on her marriage, which has lasted 31 years. She is informed that her husband's debts have been settled, and that he has been murdered. It seems that she was expecting the news.

text: An unnecessary comma.

refinement: The protagonist is reflecting on her marriage, which has lasted 31 years. She is informed that her husband's debts have been settled and that he has been murdered. It seems that she was expecting the news.


text:
SAN LORENZO DISTRICT () is a district (_distrito_) of Chiriquí Province in Panama. The population according to the 2000 census was 6,498.[1] The district covers a total area of 738 km². The capital lies at the city of Horconcitos.[2]

Administrative divisions

San Lorenzo District is divided administratively into the following _corregimientos_:

-   Horconcitos (capital)
-   Boca Chica
-   Boca del Monte
-   San Juan
-   San Lorenzo

[1]

[2]

title: San Lorenzo District, Panama

question: Where is the San Lorenzo District?

answer: In Panama

answer: The San Lorenzo district is in Chiriqui Province in Panama.

answer: San Lorenzo District is in Panama.

question: How large is the district?

answer: The district is 738 km².

answer: 738 km²

answer: The district covers a total area of 738 KM.

text: Square kilometers

refinement: The district covers a total area of 738 square KM.

question: What is the population of the San Lorenzo District?

text: Provide a response

answer: The population, as of the 2000 census, was 6498.

answer: The population based on the 2000 Census for the San Lorenzo District is 6,498.

question: Are there any tourist destinations in the San Lorenzo District?

answer: Not answered.

answer: No, there are no tourist destinations in the San Lorenzo District.

text: The input does not answer the question

answer: No this passage does not contain any relevant information about tourist destinations in the San Lorenzo District.

text: Remove the initial "No"

refinement: This passage does not contain any relevant information about tourist destinations in the San Lorenzo District.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province, Panama. It covers a total area of 738 km2 and has a population of 6,498.

answer: The San Lorenzo District in Chiriquí Province, Panama is 738 miles² of population 6498 as of the 2000 census. The city of Horconcitos is the capital of this district.

text: Fix the connectives in "Panama is 738 miles² of population 6498"

refinement: The San Lorenzo District in Chiriquí Province, Panama is 738 miles² large and has a population of 6498 as of the 2000 census. The city of Horconcitos is the capital of this district.

text: Units are square km, not square miles

refinement: The San Lorenzo District in Chiriquí Province, Panama is 738 km² large and has a population of 6498 as of the 2000 census. The city of Horconcitos is the capital of this district.

answer: The San Lorenzo District is in Chiriquí Province, Panama and has a population of 6,498. It covers an area of 738 km² and has the capital of Horconcitos.

text: Change the wording of "has the capital of"

refinement: The San Lorenzo District is in Chiriquí Province, Panama and has a population of 6,498. It covers an area of 738 km² and its capital is Horconcitos.

answer: The San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province in Panama. It covers a total area of 738 km², and its population according to the census was 6498.

text: Which census?

refinement: The San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province in Panama. It covers a total area of 738 km², and its population according to the 2000 census was 6498.

answer: The San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province in Panama. It has a population of 6498, and is 738 km² large.

answer: The San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province in Panama. It has a population of about 6,498.

text: Include the area size

refinement: The San Lorenzo District is a district of Chiriqui Province in Panama. It has a population of about 6,498 and covers 738 square kilometers.


text:
 Market Analysis

Once again, a major political event didn't roil markets.

Time and again in 2016, pundits warned major political events would cause an earthquake for markets. Brexit. Donald Trump winning the US election. And now Italy's Senate reform referendum, which failed Sunday, taking Prime Minister Matteo Renzi down with it. Yet each time, after the widely feared thing actually happened, stocks were fine. Sometimes within a couple days, as with Brexit, and sometimes within a couple minutes, as with Italy, giving investors another chance to learn a crucial lesson: Don't overrate political events.

Markets are efficient and very, very good at discounting widely discussed events before they happen. Such was the case with Italy's referendum. Unlike Brexit and the US election, referendum polls pretty soundly signaled the referendum's defeat weeks beforehand. Conversation has long since moved from, "Will it pass or fail?" to, "What happens after it fails?" Even the related "if" over whether Renzi would stay in power seemed mostly resolved before the vote. After flip-flopping on whether the vote was also a referendum on his leadership (first he said it was, then-after seeing David Cameron go down post-Brexit vote-walked it back), in the campaign's final days, Renzi made it pretty clear he'd go if he lost. Hence markets weren't shocked when, after 60% of voters rejected the ballot measure, Renzi announced his intent to mozie over to President Sergio Mattarella's office and hand in his papers.

