text:
One source told the 'Post' that the man was suspected of receiving $25,000 in commission for his role in the sale of the house.

David Friedman

(photo credit: REUTERS)

US Ambassador David M. Friedman has demanded the immediate release of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces two months ago for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City.

“Akel’s incarceration is antithetical to the values of the US & to all who advocate the cause of peaceful coexistence,” said Friedman on Twitter. “We demand his immediate release.”

  The Pal Authority has been holding US citizen Isaam Akel in prison for ~2 months. His suspected “crime”? Selling land to a Jew. Akel’s incarceration is antithetical to the values of the US & to all who advocate the cause of peaceful coexistence. We demand his immediate release.

  — David M. Friedman (@USAmbIsrael) November 28, 2018

Palestinian sources said Akel, a resident of Bethlehem, had worked for the PA Ministry for Local Government.

“The 55-year-old man, who is a US citizen, is being interrogated by the Palestinians security agencies in Ramallah for his role in the sale of an Arab-owned house in the Old City of Jerusalem to a Jewish organization,” sources told The Jerusalem Post upon Akel’s arrest.

if(window.location.pathname.indexOf("647856") != -1) {console.log("hedva connatix");document.getElementsByClassName("divConnatix")[0].style.display ="none";}
They said that the man arrested was suspected of acting as a “solicitor” between the owner of the house and Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group that has long been purchasing Arab-owned property in the east Jerusalem and the Old City, which reportedly purchased the house in the Old city of Jerusalem’s Muslim Quarter.

A senior PA security official in Ramallah refused to comment on Akel’s arrest and detention.

US government officials said they were aware of the arrest and expressed concern that he would be treated fairly. They said the State Department was in touch with the PA regarding the arrest.

Last week, the Palestinian Islamic religious authorities in east Jerusalem reaffirmed a _fatwa_ (religious decree) prohibiting Palestinians from selling their houses and lands to Israelis. Some Palestinians have called for imposing the death penalty on those who violate the ban.

One source told the _Post_ that Akel received $25,000 for brokering the sale of the house, which belonged to a Palestinian widow. The source said it was unclear whether Akel was involved in the recent sale of a second property in the Muslim Quarter to Ateret Cohanim.
Earlier this month, several Jewish families moved into the Joudeh family house, triggering a wave of protests among many Palestinians. The PA government recently announced that it has formed a commission of inquiry to investigate how the house was sold to the Jewish organization.

The Joudeh family has strongly denied selling their house to Ateret Cohanim. Members of the family said they sold the house to Khaled al-Atari, a businessman from east Jerusalem with close ties to the PA’s Mukhabarat (General Intelligence Force) headed by Gen. Majed Faraj.

The family said it originally sold the house to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian ex-pat living in the US, but canceled the contract after he failed to pay the agreed sum. Elsalameen is believed to be closely associated with deposed Fatah leader Mohammed Dahlan, an arch-enemy of PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

Elsalameen claimed the PA exerted pressure on the Joudeh family to cancel the transaction and sell the house instead to Atari. He has also accused Faraj and the PA General Intelligence Force of facilitating the sale of the house, which is located a few hundred meters from the Temple Mount, to Ateret Cohenim.

The Joudeh family has published a copy of the deed issued by the Justice Ministry’s Land Title Register Authority (Tabu) showing the ownership of the house was transferred to Atari on August 23, 2018.

That same day, ownership was flipped to an overseas company called Daho Holdings Ltd., according to the document.

Atari, an east Jerusalem businessman, has failed to explain how the house ended up being registered under the name of a foreign company, which apparently acted as a front on behalf of Ateret Cohenim.

Last week, Palestinian activists in east Jerusalem summoned Atari and a representative of the Joudeh family for what some Palestinians described as a kangaroo court in an attempt to find out who sold the house to Ateret Cohanim. A video of the “court” hearing posted on Facebook has gone viral, with many Palestinians calling for the “execution” of those involved in the transaction for “high treason.”

On November 22, Israel Police arrested east Jerusalem residents Abdullah Alqam, Fadi Mtur and Kamal Abu Kweider on suspicion of incitement for their role in organizing the “court” hearing and threatening Atari. The three were arrested hours before a second “court” session was scheduled to convene.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Isaam Akel?

answer: a Palestinian-American who has been detained for two months by the Palestinian Authority for the sale of real estate to Jewish organizations

text: "a Palestinian-American who has been detained for two months by the Palestinian Authority for the sale of real estate to Jewish organizations" - Use a capital "A" and add a period to end the sentence.

refinement: A Palestinian-American who has been detained for two months by the Palestinian Authority for the sale of real estate to Jewish organizations.

answer: Isaam Akel is a Palestinian-American civil consultant, arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces in connection with a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem.

text: "civil consultant" - there is no evidence anywhere in the wiki that Akel was ever a civil consultant. Delete this entry.

refinement: Isaam Akel is a Palestinian-American arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces in connection with a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem.

answer: He is a Palestinian-American arrested by the Palestinian Authority for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City.

answer: He is a 55-year-old Palestinian-American who was arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City.

answer: Isaam Akel is a Palestinian-American who was arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces two months ago for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who purchased the property?

answer: Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group that has been long buying Arab-owned properties in the East Jerusalem and the Old City.

text: "in the East Jerusalem" - remove "the"

refinement: Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group that has been long buying Arab-owned properties in East Jerusalem and the Old City.

answer: Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group that has long been purchasing Arab-owned property in East Jerusalem and the Old City.

answer: Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group.

answer: Ateret Cohenim.

answer: Ateret Cohanim, a yeshiva group, purchased the property.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is David M. Friedman?

answer: David M. Friedman is the United States Ambassador to Israel. He has demanded the immediate release of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City.

answer: David M. Friedman is the United States Ambassador to Israel. He is advocating for the immediate release of Isaam Akel, who is being held in prison by the Palestinian Authority for allegedly participating in a real estate transaction with a Jewish organization.

answer: He was the US Ambassador to Israel in 2018.

answer: He s the US Ambassador who is demanding the release of US citizen Isaam Akel from the Pal Authority.

text: "He s" - "He is"

refinement: He is the US Ambassador who is demanding the release of US citizen Isaam Akel from the Pal Authority.

answer: Not answered.

text: "Not answered." - it is clearly stated that he is the US Ambassador to Israel.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who are the original owners of the house and what are their thoughts on the issue?

answer: The Joudeh family insists they did sell the house to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian ex-pat living in the US. He claims the Palestinian Authority exerted pressure on the family to transfer the house to Khaled al-Atari to act as a front for Ateret Cohanim.

text: "The Joudeh family insists they did sell the house to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian ex-pat living in the US. He claims the Palestinian Authority exerted pressure on the family to transfer the house to Khaled al-Atari to act as a front for Ateret Cohanim." - this doesn't answer the question of who owns the house and what their thoughts are. Needs a full rewrite.

refinement: The Joudeh family are the original owners of the house. They strongly denied selling their house to Ateret Cohanim and instead sold it to Khaled al-Atari, a businessman from east Jerusalem with close ties to the PA’s Mukhabarat (General Intelligence Force) headed by Gen. Majed Faraj.

answer: The house is owned by the Joudeh family and they have denied selling the house to Ateret Cohanim.

answer: The original owners of the house are the Joudeh family from east Jerusalem. They are reportedly not happy that Ateret Cohanim purchased the house and the lack of transparency regarding the transaction has angered the family.

text: "from east Jerusalem." - there is no evidence that the Joudeh family are from East Jerusalem.

refinement: The original owners of the house are the Joudeh family. They are reportedly not happy that Ateret Cohanim purchased the house and the lack of transparency regarding the transaction has angered the family.

text: "They are reportedly not happy that Ateret Cohanim purchased the house and the lack of transparency regarding the transaction has angered the family." - the family's exact feelings were not mentioned and this is pure speculation. Replace with facts.

refinement: The original owners of the house are the Joudeh family. They have strongly denied selling their house to Ateret Cohanim. Members of the family said they sold the house to Khaled al-Atari. Documents from the Joudeh family later show that the ownership of the house was transferred to Atari pm August 23, 2018, but was flipped that same day to an overseas company called Daho Holdings Ltd., which apparently acted as a front for Ateret Cohanim.

