text:
**The Theater**

While I was sitting outside the coffee shop across from the theater, I overheard a woman’s conversation with what appeared to be her boyfriend. I was waiting for my ride home, so I decided to people watch to pass the time. This woman’s conversation kept catching my ear, however, and I decided to listen for a bit.

The woman spoke to her boyfriend about her children, telling him how one of them is just so funny when you get him talking about something he’s interested in, and how smart her daughter is. She told him about how her children were doing in school, how she loved them so much, and how they were growing up so fast. The man laughed along and nodded in all the right places, and they seemed to be having a nice time together.

Having heard enough of their conversation to satisfy my curiosity, I looked over at the theater. I admired all the arches and pillars and lights that made up the face of the building, and warmly remembered the theater’s opening week. People crowded the stairs, cars filled the parking lot and the outer walls were immaculate white, red letters shining from above the crystal clear glass of the windows that lined the massive, shining glass doors. Now, looking at the theater, I notices streaks of gray stained down the tops of the walls and dull spots on the windows, dimmed lights where the theater’s name used to shine so brightly.

Although it was a warm June day, the sky was filled with clouds and there was a strong wind. Gulls stood on the light fixtures above the flapping movie banners that hung on the theater’s wall, watching the occasional car meander through the parking lot. Other birds flew through the sky, catching the wind when they could and diving down to the ground before rising back into the sky. I watched them flying and felt happy that birds could be so happily excited by something that they were given by nature. In our own way, humans aren’t so different from the birds. Birds were naturally given flight, and humans were naturally given the tools to create.

I saw a group of children playing on a horizontal column of basalt, playing chicken and pretending the ground was lava. They laughed and smiled, having fun in the warm wind as I observed from a distance. The children were supervised by one of their fathers, and although there was so much fun being had around him, he looked bored as he sat watching on the bench carved from basalt across from them.

I looked back at the chatting couple sitting near me and found them kissing. In the moment before I shifted my gaze back to the theater, I caught a flash of gold from the woman’s hand. The ring on her hand had no gem, and was dulled with age. Despite the fact that I didn’t have all of the background on their story, my heart sank at this small detail. I had felt joy at watching a woman who was, to the extent of my knowledge, having an affair with this man.

I glanced back to the theater, gloomily looking at the grayed stairs, disenchanted from the realization that the happy couple was really just a display of infidelity. I saw that the escalators I had once ridden to the gleaming glass doors of the theater were now blocked by yellow tape and perfectly still. The glass roof over the escalators was dulled by rain and sun over the years, making its slow journey to opaqueness. The walls were spotted with brightness in places that were once covered by light fixtures that had long fallen off of it. My eyes slowly rose to the top of the building, where two metal spires reached into the sky, holding in place a great metal circle through which the spot of sun in the clouds shone.

I realized at that moment that I was seeing the building exactly how its imaginer had intended it to be seen, with the sun shining through the centerpiece of his wall. I widened my view to see the whole face of the building as one, rather than as individual, flawed pieces. I was amazed to see how beautiful the building I had been looking at was, and how all of the flaws disappeared when you looked at it all together.

Momentarily in awe, I looked around at all of the people around me.
I caught a glimpse of the couple holding hands, and noticed that the man had a ring to match the woman’s. Along with that, I heard the woman say with a shaky voice how sad she would be when he had to return to serve in the military.

When I looked over to the group of children, I saw the man supervising them smiling and laughing with the children while rounding them up and taking them to his vehicle. I saw the van pull away, carrying the group of children to their little league game.

Then, I heard a tapping sound to my right and saw that a gull had landed on the table next to mine. He pecked up the crumbs left over from the coffee shop’s earlier customers, and flew off again, dipping and rising in the wind.

My ride pulled up in front of the theater and I began walking toward it. I then caught another glimpse of the theater, and was happy to see that it was still as beautiful as it had been during its opening week. My eyes drifted higher and I saw that the sun had slipped from its socket atop the theater, and I smiled, feeling like I had shared a secret with the person who had envisioned the theater.

Although I only rarely see the theater now, I always remember how I felt when I stepped back and saw it for what it really was. I now realize that everything is worth looking at more than once, and that the way you first see things isn’t always how they truly are.

title: My cheesy first short story

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize all of the animal life that the narrator observes over the course of the story.

answer: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

answer: The narrator watches several gulls riding the wind. The narrator saw children playing on top of a carton.

text: It is irrelevant that the narrator saw children playing on top of a carton.

refinement: The narrator watches several gulls riding the wind.

text: It is omitted: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

refinement: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. The narrator watches several gulls riding the wind. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

answer: While people watching outside the theater, the narrator notices a group of children playing on a basalt column and a group of gulls hovering above the light fixtures. Later on, the narrator sees a man supervising the children, who are on their way to a little league game. Meanwhile, a gull lands on the table beside the narrator and pecks up crumbs left by earlier customers before flying off again. At the end of the story, the sun has slipped from its socket atop the theater, and the narrator is left feeling happy with the beauty of the theater.

text: It is irrelevant: While people watching outside the theater, the narrator notices a group of children playing on a basalt column and a group of gulls hovering above the light fixtures. Later on, the narrator sees a man supervising the children, who are on their way to a little league game. At the end of the story, the sun has slipped from its socket atop the theater, and the narrator is left feeling happy with the beauty of the theater.

refinement: A gull lands on the table beside the narrator and pecks up crumbs left by earlier customers before flying off again.

text: It is omitted: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky.

refinement: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. A gull lands on the table beside the narrator and pecks up crumbs left by earlier customers before flying off again.

answer: Over the course of the story, the narrator observes gulls, birds, and a group of children playing. The gulls are perched on light fixtures and fly through the air. The children are playing on a horizontal column of basalt and are supervised by a father. The story concludes with the narrator noticing the beauty in the theater despite it flaws.

text: Other birds, not gulls fly.

refinement: Over the course of the story, the narrator observes gulls, birds, and a group of children playing. The gulls are perched on light fixtures. The children are playing on a horizontal column of basalt and are supervised by a father. The story concludes with the narrator noticing the beauty in the theater despite it flaws.

text: It is irrelevant that the narrator sees the children.

refinement: Over the course of the story, the narrator observes gulls and other birds. The gulls are perched on light fixtures. The children are playing on a horizontal column of basalt and are supervised by a father. The story concludes with the narrator noticing the beauty in the theater despite it flaws.

text: It is irrelevant: The children are playing on a horizontal column of basalt and are supervised by a father. The story concludes with the narrator noticing the beauty in the theater despite it flaws

refinement: Over the course of the story, the narrator observes gulls and other birds. The gulls are perched on light fixtures.

text: It is omitted: Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

refinement: Over the course of the story, the narrator observes gulls and other birds. The gulls are perched on light fixtures. Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

answer: A group of children playing on a horizontal column of basalt, playing chicken.

text: The response is irrelevant.

text: It is omitted: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

refinement: There are gulls standing on light fixtures above movie banners. Other birds fly through the sky. One of the gulls lands on the table next to the narrator's.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the narrator's observations of the couple.

answer: The woman tells her boyfriend about the kids - that they're funny when you get them talking about something they're interested in, and how smart her daughter is. The woman then shares how she loves her kids so much.

text: It is omitted that the narrator sees the couple kissing; they notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair.

refinement: The woman tells her boyfriend about the kids - that they're funny when you get them talking about something they're interested in, and how smart her daughter is. The woman then shares how she loves her kids so much. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair.

text: It is omitted that the narrator notices that the man has the ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

refinement: The woman tells her boyfriend about the kids - that they're funny when you get them talking about something they're interested in, and how smart her daughter is. The woman then shares how she loves her kids so much. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

answer: The narrator notes with some surprise that the couple will be separated, and furthermore that they have a marriage. The woman passes a comment that makes the author think they ARE married. The man then takes her to a game, before they part and part ways.

text: It is unclear and partly irrelevant.

text: It is omitted: The woman tells her boyfriend about the kids - that they're funny when you get them talking about something they're interested in, and how smart her daughter is. The woman then shares how she loves her kids so much. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

refinement: The woman tells her boyfriend about the kids - that they're funny when you get them talking about something they're interested in, and how smart her daughter is. The woman then shares how she loves her kids so much. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

answer: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. The scene takes place outside a theater. The theater shows signs of fading and weathering, but the narrator is pleasantly surprised to find it beautiful nonetheless. The narrator notices a lack of sparkle in the woman's wedding ring, signaling an affair. In contrast, the children playing nearby appear to be having a happy and supervised time while the onlooker's own ride arrives. Overall, the narrator sees the couple as being deceiving in their happiness.

text: It is not stated that a lack of sparkle in the woman's wedding ring is signaling an affair.