Italian stocks dipped as much as -2.1% intraday Monday, but by day's end they'd clawed most of it back, and the benchmark FTSE MIB closed just -0.2% down on the day. Most everywhere else, markets were buoyant. The UK's FTSE 100, Germany's DAX and France's CAC 40 all topped 1% (in local currencies), enjoying pleasant mornings. The S&P 500 was up all day, finishing 0.6% higher.[i] Finance blogger (and CNBC pundit) Josh Brown-aka "The Reformed Broker"-sums the reaction up as "crisis fatigue. If everything is a crisis, then nothing is." Calling it "the boy who cried wolf" would be a bad analogy, so we won't do it, but you get the drift: When people repeatedly hear events are certain negatives for stocks, and reality proves the warnings wrong, at some point, people get wise and start brushing them off.[ii]

As for what comes next, Italy will get its eighth government since 2000 and 64th since Il Duce. No one knows who will lead yet, but we'll gain clarity in the coming days as Mattarella meets with party leaders and decides whether to call snap elections, instruct Renzi's Democratic Party (DP) to form a new administration or appoint a technocratic government. Of those options, the first seems least likely, considering Mattarella is a staunch europhile and the anti-establishment Five Star Movement (M5S) seems poised to do well in a snap vote. Most expect Italy to get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament. For now, though, Renzi will stay in power (at Mattarella's request) until Parliament approves the next budget.

In other words, Italy likely maintains the status quo: A gridlocked government that can't push through labor market or other long-delayed reforms, but can't do any harm either. It would also keep pro-euro leaders in power until 2018 at least, limiting populism's march. M5S may be polling neck and neck with the DP now, but a lot can change in a year and a half, especially if M5S-led local governments continue floundering. It's fair to point out that in Italy, "status quo" means economic and political basketcase, but again, markets are efficient. By most measures, Italy is in a far better place than in 2011 and 2012, when the eurozone crisis threatened to take it down. If global markets could handle Italy then-when Silvio Berlusconi was a going concern, the economy was shrinking and debt service costs were spiraling-they can handle Italy now. For all the hand-wringing, its economy is growing, and low interest rates have pulled down borrowing costs.

We think Italy's referendum is most compelling when viewed in concert with Austria's presidential revote, which also occurred Sunday, pitting the former leader of the Green Party Alexander Van der Bellen against the Freedom Party's Norbert Hofer. Both are technically populists, as the establishment candidates both fell in the first round earlier this year. But Van der Bellen is regarded as a pro-euro statesman, while the anti-EU Hofer would have been Europe's first democratically elected far-right head of state since the 1940s. In May, Van der Bellen narrowly won, but Hofer challenged, and the courts ruled there were irregularities and overturned the results. This time around, polls had Van der Bellen ahead 51% to 49%, but he won 53% to 47%-a stronger showing and rebuke to all those fears of a post-Brexit domino effect.

Remember this next year, as the Netherlands, France and Germany go to the polls with anti-euro populists polling well. Populism doesn't beget populism, and pro-euro parties are more resilient than they usually get credit for. French voters just said "non, merci" to former President Nicolas Sarkozy in his party's presidential primary, rejecting his populist turn in favor of free-market reformer FranÇois Fillon-a former Prime Minister who is about as "establishment" as it gets. Spain's pro-euro government just returned to power after two elections and 10 months of deadlock, sidelining the populist Podemos party. Angela Merkel is running for a fourth term in Germany and presently has no clear rival (though that could change as the other parties get more organized). Fears of populism splintering the eurozone are just another iteration of euro breakup fears, which markets have dealt with ad infinitum since 2010.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[i] Everything in this paragraph comes from FactSet, as of 12/5/2016.

[ii] You're probably wondering why it would be a bad analogy. Well, the boy who cried wolf was eventually right, and when no one listened to him, it got pretty ugly. We do realize the events that do wallop markets are the ones no one sees coming or everyone writes off, but in that scenario, you probably don't have a boy crying wolf. Unless you do. Anyway all analogies are bad analogies.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Italian politics?

answer: The article focuses on possible market impacts given Italy's Senate reform referendum which failed, taking Prime Minister Renzi down with it. Ultimately, effects were minor. Now, Italy will get its eighth government since 2000. No one knows who will lead yet, but they'll gain clarity in the coming days as Mattarella meets with party leaders and decides whether to call snap elections, instruct Renzi's Democratic Party to form a new administration, or appoint a technocratic government. The first option seems unlikely as Mattarella is a staunch europhile and the anti establishment Five Star Movement seems poised to do well in a snap vote. Most likely, Italy will get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament. Renzi will stay in power at least until Parliament approves the next budget. Italy will likely maintain the status quo: a gridlocked government that can't push through labor market or other long delayed reforms.

text: Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country. Include this portion of Italy's politics in the answer as well.

refinement: The article focuses on possible market impacts given Italy's Senate reform referendum which failed, taking Prime Minister Renzi down with it. Ultimately, effects were minor. Now, Italy will get its eighth government since 2000. No one knows who will lead yet, but they'll gain clarity in the coming days as Mattarella meets with party leaders and decides whether to call snap elections, instruct Renzi's Democratic Party to form a new administration, or appoint a technocratic government. The first option seems unlikely as Mattarella is a staunch europhile and the anti establishment Five Star Movement seems poised to do well in a snap vote. Most likely, Italy will get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament. Renzi will stay in power at least until Parliament approves the next budget. Italy will likely maintain the status quo: a gridlocked government that can't push through labor market or other long delayed reforms. Overall, Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country.

answer: What is predicted to happen next? The likelihood of a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament so Italy can stay in the EU.

text: The article discusses the impact on Italy's markets after its senate reform referendum failed, taking its Prime Minister Matteo Renzi along with it. Polls predicted the outcome of the referendum weeks before it took place, minimizing the impact on the markets. This is the main reason for the article, include it in the response.

