text:
All of their past, everything he once knew or thought he knew about the two of them begins to swirl into a fierce hurricane of red in his mind until suddenly, strangely, he reaches the calm of the storm’s eye. He interrupts her raised voice, pulling her close to bring her lips to his for the first time. In his head, he had pictured the cinematic scene of volatile tension turned passion, but instead it catches her by surprise and she instinctively shoves him away. He immediately turns toward the hall and before she can fully come to terms with the past few moments, she finds herself staring at the back of a slammed door and an empty room. Another slam down the hall interrupts the sickening mental loop of all the things that had just been said, the harshest of which reverberating the loudest in her head.

She wipes her eyes, walks out into the hall, and follows the sound of the door that knocked her back into the present; the realization of what had just happened finally settling in completely. She reaches the stairwell as another hotel guest comes out of their room and looks at her with sleepy eyes and a disgruntled expression. She mouths a quick "sorry" and enters the stairwell as the sound of a third door closing drifts down from the top floor.

Panic starts to well up inside her as she climbs each flight, her feet and heart picking up speed as she nears the rooftop level. She bursts through the door with adrenal abandon and scans the ledges for his figure, screaming his name into the night sky, but he's nowhere to be seen. What have I done, she thinks to herself. What have *you* done?

"I think we need to talk" says a relievingly familiar voice from above the stairwell door. "There’s enough room up here for both of us, come lie next to me. The stars are beautiful tonight." She climbs up with the help of his outstretched hand and lays her head on his chest. Her breathing slows and she can finally begin to relax. Her eyes look up toward the millions of shimmering specks in the night sky as they slowly turn to a teary blur; and indeed they were beautiful.

title: A pretty short story I simply call: Rooftop

question: Who is the main character?

answer: It's not specific. She's a girlfriend.

text: unfounded assumption

refinement: the answer is not contained in the passage

text: the answer field is blank

refinement: the answer is not contained in the passage

answer: The main character is a woman.

answer: The main character is the person who follows the sound of the slammed door and climbs the stairs to the rooftop.

question: What is the main plot?

answer: The main plot is the couple's argument.

text: include the reconciliation

refinement: The main plot is the couple's argument and reconciliation.

answer: The main plot is a man and a woman who have a past together. They are reunited and the man kisses the woman. The woman pushes him away and he leaves. The woman follows him and they talk.

answer: A couple is arguing. The male interrupts her and pulls her close for a kiss. It surprises her and she shoves him away, upsetting him. He leaves the room. She follows him.

text: include the reconciliation

refinement: A couple is arguing. The male interrupts her and pulls her close for a kiss. It surprises her and she shoves him away, upsetting him. He leaves the room. She follows him. They reconcile while looking up at the stars.

answer: The main plot of this story is a couple who have a fight and the man leaves the woman on the rooftop. The woman then goes to find him and they reconcile.

question: Why does the main character apologize to the hotel guest?

answer: The main character apologizes to the hotel guest because she burst into the stairwell without warning, causing the guest to look disgruntled.

answer: Because the boyfriend is slamming doors.

text: This makes a few plausible assumptions -- better to stick to the most obvious reason.

refinement: The main character apologizes to the hotel guest because she burst into the stairwell without warning, causing the guest to look disgruntled.

answer: The main character apologizes to the hotel guest because she woke them up.

text: speculation no good

refinement: The main character apologizes to the hotel guest because she burst into the stairwell without warning, causing the guest to look disgruntled.

answer: She is crying and looks upset.

text: no mention of crying in the text

refinement: The main character apologizes to the hotel guest because she burst into the stairwell without warning, causing the guest to look disgruntled.

question: Are there any other significant characters in the story?

answer: There are no other significant characters in the story.

answer: Just the main character and the boyfriend.

text: We don't know what their relationship is

refinement: Just the main character and the man she argues with.

answer: The only other character is the man who is the protagonist's lover.

text: the answer field is blank

question: Write a ~6 sentence summary.

answer: This is a story about two people who reconnect on the rooftop of a hotel after a heated argument. They eventually reconcile and find peace in each other's company.

answer: A man and woman have a conversation about their past and the man kisses the woman. The woman pushes him away and he leaves. The woman follows him and they have a conversation on the rooftop.

answer: The narrator and his girlfriend are arguing. He pulls her close and kisses her. She shoves him away. He leaves the room. She follows him and finds him on the rooftop. She apologizes and they lie together.

text: distant from the actual material

answer: A couple is arguing. The male interrupts her and pulls her close for a kiss. It surprises her and she shoves him away, upsetting him. He says some unkind things and then leaves the room, slamming the door behind him. She follows him up to the rooftop. He kindly says that they need to talk reaching for her.

text: need a comma

refinement: A couple is arguing. The male interrupts her and pulls her close for a kiss. It surprises her and she shoves him away, upsetting him. He says some unkind things and then leaves the room, slamming the door behind him. She follows him up to the rooftop. He kindly says that they need to talk, reaching for her.

text: mention the reconciliation

refinement: A couple is arguing. The male interrupts her and pulls her close for a kiss. It surprises her and she shoves him away, upsetting him. He says some unkind things and then leaves the room, slamming the door behind him. She follows him up to the rooftop. He kindly says that they need to talk, reaching for her. They reconcile while looking up at the stars.


split: train

text:
[Feedback welcomed]

It was an unusually cold summer morning. The boy almost went back inside to get his jacket but thought it useless. He wouldn’t need it soon. The sky was clear like the crystal glass he saw at that restaurant his aunt had taken him to in Denver last year. He hefted his backpack up on to his shoulders.

“Ephram! Don’t go too far, your lunch will be ready in an hour!”, his mother called through the back screen door, her voice coming out like a short wave walkie talkie from the kitchen. “Yes M'am!” he shouted over his shoulder.

He didn’t plan on coming back. He was running away. If all went well, he’d have the lunch he packed in an hour instead.

Ephram Ricken ran. He ran along the same trail he’d known his whole life. His father already out tending to the rest of the farm, they’d left this field untended for over a decade in order to give them some extra privacy around their home as they hired ranch hands and hosted all sorts of agricultural inspectors.

At the end of the field was a grove of trees. A boy of 12 Ephram didn’t know exactly what kind of trees they were, but they had made his plan possible in the best of ways.

When he got to the grove, Ephram turned around and listened, watched, and waited. He needed to be sure no one had followed him. If either his Father or Mother found out what he was doing, his hide would be tanned like a rotting pear before sundown. After what seemed like a lifetime, Eph got up off his haunches and began to run into the grove satisfied that he was alone.

After a few minutes he grabbed hold of a 2x4 nailed to the trunk of a giant tree. The tree was giant in the way that all things are giant to children as they grow, an adult might call this tree “A bit larger than normal.” Eph scurried up the tree like an excited squirrel and found his way to the bottom hatch. Pushing against the bottom and holding the spring latch open, he opened it up and pulled himself inside. Immediately, he spun around and closed the hatch with his foot listening to the satisfying wooden ‘thunk’ it made as it sealed shut.

Eph scanned the inside of the faux treehouse. Looking at all the panels he flipped a switch behind him and watched as the instrument panel lit up like an overzealous neighbor’s yard in December from above. He looked at his watch '11:35 AM’. “Oh shit!” he muttered, surprised. He had waited to see if he was being followed longer than he had thought.

Quickly and with what was an obviously well rehearsed manner he began his pre-flight check. Out of his backpack he pulled an old iPod and a newer tablet computer that his Aunt had snuck to him at Christmas. He would miss Aunt April. He would miss his Mother and Father. He would not miss anyone else. He would not miss the names like “Effer” and “Ass burger” that the kids called him at school. For a moment Eph stopped and stared at the tablet screen in his hands thinking about all this. His reflection looked back at him. “Oh man, almost forgot!"

Checking his watch again, he hurriedly opened the floor hatch and dropped down out of sight. The tablet he had just plugged into the console lit up as Eph poked his head back inside, a stolen motorcycle helmet on his head.