answer: The original owners of the house are the Joudeh family. They have stated that they did not sell the house to Ateret Cohanim, but instead sold it to Khaled Atari. The Joudeh family adamantly opposes the sale.

answer: The house is/was under the ownership of the Joudeh family, not Ateret Cohenim.

text: "The house is/was under the ownership of the Joudeh family, not Ateret Cohenim." - did not answer the second part of the question.

refinement: The house is/was under the ownership of the Joudeh family, not Ateret Cohenim. The family has strongly denied selling their house to Ateret Cohanim.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: US Ambassador David M. Friedman has demanded the release of US Citizen Isaam Akel, who was arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces for acting as a "solicitor" between the Palestinian owners of the house and Ateret Cohenim, a yeshiva group that has long been purchasing Arab-owned property in East Jerusalem and the Old City. Akel, 55, is a Palestinian-Ameican resident of Bethlehem and has worked for the PA Ministry for Local Government. The Joudeh family, who own the house, have denied selling the property to Ateret Cohenim.

answer: According to Palestinian sources, 55-year-old US citizen Isaam Akel has been arrested and detained by PA security agencies. The Palestinian Islamic religious authorities in east Jerusalem reaffirmed a _fatwa_ (religious decree) prohibiting Palestinians from selling their houses and lands to Israelis. David M. Friedman, the US Ambassador, has demanded the release of Akel.

text: " a _fatwa_ " - remove all _

refinement: According to Palestinian sources, 55-year-old US citizen Isaam Akel has been arrested and detained by PA security agencies. The Palestinian Islamic religious authorities in east Jerusalem reaffirmed a fatwa (religious decree) prohibiting Palestinians from selling their houses and lands to Israelis. David M. Friedman, the US Ambassador, has demanded the release of Akel.

answer: US Ambassador David M. Friedman has demanded the release of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American man arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces two months ago for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews. Akel is suspected of having received $25,000 in commission for the sale of a Palestinian-owned house in Jerusalem's Old City. The house was sold to a Jewish organization, raising concern among many Palestinians that it is part of an effort to take over Arab-owned property. The owner of the house has denied selling to a Jewish organization. The PA has not commented on the arrest, and Akel has not been charged with any crime.

text: Went over the 3-sentence summary requirement. Delete the last sentence and merge sentences 3 and 4.

refinement:
US Ambassador David M. Friedman has demanded the release of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American man arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces two months ago for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews.
Akel is suspected of having received $25,000 in commission for the sale of a Palestinian-owned house in Jerusalem's Old City.
The house was sold to a Jewish organization, raising concern among many Palestinians that it is part of an effort to take over Arab-owned property, but the owner of the house has denied selling to a Jewish organization.

text: "a Jewish organization" - needs to mention the organization's name, Ateret Cohanim.

refinement:
US Ambassador David M. Friedman has demanded the release of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American man arrested by the Palestinian Authority security forces two months ago for engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews.
Akel is suspected of having received $25,000 in commission for the sale of a Palestinian-owned house in Jerusalem's Old City.
The house was sold to Ateret Cohanim, a Jewish organization, raising concern among many Palestinians that it is part of an effort to take over Arab-owned property, but the owner of the house has denied selling to the organization.

answer: The article discusses the detainment of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American and a United States citizen by the Palestinian Authority Security Forces for selling a house in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City to a Jewish organization. They suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale and demands his release. While held, Akel's family says the house was originally sold to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian living in the US, but needed to be canceled because he did not pay the agreed sum. Elsalameen also claims the PA exerted pressure on the Joudeh family to cancel the transaction and sell the house instead to Atari.

text: "a Palestinian-American and a United States citizen" is redundant. Delete "a United States citizen"

refinement:
The article discusses the detainment of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American, by the Palestinian Authority Security Forces for selling a house in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City to a Jewish organization.
They suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale and demands his release.
While held, Akel's family says the house was originally sold to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian living in the US, but needed to be canceled because he did not pay the agreed sum.
Elsalameen also claims the PA exerted pressure on the Joudeh family to cancel the transaction and sell the house instead to Atari.

text: "They suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale and demands his release." - it is unclear who suspects Akel received $25,000 and who demands his release. Revise to include these parties.

refinement:
The article discusses the detainment of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American, by the Palestinian Authority Security Forces for selling a house in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City to a Jewish organization.
The PAL Authority Security Forces suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale, but the US Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, demands Akel's release.
While held, Akel's family says the house was originally sold to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian living in the US, but needed to be canceled because he did not pay the agreed sum.
Elsalameen also claims the PA exerted pressure on the Joudeh family to cancel the transaction and sell the house instead to Atari.

text: "While held, Akel's family says" - is incorrect. The Joudeh family were the ones who spoke about the house.

refinement:
The article discusses the detainment of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American, by the Palestinian Authority Security Forces for selling a house in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City to a Jewish organization.
The PAL Authority Security Forces suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale, but the US Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, demands Akel's release.
The Joudeh family says the house was originally sold to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian living in the US, but needed to be canceled because he did not pay the agreed sum.
Elsalameen also claims the PA exerted pressure on the Joudeh family to cancel the transaction and sell the house instead to Atari.

text: Went over the 3-sentence summary requirement. The last sentence can be deleted.

refinement:
The article discusses the detainment of Isaam Akel, a Palestinian-American, by the Palestinian Authority Security Forces for selling a house in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City to a Jewish organization.
The PAL Authority Security Forces suspect Akel received $25,000 for the sale, but the US Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, demands Akel's release.
The Joudeh family says the house was originally sold to Fadi Elsalameen, a Palestinian living in the US, but needed to be canceled because he did not pay the agreed sum.

answer: US Ambassador David Friedman has expressed concern for Isaam Akel, an American citizen who has been detained in the Palestinian Authority for two months on suspicion of engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City. Palestinian sources say Akel is suspected of receiving $25,000 commission for the sale, and the PA has not released him. In the meantime, the PA has reaffirmed a religious decree barring Palestinians from selling their houses and land to Israelis, while the sale of a house in the Muslim Quarter has sparked protests and arrests in recent weeks.

text: "receiving $25,000 commission" - add "a" before $25k.

refinement:
US Ambassador David Friedman has expressed concern for Isaam Akel, an American citizen who has been detained in the Palestinian Authority for two months on suspicion of engaging in a real estate transaction with Jews in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City.
Palestinian sources say Akel is suspected of receiving a $25,000 commission for the sale, and the PA has not released him.
In the meantime, the PA has reaffirmed a religious decree barring Palestinians from selling their houses and land to Israelis, while the sale of a house in the Muslim Quarter has sparked protests and arrests in recent weeks.


split: train

text:
JOHN LESLIE COOPER (born 16 December 1933) is a retired British Anglican priest. He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2] After National Service in the Royal Artillery he was a management trainee with GEC. Aftyer ordination he was Assistant Curate at All Saints, Kings Heath from 1962 to 1965. He was then a Prison Chaplain from 1965 until 1972. He was Priest in charge of St Paul's, Balsall Heath from 1973 to 1982. He was Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990; and then of Coleshill until 1993. Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

[1] ‘COOPER, Rev. Canon John Leslie’, Who's Who 2017, A & C Black, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc, 2017; online edn, Oxford University Press, 2016 ; online edn, Nov 2016 [http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U11803, accessed 24 Dec 2016]

[2] _Crockford's Clerical Directory 1975-76_ London: OUP, 1976

title: John Cooper (Archdeacon of Aston)

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where was Cooper a senior clergyman?

answer: The Anglican Diocese of Birmingham.

text: He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

answer: Cooper was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham.

text: He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

answer: The Anglican Diocese of Birmingham

text: He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

answer: The Anglican Diocese of Birmingham

text: He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

answer: Cooper was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham.

text: He was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, serving as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.[1]

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where was Cooper educated?

answer: Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.

text: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2]

answer: Cooper was educated at Chichester Theological College.

text: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2]

answer: Cooper was educated at Chichester Theological College.

text: There was another school as well.

refinement: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School Chichester Theological College.

text: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2]

answer: At Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.

text: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2]

answer: He was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.

text: Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College.[2]

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What was Cooper doing from 1993 to 1996?