refinement: The article discusses the impact on Italy's markets after its senate reform referendum failed, taking its Prime Minister Matteo Renzi along with it. Polls predicted the outcome of the referendum weeks before it took place, minimizing the impact on the markets. What is predicted to happen next? The likelihood of a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament so Italy can stay in the EU.

text: Include the other two options of what might happen next in the response as well: The president calling a snap vote, which might lead to the anti-establishment Five Star Movement M5S being elected, or Renzi's Democratic Party will be asked to form a new government, or the option already mentioned in the response, which is the most likely. Also include that the first option is undesirable because of the probable election of M5S.

refinement: The article discusses the impact on Italy's markets after its senate reform referendum failed, taking its Prime Minister Matteo Renzi along with it. Polls predicted the outcome of the referendum weeks before it took place, minimizing the impact on the markets. What is predicted to happen next? Three options are put forth in the article: Snap elections, Renzi's Democratic Party could be instructed to form a new government or appoint a technocratic government. The first seems unlikely because an anti-establishment would most probably be elected. The likelihood of a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament so Italy can stay in the EU.

text: Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country. Include this portion of Italy's politics in the answer as well.

refinement: The article discusses the impact on Italy's markets after its senate reform referendum failed, taking its Prime Minister Matteo Renzi along with it. Polls predicted the outcome of the referendum weeks before it took place, minimizing the impact on the markets. What is predicted to happen next? Three options are put forth in the article: Snap elections, Renzi's Democratic Party could be instructed to form a new government or appoint a technocratic government. The first seems unlikely because an anti-establishment would most probably be elected. The likelihood of a technocratic government with a narrow mandate to focus on electoral law reform that would limit the possibility of a hung parliament so Italy can stay in the EU. By all accounts, Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country.

answer: The article explains that the Italian Senate reform referendum failed and led to Prime Minister Matteo Renzi stepping down. Despite concern that this event could cause a major earthquake for markets, stocks were fine and there has been no major upheaval in Europe. Most people expect Italy to get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate and a focus on electoral law reform. There is still a possibility of populism, but most signs point to a status quo where the pro-euro parties remain in power.

text: Include the other two options of what might happen next in the response as well: The Italian president calling a snap vote, which might lead to the anti-establishment Five Star Movement M5S being elected, or Renzi's Democratic Party will be asked to form a new government, or the option already mentioned in the response, which is the most likely. Also include that the first option is undesirable because of the probable election of M5S, a populist party.

refinement: The article explains that the Italian Senate reform referendum failed and led to Prime Minister Matteo Renzi stepping down. Despite concern that this event could cause a major earthquake for markets, stocks were fine and there has been no major upheaval in Europe. Most people expect Italy to get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate and a focus on electoral law reform. There is still a possibility of populism when a snap election is called, but this is unlikely. Another option is for the Democratic Party to form a new government, because Renzi will stay in power until Parliament approves the next budget.

text: Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country. Include this portion of Italy's politics in the answer as well.

refinement: The article explains that the Italian Senate reform referendum failed and led to Prime Minister Matteo Renzi stepping down. Despite concern that this event could cause a major earthquake for markets, stocks were fine and there has been no major upheaval in Europe. Most people expect Italy to get a technocratic government with a narrow mandate and a focus on electoral law reform. There is still a possibility of populism when a snap election is called, but this is unlikely. Another option is for the Democratic Party to form a new government, because Renzi will stay in power until Parliament approves the next budget. It is clear that Italy is in a much better place than they were in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was a growing concern and Italy almost succumbed to the eurozone crisis.

answer: The article indicates that Italians have lost interest in the recent Senate reform referendum that failed, as it was largely predicted to do. Markets were largely unimpressed and unremarkable in their reaction to the news. Meanwhile, another populist candidate, Alexander Van der Bellen, won the Austrian presidential election, which further illustrates that populism is not having domino effects across Europe. Instead, pro-euro statesmen seems to be resilient in the face of such movements.

text: Remove the mention of Austrian politics, as well as the outlook of European politics. The question specifically refers to Italian politics.

refinement: The article indicates that Italians have lost interest in the recent Senate reform referendum that failed, as it was largely predicted to do. Markets were largely unimpressed and unremarkable in their reaction to the news.

text: Include that the fate of the prime minster, Matteo Renzi, was tied to the outcome of the senate reform referendum.

refinement: The article indicates that Italians have lost interest in the recent Senate reform referendum that failed and the fall of its prime minister, as it was largely predicted to do. Markets were largely unimpressed and unremarkable in their reaction to the news.

text: Add the three possible ways forward in the response as well as the likelihood of each way coming to fruition. The first option is to call snap elections, which is least likely because the populist part M5S is poised to win. The second option is for Renzi's Democratic Party to be instructed to form a new government, this is not likely however Renzi will stay in power until the budget is approved. The third, and most likely, option is that the president will form a technocratic government.