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. The scene takes place outside a theater. The theater shows signs of fading and weathering, but the narrator is pleasantly surprised to find it beautiful nonetheless. In contrast, the children playing nearby appear to be having a happy and supervised time while the onlooker's own ride arrives. Overall, the narrator sees the couple as being deceiving in their happiness.

text: It is not stated that the couple is deceiving in their happiness.

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. The scene takes place outside a theater. The theater shows signs of fading and weathering, but the narrator is pleasantly surprised to find it beautiful nonetheless. In contrast, the children playing nearby appear to be having a happy and supervised time while the onlooker's own ride arrives.

text: It is irrelevant: The scene takes place outside a theater. The theater shows signs of fading and weathering, but the narrator is pleasantly surprised to find it beautiful nonetheless. In contrast, the children playing nearby appear to be having a happy and supervised time while the onlooker's own ride arrives.

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend.

text: It is omitted: the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

text: 'intimate conversation' should be 'an intimate conversation'.

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school and their growth. This seems to be an intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

text: a missing comma after 'school'.

refinement: The narrator witnesses a conversation between a woman and her boyfriend. The woman speaks about her children, their accomplishment in school, and their growth. This seems to be an intimate conversation between the woman and her boyfriend. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

answer: The narrator overhears the woman speaking to what appears to be her boyfriend about her children. He later sees the couple kissing. He catches a glimpse of the woman's ring and assumes she's having an affair with the man. He later sees that the man has a matching ring as well, and overhears the woman saying she will be sad when the man returns to serve in the military.

answer: The narrator observes a woman speaking to her boyfriend about her children. While eavesdropping, the narrator realizes that these two individuals are engaging in an affair. While admiring the theater, the narrator observes how the physical state of the building has deteriorated since its opening week. Despite these flaws, the narrator recognizes that the building is beautiful even in its current state. The narrator observes that the couple is in love and dealing with the challenges of being long-distance lovers.

text: It is omitted that the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring.

refinement: The narrator observes a woman speaking to her boyfriend about her children. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring. While eavesdropping, the narrator realizes that these two individuals are engaging in an affair. While admiring the theater, the narrator observes how the physical state of the building has deteriorated since its opening week. Despite these flaws, the narrator recognizes that the building is beautiful even in its current state. The narrator observes that the couple is in love and dealing with the challenges of being long-distance lovers.

text: It is irrelevant: While admiring the theater, the narrator observes how the physical state of the building has deteriorated since its opening week. Despite these flaws, the narrator recognizes that the building is beautiful even in its current state.

refinement: The narrator observes a woman speaking to her boyfriend about her children. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring. While eavesdropping, the narrator realizes that these two individuals are engaging in an affair. The narrator observes that the couple is in love and dealing with the challenges of being long-distance lovers.

text: the narrator concludes, not realizes

refinement: The narrator observes a woman speaking to her boyfriend about her children. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring. While eavesdropping, the narrator concludes that these two individuals are engaging in an affair. The narrator observes that the couple is in love and dealing with the challenges of being long-distance lovers.

text: It is omitted: the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle.

refinement: The narrator observes a woman speaking to her boyfriend about her children. Later, the narrator sees the couple kissing. They notice that she has a ring and conclude that the couple has an affair. While eavesdropping, the narrator concludes that these two individuals are engaging in an affair.  Later, however, the narrator notices that the man has a ring that matches to woman's and sees the man taking the children to his vehicle. The narrator observes that the couple is in love and dealing with the challenges of being long-distance lovers.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the negative emotions the characters feel in this story.

answer: The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater, and the infidelity taking place within its walls. They also feel awe at the potential beauty of the theater when looked at as a whole.

text: The second sentence describes a positive feeling. It should be deleted.

refinement: The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater, and the infidelity taking place within its walls.

text: It is omitted that the father feels bored.

refinement: The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater, and the infidelity taking place within its walls. The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: The infidelity does not take place within the theatre's walls but in the coffee shop.

refinement: The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater, and the infidelity taking place within the coffee shop. The characters in this story feel sad at the site of the aged theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: it should be 'sight' instead of 'site'

refinement: The characters in this story feel sad at the sight of the aged theater, and the infidelity taking place within the coffee shop. The characters in this story feel sad at the sight of the aged theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: it should be 'aging' instead of 'aged'

refinement: The characters in this story feel sad at the sight of the aging theater, and the infidelity taking place within the coffee shop. The characters in this story feel sad at the sight of the aging theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: it should be 'the narrator' instead of 'the characters'

refinement: The narrator of this story feels sad at the sight of the aging theater, and the infidelity taking place within the coffee shop. The narrator in this story feels sad at the sight of the aging theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: It is omitted that the woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

refinement: The narrator of this story feels sad at the sight of the aging theater, and the infidelity taking place within the coffee shop. The characters in this story feel sad at the sight of the aging theater. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

answer: The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The narrator feels disenchanted after they believe the couple they have been watching is having an affair. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

text: It is omitted that the narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.

refinement: The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The narrator feels disenchanted after they believe the couple they have been watching is having an affair. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military. The narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.

answer: The narrator feels a sinking feeling over seeing a flashing golden ring on one of the characters. By inference, they've seen this couple before, and the woman may not be fully committed to the man talking with her. The other negative emotions come from the passage about the theater in general. Their sheer disappointment with its filthiness, decay, and not liking the way the children are being fostered in its proximity.

text: It is omitted that the father is bored.

refinement: The narrator feels a sinking feeling over seeing a flashing golden ring on one of the characters. By inference, they've seen this couple before, and the woman may not be fully committed to the man talking with her. The other negative emotions come from the passage about the theater in general. Their sheer disappointment with its filthiness, decay, and not liking the way the children are being fostered in its proximity. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: 'not liking the way the children are being fostered in its proximity' is not stated. It should be deleted.

refinement: The narrator feels a sinking feeling over seeing a flashing golden ring on one of the characters. By inference, they've seen this couple before, and the woman may not be fully committed to the man talking with her. The other negative emotions come from the passage about the theater in general. Their sheer disappointment with its filthiness and decay. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: It is omitted that the woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

refinement: The narrator feels a sinking feeling over seeing a flashing golden ring on one of the characters. By inference, they've seen this couple before, and the woman may not be fully committed to the man talking with her. The other negative emotions come from the passage about the theater in general. Their sheer disappointment with its filthiness and decay. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

answer: The characters in this story feel negative emotions such as sadness and gloominess. They see the deterioration of their surroundings and are saddened by what they see. They also realize that their relationships are based on infidelity and this brings them down.

text: It is omitted that the woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

refinement: The characters in this story feel negative emotions such as sadness and gloominess. They see the deterioration of their surroundings and are saddened by what they see. They also realize that their relationships are based on infidelity and this brings them down. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

text: It should be 'the narrator instead of 'the characters'.

refinement: The narrator of this story feels negative emotions such as sadness and gloominess. They see the deterioration of their surroundings and are saddened by what they see. They also realize that their relationships are based on infidelity and this brings them down. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

text: Instead of 'their relationships', it should be 'the couple's relationship'.

refinement: The narrator of this story feels negative emotions such as sadness and gloominess. They see the deterioration of their surroundings and are saddened by what they see. They also realize that the couple's relationships are based on infidelity and this brings them down. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military.

text: It is omitted that the father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

refinement: The narrator of this story feels negative emotions such as sadness and gloominess. They see the deterioration of their surroundings and are saddened by what they see. They also realize that the couple's relationships are based on infidelity and this brings them down. The woman is sad that her husband is leaving to serve in the military. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

answer: The narrator feels gloomily when they realize that the happy couples is a display of infidelity. The mother of the children feels sad when her boyfriend has to return to the military.

text: It is omitted that the father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

refinement: The narrator feels gloomily when they realize that the happy couples is a display of infidelity. The mother of the children feels sad when her boyfriend has to return to the military. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them.

text: It is omitted that the narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.

refinement: The narrator feels gloomily when they realize that the happy couples is a display of infidelity. The mother of the children feels sad when her boyfriend has to return to the military. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.

text: It should be 'gloomy' instead of 'gloomily'.

refinement: The narrator feels gloomy when they realize that the happy couples is a display of infidelity. The mother of the children feels sad when her boyfriend has to return to the military. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.

text: It should be 'couple' instead of 'couples'.

refinement: The narrator feels gloomy when they realize that the happy couple is a display of infidelity. The mother of the children feels sad when her boyfriend has to return to the military. The father of one of the children looks bored as he sits watching them. The narrator feels sad at the sight of the aging theater.


split: train

text:
SIR DAVID WOLFE KEENE, PC (born 15 April 1941) is retired Lord Justice of Appeal.