Securing the hatch again quickly, Eph got into the pilot's seat and laid it back so that the back of the chair was flush with the floor of the treehouse. Looking directly up at the tablet. he reached forward and touched a red button displayed on the center of the screen. He then touched an identical button on the iPod strapped to the arm of his flight chair with duct tape. Both displays responded with a chime and began a count down. "60… 59… 58…” began the voice from the iPod.

Eph sat back and began to strap in using the repurposed seat belts he grabbed from an old work truck on the farm. They never wore them and his Father never even noticed they were missing. Attached to the old leather desk chair with duct tape yet again, the seat belts pulled away from the leather a bit, but Eph felt safe.

Back at the house, Melody Ricken opened the back screen door and shouted for Eph. “It’s about time for lunch Ephram, get washed up!”

Eph felt a rumble beneath him, as the primary boosters ignited. “5… 4… 3…” His squeezed his eyes shut hard and pressed his body against the back of the chair. “2… 1…” The christmas lights on the panel that he had borrowed from the attic flickered as the pressure against Eph’s chest mounted. He heard the tree tops peel away as his rocket pushed through them and into the sky. He wished that he had been able to find a windshield able to give him a good view and keep the craft pressurized, but typical Earth vehicle construction hadn’t quite reached that point yet.

Soon Eph would be in the stars, on his way to a new home.

Mystified, Melody watched as a ball of fire lifted from the grove a few acres out behind her property. She had first heart a rumble and then what sounded like an explosion. She hurried from the window to the screen door, pushing it open and running outside she called “Ephram, where are you?!” When no response came, she knew. She looked up and watched as the ball of fire disappeared into the blue sky. Tears beginning to cloud her vision, she smiled. She knew her boy was going home.

title: [SP] Runaway Ricken

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about why Ephram was running away from home?

answer: Ephram runs away from home because he is being bullied at school and he does not like his parents.

text: The response contains inaccurate information.

refinement: Ephram runs away from home because he is being bullied at school.

answer: No answer

text: The response is empty.

refinement: Ephram runs away from home because he is being bullied at school.

answer: Ephram was escaping because he was bullied by the other kids.

answer: Ephram was running away because he was bullied by the other kids.

answer: Ephram ran away to escape the bullying he got from the kids at school. He was called names like "Effer" and "Ass burger". He was not happy with his parents and wished he could go to a place where he could be happy.

text: The response contains inaccurate information.

refinement: Ephram ran away to escape the bullying he got from the kids at school. He was called names like "Effer" and "Ass burger".

answer: No answer

answer: Ephram was running away from home because he was picked on a lot by the kids at school, and his parents would call the kids his names.

text: The response contains inaccurate information.

refinement: Ephram was running away from home because he was picked on a lot by the kids at school, and they would call him names.

answer: Ephram ran away because he was bullied at school. He was called names like "Effer" and "Ass burger". He was not happy with his parents and wished he could go to a place where he could be happy.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How did Melody, Ephram's mother, know her son was going home when she realized he was in the rocket in the sky?

answer: This is not known.

text: The response could be clearer in its pronoun use.

refinement: It is not known how Melody knew her son was going home in the rocket.

answer: She had simply heard a rumble and an explosion like hitting the booster, then heard the kids calling him names like Happitoos and such. Ephram always had an imagination, and Melody and the kids loved that about him. She knew he had come into the rocket from this and loved it.

text: The response does not contain information from the text.

refinement: It is not known how Melody knew her son was going home in the rocket.

answer: She had simply heard a rumble and an explosion like hitting the booster, then heard the kids calling him names like Happitoos and such. Ephram loves to dream. She knew he had come into the rocket from this and loved it.

answer: Melody saw the rocket and knew Ephram was in it.

text: While accurate, the response does not answer the question "How did Melody, Ephram's mother, know her son was going home when she realized he was in the rocket in the sky?"

refinement: Melody saw the rocket and knew Ephram was in it, but it is not known how she knew her son was going home.

answer: This passage does not provide an answer for the passage.

text: The response could use clearer language.

refinement: This passage does not provide an answer for the question "How did Melody, Ephram's mother, know her son was going home when she realized he was in the rocket in the sky?"

answer: She knew her boy was going home because she saw the rocket take off.

text: While accurate, the response does not accurately answer the question "How did Melody, Ephram's mother, know her son was going home when she realized he was in the rocket in the sky?"

refinement: Melody saw the rocket take off, but it is not known how she knew her son was going home.


text:
The CHURCH OF SANTÍSSIMA TRINDADE () is an 18th-century church located in the civil parish of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, in the Portuguese island of Flores, in the archipelago of the Azores.

History

The church dates to 1846, from the inscription over the principal portico.[1] It was the same year that Florentine António de Freitas (an ex-Seminarian born in Fajãzinha, likely from the locality of Mosteiro, which was part of the parish at the time) returned from Macau, where he had made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery.[2] For or _“as a sign of his recognition for the safety of all his possessions”_, for his gratitude to God for saving his fortune, he decided to finance the construction of a new church in Mosteiro, to the invocation of the Holy Trinity.[3]

The first burial in the new church occurred on 8 October 1847.[4]

On 23 October 1850, by royal decree, Queen D. Maria II elevated Mosteiro administratively, forming (along with locality of Caldeira) the new parish Mosteiro, that substituted the former _Mosteiros_[5] that dominated until this point.[6] It was later supported by the elevation of the religious parish to the status of ecclesiastical parish on 18 November in the same year, by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria, then bishop of Angra.[7]

Between 18 November 1895 and 18 January 1898, the parish was integrated into the municipality of Santa Cruz das Flore, at a time when the municipality of Lajes was extinguished.[8] From 1896 to 195, the old chapel in the parochial church was expanded, under the initiative of Father Caetano Bernardo de Sousa, then the parish priest.[9] The collateral retables were designed and sculpted by Father Guilherme, priest for Mosteiro and Fazenda das Lajes.[10]

Architecture

The church was erected in an area along the southwest of the island, in an isolated urban area inserted into a level area and courtyard. Around the church yard is the Império do Espírito Santo, that dates to 1879.[11][12]

The single-nave church longitudinally extends to the presbytery, which is narrower, and addorsed by lateral bell tower and sacristy, plastered and painted while, while covered in ceiling tile.[13][14] The principal facade with embrasure, pilaster cornerstones, terminates in a central frontispiece delimited by curvilinear forms and surmounted by stone cross.[15][16] In the centre is the rectangular, framed doorway surmounted by frieze and cornices, topped by an inscription and a large circular oculus flanked by stone sculptures in the form of candles.[17][18] The entranceway inscription includes:[19][20]

    _DA SANTÍSSIMA TRINDADE FEITA NO ANNO DE 1846_
    _Of the Holy Trinity built in the year 1846_

The tympanum is decorated by two scrolls and stars, also from sculpted stone.[21][22] The belltower with pilasters cornerstones is two registers and separated by cornices, with a rectangular window on the ground floor (lighting the old baptistery) and topped by rounded belfry with three bells.[23][24] The tower is decorated with a bulbous cupola and pinnacles on each corner, while it is accessed from the rear through a door located at the level of the choir, preceded by an exterior staircase, constructed over washrooms.[25][26]

The interior, plastered and painted in white, includes a wood choir, supported by three stone cormels, superseded by narrow staircase leading to the epistle.[27][28] In the sub-choir is a wooden wind protector and opposite the epistole, the old baptistery, over the belfry (now used for storage).[29][30] To the side of the access to the baptistery is a marble inscription:[31][32]

    _À MEMÓRIA DE MARIA LUÍSA RODRIGUES JORGE QUE COSTEOU UM GRANDE RESTAURO DESTA IGREJA E LEGOU, NO SEU TESTAMENTO, AVULTADA HERANÇA A ESTA PARÓQUIA. HOMENAGEM DE GRATIDÃO DOS SEUS CONTERRÂNEOS._
    _In memory of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge who costed the great restoration of the church and connected, in her testament, great inheritance to this parish. Homage in gratitude of her contemporaries._

There are doors on the lateral walls, which a smaller door leads to the sacristy.[33][34] The triumphal arch is supported by pilasters flanked by two lateral retables on angles, decorated in polychromatic and gilded woods. The ceiling is covered in painted wood forming panels.[35][36]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5] The parish name (plural or singular) derives from the immense stone cliffs and spiers that encircled the communities, and specifically the coastal megaliths, and not to the existence of any religious buildings in the parish.