answer: He was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

text: Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

answer: He was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield.

text: Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

answer: Cooper was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

text: Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

answer: Cooper was serving as an assistant curate at Holy Trinity in Sutton Coldfield.

text: Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

answer: He was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield

text: Finally he was an Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Name all the positions where Cooper worked?

answer:
Assistant Curate at All Saints, Kings Heath, 1965-1972
This, Priest in charge of St Paul's, Balsall Heath, 1973-1982
, Priest in charge of Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield, 1993-1996

answer: Colmell till 1993, Chichester Theological College until 1972, St Paul's in Balsall Heath before that, and All Souls in Kings Heath.

answer: Assistant Curate at All Saints, Kings Heath, Prison Chaplain, Priest in Charge of St. Paul's Balsall Heath, Archdeacon of Aston, and Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield.

answer: Assistant Curate at All Saints, Kings Heath from 1962 to 1965, Priest in charge of St Paul's, Balsall Heath from 1973 to 1982, Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990, and Assistant Curate at Holy Trinity, Sutton Coldfield from 1993 to 1996.

answer: A management trainee, Assistant Curate, Prison Chaplain, Priest, Archdeacon, senior clergyman and Assistant Curate

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: John Leslie Cooper served as the Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990. He was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College and served as a Prison Chaplain and as a Priest in charge before becoming Archdeacon. Cooper retired in 1996.

answer: John Leslie Cooper was an Anglican priest who served as Archdeacon of Aston in Birmingham from 1982-1990. Cooper was educated at Tiffin School and Chichester Theological College before becoming a prison chaplain and priest in charge of St. Paul's Balsall Heath. He retired in 1996.

answer: This article discusses Jim Cooper. He is a retired British Anglican Priest who was a senior clergyman in the Anglican Diocese of Birmingham in the last quarter of the 20th century, and served as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990.

answer: John Leslie Cooper is an Anglican priest. He was Archdeacon of Aston in the 1980s.

answer: John Leslie Cooper is a now-retired Anglican priest. He served as Archdeacon of Aston from 1982 to 1990, and Priest in charge of St. Paul's in Balsall Heath from 1973-1982.


text:
Your horse veers left only narrowly avoiding the rather large rosewood shrub.  Just in time it sees the scaredly defensive rattlesnake arching back and preparing to strike the horses legs.  Instinctively, and with no signal from you, the white mare jumps over the coil of snake.  Bang.  Bang.  Bang.  You free several rounds from their casings in the direction of the rustlers.

With look of stern grimace, you drive your spurs into the sides of your beast.  Harder.  Faster.  You push the horse, racing after the cattle thieves.  The warm air rushes past you.  It catches your broad brimmed hat and whisks it away onto the ground.  Never mind the hat, it’s gone.  You can’t see them for the palpable cloud of dust thrown into the air by their beasts but you know they number six.

Glancing back, you turn your head to see the two men on their mounts beside you.   That’s strange.  A look of combined adrenaline induced enthusiasm and fear is readily strewn across their faces.  Normally inexpressive masks, to make any poker player jealous, were characteristic of these old ranchers.  The fear, you decide, is likely the result of them thinking about the near off confrontation with the rustlers.  They are probably considering their wives and children back at their respective homes.
Not you though.  You’ve never had much time to take a wife.  Most of your time is spent lonesome as you wander the dirty, dusty plains of Texas.  It’s not that you’ve never thought about it, though.  There’s that one pretty young girl who works in town at the drug store beside the farriers workshop.  You often buy your tobacco from that drug store; even though it costs slightly more than if you were to purchase it from the saloon or the general store.  But you do it anyway because it’s not often a vagabond finds a reason to speak to such a pretty girl.  You can see her now.  With that long raven hair and those hazel eyes perched above her daintily freckled cheeks.  She flashes that shy smile every time you enter the store, the embodiment of perfection.

Bang.  Old John fires his pistol unnervingly close to your ear as he urges his beast past yours, and at a pace any sane man would consider too much for the sharp decline in the approaching ground.  But John doesn’t care.  Faster he pushes his horse, with reckless indifference to its or his own safety.  He was always crazier than a nesting pit viper in the middle of June, ole John.  You are going to put an end to the stealing and dealing of this gang once and for all.  Whether blood need be shed or not, this will end today.

The cattle bandits have yielded.  Side by side, the three of you take up arms and begin to exchange blasts as you blaze a wide circle around the six.  Knees locking the side of your horse, you fire shots from both of your double actions simultaneously.  One of the bandits falls from his still horse.  That makes five over three now.  But soon after John takes a shot to the shoulder, falls to the side of his mount and jerks the reigns pulling the tan beast around into a sharp stop.  Then falls the third rancher along with his horse, both of them riddled with lead.

Click.  Click.  Click.  You have expelled the final bullet from your pistols.  The bandits realize this and cease firing.  There's no rush.  The larger oafish one says something under his breath and two of them laugh as he awkwardly dismounts his beast.  You bring your horse to a stop, as you place the sixth bullet into your second revolver, about a hundred yards from the thieves.   You give the cylinder a small spin.  Click click click click click, and with an effortless flick of your wrist it snaps back into position.  Tick, one hammer is drawn.  Tick, the second hammer is extended.  You stare at your pistols.  Absolutely beautiful.  Those pearl white handles are something else.  Cost you a God damn fortune from that little shop way up in Utah, but that’s alright.  The magnificent craftsmanship was certainly worth it.

One hundred yards from the five remaining bandits.  An easy shot for a semi skilled rifle.  And young Billy was more than a semi skilled rifle.  Much more.  A God damn hawkeye the kid was.   Known throughout much of Texas and even up into most parts of Utah for his sharpshooting.  With a reputation stretches as far as that you know a man is good at what he does.  This punk kid, no older than twenty and riding with a no name gang of common cattle thieves lead by Sticky Pete.

He tilted the hat back, lifting the brim up out of his way.  You could just see Billy’s thumb rise, ever so slightly adjusting the vertical height of the rear sight of his Sharpe rifle.  His cheek rested timidly beside the thumb on the wooden stock.  Never before have you felt like this.  A completely indelible feeling of a sheer and utter lack of hope and power.

Bang.

title: Cattle Rustlers

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Describe Billy.

answer: Billy is skilled in shooting, hailed as a great gunner by others. He has blonde hair and wears a floppy hat.

text: The answer omits mention of his age.

refinement: Billy is skilled in shooting, hailed as a great gunner by others. He has blonde hair and wears a floppy hat. He is described as a punk kid, no older than twenty.

text: The story does not mention Billy having blonde hair.

refinement: Billy is skilled in shooting, hailed as a great gunner by others. He wears a floppy hat. He is described as a punk kid, no older than twenty.

answer: He is the sharpshooting and aggressive member of the cattle thieves, and is no older than 20. His name is Billy, and he is proficient with a rifle, known for his marksmanship throughout Texas. He is distinguished by his large hat with a feather on it, and he tilts it as he aims at the heroes with his rifle

text: The story does not state that Billy's hat has a feather on it.

refinement: He is the sharpshooting and aggressive member of the cattle thieves, and is no older than 20. His name is Billy, and he is proficient with a rifle, known for his marksmanship throughout Texas. He is distinguished by his large hat, and he tilts it as he aims at the heroes with his rifle

answer: Billy is a young and talented sharpshooter who is skilled in the art of sharp shooting. He has a reputation for his excellent abilities that extends into parts of Utah. He is calm under pressure, has excellent composure and has complete faith in his abilities.

text: The final statement is unattested.

refinement: Billy is a young and talented sharpshooter who is skilled in the art of sharp shooting. He has a reputation for his excellent abilities that extends into parts of Utah.

answer: Billy is a semi-skilled rifleman with a reputation for his shooting skills. Though only twenty, he is already regarded as a wily and formidable opponent.

answer: Billy is a teenager, known throughout the land for being a legendary shot. He is called a "punk kid" in the story. He happens to be riding with these random bandits. When the main character of the story sees the boy raise his rifle, he feels despair because he knows he is going to die.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the theme of perfection in the story?

answer: The protagonist has a tendency to think about how much they wish they can be together with some women they deem as physically and characteristically perfect.

text: "some women" should be the young girl in town.