Career

David Keene was called to the English Bar in 1964 by the Inner Temple. He was appointed Queen's Counsel in 1980, and appointed a Recorder in 1989. He practised mainly in public law cases and at planning inquiries. In his career as a barrister he obtained planning permission for a number of large developments, including London City Airport, and the second runway at Manchester Airport.[1]

He was chairman of the Planning Bar in 1994, in which year he was also appointed as a High Court judge and assigned to the Queen's Bench Division. In 2000, he was appointed to the Court of Appeal where he served until he retired in 2009.[2]

Sir David Keene was also a bencher and ultimately the Treasurer of the Inner Temple. He also served as Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, and is an Honorary Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford.[3]

From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years. He was a member of the QC Selection Panel from 2010–2012. He is an Honorary Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford and the Society of Advanced Legal Studies, and is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. He was Deputy President of the QFC Civil and Commercial Court in Qatar between 2010 – 2013 and since 2013 has been the Chairman of the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Tribunal.

From 2011 to 2014 non-executive chairman of Third-party litigation funder Argentum Capital.

Sir David Keene was regarded as being a close friend of former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair and his wife Cherie Blair QC.[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

title: David Keene (judge)

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How many years did Keene serve as Lord Justice of Appeal?

answer: 6 years

text: It was nine years by my calculation (from 2000 until his retirement in 2009).

answer: Nine years.

answer: He retired in 2009. 3-4 years.

text: He began at that post in 2000 and retired in 2009 so by my calculation it was nine years.

answer: Sir David Keene served as a Lord Justice of Appeal for 10 years.

text: From 2000-2009 is nine years.

refinement: Sir David Keene served as a Lord Justice of Appeal for nine years.

answer: Sir David Keene served as Lord Justice of Appeal for 11 years.

text: In 2000, he was appointed to the Court of Appeal where he served until he retired in 2009.[2]

refinement: Sir David Keene served as Lord Justice of Appeal for nine years.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

In what year did Keene serve as chairman of the Judicial Studies Board.

answer: From 2003-2007.

text: From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years.

answer: 2003-2007

text: From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years.

answer: 2003-2007.

text: From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years.

answer: 2003 - 2007.

text: From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years.

answer: 2003 to 2007

text: From 2003 to 2007 he was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, responsible for the training of all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales, having previously been chairman of its Equal Treatment Committee for five years.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where is David Keene from?

answer: Sir David Keene is from England.

answer: David Keene was born 15 April 1941 and is English. He is retired now, but when he was in office, he was from the UK.

text: The final sentence doesn't add any information relevant or necessary to the question and could potentially create confusion.

refinement: David Keene was born 15 April 1941 and is English.

answer: Sir David Keene is originally from England.

answer: It is not indicated in the article.

text: There are so many indicators and there is so much evidence that he is English.

answer: The article does not answer this question.

text: There are so many indicators and there is so much evidence that he is English.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How many years was Keene active in law?

answer: From 1964 to 1965

text: It is clear that he was active for multiple decades.

refinement: He was active for many decades from the mid-1960s to the 2010s.

answer: 1991-2009

text: It is clear that he was active for many decades.

refinement: He was active for many decades, from the mid-1960s to the 2010s.

answer: Sir David Keene was active in law for 34 years, from 1964 to 2009.

answer: It might be implied from the article that Keene had 49 active legal years.

answer: Sir David Keene has been active in law for approximately 44 years.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: Sir David Wolfe Keene is retired English judge. He had been a member of the Queen’s Bench Division, the Court of Appeal and chairman of the Judicial Studies Board there. Keene has also worked as a barrister and played a prominent role in planning permissions for large development, among other.

answer: Sir David Keene is a retired High Court judge and Lord Justice of Appeal. He is regarded as a close friend of former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair and his wife Cherie Blair QC. He was Chairman of the Judicial Studies Board, and was also responsible for training all Judges and Magistrates in England and Wales. Currently, he is the non-executive chairman of Argentum Capital.

answer: Sir David Wolfe Keene is a retired English barrister and judge. Keene received scholarhips for Christchurch Grammar School and Balliol College. He received the OBE in 1982, and the knighthood in 1991 for his services to the judiciary.

answer: Sir David Keene is an English barrister and retired Lord Justice of Appeal. He worked on many large projects, including the planning of London City Airport. Sir Keene served as chairman of the Judicial Studies Board and a High Court judge. He was a close friend of Tony Blair and his wife Cherie Blair QC.

answer: This article dictates the career of retired Lord Justice of Appeal David Wolfe Keene. His legal career began in 1964 when he was called to the English Bar by the Inner Temple. His life as a litigator spanned 49 years with varying positions, responsibilities, and achievements, and he afterward retired in 2009.


text:
Op-Ed Contributors

-   March 6, 2017
-

[People protesting the executive order President Trump signed in January, barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries.]

Credit...Yana Paskova for The New York Times

President Trump’s executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries experienced nearly universal defeat in the federal courts. On Monday, he issued a revised version of that order, but it still suffers from a fundamental, and fatal, flaw: It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination.

On the surface, this revised order looks different from the first version. It explicitly exempts Iraq from the travel ban, thus reducing the number of affected countries to six, as well as lawful permanent residents (that is, green card holders) and people who have visas. It no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country. And in a marked departure from the earlier order, it goes into effect in 10 days, so that the chaos that unfolded in airports around the world when the January order became effective presumably won’t happen again.

These changes are, no doubt, intended to address the due process concerns that led the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to affirm a lower-court ruling that put a hold on part of the original order. But while these changes are important, they do not fix the core problem with the executive order: The administration is waging an all-out assault on Islam and Muslims.

That’s because anti-Muslim bias and bigotry that characterized the original travel ban remain in this revised version. The order is still limited to only Muslim-majority countries: namely, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Residents of those countries — and only those countries — will be severely restricted in their ability to travel into the United States for 90 days. Left off are the predominately Christian countries that the State Department lists as “Terrorist Safe Havens” like Colombia, the Philippines and Venezuela.

The revised order also continues to traffic in bigoted and largely false perceptions: By requiring the governmentto compile occurrencesof “honor killings” by immigrants, it gives official recognition to an inflammatory and misleading trope of Islam that is perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups.

President Trump has not been subtle in his intentions. We need look no further than his own words to figure them out. On the campaign trail, he constantly conflated the vast majority of peaceful Muslims with the small handful of violent Muslims.

After the Paris attacks in November 2015, Mr. Trump said that “we’re going to have no choice” but to close some mosques in the United States, where “some really bad things are happening.” The next month, after the attack in San Bernardino, Calif., he called for a “complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” and released a factually dubious statement that “large segments of the Muslim population” have “great hatred towards Americans” and favor Shariah law. Astonishingly, that statement is still posted on Mr. Trump’s website.

In December, when a reporter asked whether he had reconsidered his stance on Islam, President-elect Trump replied: “You know my plans. All along, I’ve been proven to be right.” This dark and wholly unsubstantiated worldview about Islam and the American Muslim community is shared by several of the president’s senior aides and advisers.

Let’s be clear: This revised order is a Muslim ban. All the countries he has excluded are more than 90 percent Muslim. Three of them — Iran, Somalia and Yemen — are more than 99 percent Muslim. Even though Mr. Trump tailored his order to survive legal challenges, as his former adviser Rudolph Giuliani conceded on national television, his objective is clearly to exclude Muslims.

The Trump administration argues that the ban protects the country. Yet by excluding Iraq from the order, Mr. Trump has cleared travel from one of the two countries from which Islamic State terrorists operates. Moreover, the Department of Homeland Security concluded last month that “country of citizenship is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of potential terrorist activity.” Former national security officials from Democratic and Republican administrations have made clear that the January order does not make our country safer. Instead, the bigotry that Mr. Trump spews at news conferences and on Twitter have been a boon for terrorists’ recruitment efforts.