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

title: Church of Santíssima Trindade (Mosteiro)

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who built the church?

answer: The Florentine António de Freitas.

text: Freitas did not build the church, but financed the construction.

refinement: The Florentine António de Freitas financed the construction of the church.

answer: António de Freitas financed the construction of the Church of Santíssima Trindade in 1846.

text: "He decided to finance the construction of a new church in Mosteiro."

answer: Antonio de Freitas

text: Freitas did not build the church, but financed the construction.

refinement: Antonio de Freitas financed the construction of the church.

answer: António de Freitas financed the construction of the Church of Santíssima Trindade in 1846.

text: "He decided to finance the construction of a new church in Mosteiro."

answer: The church's construction was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas.

text: "He decided to finance the construction of a new church in Mosteiro."

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who was Florentine Antonio de Freitas?

answer: He was a former seminarian who made his fortune from the traffic of opium and child slavery. He returns from Macau and financed the construction of the church in Mosteiro.

text: "returns" should be made past tense.

refinement: He was a former seminarian who made his fortune from the traffic of opium and child slavery. He returned from Macau and financed the construction of the church in Mosteiro.

answer: Florentine Antonio de Freitas was the wealthy individual who financed the construction of the church of Santíssima Trindade.

answer: Antonio de Freitas was a Florentine merchant who returned from Macau in 1846 and financed the construction of the Church of Santíssima Trindade in honor of the Holy Trinity.

answer: He was an ex-Seminarian who returned from Macau after making a fortune. To thank the almighty, he decided to finance the church's construction.

answer: an ex-seminarian born in Fajanca, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery.

text: It's omitted that Freitas helped finance the church.

refinement: an ex-seminarian born in Fajanca, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. He financed the construction of the church in 1846 to thank God for saving his fortunes.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Where is the Church of Santissima Trindade situated?

answer: The Church of Santissima Trindade is located in the parish of Mosteiro, in the island of Flores, Portugal.

answer: The town of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores.

text: Mosteiro is technically a civil parish. "Town" is slightly inaccurate.

refinement: The civil parish of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores.

text: It's omitted that Mosteiro is in the Portuguese island of Flores.

refinement: The civil parish of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores on the Portuguese island of Flores.

answer: The church is situated in Mosteiro, Flores.

text: It's omitted where Flores is located.

refinement: The church is situated in Mosteiro, Flores in the archipelago of Azores.

answer: The Church of Santissima Trindade is situated in the parish of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, in the island of Flores in the archipelago of the Azores.

answer: In the municipality of Lajes das Flores, in the Portuguese island of Flores.

text: Mosteiro is omitted.

refinement: In the civil parish of Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, in the Portuguese island of Flores.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When was the church built?

answer: The church was built in 1846.

answer: 1846.

answer: 1846.

answer: The church was built in 1846.

answer: 1846.

question: Write a ~6 sentence summary.

answer: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro was built in 1846 by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift for gratitude for his fortune. The church is rectangular in shape, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

text: This is only four instead of the six requested sentences.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro was built in 1846 by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift for gratitude for his fortune. The church is rectangular in shape, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

text: Freitas didn't build the church, he funded it.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift for gratitude for his fortune. The church is rectangular in shape, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

text: Specify who Freitas was showing gratitude towards (God).

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift of gratitude to God for his fortune. The church is rectangular in shape, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

text: It isn't said explicitly that the church is rectangular. It would be better to say it is a single-nave church.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift of gratitude to God for his fortune. The church has a single nave, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

text: It's omitted where Mosteiro is.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade in Mosteiro, in the Portueguese Island of Flores, was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas as a gift of gratitude to God for his fortune. The church has a single nave, dominated by the large frontispiece with a central framed doorway surmounted by an inscription. The interior of the church has plastered walls and a painted wood ceiling. The sacristy has a large marble inscription, and the bell tower has three bells.

answer: The Church of Santíssima Trindade, located in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, was built in 1846 by Florentine António de Freitas to show gratitude for saving his fortune. The church is a simple single-nave structure with an eclectic facade decorated with sculpted stone. The interior is plastered and painted white, and includes a wind protector and an old baptismal font. There is an inscription in remembrance of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge on the facade and epistle.

text: This is only four instead of the requested six sentences.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade, located in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, was built in 1846 by Florentine António de Freitas to show gratitude for saving his fortune. The church is a simple single-nave structure with an eclectic facade decorated with sculpted stone. The interior is plastered and painted white, and includes a wind protector and an old baptismal font. There is an inscription in remembrance of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge on the facade and epistle.

text: Freitas didn't build the church, he funded it.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade, located in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas to show gratitude for saving his fortune. The church is a simple single-nave structure with an eclectic facade decorated with sculpted stone. The interior is plastered and painted white, and includes a wind protector and an old baptismal font. There is an inscription in remembrance of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge on the facade and epistle.

text: Specify who Freitas was showing gratitude towards (God).

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade, located in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas to show gratitude to God for saving his fortune. The church is a simple single-nave structure with an eclectic facade decorated with sculpted stone. The interior is plastered and painted white, and includes a wind protector and an old baptismal font. There is an inscription in remembrance of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge on the facade and epistle.

text: Mosteiro and Flores are omitted.

refinement: The Church of Santíssima Trindade, located in Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores on the Portuguese Island of Flores, was built in 1846. It was funded by Florentine António de Freitas to show gratitude to God for saving his fortune. The church is a simple single-nave structure with an eclectic facade decorated with sculpted stone. The interior is plastered and painted white, and includes a wind protector and an old baptismal font. There is an inscription in remembrance of Maria Luísa Rodrigues Jorge on the facade and epistle.

answer:
The Church of Santissima Trindade is situated in Mosterio, Flores. The church was built in 1846, financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas.

The church is erected along the southwest area of the island. "DA SANTÍSSIMA TRINDADE FEITA NO ANNO DE 1846 Of the Holy Trinity built in the year 1846" is inscribed on the church's entrance. The tower of the church is decorated with copula and pinnacles on each corner. The ceiling is covered in painted wood-forming panels.

answer: The church of Santíssima Trindade is located in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, a municipality in the Portuguese province of Santa Cruz das Flores, on the island of Flores located in the archipelago of the Azores. The church is built in honor of the Holy Trinity and financed by Florentine António de Freitas, a rich entrepreneur who made his fortune from the traffic of opium and child slavery. In 1850, the church was elevated from a "parish" to "district" by Queen D. Maria II and was later supported by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria as an "ecclesiastical district" in 1851. The church received a restoration in 1895 by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria. Another restoration happened in 1898, when the chapel was expanded.

text: Mosteiro is omitted.

refinement: The church of Santíssima Trindade is located in Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, a municipality in the Portuguese province of Santa Cruz das Flores, on the island of Flores located in the archipelago of the Azores. The church is built in honor of the Holy Trinity and financed by Florentine António de Freitas, a rich entrepreneur who made his fortune from the traffic of opium and child slavery. In 1850, the church was elevated from a "parish" to "district" by Queen D. Maria II and was later supported by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria as an "ecclesiastical district" in 1851. The church received a restoration in 1895 by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria. Another restoration happened in 1898, when the chapel was expanded.

text: This is five sentences instead of the requested six. Include that the church dates back to 1846.

refinement: The church of Santíssima Trindade is located in Mosteiro in the municipality of Lajes das Flores, a municipality in the Portuguese province of Santa Cruz das Flores, on the island of Flores located in the archipelago of the Azores. It dates back to 1846. The church is built in honor of the Holy Trinity and financed by Florentine António de Freitas, a rich entrepreneur who made his fortune from the traffic of opium and child slavery. In 1850, the church was elevated from a "parish" to "district" by Queen D. Maria II and was later supported by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria as an "ecclesiastical district" in 1851. The church received a restoration in 1895 by friar D. Estêvão de Jesus Maria. Another restoration happened in 1898, when the chapel was expanded. The church has a single nave and the Imperio do Espirito Santo is featured in the church yard.