refinement: The protagonist has a tendency to think about how much they wish they can be together with a pretty young girl in town they deem as physically and characteristically perfect.

text: The answer doesn't mention that perfection also applies to the gun.

refinement: The protagonist has a tendency to think about how much they wish they can be together with a pretty young girl in town they deem as physically and characteristically perfect. He also describes his pistols in terms of perfection.

text: Doesn't mention Billy.

refinement: The protagonist has a tendency to think about how much they wish they can be together with a pretty young girl in town they deem as physically and characteristically perfect. He also describes his pistols in terms of perfection. Billy is also discussed as incredibly skilled as a sharpshooter.

answer: The most commonly used word for the theme of perfection is "beauty". There are many times that Billy is described as being a trained sharpshooter and at the end is described as a "God damn" "hawk eye" that he is able to knock down his target with a single shot. But, more than that, the story describes the couple, Edy, and the narrator and their warm feelings they have toward each other.

text: There is no one named "Edy" in the story.

refinement: The most commonly used word for the theme of perfection is "beauty". There are many times that Billy is described as being a trained sharpshooter and at the end is described as a "God damn" "hawk eye" that he is able to knock down his target with a single shot.

text: The answer doesn't mention that the woman is also described as perfection.

refinement: The most commonly used word for the theme of perfection is "beauty". There are many times that Billy is described as being a trained sharpshooter and at the end is described as a "God damn" "hawk eye" that he is able to knock down his target with a single shot. The pretty young girl in town is also described as the embodiment of perfection.

answer: The narrator remembers a perfect girl he once knew. He describes her features in detail. Later the same imagery is used to refer to the rifles the narrator owns and which they went to great effort to get from a shop in Utah. This reflects an intertwined theme of love and death, and foreshadows the narrator's death at the end of the story.

answer: The theme of perfection in the story is the idea that anything that is perfect is more beautiful, advanced, and powerful than anything that is not perfect. This can be applied specifically in the story to the perfection of the pistols, the skill of Billy, or the physical beauty of the young girl in town. This theme of perfection signals something that is remarkable or extraordinary.

answer: The theme of perfection in the story is achieving excellence. The protagonist achieves perfection by achieving the best result possible in a dangerous situation, shooting the bandits one by one. The protagonist admires his guns, noting their quality and craftsmanship, indicating that he values perfection in weaponry. Furthermore, his attraction to a pretty young girl suggests an appreciation of perfection as well, specifically in terms of physical attractiveness. The protagonist values perfection both in himself and in others.


text:
Armand Sylvestre}} ARMAND SYLVESTRE (October 16, 1910 – November 4, 1980) was a lawyer, judge and political figure in Quebec. He represented Berthier in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1944 to 1948 as a Liberal.[1]

Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec, the son of Camille Sylvestre and Marie-Louise Paquette, Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal. He was called to the Quebec bar in 1937 and set up practice in Berthierville. Sylvestre was solicitor for the Liquor Commission in Joliette district from 1939 to 1944 and managing director of the _Courrier de Berthier_ from 1945 to 1948. In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault. He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952. Sylvestre was judge in the Court of Sessions of the Peace at Montreal from 1962 to 1972. He died at Saint-Thomas at the age of 70.

[1]

title: Armand Sylvestre (MLA)

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where was Sylvestre born?

answer: Sylvestre was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec.

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

answer: Sylvestre was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec.

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

answer: In Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec.

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

answer: St. Cuthbert, Quebec

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

answer: Sylvestre was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec.

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where did Sylvestre study?

answer: The Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville, and the Université de Montréal.

text: Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

answer: Sylvestre studied at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville, and the Université de Montréal.

text: Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

answer: Sylvestre studied at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville, and the Université de Montréal.

text: Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

answer: He studied at the College de Berthierville and the Universite de Montreal.

text: Séminaire de Joliette is missing.

refinement: He studied at Séminaire de Joliette, the College de Berthierville, and the Universite de Montreal.

text: Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

answer: Consription de Berthierville, Université de Montréal, and Séminaire de Joliette.

text: Sylvestre was educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who did he marry?

answer: Armand Sylvestre married Mariette Daviault.

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

answer: Mariette Daviault

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

answer: Armand Sylvestre married Mariette Daviault.

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

answer: Mariette Daviault

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

answer: He married Mariette Daviault.

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Did he win the elections?

answer: He won in the 1944 Quebec general election.

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election

answer: Yes, but was defeated in 1952.

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952

answer: No, he was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948.

text: He won in 1944. The question does not specify an election, it was asking if he won any election. The answer should indicate that he did win.

refinement: Yes, he was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948.

answer: No, Sylvestre was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948.

text: He won in 1944. The question does not specify an election, it was asking if he won any election. The answer should indicate that he did win.

refinement: Yes, but Sylvestre was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948.

answer: Yes, he was elected in the 1944 Quebec general elections.

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952.

question: Write a ~5 sentence summary.

answer: Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and judge from Quebec. He served in the Quebec Legislative Assembly from 1944 to 1948. Sylvestre represented the constituency of Berthier, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948 and 1952. Sylvestre died in 1980 at age 70.

text: Needs 5 sentences.

refinement: Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and judge from Quebec. He served in the Quebec Legislative Assembly from 1944 to 1948. Sylvestre represented the constituency of Berthier in 1944. He was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948 and 1952. Sylvestre died in 1980 at age 70.

text: ARMAND SYLVESTRE (October 16, 1910 – November 4, 1980) was a lawyer, judge and political figure in Quebec.

text: He represented Berthier in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1944 to 1948 as a Liberal.[1]

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952. Sylvestre was judge in the Court of Sessions of the Peace at Montreal from 1962 to 1972. He died at Saint-Thomas at the age of 70.

answer: Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and political figure from Quebec. He represented Berthier in the legislature from 1944 to 1948. Sylvestre died at the age of 70 in 1980. His political legacy was primarily based on his service as a lawyer and as a judge.

text: Needs 5 sentences.

refinement: Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and political figure from Quebec. He represented Berthier in the legislature from 1944 to 1948. He ran for reelection in 1948 and 1952 but lost. Sylvestre died at the age of 70 in 1980. His political legacy was primarily based on his service as a lawyer and as a judge.

text: ARMAND SYLVESTRE (October 16, 1910 – November 4, 1980) was a lawyer, judge and political figure in Quebec.

text: He represented Berthier in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1944 to 1948 as a Liberal.[1]

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952. Sylvestre was judge in the Court of Sessions of the Peace at Montreal from 1962 to 1972. He died at Saint-Thomas at the age of 70.

answer: Armand Sylvestre was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec in 1910. He was a lawyer, judge, and political figure. Sylvestre was educated in 6 schools, had a bachelor's degree and was licensed to practice law in 1937. Sylvestre died in 1980.

text: He was educated in 3 schools, not 6

refinement: Armand Sylvestre was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec in 1910. He was a lawyer, judge, and political figure. Sylvestre was educated in 3 schools, had a bachelor's degree and was licensed to practice law in 1937. Sylvestre died in 1980.

text:
Needs 5 sentences.
Needs to focus on his political career.

refinement: Armand Sylvestre (1910-1980) was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec. He was a lawyer, judge, and political figure. Sylvestre was educated in 3 schools, had a bachelor's degree and was licensed to practice law in 1937.  He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952. Sylvestre was judge in the Court of Sessions of the Peace at Montreal from 1962 to 1972.

text: ARMAND SYLVESTRE (October 16, 1910 – November 4, 1980)

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert

text: He was called to the Quebec bar in 1937 and set up practice in Berthierville.

text: He died at Saint-Thomas at the age of 70.

answer:
Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer, judge, and political figure in Quebec. He was born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec. He attended College de Berthierville and the Universite de Montreal. He was elected in 1944 in the Quebec general elections but lost when he ran for reelections.

Sylvestre was married to Mariette Daviault.

text: Born in Saint-Cuthbert, Quebec

text: educated in Saint-Cuthbert, at the Séminaire de Joliette, the Collège de Berthierville and the Université de Montréal.

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952.

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

answer:
Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and political figure from Quebec. Sylvestre represented Berthier in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1944 to 1948 as a Liberal.

Sylvestre married Mariette Daviault in 1941 and he died in 1980.