refinement: The article indicates that Italians have lost interest in the recent Senate reform referendum that failed and the fall of its prime minister, as it was largely predicted to do. Markets were largely unimpressed and unremarkable in their reaction to the news. There are three options for the next leader of Italy. The first is a snap election, unlikely due to the popular populist party, the current Democratic Party being instructed to form a new government, or the president establishing a technocratic government. The last is the most likely option, with Renzi staying in power until the budget is approved.

text: Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country. Include this portion of Italy's politics in the answer as well.

refinement: The article indicates that Italians have lost interest in the recent Senate reform referendum that failed and the fall of its prime minister, as it was largely predicted to do. Markets were largely unimpressed and unremarkable in their reaction to the news. There are three options for the next leader of Italy. The first is a snap election, unlikely due to the popular populist party, the current Democratic Party being instructed to form a new government, or the president establishing a technocratic government. The last is the most likely option, with Renzi staying in power until the budget is approved. All things considered, Italy is in a stronger position than it was in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi almost let Italy succumb to the eurozone crisis.

answer: Renzi announces his resignation as an anti-establishment wave sweeps Italy. The anti-establishment wave is supported by M5S, an anti-euro populist party. M5S is expected to do well in the snap vote, which would limit the possibility of a hung parliament.

text: If a snap vote is called following the resignation of Italy's Prime Minister, the anti-establishment and populist party M5S will probably win the election. However, this is not the likely course. Change the wording in the answer to remove the 'anti-establishment wave' and include the outcome of the senate reform referendum that was tied to Renzi's fate.

refinement: Renzi announces his resignation as the Italian Senate reform referendum failed. An option for a new government is a snap election where it is thought the anti-establishment and anti-euro M5S party will achieve majority. For this reason, it is unlikely that a snap election will be called.

text: Add the other two options for a new Italian government to the response as well as the likelihood of each and the immediate plans. The second option that will be considered is to instruct Renzi's Democratic Party to form a new government, this is not likely but Renzi will remain in power until the budget is approved in Parliament. The third option is for the president to form a technocratic government, this is the most likely way forward until the next election in 2018.

refinement: Renzi announces his resignation as the Italian Senate reform referendum failed. The first option for a new government is a snap election where it is thought the anti-establishment and anti-euro M5S party will achieve majority. For this reason, it is unlikely that a snap election will be called. The second option that will be considered is to instruct Renzi's Democratic Party to form a new government, this is not likely but Renzi will remain in power until the budget is approved in Parliament. The third option is for the president to form a technocratic government, this is the most likely way forward until the next election in 2018.

text: Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country. Include this portion of Italy's politics in the answer as well.

refinement: Renzi announces his resignation as the Italian Senate reform referendum failed. The first option for a new government is a snap election where it is thought the anti-establishment and anti-euro M5S party will achieve majority. For this reason, it is unlikely that a snap election will be called. The second option that will be considered is to instruct Renzi's Democratic Party to form a new government, this is not likely but Renzi will remain in power until the budget is approved in Parliament. The third option is for the president to form a technocratic government, this is the most likely way forward until the next election in 2018. Even with these events, Italy is in a much better place than in 2011 and 2012 when Berlusconi was the prime minister and a growing concern, and a eurozone crisis threatened to take down the country.


text:
*If only he could be friendly, fun, and fuckable all at the same time.*

She traces her fingers around the outline of his shadow, scared to let those fingers touch his physical form.  The afterglow having turned harsh and uninviting, she decides to shuffle off the bed and quickly begins to dress, suddenly self conscious.  The previously warm glow from the corner lamp now seems too bright and revealing.

The night before he had seemed so kind, offering up his jacket and holding the door for her.  She had never been one for chivalry; in fact, she didn’t really care if it was dead, as the prophets at the Daily Mail seemed to think.  It was the way that he so casually made her feel appreciated that really struck her.  Almost as if he wasn’t just trying to get in her pants.

She meanders to the door, hoping he asks her to stay and dreading it at the same time.  “Well, I guess I’ll see you ‘round,” he drawls, unsuccessfully hiding his unease.  She leaves with a mutter or two about calling him later and with that she is walking down the hallway, accompanied by a door slam filled with relief.

*Well, I guess we can chalk that one up to bad luck.*

It seems to have been happening more frequently as of late.  Expectations, it would appear, are a bit of a bitch.  Her routine of going out for a quiet drink or two, hoping to meet someone who would playfully flirt, take her number, and call her the next day, had become a routine of quickly falling for potential.  Most nights now ended with her on her back, or on her knees, or on top.  Not quite the ending she envisioned but not altogether unsatisfactory.

Now outside, she gathers her bearings and steps on an arriving bus.  Finding a free seat, she sits down and contemplates the odds of finding someone whom she found to be friendly, fun, and fuckable in a city as big as Toronto.

“Excuse me, is this seat taken?”