answer:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, likely erected in the 18th-century, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity and financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo, which contains a cross, the symbol of Christ and harvest, while the church itself includes a cross with Jesus Christ and the Eucharist.

text: The church isn't just "likely erected in the 18th century", it is factually dated back to 1846.

refinement:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity and financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo, which contains a cross, the symbol of Christ and harvest, while the church itself includes a cross with Jesus Christ and the Eucharist.

text: This is five sentences instead of six. The second sentence could be divided into two.

refinement:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity. It was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo, which contains a cross, the symbol of Christ and harvest, while the church itself includes a cross with Jesus Christ and the Eucharist.

text: There is no mention of Jesus or the Eucharist in the article. This could be inaccurate and doesn't help summarize the article.

refinement:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity. It was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo, which contains a cross, the symbol of Christ and harvest.

text: There is no mention of harvest in the article being something that the cross represents.

refinement:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity. It was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo, which contains a cross, the symbol of Christ.

text: There is no mention of a cross being in the Imperio do Espirito Santo. It would be better to remove that and the Christ detail.

refinement:
The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity. It was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. Antonio de Freitas' magnanimous gesture, which included all he had, including slaves, resulted in his financial accolades as a trader.

The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo.

text: No where in the article is there mention of Freitas' gesture including all that he had. This should be replaced by saying the first burial took place in 1847.

refinement: The church of Santissima Trindade (Mosteiro) is part of the parish of Mosteiro in the Lajes das Flores municipality, in the Portuguese island of Flores of the Azores archipelago. The church, dating back to 1846, is dedicated to the Holy Trinity. It was financed by Florentine Antonio de Freitas, who made his fortune in the traffic of opium and child slavery. His goal was to build a church to thank God for saving his fortune. The first burial took place in 1847. The church is surrounded by Império do Espirito Santo.


text:
The BATTLE OF DJAHY was a major land battle between the forces of pharaoh Ramesses III and the Sea Peoples who intended to invade and conquer Egypt. The conflict occurred somewhere on the Egyptian Empire's easternmost frontier in Djahy or modern-day southern Lebanon, in the eighth year of pharaoh Ramesses III or about c. 1178 BC.

In this battle the Egyptians, led personally by Ramesses III, defeated the Sea Peoples, who were attempting to invade Egypt by land and sea. Almost all that we know about the battle comes from the mortuary temple of Ramesses III in Medinet Habu. The description of the battle and prisoners is well documented on temple walls where we also find the longest hieroglyphic inscription known to us. Temple reliefs feature many bound prisoners defeated in battle.

Historical background

In Egypt, Ramesses III was fighting to save his country and Empire in the midst of the Bronze Age collapse, a prolonged period of region-wide droughts, crop failures, depopulation, invasions, and collapse of urban centers. It is likely that the Nile-irrigated lands remained fruitful and would have been highly desirable to Egypt's neighbors. During this chaotic time, a new warlike group of people from the north, the Sea People, repeatedly attacked and plundered various Near Eastern powers.

Ramesses III had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier, in his fifth year. A greater threat was posed by a group of migrating peoples called the Sea Peoples. These were times of crisis in the Mediterranean, as many 12th century BC civilizations were destroyed by the Sea Peoples and other migrating nations. The great Hittite Empire fell, as did the Mycenaean civilization, the kingdom of Alashiya (which consisted of part or all of Cyprus) and Ugarit, and other great cultures.

Whatever their origins, the Sea Peoples moved around the eastern Mediterranean, attacking the coasts of Anatolia, Cyprus, Syria and Canaan, before attempting an invasion of Egypt in the 1180s. We know that the Sea Peoples were great warriors, and some evidence suggests they had a high level of organization and military strategy. Egypt was in particular danger because the invaders did not merely want the spoils and goods of the land, but the land itself; and there was no country with better soils and access to gold than Egypt. The Egyptians say that no other country had withstood their attacks, as these inscriptions from the mortuary temple of Ramesses III in Medinet Habu attest:

  The foreign countries (i.e. Sea Peoples) made a conspiracy in their islands. All at once the lands were removed and scattered in the fray. No land could stand before their arms: from Hatti, Qode, Carchemish, Arzawa and Alashiya on, being cut off (i.e. destroyed) at one time. A camp was set up in Amurru. They desolated its people, and its land was like that which has never come into being. They were coming forward toward Egypt, while the flame was prepared before them. Their confederation was the Peleset, Tjeker, Shekelesh, Denyen and Weshesh, lands united. They laid their hands upon the land as far as the circuit of the earth, their hearts confident and trusting: 'Our plans will succeed![1]

Battle

Prior to the battle, the Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru which was located close to the border of the Egyptian Empire. This gave the pharaoh time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. As Ramesses III notes in an inscription from his mortuary temple at Medinet Habu: “I equipped my frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them.”[2] The Sea Peoples' “land forces were moving south along the Levantine coast and through Palestine when they were confronted and stopped by Ramesses' forces at the Egyptian frontier in Djahi in the region of later Phoenicia” writes the Hittitologist Trevor Bryce.[3]

Ramesses III refers to his battle with the Sea Peoples in stark, uncompromising terms:

  The [Egyptian] charioteers were warriors [...], and all good officers, ready of hand. Their horses were quivering in their every limb, ready to crush the [foreign] countries under their feet...Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their heart and soul are finished forever and ever.[4]

Aftermath

While the battle ended with a great Egyptian victory, Egypt's war with the Sea Peoples was not yet over. The Sea Peoples would attack Egypt proper with their naval fleet, around the mouth of the Nile river. These invaders were defeated in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces.

Although the pharaoh defeated them, Egypt could not ultimately prevent them from settling in the eastern parts of their empire decades later. With this conflict, and a subsequent second battle with invading Libyan tribes in Year 11 of Ramesses III, Egypt's treasury became so depleted that it would never fully recover its imperial power. The Egyptian Empire over Asia and Nubia would be permanently lost less than 80 years after Ramesses III's reign under Ramesses XI, the last king of Egypt's New Kingdom.

Reliefs depicting the battle

Egyptian reliefs depicting the battle in the mortuary temple of Ramesses III at Medinet Habu provide much of the information regarding the battle. Featured are Egyptian troops, chariots and auxiliaries fighting an enemy that also employed chariots, very similar in design to Egyptian ones.

[1] Medinet Habu inscription of Ramesses III's 8th year, lines 16-17, trans. by John A. Wilson in Pritchard, J.B. (ed.) Ancient Near Eastern Texts relating to the Old Testament, 3rd edition, Princeton 1969., p.262

[2] Extracts from Medinet Habu inscription, trans. James H. Breasted 1906, iv.§§ 65-66

[3] Trevor R. Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites, sub-chapter 'The Fall of the Kingdom and its Aftermath', Oxford University Press, 1998. p.371

[4] Breasted, op. cit., pp.65-66

title: Battle of Djahy

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Summarize the factors that helped Egypt win.

answer: The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru, giving Egypt time to prepare. Egypt had defeated an attack by the Libyans on the western frontier in Ramesses III's fifth year. Ramesses III's forces were better prepared than the invaders. The invaders also lacked the support of their homeland, and Egypt had better soil and access to gold.

text: There is no evidence in the passage that mentions the invaders lacked support of their homeland. Also, Egypt having better soil and access to gold was not a factor that helped them win.

refinement: The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru, giving Egypt time to prepare. Egypt had defeated an attack by the Libyans on the western frontier in Ramesses III's fifth year. Ramesses III's forces were better prepared than the invaders.

answer: The Egyptians won the battle due to a high decorated military. They also had lots of chariots and horses. The Egyptians had pharaoh Ramesses III to lead them, which was an added bonus. The Sea Peoples were attempting to invade Egypt by way of land and sea. None of these nations were able to withstand the attack. They were moving south when they met up with Phoenician forces.

answer: No answer

text: The response misses to answer the question in the task.

refinement: These invaders were defeated in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces. The pharaoh had time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. He had equipped the frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them. The Sea Peoples' land forces were moving south along the Levantine coast and through Palestine when they were confronted and stopped by Ramesses' forces at the Egyptian frontier in Djahi.

answer: It is not stated why Egypt won the battle'.

text: The response misses to answer the instruction in the task.

refinement: These invaders were defeated in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces. The pharaoh had time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. He had equipped the frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them. The Sea Peoples' land forces were moving south along the Levantine coast and through Palestine when they were confronted and stopped by Ramesses' forces at the Egyptian frontier in Djahi.

answer:
Ramesses III had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier, in his fifth year. A greater threat was posed by a group of migrating peoples called the Sea Peoples. These were times of crisis in the Mediterranean, as many 12th century BC civilizations were destroyed by the Sea Peoples and other migrating nations. The great Hittite Empire fell, as did the Mycenaean civilization, the kingdom of Alashiya (which consisted of part or all of Cyprus) and Ugarit, and other great cultures.