Sylvestre was a public speaker, lawyer, judge, and managing director of the Courrier de Berthier.

text: Needs 5 sentences.

refinement:
Armand Sylvestre was a lawyer and political figure from Quebec. Sylvestre represented Berthier in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1944 to 1948 as a Liberal.

Sylvestre married Mariette Daviault in 1941.

Sylvestre was a public speaker, lawyer, judge, and managing director of the Courrier de Berthier.

He died in 1980.

text: In 1941, he married Mariette Daviault.

text: ARMAND SYLVESTRE (October 16, 1910 – November 4, 1980) was a lawyer, judge and political figure in Quebec.

text: He was elected in the 1944 Quebec general election, but was defeated when he ran for reelection in 1948, and again in 1952.

text: He died at Saint-Thomas at the age of 70.

text: Sylvestre was solicitor for the Liquor Commission in Joliette district from 1939 to 1944 and managing director of the _Courrier de Berthier_ from 1945 to 1948


text:
We all know how this ends; there's no need to continue. But if you feel the need to indulge yourself, I can't stop you. I will tell you one thing, though, it won't be a fun ride. This isn't the type of thing you discuss amongst your family around the dining room table. Even though you can feel in the air how much they want to ask you about it - as taboo as the subject is - there's no way they'll cross that line. But there's always that one friend who doesn't understand boundaries and why you shouldn't cross them. That ignorant bastard.

"So, did you kill anybody?"

I can feel my heart sink into my stomach, and with those five words all the memories I've tried so desperately to repress come flowing through my mind.

Images forever burned into my conscience.

How we got into this situation was the same for most of us: we wanted to heroes.  Granted, there is that one guy - down on his luck -  whose up to his knees in debt. They told him all his worries would disappear if he just signed on the dotted line. He needed a way out and couldn't think of any other options. But even then, in the back of his mind, the idea of ending another man's life without consequence, maybe even praise, had to impact his decision in some way. He could have chose a safer job... Anything but Combat Arms. But why fix the damage when you can inflict the damage?  You're a joke if you get a medal for making sure everyone gets paid on time.

In the long run all we really want is recognition.

One-hundred and thirty-eight days in country and not a single thing to write home about. You could feel the hostility in the air. Each and every one of us were growing tired of the monotony. All we wanted was a real reason to clean our weapons. And this is the insanity that the US Military inflicts among its indentured servants. Train a man to kill, give him guns and grenades, throw him into a desert and suddenly he wants to get shot at. We were all normal once-upon-a-time. Eventually everything fades to gray and you can't remember what exactly normal is anymore. At this point every man in Charlie Co. Fire Squad Alpha doesn't realize they've crossed the point of no return.

I couldn't see what I was shooting at, but it didn't matter. The gurgled screams let me know I was hitting something, though, and it felt good. The lesson I learned that day is that Positive Identification isn't always necessary. Before I get ahead of myself, let me explain. Those bastards thought they could run into a Mosque and they would be safe. Well, your Holy Place isn't mine. Your God can't judge me. Out here, life is a gift, and you have to be willing to take that gift away without a second thought about it.

Out here, standing by a road with a shovel can get you killed.

With my adrenaline pumping I guess I didn't notice what time it was... it just slipped my mind. All that matters is the target was eliminated; mission complete. The weight had immediately been lifted off my shoulders. I finally got what I was looking for and I felt vindicated.

After the C4 blast there wasn't much left of the Mosque, and the screams finally subsided. Sifting through the rubble, the pride I felt started to subside, and a sense of nausea overcame me. I stumbled upon what appeared to be a hand - a tiny little hand. I had never seen gore like this. A hand, a foot, an arm, a leg. Things unrecognizable as human. What have I done? These people weren't the enemy. These were human beings like you and I. Men, women, and children reduced to humps of body parts. I can never look at a hamburger the same way again.

"Soldier, you're about to learn a very important lesson today."

This was all too much to take in.

"Why do you think when we find a weapon cache every vehicle gets an RPG stowed in the back?"

Stunned, I didn't want to know.

Sergeant collected 3 RPGs and scattered them in the ruins of what once was a Mosque. stepping back and observing the scene, without a hint of emotion in his face, he took in a deep breath.

"When we get back to the FOB, CID will be there to conduct their investigation, so we'd better get our story straight. I'll tell you this, though, Soldier. Tomorrow you'll be on the cover of Stars & Strips. You're going to be a War Hero."

title: Collateral Damage

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Why will the narrator be a hero tomorrow?

answer: The narrator will be a hero tomorrow because he killed people during a military operation.

text: The response misses to mention that the narrator killed innocent people but it would be covered up to make it look like an attack and therefore considered a hero.

refinement: The narrator will be a hero tomorrow because he killed innocent people at a mosque during a military operation but their actions will be covered up to make it look like they had been attacked.

answer: The protagonist has killed multiple human beings and destroyed a mosque, making them a war hero. By completing a difficult mission, they have gained recognition and praise.

text: The response misses to mention that the narrator killed innocent people but it would be covered up to make it look like an attack and therefore considered a hero.

refinement: The protagonist has killed multiple innocent human beings and destroyed a mosque by accident but it will be covered up to make it appear as if they've been attacked, making them a war hero. By completing a difficult mission, they have gained recognition and praise.

answer: They just blew up a mosque, killing everyone inside.

text: The response misses to mention that the narrator killed innocent people but it would be covered up to make it look like an attack and therefore considered a hero.

refinement: They just blew up a mosque, killing innocent people inside but it will be covered up as if they've been attacked. Therefore they would be considered heroes the next day.

answer: The soldier has killed innocent people in their place of worship but his commander is ready to cover it up. They keep RPG weapons in their vehicles so when accidents happen they can set up the scene to look like they were under attack. The senior officer takes out three of these weapons and places them among the slaughtered people so that the investigators will be misled.

answer: It is implied they are going to place weapons in the rubble of the mosque they bombed to frame the enemy.

text: The response misses to mention that they've also accidentally killed innocent people.

refinement: It is implied they are going to place weapons in the rubble of the bombed mosque where they accidentally killed innocent people and plan to frame the enemy and be considered heroes.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What emotions have driven the narrator to kill these innocent people?

answer: He wants to learn a very important lesson - all too much to take, driven by lust for glory.

text: The response misses to mention that recognition and vindication drives the narrator to kill people.

refinement: He is taught a very important lesson - he is driven by recognition and vindication.

answer: The motivation that comes with being in the military is what moves the narrator to kill what were previously considered civilians. The military training makes them want to get shot at and also justifies their actions when they shoot something that is not a training target.

text: The response misses to mention that recognition and vindication also drives the narrator to kill people.

refinement: The motivation that comes with being in the military is what moves the narrator to kill what were previously considered civilians. The military training makes them want to get shot at and also justifies their actions when they shoot something that is not a training target. Recognition and sense of vindication are driving factors.

answer: The emotions driving the narrator are a mixture of desperation and revenge, coupled with a disbelief in the atrocities of war.

text: The response misses to mention that recognition and vindication also drives the narrator to kill people.

refinement: The emotions driving the narrator are a mixture of recognition and sense of vindication.

answer: They had joined the army because they wanted to be heroes. They wanted the recognition and in the end, all they got was boredom - 138 days of inaction and nothing to write home about. They were bored senseless and each of the soldiers wanted to put their training into action. they had got to the point where any action was better than no action.

answer: The narrator has felt vindicated through killing these people, though they know they do not deserve to be considered a war hero. Their emotions have driven them to carry out these actions because they are seeking praise and recognition. At some point, however, the horror of what they've done dawns on them. Sickness and nausea overtake them at seeing the gore left behind and grown to realize the victims were human. They then come to understand the pain and harm they've caused and are filled with remorse and guilt.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How did the soldier feel about what he had done?

answer: The soldier was appalled.

answer: Though his commanding officer tells the narrator that he will be a war hero. He feels nothing of the sort. He is deeply ashamed of himself and prefers not to talk about what happened. He is also filled with guilt and desperately tries to repress the memories of what he did.

answer: The soldier felt sickened and horrified by what he had done, and ultimately regretted his actions.

answer: He knew he had crossed the point of no return

text: The response misses to mention that the solider felt nausea and was sickened after realizing what he had done.

refinement: He knew he had crossed the point of no return. After realizing what he had done, a sense of nausea and sickness overcame him.

answer: The soldier felt disgust and shame for the violence he had inflicted.


text:
[]

Robots (or spiders, or crawlers) are little computer programs that search engines use to scan and index websites. Robots.txt is a little file placed on webservers to tell search engines what they should and shouldn't index. The Internet Archive isn't a search engine, but has historically obeyed exclusion requests from robots.txt files. But it's changing its mind, because robots.txt is almost always crafted with search engines in mind and rarely reflects the intentions of domain owners when it comes to archiving.