The twisted worldview does not match reality. Muslims have been part of America for centuries, since the first slave ships arrived in the 17th century. Today, Muslims represent 1 percent of the United States population: They are our teachers, doctors, neighbors and co-workers.

American Muslims will suffer a particular harm from this executive order: Those who have ties to the banned countries won’t be able to see their family members and close friends. American Muslims will also be deprived of the instruction from the leading Islamic scholars who are from those countries.

Thousands of Muslim men and women serve in the armed forces; many have given their lives defending our nation and our ideals. They contribute to the diversity that has always been our nation’s pride and strength. President George W. Bush paid tribute to this in the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks when he said, “There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion.”

President Trump and his top advisers would be wise to listen to President Bush. The Muslim ban and President Trump’s relentless attacks on Islam are not just an assault on thousands of patriotic, innocent Americans — they violate our Constitution and our most fundamental American values and beliefs.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why is President Trump’s executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries illegal?

answer: Because it constitutes unlawful religious discrimination.

answer: The executive order is illegal because it is discriminatory and constitutes religious discrimination. The order applies to only Muslim-majority countries and leaves out predominately Christian countries, to the detriment of American Muslims. Furthermore, the order relies on false stereotypes of Islam perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups. Ultimately, the order goes against our Constitution and most fundamental American values.

text: The first sentence is sufficient to answer the question

refinement: The executive order is illegal because it is discriminatory and constitutes religious discrimination.

answer: It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination.

answer: The executive order is illegal because it disproportionately targets Muslim-majority countries and constitutes unlawful religious discrimination.

answer: It constitutes religious discrimination.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How do two versions of the order differ?

answer: The two versions of the order differ in that the revised order exempts Iraq from the travel ban, categorically excludes Syrian refugees, and goes into effect in 10 days instead of immediately. Additionally, the revised order does not include a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country. The order still disproportionately affects Muslim-majority countries, perpetuates bigoted beliefs about Islam, and does not improve national security.

text: The revised order also exempts "lawful permanent residents" and "people who have visas"

refinement: The two versions of the order differ in that the revised order exempts Iraq from the travel ban, exempts lawful permanent residents and people who have visas, categorically excludes Syrian refugees, and goes into effect in 10 days instead of immediately. Additionally, the revised order does not include a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country. The order still disproportionately affects Muslim-majority countries, perpetuates bigoted beliefs about Islam, and does not improve national security.

text: The revised order does not bar Syrian refugees; the original order did

refinement: The two versions of the order differ in that the revised order exempts Iraq from the travel ban, exempts lawful permanent residents and people who have visas, no longer categorically excludes Syrian refugees, and goes into effect in 10 days instead of immediately. Additionally, the revised order does not include a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country. The order still disproportionately affects Muslim-majority countries, perpetuates bigoted beliefs about Islam, and does not improve national security.

text: The question asks how the two orders differ; the last sentence gives a similarity between them

refinement: The two versions of the order differ in that the revised order exempts Iraq from the travel ban, exempts lawful permanent residents and people who have visas, no longer categorically excludes Syrian refugees, and goes into effect in 10 days instead of immediately. Additionally, the revised order does not include a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country.

answer: Version 2 includes exemptions for Iraq.

text: Exempting Iraq is not the only change between the versions

refinement: Version 2 exempts Iraq from the travel ban, exempts lawful permanent residents and people who have visas, no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter, and it goes into effect in 10 days instead of immediately.

answer: The original version bar immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries and reviewed version exempts Iraq, permanent residents, and people who have visas.

text: Correct the tense and number of "bar"

refinement: The original version barred immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries and reviewed version exempts Iraq, permanent residents, and people who have visas.

text: The second version is not "reviewed"

refinement: The original version barred immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries and second version exempts Iraq, permanent residents, and people who have visas.

text: The second version also "no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country" and "goes into effect in 10 days" rather than immediately

refinement: The original version barred immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries and second version exempts Iraq, permanent residents, and people who have visas. The second version also no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country, and it goes into effect in 10 days rather than immediately.

answer: While the first version (the subject of this op-ed column) outsized protections on all 7 Muslin-majority countries, this one only covers six.

text: Unclear and confusing response

text: Provide a response

refinement: The second version exempts Iraq from the travel ban, exempts lawful permanent residents and people who have visas, no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter, and it goes into effect in 10 days rather than immediately.

answer: The revised versions of President Trump's order differ in that Iraq is exempt from the ban, refugees are exempted, and the order takes effect in 10 days instead of immediately. Beyond that, the primary difference is that the order targets Muslim-majority countries, while ignoring predominately Christian countries listed by the State Department as "Terrorist Safe Havens." This is perceived to be a discriminatory act against Muslims.

text: The targeting of Muslim-majority countries is a shared trait of both orders, not a difference between them

refinement: The revised versions of President Trump's order differ in that Iraq is exempt from the ban, refugees are exempted, and the order takes effect in 10 days instead of immediately.

text: There is only one revised version

refinement: The revised version of President Trump's order differs in that Iraq is exempt from the ban, refugees are exempted, and the order takes effect in 10 days instead of immediately.

text: Refugees are not exempted; the new order " no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter the country"

refinement: The revised version of President Trump's order differs in that Iraq is exempt from the ban, it no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter, and the order takes effect in 10 days instead of immediately.

text: Green card holders and visa holders are also exempt

refinement: The revised version of President Trump's order differs in that Iraq is exempt from the ban, lawful permanent residents and people who have visas are exempt, it no longer categorically bars Syrian refugees or includes a religious test to determine which refugees may enter, and the order takes effect in 10 days instead of immediately.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Is the reviewed version of the order better?

answer: No, the reviewed version of the order is not better. While there are some changes, it still discriminates against Muslims, and does not match reality.

text: "it still suffers from a fundamental, and fatal, flaw: It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination."

text: "The twisted worldview does not match reality."

answer: It seems more applicable for people with valid travel visas.

text: I wouldn't say "more applicable" but perhaps "slightly better"

refinement: It seems slightly better for people with valid travel visas.

text: But the author argues that "it still suffers from a fundamental, and fatal, flaw: It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination" which seems important to note

refinement: It seems slightly better for people with valid travel visas. However, it still constitutes unlawful religious discrimination.

text: "It explicitly exempts [...] lawful permanent residents (that is, green card holders) and people who have visas"

answer: No. The reviewed version of the order continues to discriminate against Muslim-majority countries by limiting their residents' ability to travel to the United States and continues to traffic in bigoted and inaccurate perceptions of Islam.

text: "it still suffers from a fundamental, and fatal, flaw: It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination"

text: "The revised order also continues to traffic in bigoted and largely false perceptions: By requiring the governmentto compile occurrencesof “honor killings” by immigrants, it gives official recognition to an inflammatory and misleading trope of Islam that is perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups."

answer: The order does not fix the core problem that the executive order is prohibiting Muslims from entering the country.

text: "Let’s be clear: This revised order is a Muslim ban."

answer: Not really, because anti-Muslim bias and bigotry remain in the reviewed version.

text: "Let’s be clear: This revised order is a Muslim ban."

text: "The revised order also continues to traffic in bigoted and largely false perceptions: By requiring the governmentto compile occurrencesof “honor killings” by immigrants, it gives official recognition to an inflammatory and misleading trope of Islam that is perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups."