The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru which was located close to the border of the Egyptian Empire. This gave the pharaoh time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. As Ramesses III notes in an inscription from his mortuary temple at Medinet Habu: “I equipped my frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them.”[2] The Sea Peoples' “land forces were moving south along the Levantine coast and through Palestine when they were confronted and stopped by Ramesses' forces at the Egyptian frontier in Djahi in the region of later Phoenicia” writes the Hittitologist Trevor Bryce.[3]

The Sea Peoples were defeated in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces.

Although the pharaoh defeated them, Egypt could not ultimately prevent them from settling in the eastern parts of their empire decades later. With this conflict, and a subsequent second battle with invading Libyan tribes in Year 11 of Ramesses III, Egypt's treasury became so depleted that it would never fully recover its imperial power. The Egyptian Empire over Asia and Nubia would be permanently lost less than 80 years after Ramesses III's reign under Ramesses XI, the last king of Egypt's New Kingdom.

text: The response includes extraneous information not useful for the task.

refinement:
The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru which was located close to the border of the Egyptian Empire. This gave the pharaoh time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. As Ramesses III notes in an inscription from his mortuary temple at Medinet Habu: “I equipped my frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them.”[2] The Sea Peoples' “land forces were moving south along the Levantine coast and through Palestine when they were confronted and stopped by Ramesses' forces at the Egyptian frontier in Djahi in the region of later Phoenicia” writes the Hittitologist Trevor Bryce.[3]

The Sea Peoples were defeated in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces.

answer: The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru, giving Egypt time to prepare. Egypt had defeated an attack by the Libyans on the western frontier in Ramesses III's fifth year. Ramesses III's forces were better prepared than the invaders. The invaders also lacked the support of their homeland.

answer:
Ramesses III had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier, in his fifth year. A greater threat was posed by a group of migrating peoples called the Sea Peoples. These were times of crisis in the Mediterranean, as many 12th century BC civilizations were destroyed by the Sea Peoples and other migrating nations. The great Hittite Empire fell, as did the Mycenaean civilization, the kingdom of Alashiya (which consisted of part or all of Cyprus) and Ugarit, and other great cultures.

The Sea Peoples had sacked the Hittite vassal state of Amurru which was located close to the border of the Egyptian Empire. This gave the pharaoh time to make preparations for the expected onslaught by the invaders. As Ramesses III notes in an inscription from his mortuary temple at Medinet Habu: “I equipped my frontier in Zahi (Djahy) prepared before them.”[2] The Sea Peoples' “land forces were moving

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Ramesses III?

answer: He lead the attacks of the Sea Peoples in his 8th year of ruling Egypt. Egypt claims that nowhere else in the world could withstand their attacks. Egypt had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on their western frontier. He defeats the seas, but they were not conquered. They would attack again through the Nile River and Egypt's empire would begin to decline.

text: The response misses to specify that he defeats the Sea People, not "the seas".

refinement: He lead the attacks of the Sea Peoples in his 8th year of ruling Egypt. Egypt claims that nowhere else in the world could withstand their attacks. Egypt had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on their western frontier. He defeats the Sea People, but they were not conquered. They would attack again through the Nile River and Egypt's empire would begin to decline.

answer: Ramesses III was the pharaoh of Egypt during the Bronze Age collapse, a prolonged period of region-wide droughts, crop failures, depopulation, invasions, and collapse of urban centers. He was fighting to save his country and empire in the midst of the collapse. He previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier. He was in danger because the invaders did not merely want the spoils and goods of the land, but the land itself. He defeated the Sea Peoples in the Battle of Djahy.

answer: A battle took place between the forces of Ramesses III and the Sea Peoples who aimed to invade and conquer Egypt. The battle is said to have taken place sometime in the 8th year of Ramesses III's rule in the region of modern-day southern Lebanon. The captives were well-documented on temple walls. In the mortuary temple of Ramesses III, is found the longest hieroglyphic inscription known to man. The temple reliefs feature many bound prisoners defeated in battle. In it, Ramesses III noted that 'since his conquest, the flame was prepared before them' and 'their seed is not'. In other inscriptions, he stated that 'The foreign countries (i.e. Sea Peoples) made a conspiracy in their islands. All at once the lands were removed and scattered in the fray. No land could stand before their arms: from Hatti, Qode, Carchemish, Arzawa and Alashiya on, being cut off (i.e. destroyed) at one time. A camp was set up in Amurru.'

answer: Ramesses III was the pharaoh of Egypt during the Bronze Age collapse, a prolonged period of region-wide droughts, crop failures, depopulation, invasions, and collapse of urban centers. He was fighting to save his country and empire in the midst of the collapse. He previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier. He was in danger because the invaders did not merely want the spoils and goods of the land, but the land itself.

answer: Ramesses III was pharaoh during the Battle of Djahy. His army defeated the Shalunan sailors and their ground infantry. In the battle Ramesses III recorded his army decimating the enemy soldiers to the point that their descendants willed not exist. Afterwards he defeated Libyan tribes to further defend Egypt. He was greatly depleted by the power of the war and Egypt would never fully recover from his reign.

text: The response inaccurately mentions details not evidenced in the text.

refinement: Ramesses III was pharaoh during the Battle of Djahy. His army defeated the Sea Peoples. He was greatly depleted by the power of the war and Egypt would never fully recover from his reign.

text: The response misses to mention that although Ramesses III defeated the Sea Peoples, he could not ultimately prevent them from settling the eastern parts.

refinement: Ramesses III was pharaoh during the Battle of Djahy. His army defeated the Sea Peoples. However, he could not prevent them from settling the eastern parts of the empire. He was greatly depleted by the power of the war and Egypt would never fully recover from his reign.

answer: Ramesses III was the pharaoh of Egypt during the Bronze Age collapse. He was fighting to save his country and Empire in the midst of the Bronze Age collapse, a prolonged period of region-wide droughts, crop failures, depopulation, invasions, and collapse of urban centers. He had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on the Egyptian Empire's western frontier, in his fifth year. The greatest threat he faced was posed by a group of migrating peoples called the Sea Peoples. The Sea Peoples attacked Egypt proper with their naval fleet, around the mouth of the Nile river. He defeated them in a great sea battle during which many were either killed by hails of Egyptian arrows, or dragged from their boats and killed on the banks of the Nile river by Ramesses III's well-prepared forces.

answer: Ramesses III lead the attacks of the Sea Peoples in his 8th year of ruling Egypt. Egypt claims that nowhere else in the world could withstand their attacks. Egypt had previously defeated an attack by the Libyans on their western frontier. Now Egypt was attacked by a different group of warriors, the Sea Peoples. The battle against the Sea Peoples was a great victory for Ramesses III, but they weren't fully conquered. They would attack again through the Nile River and Egypt's empire would begin to decline.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the text say about the pyramids?

answer: The pyramids were built by the Egyptians in the Bronze Age.

text: The passage does not mention the pyramids, therefore the response is inaccurate.

answer: According to the author, it is not known how the pyramids were built or designed.

text: The passage does not mention the pyramids, therefore the response is inaccurate.

answer: No answer

answer: No answer

answer: No answer

answer: No answer


text:
The DRDO SMART ANTI-AIRFIELD WEAPON (SAAW) is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon currently developed by India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). It is designed to be capable of engaging ground targets with high precision up to a range of .