  Over time we have observed that the robots.txt files that are geared toward search engine crawlers do not necessarily serve our archival purposes. Internet Archive's goal is to create complete "snapshots" of web pages, including the duplicate content and the large versions of files. We have also seen an upsurge of the use of robots.txt files to remove entire domains from search engines when they transition from a live web site into a parked domain, which has historically also removed the entire domain from view in the Wayback Machine. In other words, a site goes out of business and then the parked domain is "blocked" from search engines and no one can look at the history of that site in the Wayback Machine anymore. We receive inquiries and complaints on these "disappeared" sites almost daily.

  A few months ago we stopped referring to robots.txt files on U.S. government and military web sites for both crawling and displaying web pages (though we respond to removal requests sent to info@archive.org). As we have moved towards broader access it has not caused problems, which we take as a good sign. We are now looking to do this more broadly.

An excellent decision. To be clear, they're ignoring robots.txt even if you explicitly identify and disallow the Internet Archive. It's a splendid remember that nothing published on the web is ever meaningfully private, and will always go on your permanent record.

-

    Internet Archive turns on Flash emulation, already has 1000 items to check out

    [] Adobe Flash was the language of choice for a generation of game developers, helping kickstart an indie revolution on the still-young web of the 1990s and 2000s. But it withered on the proprietary and insecure vine, and both web browsers and Adobe have now canned it, threatening countless games and interactive presentations with the memory… READ THE REST

-

    Earliest known photograph of a tornado

    [] This photo was taken on April 26, 1884 and is the earliest known shot of a tornado (compare to the second-earliest). It appears to be a 3D or stereographic image, too, but my effort at recreating the 3D effect (below, as a two-frame GIF) doesn't seem particularly impressive. Modern meteorologists consider Adam's photograph to indeed… READ THE REST

-

    Edwardian home electrical wiring was scary stuff

    [] The advent of electrical lighting and appliances came with a lot of trial and error, meaning a lot of injuries, destruction, and death before things got standardized and safety-tested. In Edwardian times, for instance, each electricity producer chose their own voltage and method of delivery, among other unnerving practices. Take a deep dive into the… READ THE REST

-

    Black Friday is dropping by early this year for huge savings on 30 great items

    [] For the Black Friday lovers out there, we understand this year is going to be hard for you. All the old rules about scouting doorbuster deals, camping out, and planning your post-Thanksgiving shopping tactics are no more this year.  But don't worry – just because there's no physical doorbusting going on this year doesn't mean… READ THE REST

-

    Save an extra 40% on this software that will help troubleshoot your WiFi issues

    [] The Dead Zone isn't just a great Stephen King novel. It's also that unfortunate area in your house where WiFi signals go to die. Dead zones may be caused by actual physical barriers in your home, like a wall or a refrigerator. It could be that the distance between your router and that particular spot… READ THE REST

-

    This handy adapter ties your Nintendo Switch, smartphone, and Bluetooth headphones' audio together

    [] A kid in tech-savvy 2020 has a lot of plates to keep spinning. That avalanche of technology often requires making some difficult choices, like this one: what happens when you want to listen to music streaming from your phone and play a game on your Nintendo Switch? Since you're obviously going to be wearing headphones,… READ THE REST

question: Define Robots in computing.

answer: They are little computer programs that search engines use to scan and index websites.

answer: Robots, also known as "spiders" or "crawlers," are little computer programs that search engines use to scan and index websites. Robots.txt is a little file placed on webservers to tell search engines what they should and shouldn't index.

answer: Robots are little computer programs that search engines use to scan and index websites.

answer: Robots are little computer programs that search engines use to scan and index websites. They are often used to index websites for search engines, but the Internet Archive is ignoring robots.txt files in order to archive websites more comprehensively.

question: What is the Internet Archive?

answer: The Internet Archive is a non-profit organization that preserves websites and other online content for historical purposes. They do this by using robots to scan and index websites, and by ignoring robots.txt exclusion requests when archiving content.

text: No need to talk about robots.txt

refinement: The Internet Archive is a non-profit organization that preserves websites and other online content for historical purposes.

answer: The Internet Archive creates complete "snapshots" of web pages, including duplicate content and the large versions of files. It is not a search engine, but historically obeys exclusion requests from robot.txt files, which results in the use of robots.txt files to remove entire domains from search engines when they transition from a live website into a parked domain, which also removes the entire domain from view in the Wayback Machine.

text: just tell us what the company is

refinement: The Internet Archive is a digital library that creates complete "snapshots" of web pages, including duplicate content and the large versions of files.

answer: The Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that offers permanent access to historical collections that exist in digital format.

answer: The Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that archives the web.

question: What is the Wayback Machine?

answer: The Wayback Machine is a tool that allows users to see archived versions of websites. It is often used by researchers and historians to see how websites looked in the past.

answer: A tool where the entire history of a website can be viewed.

answer: The Wayback Machine is a service that allows users to see archived versions of websites.

answer: The Wayback Machine is a digital archive of the World Wide Web and other information on the Internet. It was launched in 2001 by the Internet Archive, a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California, United States.

question: What happens when a site goes out of business and the parked domain is blocked from search engines?

answer: No one can look at the history of that particular site in the Wayback Machine anymore.

answer: The Wayback Machine can no longer view the history of that site.

answer: People who want to look at the history of the site in the Internet Archive cannot do so anymore.

answer: The site is no longer available to the public.

question: Write a ~4 sentence summary.

answer: The Internet Archive (archive.org) has noticed an upsurge in the use of robots.txt files to remove entire domains from search engines when they transition from a live website into a parked domain, which has historically also removed the entire domain from view in the Wayback Machine. As a result, when a site goes out of business and the parked domain is blocked from search engines, no one can look at the history of that site in the Wayback Machine anymore. After getting a lot of complaints, archive.org has decided to stop referring to robot.txt files on U.S. government and military websites for crawling and displaying web pages. The move hasn't caused major problems.

answer: The Internet Archive is a non-profit organization that archives the internet. They have decided to ignore robots.txt files, which are used to tell search engines what to index and what not to index. The Internet Archive wants to create complete "snapshots" of web pages, including duplicate content and large versions of files. They have also seen an upsurge of the use of robots.txt files to remove entire domains from search engines when they transition from a live web site into a parked domain, which has historically also removed the entire domain from view in the Wayback Machine.

answer: The Internet Archive is changing its mind about honoring robots.txt exclusion requests because they are often geared towards search engine crawlers and not the intentions of domain owners. The Internet Archive is now looking to do this more broadly.

answer: The Internet Archive is ignoring robots.txt files, even if they explicitly disallow the Archive from indexing a website. This is because robots.txt files are usually geared towards search engine crawlers, and not archival purposes. As a result, websites that transition into parked domains can be "blocked" from the Wayback Machine, and complaints about "disappeared" sites are common.


text:
“…damaged goods.” The words seem to escape your lips before you can even realize what you’re saying, but that only makes it worse. You’re always so censored, so guarded, so hearing these words that you let slip out is a glimpse into your true feelings. The ones I never get to see, but so desperately want to. As soon as the phrase rolls off of your tongue a pained look appears in your eyes, and for a moment you seem to regret it.

	“Did you think about that for two days before you said it?” You have a two-day rule; if you have something to say you’ll think about it for two days to see if you really want to say it. I suppose it’s the smart thing to do, but I always believed life is about living in the moment and saying and doing whatever’s on your mind at a given moment. You are always so composed, calculating your every move and interaction. You and I could not be any more opposite. And yet, you and I could not be any more in love.

	At least, until the events of tonight left us and our love broken and tangled like those split ends in my hair, and I’m reminded that I’m due for a haircut. I wait for your response, half expecting you to apologize and take it back. I know you better, though, you’d never lose your cool in front of me.