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why did President Trump want to ban Muslims?

answer: According to the passage, President Trump wants to ban Muslims due to his belief that Muslims are dangerous and violent and that they pose a threat to Americans.

text: "On the campaign trail, he constantly conflated the vast majority of peaceful Muslims with the small handful of violent Muslims."

answer: President Trump had a belief that Muslims are more like to look to terrorist centers and Islam is different from Christianity.

text: The article never mentions "terrorist centers," and Trump never compares Islam and Christianity in the article

text: Provide a response

refinement: He believes that Muslims are violent and dangerous.

answer: It is unknown, but Trump's own words and actions shows it is because he believed all Muslim six countries have strong hatred toward Americans and favor Sharia law.

text: The response is not grammatical, and the question asks why Trump wants to ban Muslims, not about the specific countries affected by his travel ban

text: Provide a response

refinement: He believes that Muslims are violent and dangerous.

answer: He argues that the ban protects the country.

text: "The Trump administration argues that the ban protects the country."

answer: President Trump wanted to ban Muslims based on a bigoted and inaccurate view of Islam and Muslims. He believes that Muslim-majority countries are likely to have terrorists, and because of that, he wants to prohibit travel into the United States from those countries.

text: "he constantly conflated the vast majority of peaceful Muslims with the small handful of violent Muslims."

question: Write a ~4 sentence summary.

answer: The revised travel ban issued by President Trump still discriminates against Muslims, despite some new language. It explicitly exempts Iraq and allows lawfully-present permanent residents and people with visas. The order is incomplete and discriminatory, and does not improve the safety of the United States.

text: In what way is the new order "incomplete?"

refinement: The revised travel ban issued by President Trump still discriminates against Muslims, despite some new language. It explicitly exempts Iraq and allows lawfully-present permanent residents and people with visas. The order is discriminatory, and does not improve the safety of the United States.

answer: President Trump’s executive order and reviewed version of the order barring immigrants from some Muslim-majority countries are illegal as they constitute unlawful religious discrimination. The revisited version is not much better than the original as it keeps anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. Muslims have been part of America since the 17th century and represent 1 percent of the U.S. population today. They will suffer harm from this order as twill not be able to see their family members and friends from banned countries and will be deprived of the instruction from the leading Islamic scholars who are from those countries.

text: Correct "reviewed" and "revisited" to "revised"

refinement: President Trump’s executive order and revised version of the order barring immigrants from some Muslim-majority countries are illegal as they constitute unlawful religious discrimination. The revised version is not much better than the original as it keeps anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. Muslims have been part of America since the 17th century and represent 1 percent of the U.S. population today. They will suffer harm from this order as twill not be able to see their family members and friends from banned countries and will be deprived of the instruction from the leading Islamic scholars who are from those countries.

text: "as twill" should be "and will"

refinement: President Trump’s executive order and revised version of the order barring immigrants from some Muslim-majority countries are illegal as they constitute unlawful religious discrimination. The revised version is not much better than the original as it keeps anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. Muslims have been part of America since the 17th century and represent 1 percent of the U.S. population today. They will suffer harm from this order and will not be able to see their family members and friends from banned countries and will be deprived of the instruction from the leading Islamic scholars who are from those countries.

answer: The revised executive order on immigration signed by President Trump is still discriminatory, barring immigrants from only Muslim-majority countries. This order continues to traffic in bigoted and false perceptions, both of Islam as a religion and of Muslims as a group. The order will cause further harm to Muslim Americans and does not improve national security. President Trump's actions do not match American values.

answer: The author writes that President Trump's executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries is still unlawful because it still suffers from anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. The author feels that President Trump's attack toward Islam violates the Constitution and fundamental American values and beliefs. The author also feels that the executive order is a Muslim ban which targets opponents of Islam. The revised version is aimed at minimizing harms of the January order by acknowledging that the country of origin is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of terrorism, but the dictation, according to the author, is still a Muslim ban.

text: The ban does not target "opponents of Islam"

refinement: The author writes that President Trump's executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries is still unlawful because it still suffers from anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. The author feels that President Trump's attack toward Islam violates the Constitution and fundamental American values and beliefs. The author also feels that the executive order is a Muslim ban. The revised version is aimed at minimizing harms of the January order by acknowledging that the country of origin is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of terrorism, but the dictation, according to the author, is still a Muslim ban.

text: The order does not acknowledge "that the country of origin is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of terrorism"

refinement: The author writes that President Trump's executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries is still unlawful because it still suffers from anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. The author feels that President Trump's attack toward Islam violates the Constitution and fundamental American values and beliefs. The author also feels that the executive order is a Muslim ban.

text: The author specifically is talking about the revised order

refinement: The author writes that President Trump's revised executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries is still unlawful because it still suffers from anti-Muslim bias and bigotry. The author feels that President Trump's attack toward Islam violates the Constitution and fundamental American values and beliefs. The author also feels that the executive order is a Muslim ban.

answer: This article discusses President Trump's new executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. It makes changes to the original order, like being clear about the number of countries excluded, but it still does not work. It dispite being tailored to survive legal challenges, the Trump administration's motives are still racist. The new order will still do more harm than good.

text: One of the changes is not "being clear about the number of countries excluded"

refinement: This article discusses President Trump's new executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. It makes changes to the original order, but it still does not work. It dispite being tailored to survive legal challenges, the Trump administration's motives are still racist. The new order will still do more harm than good.

text: "it still does not work" specifically because "It constitutes unlawful religious discrimination"

refinement: This article discusses President Trump's new executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. It makes changes to the original order, but it still constitutes unlawful religious discrimination. It dispite being tailored to survive legal challenges, the Trump administration's motives are still racist. The new order will still do more harm than good.

text: Fix the spelling of "dispite" and remove the preceding "it"

refinement: This article discusses President Trump's new executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. It makes changes to the original order, but it still constitutes unlawful religious discrimination. Despite being tailored to survive legal challenges, the Trump administration's motives are still racist. The new order will still do more harm than good.

text: Change "racist" to "discriminatory;" both racial and religious discrimination are at play

refinement: This article discusses President Trump's new executive order barring travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. It makes changes to the original order, but it still constitutes unlawful religious discrimination. Despite being tailored to survive legal challenges, the Trump administration's motives are still discriminatory. The new order will still do more harm than good.


text:
HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter.

Biography

Kraay Jr. was born in Utrecht on 22 December 1959, the son of fellow footballer Hans Kraay Sr.

Career

Kraay played professionally in the Netherlands for AZ, SBV Excelsior, HFC Haarlem, NAC Breda, RKC Waalwijk, Helmond Sport, FC Eindhoven, De Graafschap, FC Dordrecht, Telstar and FC Den Bosch, in the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers and the San Jose Earthquakes,[1] in England for Brighton & Hove Albion,[2] and in Belgium for Sint-Niklase.

He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011, leading the club from Tweede Klasse to Topklasse and making it nationally known within Dutch football.[3][4]

On November 2011 he was appointed head coach of Topklasse club SVZW.[5] One month later, it was revealed his appointment head coach of JVC Cuijk, effective from July 2012.[6] He left after two seasons in charge to become new head coach of Hoofdklasse club DOVO, effective from July 2014.[7]

Kraay presented numerous television shows on Dutch television, most notably for SBS 6, for which he worked from 1997 till 2015. Between 2002 and 2015 he was the presenter of _Lachen om Home Video's_, on SBS 6, a compilation program of funny home videos. A part of the videos were taken from America's Funniest Home Videos.[8] In 2003 he had a hit record in The Netherlands reaching #3 at the Dutch Top 40 with _Er zal d'r altijd eentje winnen_, a song recorded with fans of various Dutch football clubs as a reaction to the violent meeting at Beverwijk of hooligans of AFC Ajax and Feyenoord, leading to the death of one hooligan.[9]

In April 2018, Kraay handed in his resignation at FC Lienden due to a discourtesy by supporters of the FC Lienden business club.[10]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7] {{ cite news |url=http://www.omroepbrabant.nl/?news/204174772/Hans+Kraay+jr.+wisselt+JVC+Cuijk+volgend+seizoen+in+voor+DOVO.aspx |publisher=Omroep Brabant |title=Hans Kraay jr. wisselt JVC Cuijk volgend seizoen in voor DOVO |accessdate=8 September 2014 |date=20 December 2013 |language=Dutch }}

[8] {{ cite news |url=https://www.ad.nl/show/hans-kraay-jr-weg-bij-sbs~a10333b3/ |publisher=AD |title=Hans Kraay jr. weg bij SBS |accessdate=23 December 2017 |date=26 June 2015 |language=Dutch }}

[9] {{ cite news |url=https://www.top40.nl/hans-kraay-jr-supporters-united/hans-kraay-jr-supporters-united-er-zal-d-r-altijd-eentje-winnen-2477 |title=Hans Kraay Jr. & Supporters United - Er Zal D'r Altijd Eentje Winnen |publisher=Dutch Top40 |date= |accessdate=24 December 2017}}

[10] {{ cite news |url=https://www.nu.nl/voetbal/5237774/kraay-jr-voelt-zich-geschoffeerd-en-neemt-per-direct-ontslag-bij-lienden.html |title=Kraay jr. voelt zich geschoffeerd en neemt per direct ontslag bij Lienden |publisher=nu.nl |date= |accessdate=3 May 2018}}

title: Hans Kraay Jr.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What nationality is Hans Kraay Jr?

answer: Hans Kraay Jr is Dutch.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch" is evidence that Kraay has a Dutch nationality.