The SAAW project was approved by the Government of India in 2013. The first successful test of the weapon was conducted in May 2016. Another successful test was conducted in November of the following year. This was followed by a series of three successful tests in December 2017.

Between 16 and 18 August 2018, three successful tests were conducted, which brought the total number of tests to eight.

In September 2020, the SAAW was approved for procurement by the Indian government for the Navy and the Air Force.[1]

Description

The SAAW is being developed by the Research Centre Imarat (RCI), and other DRDO laboratories in collaboration with the Indian Air Force (IAF).[2][3] It is a lightweight high precision guided bomb designed to destroy ground targets, such as runways, bunkers, aircraft hangars and other reinforced structures.[4][5][6] Weighing [7] it has deep penetration capabilities,[8][9] carries a high explosive warhead[10] and has a standoff range of , which will allow users to strike targets, such as enemy airfields, at a safe distance without putting pilots and aircraft at risk.[11][12] It is India's first fully indigenous anti-airfield weapon, being designed and developed wholly by DRDO.[13][14]

According to DRDO chief S. Christopher, unlike normal bombs in the Indian inventory which are sensitive to environmental conditions and therefore may not precisely hit the intended target, the precision-guided SAAW has higher precision and can precisely hit the intended target.[15] According to him, “_this is a sort of guided bomb and it will be much much cheaper than a missile or rocket, the reason being that it is not having a propulsion, it is making use of the aircraft's propulsion. It can go and land in a place we want._”[16]

The SAAW can currently be launched from the Jaguar and Su-30MKI aircraft. The former is capable of carrying six such weapons.[17] There are plans to integrate the weapon with the Dassault Rafale when it is inducted into the Indian Air Force.[18]

Development and trials

In September 2013, the SAAW project was sanctioned by the Indian Government for rupees .[19][20] The project finds mention in a written note submitted by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to the Standing Committee on Defence, in a report on 'Demands for Grants' to be provided in 2014–15 to the Ordnance Factories Board and DRDO. It is also listed in the list of current programmes of the Mission and Combat System R&D Center (MCSRDC) of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).[21]

Trials for the wing functioning of the weapon were successfully conducted in late 2015 at the Rail Track Rocket Sled (RTRS) facility located at the Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory (TBRL), Ramgarh, Haryana.[22]

According to plans, the weapon was to be tested by the beginning of May 2016 in Jaisalmer. However, owing to technical reasons, the test had to be aborted twice.[23] The weapon was finally tested at the end of the first week of May 2016 by the Aircraft and Systems Testing Establishment (ASTE) of the IAF from a Jaguar DARIN II aircraft in Bengaluru, and the test was successful.[24][25]

A second test of the weapon was successfully conducted on 24 December 2016 by the DRDO from a Su-30MKI aircraft at the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Chandipur, Odisha. It included captive flight and release tests which were tracked by radar and telemetry ground stations at the ITR throughout the flight duration.[26][27][28]

On 3 November 2017, a series of three tests were successfully conducted from an Indian Air Force aircraft at the ITR at Chandipur, Odisha.[29][30] The bomb, upon release from the aircraft, was guided by an on-board precision navigation system and reached the targets at a range of more than 70 kilometers with high accuracy.[31][32][33] According to a statement by the MoD, the tests were conducted with different release conditions and ranges.[34] The statement also cited DRDO chief S. Christopher as saying that the weapon will soon be inducted into service.[35]

On 19 August 2018, the MoD announced through a press release that a total of three tests were successfully conducted from a Jaguar aircraft between 16 and 18 August 2018 at the Chandan range in Pokhran, Rajasthan, thus bringing the total number of tests to eight.[36][37] During the tests, the SAAW, fitted with a live warhead, destroyed the intended targets with high precision. The press statement further said that all the mission objectives were achieved, adding that the tests were witnessed by senior officials from DRDO, HAL and IAF.[38]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

title: DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Write a short description of the DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon (SAAW) is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon. It is designed to be capable of engaging ground targets with high precision. It is being developed by the Indian Defence Research and Development Organisation and Imarat in collaboration with the Indian Air Force.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon being developed by India's Defense Research and Development Organisation. It's designed to be capable of engaging ground targets with high precision up to a range of 80 kilometers.

text: 70 kilometers

refinement: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon being developed by India's Defense Research and Development Organisation. It's designed to be capable of engaging ground targets with high precision up to a range of over 70 kilometers.

answer: The DRDO SMART ANTI-AIRFIELD WEAPON (SAAW) is a precision-guided anti-airfield weapon designed to destroy ground targets, such as runways, bunkers, aircraft hangars, and other reinforced structures. Weighing , the SAAW uses an on-board precision navigation system to reach its intended targets at distances of over 70 kilometers. Eight successful tests have already been conducted, and it is expected to be inducted into service soon.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon or SAAW is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield bomb developed by the Research Centre Imarat (RCI), and other DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) laboratories in collaboration with the Indian Air Force (IAF). It was sanctioned in 2013 and was tested from 2016 to 2018.

answer: The DRDO SMART ANTI-AIRFIELD WEAPON is a precision-guided anti-airfield weapon that is designed to destroy ground targets such as runways, bunkers, aircraft hangars and reinforced structures. The weapon is lightweight, carries a high explosive warhead and has a standoff range of up to 70 km.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What is the weapon's purpose?

answer: To destroy enemy runways.

answer: The SAAW is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon designed to destroy ground targets such as runways, bunkers, aircraft hangars, and other reinforced structures.

answer: It is designed to destroy ground targets, such as runways, bunkers, aircraft hangars, and other reinforced structures.

answer: To destroy ground targets.

answer: The SAAW is an anti-airfield weapon designed to destroy ground targets such as aircraft hangars and other reinforced structures.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

How long did it take to make the weapon?

answer: About four years.

text: Really five counting 18

answer: The SAAW was approved by the Indian government in 2013. The first successful test was conducted in May 2016. This brings the total amount of time taken by the SAAW's development to just over two years.

text: Rotten math

refinement: The SAAW was approved by the Indian government in 2013. The first successful test was conducted in May 2016, and the last in 2018. This brings the total amount of time taken by the SAAW's development to just over five years.

answer: The SAAW has been in development since 2013.

text: Give us more context and tell us the amount of time.

refinement: Five years. The SAAW has been in development since 2013, and finished testing 2018.

answer: Five years. The project was sanctioned in 2013 and was tested until 2018.

answer: The project was started in September 2013, and the first test occurred in May 2016. A second test occurred in November 2016, and a series of 3 tests occurred the following month. 8 total tests took place between the start of September 2017 and August 2018.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who sanctioned the project for the weapon?

answer: The Indian Government sanctioned the SAAW project.

answer: The project was sanctioned by the Indian Government.

answer: The Indian government.

answer: The Government of India.

answer: The Indian Government sanctioned the SAAW project.

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon or SAAW is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield bomb developed by India's Defence Research and Development Organisation. It was sanctioned in 2013 and was tested from 2016 to 2018.

answer: This article describes the DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon, a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon. It details the weapons characteristics and development, as well as testing and development of the weapon.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon (SAAW) is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon currently developed by India's Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO). It is designed to engage ground targets with high precision.

answer: The DRDO Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon (SAAW) is a long-range precision-guided anti-airfield weapon designed to destroy ground targets. It has been proven capable of precise target destruction at ranges up to 70 kilometers. It has been tested a total of eight times in recent months and has been cleared for procurement by the Indian military.

answer: The DRDO SMART ANTI-AIRFIELD WEAPON is a precision-guided anti-airfield weapon currently being developed by India's Defence Research and Development Organisation. It has been designed to provide high precision and be capable of destroying ground targets up to a range of 70 kilometers. Eight successful tests have been conducted thus far. It is expected that the SAAW will soon be inducted into service.


text:
FREDERICK HAMBRIGHT (May 1, 1727 n.s.– March 9, 1817) was a military officer who fought in both the local militia and in the North Carolina Line of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War. He is best known for his participation in the Battle of Kings Mountain in 1780. Serving as a statesman early in the Revolution, Hambright joined the War in 1777, ranked a lieutenant colonel in a local militia. His early actions were limited to occasional checks on (and some minor skirmishes with) Loyalist groups. This changed in 1780 with Hambright's important role at the Battle of Kings Mountain, which occurred near his lands in the newly formed Lincoln County, North Carolina. Hambright was commended for his bravery during the battle, though suffering a wound which forced him to permanently resign from military service.