	“If I hadn’t considered it for so long, I wouldn’t have said it.” As always, you won’t back down or, God forbid, admit you were wrong. Somehow, you escape the general rule that all humans make mistakes. In the unlikely event you do fuck something up, you can always find a way around it, a way to make it look like a carefully planned accident.

	I smile at you, and I can tell it throws you off. You’re so used to me getting upset, yelling, crying – anything but staying calm. “You’re so fucking pathetic.” I laugh quietly to myself, not listening for your response. I’m not finished. “Your pride, your ego, is too fucking huge…is it even possible for you to admit you’ve made a mistake? Is it? Or is that too much to ask? For you to admit you’re a goddamn imperfect human being?”

	“I told you, I’ve been thinking that for a while now.”

	“Oh yeah? Have you?” I can feel my unruffled demeanor beginning to unravel. You frustrate me so badly sometimes, I turn into a person I hardly even know. It’s not like me to lose control, to shout at the people I love and to break down – but you manage to bring it out in me. “If you’d thought about that for more than two seconds, you should know that is a terrible thing to say to someone. Especially someone you’re supposed to love.” I finally look up to meet your eyes. They’re as cold as ever, and I can’t seem to detect an ounce of emotion in them.

	“Why wouldn’t I say it, if that’s what I think?”

	I swear to God, your stubbornness only increases my urge to hit you.

	But I don’t, because unlike you, I try not to hurt the people I love.

	“Because it’s fucking inconsiderate!” I know my voice level is getting increasingly higher, but I don’t care. You said such mean things, and I don’t care. “You do not call a person ‘damaged goods.’ Especially when it wasn’t their fault.”

	“Why not?” You raise your voice to compete with mine, and that stoic exterior is slowly slipping away. “You hurt yourself, I don’t care. Some guy fucked you, I don’t care. You’re damaged goods, but I got over that!”

That’s it. I have the overwhelming urge to slap you, but I know you’d deal it back ten times worse. My fingernails dig so deeply into my palms I worry the skin is going to break. Tears of frustration are brimming at my eyes, and keeping them back is getting harder by the second. I’m not even sure what to say to you, and I know that any words are going to send me over the edge and into an ocean of tears. How dare you say that. How fucking dare you. You’re acting like I wanted all this to happen. You’re making it sound like, at fourteen years old, I wanted some older guy to force himself upon me. Like I wanted to hate myself and hurt myself for years over it. And now you’re trying to tell me that you’re the one who ‘got over it’? I’m pretty sure I had much more ‘getting over it’ to do than you did.

	“This isn’t love.” The three words pass my lips almost without my consent, and come out barely above a whisper. I hear you ask me to reiterate, but I’m too lost in my own mind to pay attention to you. “This isn’t love,” I murmur again, and the phrase keeps repeating itself in my head. Love doesn’t hurt, at least not like this. Love doesn’t play games, hold grudges.

	You are beautiful, and I wanted this to be love so badly that I convinced myself that it was. But it isn’t, and that’s become more and more of an inescapable truth.

	I get off your bed. I will no longer refer to it as ‘our’ bed, because it isn’t. I hear you standing up to come after me, and I smirk sardonically to myself. For once, you put aside your pride. Too bad it came too late. I walk fast, but you’re faster, and you grab my arm and whirl me around. You seem angry, which is amusing since I’m the one who just got insulted.

	“Where do you think you’re going?”

	“I’m leaving you.”

	“No you aren’t.” For a moment, I stop resisting to look at you, and shake my head. Maybe if you had asked nicely, I’d have stayed. Maybe if you didn’t act like I was just your property, some object you could do as you please with. Maybe if you’d admitted you were hurt instead of getting angry, I’d have stayed.

	But you didn’t. You didn’t do any of that. I jerk my arm away from you.

	“Don’t touch me.” Those words seem to get to you, and suddenly you appear to have a change of heart. I turn away and continue walking, hardly interested in whatever apology or sob story you have to offer this time.

	“No, I didn’t mean it, don’t leave…I can fix you.” The comment stops me, and I turn to face you one last time. There is nothing you can say now to save yourself. I consider myself to be a forgiving person, but the things you’ve said and done to me are unforgiveable. I almost pity you, and how you think you can ‘fix’ me. How you think you’re some savoir, God’s greatest gift to the planet. I think that you honestly believe you are all those things, and the sad reality is that you aren’t. Sadder even, is that you’re too blind to realize it.

	“No, you can’t.” You begin to say something, but I cut you off. “You can’t fix something that isn’t broken.”

title: [Damaged Goods] first story ever :3

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is the narrator talking to?

answer: The narrator is talking to a person that has hurt them.

text: The narrator is talking to their lover.

answer: The reader takes on the role of the second character.

text: The narrator is talking to their lover.

answer: The narrator is talking to their lover.

answer: The narrator is talking to their significant other.

answer: S/he is talking to her significant other.

text: It's clear the narrator is a woman

refinement: She is talking to her significant other.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What are the two characters fighting about?

answer: They argue about one person calling the other 'damaged goods' and for having a big ego.

answer: The two characters are fighting about one character calling the other "damaged goods." The other character is offended by this because the first character implies that it is the other character's fault they are "damaged."

answer: The woman wants her SO to admit he was wrong after he insulted her, even though the insult was implied. Even after apologize, he keeps insisting that he's right.

text: He does not apologize

refinement: The woman wants her SO to admit he was wrong after he insulted her, even though the insult was implied. He keeps insisting that he's right.

text: Make 'so' lowercase

refinement: The woman wants her so to admit he was wrong after he insulted her, even though the insult was implied. He keeps insisting that he's right.

text: He called her damaged goods

refinement: The woman wants her so to admit he was wrong after he called her damaged goods, even though the insult was implied. He keeps insisting that he's right.

answer: The two characters are fighting about the disparaging remarks made by one character about the other character's scar from an earlier assault. The first character is hurt and frustrated by the callous remarks, while the second character tries to defend themselves by stating that they only said as they thought.

answer: The girl is upset because her boyfriend called her "damaged goods."

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is one of the speakers trying to fix?

answer: The other speaker

answer: The narrator doesn't go into much detail, but it seems as though they are trying to mend the relationship between the two of them.

text: The other speaker

answer: One of the speakers in the passage is trying to fix the damage their words caused by calling someone damaged goods.

text: The other speaker

answer: The speaker is trying to fix their relationship with the other speaker. They take issue with the other speaker saying they are "damaged goods". The first speaker believes this is an insensitive thing to say and the comments have left their love broken and tangled. The second speaker argues that they have been thinking that for a while now, and that they said it because it was what they truly believed. The first speaker disagrees and argues that love doesn't hurt the way the second speaker had hurt them. The second speaker tries to justify their words, but in the end they cannot fix what is broken.

text: The other speaker

answer: Something implied to be the bad break-up.

text: The other speaker

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What happened to the narrator when they were younger?

answer: Information not found.

text: They were sexually assaulted

answer: The narrator was raped by an older boy when they were 14 years old. The boyfriend referred to the narrator as 'damaged goods' and claimed that his ego was too big to admit they were an imperfect human being. This upset the narrator deeply and they finally decided they wanted to leave. The boyfriend apologized but they felt that it wasn't enough and refused to stay with him.

answer: An older man forced himself on the narrator.

answer: They were sexually assaulted.

answer: The narrator was victimized as a teenager by an older man. The offender never acknowledged the pain they caused the narrator, instead minimizing the serious offense. The perpetrator also insulted the narrator by calling them damaged goods. The narrator is now ready to leave the perpetrator. The narrator believes they can find love elsewhere and that it is not love if the perpetrator can't be compassionate and show empathy to their suffering.

text: Everything after sentence 1 is wrong

refinement: The narrator was victimized as a teenager by an older man.

question: Write a ~1 sentence summary.

answer: The narrator accuses her partner of being inconsiderate when he told her she was "damaged goods." He tries to convince her to stay, but she decides to leave him instead.

answer: The shame the narrator feels when her partner calls her "damaged goods" leads to a massive argument, culminating in her leaving him.

answer: This story is a dialogue between two characters in which they have an argument about something insulting one of the speakers said.

answer: The main character realizes their partner was rude in calling them damaged goods. She tells him that love isn't supposed to hurt, and decides to leave him as a result.

answer: The narrator laments that his seemingly perfect partner is too stubborn to admit when they have made a mistake.

text: Main character female

refinement: The shame the narrator feels when her partner calls her "damaged goods" leads to a massive argument, culminating in her leaving him.


text:
PENTAGON REFUSES TO ARM MILITARY RECRUITERS – TELLS THEM TO “CLOSE THE BLINDS”

ARMY CHIEF OF STAFF GEN. RAY ODIERNO said on Friday he has no plans to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers in the wake of the Islamist terror attacks on unarmed, unguarded military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee on Thursday. Odierno basically said he doesn’t trust his troops to handle their weapons properly.