answer:
Dutch.
The fact he is a Dutch-born and raised made his presentation of television shows on Dutch television fit well.

text: Its irrelevant that he's dutch that would make him present well on television.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch" is evidence that Kraay has a Dutch nationality.

answer: Dutch.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch" is evidence that Kraay has a Dutch nationality.

answer: Dutch.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch" is evidence that Kraay has a Dutch nationality.

answer: He is Dutch.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959) is a Dutch" is evidence that Kraay has a Dutch nationality.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When was Hans Kraay Jr born?

answer: 22 December 1959.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959)" is evidence Kraay was born on December 22, 1959.

answer: 22 December 1959

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959)" is evidence Kraay was born on December 22, 1959.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr was born on December 22, 1959.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959)" is evidence Kraay was born on December 22, 1959.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr was born on December 22nd, 1959.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959)" is evidence Kraay was born on December 22, 1959.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr. was born on 22 December 1959.

text: "HANS KRAAY JR. (born 22 December 1959)" is evidence Kraay was born on December 22, 1959.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What Belgian team did Hans Kraay Jr play for?

answer: Hans Kraay Jr played for the Belgian team Sint-Niklase.

text: "in Belgium for Sint-Niklase" is evidence that in Belgium Kraay played for the Sint-Niklase.

answer: FC Den Bosch

text: FC Den Bosch is a Dutch team. It misses to mention that the Belgian team Kraay played for was Sint-Niklase.

answer: FC Den Bosch.

text: FC Den Bosch is a Dutch team. It misses to mention that the Belgian team Kraay played for was Sint-Niklase.

answer: He played for Sint-Niklase.

text: "in Belgium for Sint-Niklase" is evidence that in Belgium Kraay played for the Sint-Niklase.

answer: He played for Sint-Niklase.

text: "in Belgium for Sint-Niklase" is evidence that in Belgium Kraay played for the Sint-Niklase.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What team did Hans Kraay Jr coach from 2004 to 2011?

answer: FC Lienden.

text: "He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011" is evidence that from 2004-2011 Kraay coached FC Lienden.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr coached FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011.

text: "He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011" is evidence that from 2004-2011 Kraay coached FC Lienden.

answer: FC Lienden.

text: "He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011" is evidence that from 2004-2011 Kraay coached FC Lienden.

answer: FC Lienden

text: "He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011" is evidence that from 2004-2011 Kraay coached FC Lienden.

answer: FC Lienden

text: "He also served as head coach of Dutch amateurs FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011" is evidence that from 2004-2011 Kraay coached FC Lienden.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What league do the Edmonton Drillers play for?

answer: The Edmonton Drillers played in the North American Soccer League.

text: "the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers" is evidence that the Edmonton Drillers play for the North American Soccer League.

answer: Information can't be found.

text: It incorrectly mentions that the answer can't be found, however "the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers" is evidence that the Edmonton Drillers play for the North American Soccer League.

refinement: the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers

answer: The Edmonton Drillers play in the North American Soccer League.

text: "the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers" is evidence that the Edmonton Drillers play in the North American Soccer League.

answer: The Edmonton Drillers play for the North American Soccer League.

text: "the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers" is evidence that the Edmonton Drillers play for the North American Soccer League.

answer: That information can't be found.

text: It incorrectly mentions that the answer can't be found, however "the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers" is evidence that the Edmonton Drillers play for the North American Soccer League.

refinement: the North American Soccer League for the Edmonton Drillers

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. Kraay Jr. is the son of a fellow footballer Hans Kraay Sr. He represented the Amsterdam soccer team for years.

text: There is no evidence to suggest that Kraay represented the Amsterdam soccer team.

refinement: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. Kraay Jr. is the son of a fellow footballer Hans Kraay Sr. He represented numerous Dutch, American, English and Belgian soccer teams.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. He earned his reputation as a coach based on his time at FC Lienden - leading the club from Tweede Klasse to Topklasse and making it nationally known within Dutch football. He resigned from FC Lienden due to his players' lack of support for him.

text: There's no evidence to suggest that the lack of support was from players.

refinement: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. He earned his reputation as a coach based on his time at FC Lienden - leading the club from Tweede Klasse to Topklasse and making it nationally known within Dutch football. He resigned from FC Lienden due to  discourtesy by supporters of the FC Lienden business club..

answer: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. He served as the head coach at FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011, and head coach at two other Dutch clubs since 2014. He also presented television shows such as 'Lachen om Home Video's' from 1997 to 2015. He recently decided to resign from FC Lienden due to a discourtesy by supporters, in April 2018.

text: Extra details exceeds the targeted summary length.

refinement: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. He served as the head coach at FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011, and head coach at two other Dutch clubs since 2014. He recently decided to resign from FC Lienden due to a discourtesy by supporters, in April 2018.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr. is a Dutch former professional footballer turned coach and television presenter. He served as head coach of various Dutch amateur clubs, most recently at FC Lienden, before resigning due to improper conduct from club supporters. He has also presented various television shows on Dutch television.

answer: Hans Kraay Jr is a Dutch professional football player, coach, and television personality. He played for many teams across many leagues during his career, and ended up coaching FC Lienden from 2004 to 2011. He hosted several television shows on Dutch television, and even released a hit record.


text:
__

_Disclaimer: This story was written based on comments made by Dixie Carter, owner of TNA Impact Wrestling on her Facebook account. Attempts were made to get a comment from Carter through her Facebook account, but as of press time, no other comment was made by Carter or other members of TNA management._

_Could two cryptic messages written by president of TNA Wrestling Dixie Carter mean one of the WWE's biggest stars will be the newest member of the promotion's wrestling roster this summer?_

_Carter appeared on the Bellator 88 broadcast to not only promote King Mo Lawal's debut in TNA, but also to announce that current TNA World Champion Jeff Hardy had signed a new two-year contract to remain with the company._

_Carter also took to her Facebook page, where she sent to two messages to her fans about the signing of a major WWE superstar, whose contract expires after WrestleMania 29._

_"The surprise in June will be involving a new talent with the company. His WWE contract expires after Wrestlemania, and we just happened to pick him up," Carter said._

_As part of the tease, Carter also tried to give her fans on Facebook a little more subtle information about who the company had signed._

_"One last hint. The newest member to the TNA roster, debuting in June, is a guy who will "slither and strike" when the time is right."_

_Immediately, Facebook fans responded by asking if "The Viper" Randy Orton would be joining the TNA roster._

_Orton is a third-generation professional wrestler; his grandfather, Bob Orton Sr., and father, "Cowboy" Bob Orton, were regional stars in several wrestling promotions. Bob Orton Jr. was one of the better mat technicians in the NWA before moving on to the WWF and helped usher in the "Rock and Wrestling" connection with Roddy Piper. Bob Orton Sr. was known as one of the best "shoot" wrestlers of his generation._

_Although it is purely speculative, if Orton is let out of his contract with the WWE and he moves to TNA"s promotion in Florida, it is a major accomplishment for the WWE's only competition. While other former WWE superstars like Kurt Angle, Demon and Bully Ray and Jeff Hardy have all found success with Impact Wrestling, Orton may be the biggest coup for Carter and management._

_There have been rumors as of late that the ultra-popular Orton will at some point turn heel, but that has not happened yet._

_His signing could also mean other wrestlers may follow suit, and viewership for TNA's Thursday night program could see a solid increase._

_Orton has won 11 total championships in WWE, including being a nine-time world champion, having won the World Heavyweight Championship three times and the WWE Championship six times. He is also the winner of the 2009 Royal Rumble match._

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...e-carter-hints-at-wrestlers-big-jump-from-wwe

:O

question: Who is Dixie Carter?

answer: Dixie Carter is the president of TNA Wrestling.

text: She's owner, not president.

refinement: Dixie Carter is the owner of TNA Wrestling.

answer: Dixie Carter is the owner of TNA iImpact Wrestling

answer: Dixie Carter is the owner of TNA Impact Wrestling.

question: Who is Randy Orton?

answer: Randy Orton is a professional, third-generation professional wrestler.

text: He's also one of WWE's biggest stars having been world champion nine times. He may also be the newest member of TNA.

refinement: Randy Orton is a professional, third-generation professional wrestler and is one of WWE's biggest stars, having held WWE's World Championship on nine separate occasions. If TNA holds true to the clues unraveled by president Dixie Carter, Orton may be the newest member of the TNA roster this summer.