*Well, then.  I guess it’s high time to start narrowing down those odds.*

title: Friendly, fun, and fuckable

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the narrator?

answer: That information can't be found

text: The narrator is a woman.

answer: This information is not mentioned.

text: The narrator is a woman.

answer: The narrator is a woman.

answer: The narrator seems to be a woman.

answer: The narrator is a woman.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the narrator with?

answer: The narrator is alone.

text: A stranger.

answer: A stranger in her room/bed.

text: Not in her room

answer: Unclear, it seems as though he's had a one night stand with a man, and is leaving his house.

answer: A figurative "friend".

text: A stranger.

answer: The narrator is alone.

text: A stranger.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where is the narrator going?

answer: It is not certain where the narrator departs to.

answer: Unclear, but it is her routine to go out looking for a date.

answer: Unclear

answer: The narrator is getting on a bus in order to find someone who is friendly, fun and fuckable in Toronto.

answer: The narrator is going home.

text: The narrator is getting on a bus in order to find someone who is friendly, fun and fuckable in Toronto.

refinement: The narrator is getting on a bus in order to find someone who is friendly, fun and fuckable in Toronto.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the narrator contemplating?

answer: The narrator is contemplating the odds of finding someone who is friendly, fun, and fuckable.

answer: She is contemplating the odds of finding an ideal romantic and sexual partner in a city as big as Toronto.

answer: The odds of finding someone they found to be friendly, fun, and fuckable.

answer: Perhaps narrowing down their chances for finding a date in the big city like Toronto.

answer: The narrator is contemplating finding someone who can be friendly, fun, and fuckable all at once.

question: Write a ~4 sentence summary.

answer: The woman had hoped to find a flirt and instead had been disappointed by trying to connect with someone who was friendly, fun, and fuckable all at the same time. She decides to give the city another try but has her doubts. Much to her surprise, someone does show up and asks if the seat beside her is free. She entertains the possibility that she might finally find someone who is all three.

answer:
A woman has spent the night with a man whom she initially had expected to have a "friendly, fun, fucking" time with. He was kind, a gentleman, had let her try on his jacket, and was cute. But as the night progressed, she tried to make out with him, roll out the condoms, and offer to give him oral sex. All that mattered to her was that he treated her with respect and was not just trying to get in her pants.

Outside, the post-sex glow has faded and she's looking for a fun, casual partner. A man asks to share her seat on the bus. She can't tell if he's potential material, but the guy strikes up a conversation so she is game.

answer: The protagonist is in a stranger's bed after a night of sex. She regrets it morning so she dresses and leaves him. While on a bus later, a man tries to sit next to her. She can now rule out finding all three qualities with one person-friendly, fun, and fuckable.

answer: The narrator is scared to let her fingers touch potential new partners, scared of expectation. One man had appeared interesting at first but turned out to be less than friendly, fun, or fuckable. However, on the way to the bus a new man asks if he can share the seat, and she hopes that this might be the start of finding someone better.

answer: The narrator wakes up after a one night stand and gets dressed. She quickly darts out of the man's house and gets on the bus. She contemplates how likely it would be to find someone romantically and sexually suitable. While on the bus, someone asks her if the seat next to her is taken.


text:
Footsteps echo in the long stone corridor. Small chains can also be heard. The man is panting, running towards a wooden door with golden engravings. He rams in the door, forgetting about the doorknob. The door hits the Jester, who then falls to the ground and breaks his nose. In the middle of the room, is the leader. Without wasting an instant, he yells

“Sire! We are under attack!” Yells the Subreddit knight.
“What?” Screams the leader, standing up
“Yes sire! Castle Repost is breaching our walls! It won't be long now!”
“What are they after?”
“The same thing as always, they wish to break Castle AdviceAnimal's walls and reach the Front Page fortress!”
“This shouldn't be a problem, our Downvote cannons are always charged! Tell me what happened!”
“They managed to outnumber us. They silently shot down our defenses with their Upvote Cannons. From that point, they burned the front gate and slowly walked in.”
“Where are they now?” Asks the Leader
“We managed to arm our comment guns and slow them down, but soon they will overpower us.” The knight explained
“Did you try calling on an ally Castle? Like Castle Funny or Castle Aww?”
“We did, but they said they could not arrive for a few days. We sent messages to Castle Atheist and Circle-Jerk, we have no response yet, but I'm sure they will refuse.”
“What about the citizens?”

A cannon shot is heard, then a smashing sound. Screams flood the air, followed by another explosion and screams of glory.

“We tried to make them leave by the secret tunnels, but many citizens took to arms and jumped into the fight. Many died and are still dying. The ones that decided to escape found that most of the tunnels were blocked. We lost many.” Explains the Knight, a hint of sadness in his voice.
“How many men do we have left?”
“When I left, a few were still standing. A few of our men have been captured and enslaved. The Fortress was still untouched, but, as we heard, that has changed.”
“Then follow me, we shall gather what few we have and craft some plan that might turn the table.” Commands the King.

The King opens the door. A few cats run away from the room. The Jester stands up and runs to the corridor, where a cannonball smashes through and hits him. The Knight goes first, but turns left. The King follows him. They walk through the stone corridors and passageways, on their way seeing the Castle Nobles running awry. The Scumbag Brain is hitting a door, trying to get in, while the Scumbag Steve and Stacy are pushing people aside, running in circles. As the Knight and King finally arrive to the armory, they realize that it's completely empty.

“Where are they all?” Asks the King
“At the walls, fighting off the enemy. We were lucky not to encounter them.”
More screams are heard, this time closer to them. Again, the same victory cries are heard.

“We don't have any time left. The enemy is here, searching for me. We have to act now.”
“All the weapons we have left are here. A few pounds of black powder, some swords and dagger and two shields.” Counts the Knight, as he locks the door.