ALSO ON FRIDAY, THE MARINE CORPS ORDERED RECRUITERS TO NOT WEAR THEIR UNIFORMS AT WORK FOR ‘FORCE PROTECTION.’

Today the Pentagon added this–
Military recruiters are being told to “close the blinds” for added safety.

Gretchen Carlson reported:

TRENDING: Crowd Erupts in Cheers as Giuliani Tells AZ State Lawmakers: "Your Political Career is Worth Losing if You Can Save the Right to Vote in America" (VIDEO)

  We have just confirmed here at FOX from the Pentagon, that the head of THE US NORTHERN COMMAND HAS NOW ISSUED A DIRECTIVE TO AUTHORIZE RECRUITERS NOT TO BE ABLE TO CARRY WEAPONS AT THE CENTERS but he wants them to implement NEW SECURITY MEASURES LIKE “CLOSING THE BLINDS AT THE OFFICE.”

Via The Real Story:

question: What did the Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno say about arming recruiters in the wake of the Islamist terror attacks in Tennessee?

answer: Odierno said he has no plans to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers in the wake of the Islamist terror attacks on unarmed, unguarded military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee on Thursday.

answer: He said he has no plans to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers.

answer: Gen. Odierno said that he does not plan to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers in response to the Islamist terror attacks in Tennessee.

answer: General Ray Odierno says he will not arm recruiters or security patrols as he doesn't trust them to handle their weapons properly.

text: "as he doesn't trust them to handle their weapons properly" isn't necessarily what Odierno said, but what the author believes. The author said Odierno "basically said" that, which is not the same as literally saying something.

refinement: General Ray Odierno says he will not arm recruiters or security patrols as he doesn't trust them to handle their weapons properly.

text: "Add" should be used before "security patrols". "Or add security patrols" is a different meaning than "will not arm...security patrols".

refinement: General Ray Odierno says he will not arm recruiters or security patrols as he doesn't trust them to handle their weapons properly.

question: What order did the Marine Corps give to recruiters?

answer: They were told not to wear their uniforms at work for "force protection".

answer: The Marine Corps ordered recruiters to not wear their uniforms at work for "force protection."

answer: The Marine Corps ordered recruiters to not wear their uniforms at work for "force protection."

answer: The Marine Corps ordered recruiters to not wear their uniforms at work for "force protection."

question: What were the Pentagon's orders to the recruiters?

answer: The Pentagon ordered recruiters to "close the blinds" for added safety.

text: Recruiters were also ordered not to carry weapons at the centers.

refinement: The Pentagon ordered recruiters to "close the blinds" and not to carry weapons at the centers for added safety.

answer: The Pentagon ordered recruiters to close the blinds in their offices for added safety.

text: Recruiters were also ordered not to carry weapons at the centers.

refinement: The Pentagon ordered recruiters to close the blinds in their offices and not to carry weapons at the center for added safety.

answer: The Pentagon ordered recruiters to not carry weapons at the centers and to close the blinds.

answer: Recruiters were told to "close their blinds" for safety.

text: Recruiters were also ordered not to carry weapons at the centers.

refinement: Recruiters were told to "close their blinds" for safety and to not carry weapons at the centers.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: The Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Ray Odierno, says he has no plans to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers in the wake of the Islamist terror attacks on unarmed, unguarded military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee on Thursday. The Marine Corps ordered recruiters to not wear their uniforms at work for "force protection." The Pentagon added this - military recruiters are being told to "close the blinds" for added safety.

text: It would be more accurate to add "at the time of the article" after "Thursday".

refinement: The Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Ray Odierno, says he has no plans to arm recruiters or add security patrols to military recruitment centers in the wake of the Islamist terror attacks on unarmed, unguarded military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee on Thursday at the time of the article. The Marine Corps ordered recruiters to not wear their uniforms at work for "force protection." The Pentagon added this - military recruiters are being told to "close the blinds" for added safety.

answer: The Pentagon has ordered military recruiters to not carry weapons and to close the blinds at their offices.

text: This is only one sentence instead of three. 2 important points are missing.

refinement: The Pentagon has ordered military recruiters to not carry weapons and to close the blinds at their offices. The Marine Corps ordered recruiters not to wear their uniforms at work for force protection.

text: The reason why the recruiters are being given these orders is omitted.

refinement: The Pentagon has ordered military recruiters to not carry weapons and to close the blinds at their offices. The Marine Corps ordered recruiters not to wear their uniforms at work for force protection. This comes after the Islamist terror attacks on unarmed, unguarded military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

answer: After the Islamist terrorists' attacks at Chattanooga, Tennesse, the Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno has said he will not arm recruiters as they cannot yet handle their weapons properly. The Pentagon gave the recruiters orders to always "close their blinds" for safety. The Marine Corp also told the recruiters not to wear their uniforms to work for "force protection".

answer: The Pentagon has ordered military recruiters not to carry weapons, and instead to take measures such as closing the blinds for added safety. This comes in the wake of the recent terrorist attack on unarmed military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

text: This is only two instead of three sentences. It's important to include that Military recruiters were also told not to wear their uniforms at work.

refinement: The Pentagon has ordered military recruiters not to carry weapons, and instead to take measures such as closing the blinds for added safety. Recruiters were also told not to wear their uniforms to work. This comes in the wake of the recent terrorist attack on unarmed military offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee.


text:
JOVAN ZUCOVIĆ (; born 17 April 1990) is a Serbian footballer, who plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City.[1]

Career

In January 2020, Zucović joined Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia under newly hired Serbian coach Vojislav Bralušić.[2]

[1]

[2] Ulaanbaatar City Names Vojislav Bralušić New Head Coach, mongolianfootball.com, 20 January 2020

title: Jovan Zucović

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Jovan Zucović?

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian defender who currently plays for Ulaanbaatar City.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian footballer who currently plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian football player. He currently plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian footballer who plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia.

answer: Serbian footballer

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When was Jovan Zucović born?

answer: April 17 1990

answer: 17 April 1990

answer: 17 April 1990.

answer: Jovan Zucović was born 17 April 1990.

answer: 17 April 1990

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When did Jovan Zucović join Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia?

answer: In January 2020.

answer: Zucović joined Ulaanbaatar City in January 2020.

answer: January 2020

answer: Zucović joined Ulaanbaatar City in 2020.

answer: January 2020

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Ulaanbaatar City's head coach?

answer: Vojislav Bralušić

answer: Ulaanbaatar City's head coach is Vojislav Bralušić.

answer: Vojislav Bralušić is Ulaanbaatar City's head coach.

answer: Vojislav Bralušić

answer: Ulaanbaatar City's head coach is Vojislav Bralušić.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian footballer who plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia. He joined Ulaanbaatar City in 2020 under head coach Vojislav Bralušić.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian defender who recently joined the Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia. He was recruited by new head coach Vojislav Bralušić.

text: This should contain the name of the sport he plays.

refinement: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian soccer player who plays the position of defender. He recently joined the Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia after being recruited by new head coach Vojislav Bralušić.

answer: Jovan Zucović (born in April 1990) is a Serbian footballer who plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City. He joined Ulaanbaatar City in 2020 after the new head coach was hired.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian footballer who currently plays as a defender for Ulaanbaatar City. They were hired by Vojislav Bralušić in January 2020.

answer: Jovan Zucović is a Serbian footballer who recently signed with Ulaanbaatar City in Mongolia. He will be playing under new coach Vojislav Bralušić.