A native of the Duchy of Bavaria, Hambright immigrated to Lancaster County, Pennsylvania in 1738. Between 1755 and 1775, he moved several times, first to Virginia, and then to various areas in North Carolina. After the War, he lived the remainder of his life near Kings Mountain.

Early life

Frederick Hambright was born to Conrad Hambrecht on May 1, 1727 in Moosbach, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire and in present day Germany). He lived there for the first eleven years of his life, until the family immigrated to the Pennsylvania Colony on October 27, 1738, initially settling in Lancaster County. At the age of eighteen, Hambright left his father's home for Henrico County, Virginia. There he married his first wife, Sarah Hardin, sister of Colonel Joseph Hardin, who bore him 12 children, 6 of whom were raised to maturity.[1] Along with several neighbors, Hambright again emigrated, in 1760, to rural Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (in the area which was to become Tryon County in 1768), settling near the Catawba River close to a frontier fortification that ensured his family's protection from Indian attacks.[2] This area was to become part of Lincoln County, North Carolina in 1779, and eventually Gaston County, in 1846.

Revolutionary War

Service record:[3]

-   Lincoln County Regiment, North Carolina militia 1779-1783
-   9/9/1775, a major under Col. William Graham in the Tryon County Regiment (North Carolina)
-   June 1776, back to captain.
-   1779, a lieutenant colonel of Riflemen under Col. Andrew Hampton (Rutherford County Regiment).
-   May have been at the Battle of Stono Ferry in South Carolina
-   At the Battle of Ramseur's Mill in North Carolina under Col. Francis Locke (Rowan County Regiment).
-   Wounded at the Battle of Kings Mountain in South Carolina
-   Not very active during 1781 and 1782.
-   Resigned April 30, 1783.

Before serving as a soldier, Hambright was a signer of the Tryon Resolves of August 14, 1775, a document which declared that the signers would vow resistance against the British for their actions at the Battle of Lexington. He was a representative of Tryon County, at the Third Provincial Congress, which lasted from August 20 to September 10, 1775.[4] In late 1776, Hambright took part in the Rutherford Light Horse expedition against the Overhill Cherokee.[5]

When the war reached Tryon County in 1777, Hambright joined the colonial cause as a lieutenant colonel of the Lincoln County Regiment (locally known as “The South Fork Boys”). Hambright was called the “Terror of the Tories”.[6]

Battle of Kings Mountain

On May 22, 1780, Major Patrick Ferguson was assigned as “Inspector of the British Militia”, and was promptly ordered to march to Tryon County, North Carolina to raise troops and to protect the left flank of Lord Cornwallis's main body which occupied Charlotte, North Carolina at the time.[7][8] By September 10, Ferguson had established a military camp at Gilbert Town, North Carolina and issued a challenge to the Patriot leaders to lay down their arms or he would, “_Lay waste to their country with fire and sword_.”[9] After receiving this message, Patriot leaders Isaac Shelby and John Sevier quickly planned a preemptive campaign against Ferguson's army. They sent messages to military leaders William Campbell and Benjamin Cleveland to join them.[10] The rendezvous at Sycamore Shoals on September 25, brought to Campbell's army 200 Virginians and 160 North Carolinians.[11] Another 1,100 “Overmountain Men,” volunteers from the Washington District, also arrived to fight for the Patriot cause. The army met with Cleveland's 350 men at Burke County, North Carolina,[12] and the now 1,400–strong force marched towards the South Mountains.[13]

When word of this force reached Ferguson, he sent a message to Cornwallis asking for reinforcements. This message did not reach Cornwallis in time, and on October 1 Ferguson retreated towards the Broad River, asking for local loyalist militia to join him. By October 6, the Patriots had passed Gilbert Town and had reached Cowpens, South Carolina. Local sympathizers informed the Patriots that Ferguson had 1500 men camped on Kings Mountain.[14]

As they were pressed for time before Ferguson would continue on to Charlotte, Patriot leaders picked 900 men—including Hambright's—to ride to Kings Mountain.[15] By the morning of the 7th, they had reached Kings Mountain, surrounded it, and attacked. The militia's commanding officer, Col. William Graham, was absent during the battle due to an illness in his family, leaving Hambright in command.[16] Hambright's group, along with six units, was positioned at the “ball” base beside the “heel” crest of the mountain, in position suited to attack the main Loyalist position. The objective was to catch the Loyalists by surprise. During the assault, Hambright was severely wounded from a musket ball shot to his thigh. Although bleeding badly, he continued fighting. Hambright's comrades were impressed with his bravery, and as fellow soldier, Samuel Moore, later put it:

After the battle, Hambright was taken to his nearby log cabin for treatment. He survived, but had to resign from service due to his injury, which caused a permanent limp in Hambright's walk.[17]

Later life

[The Hambright Homestead, 1920.]

After his first wife's death on July 17, 1781, Hambright married Mary Dover. Together they had ten children, eight of whom survived to maturity.[18] He lived a quiet life on his homestead near Kings Mountain, until his death on March 9, 1817 at the age of ninety.[19] His remains were interred at Old Shiloh Presbyterian Cemetery in Grover, North Carolina.

Thomas Dixon Jr. was his grandson.

Footnotes

[1] Hunter p. 325

[2] Hunter p. 325

[3]

[4] Connor p. 409

[5] _Cherokee Expeditions_; Carolana.com; retrieved May 2016

[6] Hunter p. 326

[7] Buchanan p. 202

[8] Dameron p. 22

[9] Buchanan p. 208

[10] Buchanan, pp. 210-211

[11] Buchanan p. 213

[12] Buchanan p. 215

[13] Buchanan p. 217

[14] Buchanan p. 223

[15] Buchanan p. 223

[16]

[17] Hunter p. 327

[18] Hunter p. 327

[19] Hunter p. 327

title: Frederick Hambright

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the story say about Frederick Hambright's role in the Battle of Kings Mountain?

answer: Hambright played a commanding role in the Battle of Kings Mountain as lieutenant colonel of a local militia. He led his group in the surprise attack that eventually led to the defeat of the British forces at the battle. Hambright was wounded during the battle, but continued fighting despite the injury.

answer: Hambright has his men stationed behind a bald peak that had the Loyalists occupied. Hambright's men throw rocks and even the wounded had time to fire, the Loyalists on the summit never saw them approach before being under a barrage of shots. But Hambright got shot in the thigh. Despite the blood loss, he continued on in the gun fight. The Loyalists were outgunned and decided to burn the mountain. They headed towards the Broad River, after requesting local loyalists to join them.

answer: Hambright was in command during the battle. The Patriot leaders' plan was to catch the Loyalists by surprise. Hambright was severely wounded but continued fighting. After the battle, he had to resign from service due to his injury.

answer: Hambright joined the war in 1777, he joined the War in 1777, ranked a lieutenant colonel in the local militia. His early actions were limited to occasional checks on Friendly groups. This changed in 1780 with Hambright's important role at the Battle of Kings Mountain. He was commended for his bravery during the battle. He suffered a wound and had to permanently resign from military service.

answer: Hambright joined the colonial cause during the Revolutionary War, serving first in the local militia and then participating in the Battle of Kings Mountain. During the battle, Hambright commanded a group positioned at the "ball" base and fought despite being severely wounded. However, his injury ultimately caused him to resign from service.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

What does the article say about Hambright's personal life?