The King walks and sits in a corner. As he does this, the door blasts open in a cloud of fire, smoke and blood. The King screams as portions of his newest friend splatters his robes. As the smoke dies down, an orange arrow smashes into the wall next to his head.

“So, you managed to outlive all of your little guards? No matter, you will join them soon enough.” A voice chuckles.
“So you are the new general that managed to recruit all of these newbies? You are new yourself, but competent.” Tells the King.
“Why thank you, but don't think complements will save you. I am here on a mission.” Exclaims the General
“You are competent, but still inexperienced. Exactly like your army.”  Explains the King
“And why is that?” Asks the General
“Because you didn't think this through. The worst place to be when you attack a Fortress, especially when you confront someone, is the armory.” Slowly says the King
“Explain.” Demands the General
“Let me show you.” The King says

The General and his army intensely stares at the King, while he reaches into his back pocket with his left hand. He slowly pulls out a gun.

“Downvote gun, one of the most powerful ever built” Says the King.
“Don't even think about shooting me or yourself.” Confidently says the General.

The King lets out a little laugh. He slowly points the muzzle to his left. The entire audience looks left, over to a pile of swords and daggers. As fast as he can, the King takes a shield and shoots to his right, on a pile of black powder. As the audience looks right, they see a large flash of light, then another ball of fire, smoke and blood fill the room. Screams are heard, but no victory cries are heard this time. When the smoke falls, the King uncurls from behind the shield and stands up.

“Time to rebuild, again... Will these attacks ever end?” He sighs

As he walks out of the room, he looks at all the damage done to the Fortress and the Kingdom. A cat walks to him and starts cuddling.

- “I really need a bath.” He whispers.

title: The attack of the Repost

question: Who is the leader of Castle AdviceAnimal?

answer: The King.

answer: The King.

answer: The leader of Castle AdviceAnimal is the King.

text: Empty answer.

question: Who is leading Castle Repost?

answer: The leader of Castle Repost is the King.

text: This is incorrect--the leader appears to be the General.

refinement: The leader of Castle Repost is the General.

answer: The leader of Castle Repost is the King.

text: This is incorrect--the leader appears to be the General.

refinement: The leader of Castle Repost is the General.

answer: The leader of Castle Repost is the General.

answer: The General.

question: How will Castle AdviceAnimal defend themselves?

answer: Everyone follows the King while they craft a plan.

text: Doesn't mention that the king plans to use the Downvote gun.

refinement: Everyone follows the King while they craft a plan. The King plans to use the Downvote gun.

text: "Then follow me, we shall gather what few we have and craft some plan that might turn the table" is evidence that the King intends to craft a plan and instructs his people to follow him.

answer: The King will use his Downvote Gun to shoot the General and his army.

text:
"He slowly pulls out a gun.

“Downvote gun, one of the most powerful ever built” Says the King." is evidence that the King intends to use the Downvote gun against the General.

answer: They have Downvote cannons.

text: While the army does have Downvote cannons, the fact that the King still needs to come up with a plan after stating this suggests the Downvote cannons are not successful in warding off the enemy.

refinement: The Kin plans to use a Downvote gun against the General.

answer: Castle AdviceAnimal will likely use their Downvote cannons to slow down the enemy, and use their few remaining weapons to fight back. They will also likely try to use their secret tunnels to escape, but many of them will likely be blocked. In the end, they will likely have to rely on their wits and cunning to defend themselves.

text: Does not mention the Downvote gun.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal will likely use their Downvote cannons to slow down the enemy, and use their few remaining weapons to fight back. They will also likely try to use their secret tunnels to escape, but many of them will likely be blocked. In the end, they will likely have to rely on their wits and cunning to defend themselves. The King also has a Downvote gun, which he plans to use on the General.

question: Describe the situation outside the castle.

answer: The situation outside the castle is that the castle is under attack. The attackers are trying to break through the walls and reach the Front Page fortress. The attackers have managed to outnumber the defenders and have taken over the castle. The defenders are trying to hold the attackers back, but they are slowly being overpowered.

text: "Sire! We are under attack" is evidence that the castle is under attack.

text: "We managed to arm our comment guns and slow them down, but soon they will overpower us" is evidence that the defenders are being overpowered.

answer: Outside the castle, there is chaos. The ground is littered with bodies, both of the attackers and defenders. The walls are scorched and broken, with the attackers slowly making their way in. The defenders are fighting valiantly, but it seems like they are slowly being overpowered. The cries of the dying and the victorious can be heard all around.

text: There is no evidence that the walls of the castle are burned. Rather, the knight states that the gate has been burned.

refinement: Outside the castle, there is chaos. The ground is littered with bodies, both of the attackers and defenders. The gate has been burned, with the attackers slowly making their way in. The defenders are fighting valiantly, but it seems like they are slowly being overpowered. The cries of the dying and the victorious can be heard all around.

text: "Screams flood the air, followed by another explosion and screams of glory" is evidence that the cries of the dying can be heard.

text: "Again, the same victory cries are heard" is evidence that victory cries can be heard.

text: "They silently shot down our defenses with their Upvote Cannons" is evidence that there are bodies outside the castle.