answer: Randy Orton is one of WWE's biggest stars, having held WWE's World Championship on nine separate occasions. If TNA holds true to the clues unraveled by president Dixie Carter, Orton may be the newest member of the TNA roster this summer.

text: He's also a third generation wrestler.

refinement: Randy Orton is a third generation wrestler and one of WWE's biggest stars, having held WWE's World Championship on nine separate occasions. If TNA holds true to the clues unraveled by president Dixie Carter, Orton may be the newest member of the TNA roster this summer.

answer: Randy Orton is a professional wrestler in the WWE, and holds the record as one of the company's most dominant wrestlers. He has won the World Heavyweight Championship three times and is the winner of the 2009 Royal Rumble match.

text: He's also a third generation wrestler.

refinement: Randy Orton is a third generation professional wrestler in the WWE, and holds the record as one of the company's most dominant wrestlers. He has won the World Heavyweight Championship three times and is the winner of the 2009 Royal Rumble match.

question: Who will be joining the TNA in June?

answer: Carter teased that a new talent will be joining the TNA company, but did not say who.

text: She also hinted at who it would be.

refinement: Carter teased that a new talent will be joining the TNA company, but did not say who. She hinted that it's a guy who will "slither and strike when the time is right."

answer: Either Randy Orton or another WWE star is set to join TNA in June.

answer: The latest rumor suggests that WWE superstar Randy Orton will be joining TNA Wrestling in June.

question: How many championships has Orton won?

answer: Orton has won 11 total championships in the WWE.

answer: 11.

answer: 11.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: In the article written by Roland Gambuzz, Dixie Carter hinted at who her company signed this summer, and Randy Orton is a rumored WWE wrestling star whose departure and signing TNA would be an accomplishment.

text: It never says who wrote the article.

refinement: Dixie Carter hinted at who her company signed this summer, and Randy Orton is a rumored WWE wrestling star whose departure and signing TNA would be an accomplishment.

answer:
TNA Wrestling president reveals Randy Orton may be newest member of TNA roster, but speculates if is he is the WWE superstar to be announced.

TNA Wrestling president Dixie Carter hinted that wrestling superstar Randy Orton may be becoming the newest member to join TNA's roster. However, Carter speculates if he is the specific WWE superstar to be announced in June, as his contract expires after WrestleMania.

text: Carter never specifies who the new member may be, she simply drops a hint.

refinement: TNA Wrestling president reveals newest member of TNA roster will "slither and strike when the time is right;" fans are speculating it's Randy "The Viper" Orton. His contract expires after WrestleMania.

answer: Carter hints that star wrestler Randy Orton may be joining the TNA roster.

text: Carter never specifies who the new member may be, she simply drops a hint.

refinement: Carter hints that the next wrestling star joining the TNA roster will "slither and strike when the time is right." Fans are speculating that it's Randy "The Viper" Orton.

answer: TNA Impact Wrestling president Dixie Carter teased Tuesday about a major wrestler signing with the company. Some WWE fans speculated that Randy Orton, a third-generation professional wrestler, would be making the switch.

answer: Dixie Carter, the owner of TNA Impact Wrestling, teased that a major signing would be joining the TNA company this summer. Many fans speculate that the new signee may be "The Viper" Randy Orton, 11-time WWE champion.

answer: Dixie Carter hinted on her Facebook that 'The Surprise in June' involves a new WWE superstar departing the promotion and joining TNA's roster. She also implied that 'The Viper' Randy Orton would be the newest superstar signing.

text: She never directly said it would be Orton.

refinement: Dixie Carter hinted on her Facebook that 'The Surprise in June' involves a new WWE superstar departing the promotion and joining TNA's roster. She also implied that 'The Viper' Randy Orton would be the newest superstar signing.


text:
The Dart Center is offering a two-day workshop for journalists on covering guns and gun violence, May 29-30, in Phoenix, Arizona.

[]
Lighted angels hang from a tree in Monroe, Connecticut January 14, 2013, on the one-month anniversary of the shooting at Sandy Hook elementary School in Newtown that killed 20 children and six staff members.

Reporting on gun violence – on individual incidents, policy shifts and polarized political debate – is a major challenge for journalists and news organizations. Every day, 86 Americans die of firearm related injuries, including nearly 12,000 murdered with guns each year – a rate 20 times higher than that of other developed countries. Nearly 100 school shootings have occurred since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary only two years ago.

When it comes to reporting on guns, local and regional reporters bear the primary burden. They are often trapped into narrow deadline-driven beats with little time to develop expert sources, investigative angles or broader perspectives. And newsrooms and news managers are unprepared for the overwhelming, spasmodic tragedy of mass shootings. As a consequence, incidents of gun violence are too often viewed in isolation as random, inevitable tragedy rather than part of a wider phenomenon with complex causes but amenable to prevention efforts.

To help journalists and news organizations in the Southwest improve their reporting on guns and gun violence, the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma at Columbia Journalism School is organizing a two-day regional workshop May 29 and 30, 2015 for reporters, editors, news directors, photographers, producers, and bloggers. The workshop, funded by Everytown for Gun Safety, will offer independent expert briefings and specialized reporting skills training to enhance the practical ability of journalists to report on guns and gun violence knowledgeably, ethically and effectively. The workshop will cover such topics as state and federal gun laws; patterns of gun sales and gun trafficking; national trends and polling; education and prevention initiatives; social, economic and public health impacts; and special populations (e.g. children and youth, women and returning veterans.)

Speakers include national public health and policy experts; researchers and clinicians; award-winning journalists, and prevention advocates and survivors.

The workshop will:

-   Serve as a forum for improving journalists’ knowledge of guns and gun violence, and the implications of public policies like background check requirements
-   Explore new research, reporting ideas and best practices with leading public health and policy experts
-   Confront challenges — and identify opportunities — that exist for local journalists pursuing these stories with limited resources
-   Provide practical tools to enable journalists to successfully produce meaningful stories on guns and gun violence.

Participation is open to reporters, editors, news directors, photographers and producers for print, broadcast and online media. Staff, contract and freelance journalists are eligible to apply. Thirty individuals will be selected for the workshop. Travel stipends of up to $350 for airfare or trainfare, and two nights of lodging, will be provided to 15 selected participants.

Application Information

THE DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS HAS PASSED. ALL APPLICANTS WHO APPLIED BY THE APRIL 13 DEADLINE WILL BE NOTIFIED WITH A DECISION BY APRIL 20, 2015. If you have any questions, please email [email protected].

This workshop is being made possible by a grant from Everytown for Gun Safety.

-   Homicide & Mass Shooting
-   Featured Articles
-   gun violence
-   Mass shootings
-   Announcement

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When is the workshop being held?

answer: The workshop is scheduled for May 29-30, 2015.

answer: May 29-30, 2015

answer: The workshop is being held on May 29-30.

answer: May 29 to 30, 2015

answer: May 29-30, 2015

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How many Americans die per day due to firearm injuries?

answer: 86.

text: In the passage, it is stated that "Every day, 86 Americans die of firearm related injuries".

answer: 86 Americans die per day due to firearm injuries. Just over 18,000 Americans also are murdered per year with guns, or 11.7 a day.

text: The second half of this response can be omitted since it is incorrect.

refinement: 86 Americans die per day due to firearm injuries.

answer: Each day, 86 Americans die due to firearm injuries.

answer: According to the passage, 86 Americans die every day due to firearm-related injuries.

answer: 86 Americans die per day from firearm injuries.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How much is the travel stipend?

answer: The travel stipend is up to $350.

answer: The travel stipend is up to $350 for the selected participants.

answer: The travel stipend for this workshop is up to $350.

answer: A maximum of $350.

answer: A maximum of $350 for airfare or trainfare, with two nights of lodging provided for up to 15 selected participants.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How many individuals will be selected for the workshop?

answer: 30 individuals will be selected.

answer: Thirty individuals will be selected for the workshop.

answer: Thirty individuals will be selected.

answer: Thirty individuals will be selected for the workshop.

answer: 30 individuals will be selected for the workshop.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: The Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma is organizing a two-day workshop in Phoenix, Arizona for journalists on covering guns and gun violence. The workshop will cover such topics as state and federal gun laws; social, economic and public health impacts; and special populations like children and returning veterans. Participants will receive research and practical tools to help them cover this important issue more effectively. The workshop is open to journalists in print, broadcast and online media. The deadline for applications has passed.

answer: The Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma is offering a workshop in Phoenix, Arizona for reporters on reporting on guns and gun violence. The workshop will include expert briefings and specialized reporting skills training on state and federal gun laws, national trends, and patterns of gun sales and trafficking.