answer: The castle is under attack by Castle Repost. The castle's defenses are being overpowered by the enemy's Upvote cannons. The enemy is trying to break through the castle's walls and reach the Front Page fortress.

text: "They silently shot down our defenses with their Upvote Cannons" is evidence that the enemy is overpowering the castle's defenses.

text: "they wish to break Castle AdviceAnimal's walls and reach the Front Page fortress" is evidence that the enemy is trying to break through to the Front Page fortress.

answer: Many of the citizens have taken to arms and jumped into the fight instead of leaving by  secret tunnels.

text: This answer does not describe what the fight is.

refinement: The castle is under attack by Castle Repost. Many of the citizens have taken to arms and jumped into the fight instead of leaving by  secret tunnels.

text: Does not mention that the gate has been burned down.

refinement: The castle is under attack by Castle Repost. Many of the citizens have taken to arms and jumped into the fight instead of leaving by  secret tunnels. The enemy has burned down the gate and is advancing toward the Front Page fortress.

text: "We tried to make them leave by the secret tunnels, but many citizens took to arms and jumped into the fight" is evidence that the citizens have chosen to take up arms rather than to flee.

question: Write a ~4 sentence summary.

answer: Subreddit knight rushes to inform the King that Castle Repost has breached the walls of Castle AdviceAnimal. The King gathers everyone remaining and leads them as they formulate a plan. As his knight locks the door, it is blasted open by the General. The King pulls out a gun and shoots a nearby pile of gunpowder, stunning everyone in the room.

text: The summary does not mention that it is implied the General is killed in the blast.

refinement: Subreddit knight rushes to inform the King that Castle Repost has breached the walls of Castle AdviceAnimal. The King gathers everyone remaining and leads them as they formulate a plan. As his knight locks the door, it is blasted open by the General. The King pulls out a gun and shoots a nearby pile of gunpowder, and it is implied that the General is defeated by the blast.

answer: The King of Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by the General of Castle Repost. The King is in the armory, which is the worst place to be when you attack a Fortress. The King uses a Downvote Gun to shoot the General and his army. The General is killed and the King is able to escape.

text: It is not simply the King who is under attack; the entire castle is under attack.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by the General of Castle Repost. The King is in the armory, which is the worst place to be when you attack a Fortress. The King uses a Downvote Gun to shoot the General and his army. The General is killed and the King is able to escape.

text: It is not necessary to state where the King is.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by the General of Castle Repost. The King uses a Downvote Gun to shoot the General and his army. The General is killed and the King is able to escape.

text: Does not mention the goal of Castle Repost.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by the General of Castle Repost. The enemy is attempting to breach the Front Page fortress. The King uses a Downvote Gun to shoot the General and his army. The General is killed and the King is able to escape.

answer: The Subreddit Knight reports to the King that Castle Repost is breaching their walls. The King asks the Knight what happened, and the Knight explains that they were outmaneuvered by the enemy. The King and the Knight go to the armory, but it is empty. The King explains that the worst place to be when you attack a fortress is the armory, and he shoots the General with a downvote gun.

text: The second and third sentence are unnecessary.

refinement: The Subreddit Knight reports to the King that Castle Repost is breaching their walls. The King explains that the worst place to be when you attack a fortress is the armory, and he shoots the General with a downvote gun.

text: Does not mention what the goal of Castle Repost is.

refinement: The Subreddit Knight reports to the King that Castle Repost is breaching their walls. The enemy forces are attempting to breach the Front Page fortress. The King explains that the worst place to be when you attack a fortress is the armory, and he shoots the General with a downvote gun.

text: The King doesn't shoot the general; he shoots the pile of black powder.

refinement: The Subreddit Knight reports to the King that Castle Repost is breaching their walls. The enemy forces are attempting to breach the Front Page fortress. The King explains that the worst place to be when you attack a fortress is the armory, and he shoots a pile of black powder, which explodes and kills the General.

text: Does not mention that the King confronts the General.

refinement: The Subreddit Knight reports to the King that Castle Repost is breaching their walls. The enemy forces are attempting to breach the Front Page fortress. The King confronts the General and shoots a pile of black powder, which explodes and kills the General.

answer: The protagonist's castle is under attack by a rival kingdom, and they are quickly losing ground. The protagonist and his knight manage to escape the initial onslaught, but find that they have few weapons and few men left. The protagonist uses a downvote gun to set off a chain reaction of explosions, killing the invading army. He knows that rebuilding will be necessary, but is unsure if the attacks will ever end.

text: Does not specifically name either castle.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by a Castle Repost, and they are quickly losing ground. The protagonist and his knight manage to escape the initial onslaught, but find that they have few weapons and few men left. The protagonist uses a downvote gun to set off a chain reaction of explosions, killing the invading army. He knows that rebuilding will be necessary, but is unsure if the attacks will ever end.

text: Does not mention who the protagonist is.

refinement: Castle AdviceAnimal is under attack by a Castle Repost, and they are quickly losing ground. The King and his knight manage to escape the initial onslaught, but find that they have few weapons and few men left. The King uses a downvote gun to set off a chain reaction of explosions, killing the invading army. He knows that rebuilding will be necessary, but is unsure if the attacks will ever end.


text:
Imagine a world, a world in the future. Not the near future like in back to the future. A future where humans are the underdog, not the likeable underdog as in david and goliath where he wins even through the odds are not in his favor. This is the near future where the humans are the slaves, the slaves to the dragons. Why not robots, you might ask. Well robots are always the slave masters that have taken over the world. Don't you think dragons should get their chance at having a fierce reign over the whole known world?

These dragons aren't just ordinary dragons, known from popular - well medieval - literature, no these fierce-full creatures, huge in their appearance, need us humans. I didn't get to describe the dragon yet, so don't panik just now. They usually don't hurt you. Look over there. See that majestic creature? His name is Draaga.

You see him, 10 meters tall, imagining him next to a typical one story house, he would be able to look over it without a problem.  Cars seem small next to him. His scales - every dragon has scales, where were you the last 100 years? - are shining in a matt metallic green. Can't imagine it? Fuck off, he's a dragon. He can look as impossible as he wants to.

Back to Draaga, why am I showing you him? He is special. He doesn't just enslave humans for his needs, no he has dragons under his rule. These dragons do menial work for him. Build him caves, find him mates, and they even bring him food. But he still is a healthy dragon. He isn't lazy like others might be in his position. He only does /fun/ things. That is where we humans come into play.

Dragons have kept good care of us humans. We might not be able to vote, or have our own property, but they need us. Specially they need the intelligent humans. You must know, dragons want to have fun. We can provide them with fun. Real fun.

Dragons have selectively breeded the most intelligent humans for the past 5 generations. For you math lazy people, that's more than 400 years. Only the most adapt, the most intelligent humans survived their selection. They built us - and helped us build - schools, universities, laboratories and more. These have only one function. To make us have the ability to produce psychedelic drugs. Acid in particular. That is their fun. That is our existence. Producing and refining Acid for the pleasure of dragons. Would you want to live in that future? FUCK YEAH DRAGONS!!!!

title: Future, Acid, Dragons. Tell me what you think.

question: When is the story set?

answer: The story is set in the future, likely sometime after the dragons have taken over the world.

answer: The author is writing in the present, describing a version of the distant future.

answer: The story is set in the future.

answer: The story is set in the future.

question: Summarize everything relating to acid.

answer: Acid is a drug that dragons enjoy. It is produced by humans for the dragons.

answer: In the distant future, dragons recreationally do the drug acid, and it is the main reason they keep humans around as slaves (that have been bred selectively) - so humans can produce the acid for the dragons' pleasure.

answer: In the future imagined in the passage, acid is a drug that is produced and refined for the pleasure of dragons. It is seen as a form of entertainment for these creatures, and it is the only thing that keeps the human population alive.

answer: The passage is about a future where humans are enslaved by dragons. The dragons have selectively bred the most intelligent humans for the past 400 years to produce acid for their pleasure.

question: Describe the social structure.

answer: The social structure in the future described in the passage is one where humans are enslaved by dragons, who use them for menial labor and entertainment. The intelligent humans are selectively bred to produce drugs for the dragons' pleasure, specifically acid.

text: " The intelligent humans" - delete "the"

refinement: The social structure in the future described in the passage is one where humans are enslaved by dragons, who use them for menial labor and entertainment. Intelligent humans are selectively bred to produce drugs for the dragons' pleasure, specifically acid.

answer: Humans are slaves to dragons.

answer: Humans live as slaves under dragon rule.

answer: The social structure is a hierarchy with dragons at the top. They are the only ones with any power. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the

text: Model error.

refinement: The social structure is a hierarchy with dragons at the top. They are the only ones with any power. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the only ones with any say in what happens. They are the

question: How are the "Future, Acid, Dragons" from the title related?

answer: The future depicted in the passage is one where dragons rule over humans, and the humans' only purpose is to produce and refine acid for the dragons' enjoyment.

answer: The "Future, Acid, Dragons" are related because they are all part of the same world.

text: "The "Future, Acid, Dragons" are related because they are all part of the same world." - while this answer is true, it doesn't explain the relationship between the three. Rewrite to reflect how the future, acid, and dragons are related.

refinement: There is a future where dragons rule the world and do the drug, acid, for pleasure and entertainment.

answer: The dragons are the rulers of the world and they use humans to produce acid for their pleasure.

text: "The dragons are the rulers of the world and they use humans to produce acid for their pleasure." - missing the part about the future. Revise the answer.

refinement: In an alternate future, dragons are the rulers of the world and they use humans to produce acid for their pleasure.

answer: The text describes a future in which dragons do drugs like acid recreationally.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: In the future, humans are enslaved by dragons. They are forced to produce acid for the dragons' pleasure.

text: Went over the 1-sentence summary requirement. Merge the two sentences.

refinement: In the future, humans are enslaved by dragons, and they are forced to produce acid for the dragons' pleasure.

answer: In the future, humans are enslaved by dragons, who use them to produce and refine acid for their own entertainment.

answer: The author is writing in the present, describing a version of the distant future in which humans live as slaves under dragon rule and are selectively bred to be intelligent so as to best serve the dragons by producing acid (the drug) for the dragons' recreational use.

answer: The author describes a future where dragons enslave humans and use them to produce acid for their own pleasure.