answer: The Dart Center at Columbia Journalism was funding a two-day journalism workshop on covering guns and gun violence, in Phoenix, Arizona. Speakers to this would include gun researchers, public health experts, award-winning journalists, and prevention advocates and survivors.

answer: This article is an advertisement for a two-day regional workshop on covering guns and gun violence. It briefly discusses the instructor and gives course overview.

answer: The Dart Center is offering a workshop to members of the media on how to deal with reporting on gun violence. The workshop is available to thirty people, and deals with giving media members the tools necessary to accurately report on these incidents.


text:
War Birds

The air is still and cold, frozen. Frozen like the whole of the City’s population. They stand and stare on porches and balconies, wait in terror on sidewalks and roadways. Sirens ring out long and loud, a useless warning of what is coming. Then there is silence. No traffic, no footsteps, only a deafening quiet. It creeps up the roads and into the houses filling up the lungs of the citizens. Families cower in their living rooms, while couples prepare to throw each other into the arms of the enemy, and those who are alone thank God no one will see them in their most fragile of moments. The City waits in terror. No one runs, no one breaths, no screams…yet. The still wind begins to move as if uncomfortable in the silence. Suddenly the wind begins to scream, cut through by mile wide metal wings. Like an ant hill trampled the City is in instant chaos. People climbing over people, hurtling fences, tumbling over cars. They run. In their hearts they know they will not escape the fire storm that is coming, but still they run. Anything to trick themselves into hopefulness. Those on the southern most fringe of the City see them first. The War Birds. They rip through the clouds, gnashing their teeth and bringing death. The wind roars for them as they hunt for prey that cannot hide. Those on to the north run from the city limits hoping only to evade the deepest circles of the Hell now brought to their doors. Others simply wait accepting that they will die today in burning arms. Far more citizens wait in their homes without the dignity of acceptance. Those who acknowledged the Reapers coming embrace sit calmly, while the rest blubber prayers to Gods they never believed in, or prepare an early departure from this world. In its last terrified moments the City tosses off all pretense. It citizens show one another who they truly are cowards and heroes alike. The War Birds descend on the City for an infinite moment that ripples through time out into forever. Even as this moment passes the City stills feels the hot breath they breathed down the streets. Even as they fly back to their hangers to rest on a new batch of hellish eggs the City feels their terrible presence in the fires that linger. The citizens scream prayers and damnations as they melt into the crumbling inferno that is their City
Even after the long living fires are reduced to embers the screams stretch on and on throughout eternity. No one was spared from the fires not children, nor the elderly, not the guilty or the innocent. The air is hot and still, the acrid smell of death is scorched into the earth itself. No one goes near the City anymore. The roads were closed and the maps were changed. Everyone forgets what they know to be true. This great memory loss is everyone’s reminder that the War Birds and their masters are the powerful and the strong. A reminder that Gods hold the fire and any so bold as to emulate Prometheus can be punished just as severely for their ambition. This is the legacy the War of Birds.

title: War Birds

question: How does the author say people feel about what's to come?

answer: There are a variety of reactions, at first people are frozen in fear and then some turn to chaos, running and and falling over each other. Others are calm, some pray and some hold their families close.

answer: The author says people feel desperate and panicked

answer: The author makes it clear that the citizens are very fearful and uneasy about what's to come.

question: Why are the War Birds attacking the city?

answer: The birds are attacking for their eggs to ascend to the next level of the game

text: No reason is given

answer: No motive is given.

answer: The War Birds are attacking the City to express their power and strength. They are emulating Prometheus.

text: The birds are not emulating Prometheus they are warning against him

refinement: The War Birds are attacking the City to express their power and strength.

question: Did everyone die in the bombing?

answer: Yes, almost everyone in the city perished in the resulting firestorm.

answer: Based on the passage above, everyone in the city was killed when the War Birds descended and bombed it.

answer: The narrator suggests that no-one escaped the firestorm. No-one was spared.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Seventy years ago a war broke out and decimated a city. War Machines, or War Birds, descended upon the city and killed everyone in sight, from children to the elderly to the guilty to the innocent. No one ever returned to the city again.

answer: In the beginning of the story, the city is at peace until the air and streets are filled with fire and death. Citizens run for cover, not knowing people were killed in their own homes and many family members were separated from each other. The fires were hot and full of smoke and screams. Everyone forget what they know to be true and the whole city is abandoned.

answer: An ancient story evoking a time of great upheaval, War Birds tells the story of a future where powerful War Birds are hunted by brave warriors for the fire to create rain. A story of heroism, heartbreak and sacrafice.

answer: In this passage, the speaker describes their experience with the War Birds, deadly warriors that fly great distances to commit mass genocide, wiping out all in their path. The passage is in first person and is maybe meant to be tragic for the narrator, or horror for the reader.

answer: A war helicopter comes to a small town at the period of Puritan society. The town's residents must decide whether they are the sane or the insane but we learn the roots of Puritan society.

text: Puritans? What? This text has nothing to do with the group.

refinement: War Birds destroy a city. Nothing but ashes and rubble remain.

answer: A short story about a city about to be bombed. The story reflects on the way people react to the knowledge of impending doom as well as the lasting legacy of the bombing.


text:
KUNG CHAO-YUAN (1836 – July 20, 1897) was a Chinese Ambassador.

-   In 1888 he was Shanghai Custom Taotai responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.
-   From 1893 to 1896 he was sent by Li Hongzhang as ambassador to the Court of St James's and was concurrently accredited in Rome.
-   In London he trapped Sun Yat-sen in his legation, but had to release him under British pressure.[1]
-   In 1896 he left London already seriously ill.[2]

[1] release of Sun Yat-sen from the Chinese legation, than he assured the Chinese minister that Her Majesty's government would do all that was 'legally in their power to prevent any British territory being used for preparing conspiracies against the Chinese government or its officers. 12

[2] Léon Wieger, China throughout the ages, Hsien press, 1928, 508 pp.p. 346

title: Kung Chao-Yuan

question: Who was Kung Chao-Yuan?

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese Ambassador.

answer: He was a Chinese Ambassador.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese ambassador who was sent to the Court of St James's in the late 1800s.

answer: He was a Chinese Ambassador.

question: What was Kung Chao-Yun responsible for in 1888?

answer: He was responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.

answer: He was responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was responsible for overseeing the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai in 1888.

question: What occupation did Kung Chao-Yuan have from 1893-1896?

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was an ambassador.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was an ambassador during the years 1893-1896.

answer: He was sent by Li Hongzhang as ambassador to the Court of St James's and was concurrently accredited in Rome.

answer: He was an ambassador to the Court of St. James's and was concurrently accredited in Rome.

question: Why did Kung Chao-Yuan have to release Sun Yat-sen?

answer: He had to release Sun Yat-sen under British pressure.

text: "He had to release Sun Yat-sen under British pressure." - improve the flow of the sentence by replacing "under" with "due to"

refinement: He had to release Sun Yat-sen because due to British pressure.

answer: He had to release him due to British pressure.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan had to release Sun Yat-sen because the British government pressured him to do so. This was due to the fact that Sun Yat-sen was plotting against the Chinese government, and the British did not want their territory to be used for such activities.

text: "This was due to the fact that Sun Yat-sen was plotting against the Chinese government, and the British did not want their territory to be used for such activities." - this section is from an external source and not in the passage. Should be deleted.

refinement: Kung Chao-Yuan had to release Sun Yat-sen because the British government pressured him to do so.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan had to release Sun Yat-sen because he was under British pressure.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese Ambassador who was sent to the Court of St James's and was concurrently accredited in Rome. He was responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.

text: Went over the 1-sentence summary requirement. Revise the current summary.

refinement: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese Ambassador who was sent to the Court of St James's and was responsible for the public investment in the Huahsin Spinning and Weaving Company in Shanghai.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese ambassador who was sent to the Court of St. James's in the 1890s. He was responsible for trapping Sun Yat-sen in his legation, but was forced to release him under British pressure.

text: Went over the 1-sentence summary requirement. Revise the current summary.

refinement: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese ambassador who was sent to the Court of St. James's in the 1890s and was responsible for trapping Sun Yat-sen in his legation but was forced to release him under British pressure.

answer: Kung Chao-Yuan was a Chinese Ambassador.

answer: This article describes the political career of Kung Chao-Yuan.