answer: Hambright was born in Bavaria in 1727. His family immigrated to the Pennsylvania Colony in 1738. At the age of eighteen, Hambright left his father's home for Virginia where he married his first wife who bore him 12 children. Hambright again emigrated, in 1760, to North Carolina. After his first wife's death in 1781, Hambright married Mary Dover, and they had ten children.

answer: Hambright was born in May 1, 1727 to Conrad Hambrecht in Moosbach, Bavaria (then part of the Holy Roman Empire and in present day Germany). He immigrated to Lancaster County, Pennsylvania in 1738 and then to Virginia before settling in North Carolina. After marrying his first wife, Sarah Hardin, and having 12 children, 6 of whom matured, he moved from Virginia to North Carolina several times. After the Revolutionary War, he moved to the area around Kings Mountain, where he established a homestead and built another family. He lived there until his death at the age of ninety.

answer: Hambright was born in Bavaria and immigrated to the Pennsylvania Colony in 1738. He moved multiple times and joined the North Carolina militia in 1777. He participated at the Battle of Kings Mountain in 1780, where he was wounded. After the War, he lived the remainder of his life near Kings Mountain. Specifically, Hambright married twice, and had ten children.

answer: Hambright was originally from Bavaria and emigrated with his family to Pennsylvania in 1738. After the Revolutionary War, Hambright lived near Kings Mountain and married two wives. He participated in the Battle of Kings Mountain in 1780, where he was wounded, and had to permanently retire from military service.

answer: He is known to have married Sarah Hardin, and to have sired 12 children of them (six surviving to maturity). He had a son Frederick Carlton Hambright, and a daughter Eliza Augusta Boyle. After the death of Sarah, Hambright married a second time and had ten kids from his second marriage. He also had a grandfather named Frederick Chase, who had a son Thomas Dixon Jr.


text:
[]

March 22, 2017 / 3:06 PM / CBS News

Democratic Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub is asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election.

In a letter Wednesday, Weintraub wrote for a second time to Mr. Trump about his allegation that “thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.”

In January, Mr. Trump tweeted, “I will be asking for a major investigation into VOTER FRAUD, including those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and....even, those registered to vote who are dead (and many for a long time). Depending on results, we will strengthen up voting procedures!” He cited no evidence at that time or afterward. In February, he tapped Vice President Pence to investigate his claims.

She told him in her letter that “your allegations are not properly a matter for a future investigation to take up, as you cannot have responsibly alleged this scheme without already having sufficient facts in hand to do so.” Weintraub said she had seen no bus expenses on any campaign finance filing and said it’s “important” for Mr. Trump to provide evidence, so that “the truth of what happened in New Hampshire” can be determined.

Weintraub concluded by reminding him that democracy depends on the people’s faith in elections.

“Your voter-fraud allegations run the risk of undermining that faith,” she wrote. “Facts matter, Mr. President. The American people deserve to see your evidence.”

An outside group, Cause of Action, has called for an FEC inspector general investigation into Weintraub’s actions. Asserting that voter fraud is outside of the FEC’s jurisdiction, the group argues that an earlier letter she wrote to the president on the same issue that she posted on the FEC’s website misuses government property and time.

question: Explain Ellen Weintraub's primary complaint against Trump in this article.

answer: She is asking Trump to provide evidence of his voter fraud claims.

text: "asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire" is evidence that Weintraub is complaining about Trump's lack of evidence of his voter fraud claims.

answer: Weintraub is asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election.

text: "Ellen Weintraub is asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election" is evidence that Weintraub is primarily asking Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud

answer: Weintraub is asking President Trump to provide evidence of his claims of voter fraud in New Hampshire during the 2016 presidential election. She believes that without evidence, Trump's allegations could undermine faith in the electoral process.

text: "Ellen Weintraub is asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election" is evidence that Weintraub is primarily asking Trump to disclose evidence of his claims of voter fraud

answer: That he has accused New Hampshire of voter fraud without producing evidence, which undermines the people's faith in democratically held elections.

text: "'Your voter-fraud allegations run the risk of undermining that faith', she wrote" is evidence that she believes that his claims undermines the people's faith.

question: Explain all of Trump's opinions in this article.

answer: Trump thinks that voters were bused from MA to NH to commit voter fraud and that there may have been broader voter fraud occurring across the U.S.

text: it misses to mention that Trump also believes that amongst voters are "those who are illegal and....even, those registered to vote who are dead"

refinement: Trump thinks that voters were bused from MA to NH to commit voter fraud and that there may have been broader voter fraud occurring across the U.S. He also believes that amongst voters are those who are illegal those who are dead.

text: "his allegation that 'thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally'” is evidence of what Trump believes happened

answer: President Trump has been accused of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He has been asked to provide evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election.

text: It inaccurately mentions that Trump has been accused, however he is the one accusing of voter fraud.

refinement: President Trump is claiming voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He has been asked to provide evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election.

text: It misses to mention Trump's opinions.

refinement: President Trump is claiming voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. Trump believes thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.

answer: Trump believes that there was voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He believes that thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally. He believes that there was voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He believes that thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally. He believes that there was voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He believes that thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.

text: Repeated sentences.

refinement: Trump believes that there was voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. He believes that thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.

answer: President Trump has alleged that there was voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election in New Hampshire, and has called for an investigation into the matter. He has not provided any evidence to support his claims, and Democratic Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub has asked him to do so, warning that his allegations could undermine faith in democracy. Cause of Action has called for an FEC inspector general investigation into Weintraub's actions, arguing that voter fraud is outside of the FEC's jurisdiction.

text: it misses to mention that Trump alleges that “thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.”

refinement: President Trump has alleged that there was voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election in New Hampshire, and has called for an investigation into the matter. He alleges that “thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.” He has not provided any evidence to support his claims, and Democratic Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub has asked him to do so, warning that his allegations could undermine faith in democracy. Cause of Action has called for an FEC inspector general investigation into Weintraub's actions, arguing that voter fraud is outside of the FEC's jurisdiction.

text: Misses to mention that Trump believes amongst voters are "those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and those who are dead".

refinement: President Trump has alleged that there was voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election in New Hampshire, and has called for an investigation into the matter. He alleges that “thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.” He believes that amongst voters are "those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and....even, those registered to vote who are dead". ”He has not provided any evidence to support his claims, and Democratic Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub has asked him to do so, warning that his allegations could undermine faith in democracy. Cause of Action has called for an FEC inspector general investigation into Weintraub's actions, arguing that voter fraud is outside of the FEC's jurisdiction.

text: Extra details of Ellen Weintraub's complaints distracts from the question.

refinement: President Trump has alleged that there was voter fraud in the 2016 presidential election in New Hampshire, and has called for an investigation into the matter. He alleges that “thousands of voters were bused from Massachusetts to New Hampshire to vote illegally.” He believes that amongst voters are "those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and....even, those registered to vote who are dead". ”

question: When was this article published?

answer: March 22, 2017

text: "March 22, 2017 / 3:06 PM / CBS News" is evidence that the article was published then.

answer: March 22, 2017.

text: "March 22, 2017 / 3:06 PM / CBS News" is evidence that the article was published then.

answer: March 22, 2017

text: "March 22, 2017 / 3:06 PM / CBS News" is evidence that the article was published then.

answer: March 22, 2017.

text: "March 22, 2017 / 3:06 PM / CBS News" is evidence that the article was published then.

question: What outside group is mentioned in this article?

answer: Cause of Action.

text: "An outside group, Cause of Action, has called for an FEC inspector general investigation" is evidence of the outside group

answer: Cause of Action

text: "An outside group, Cause of Action, has called for an FEC inspector general investigation" is evidence of the outside group

answer: Cause of Action is mentioned in the article as calling for an FEC inspector general investigation into Ellen Weintraub's actions.

text: "An outside group, Cause of Action, has called for an FEC inspector general investigation" is evidence of the outside group

answer: Cause of Action

text: "An outside group, Cause of Action, has called for an FEC inspector general investigation" is evidence of the outside group

question: Write a ~2 sentence summary.

answer: Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic Federal Election Commissioner, is asking President Trump to disclose evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. She says that his allegations run the risk of undermining the people's faith in elections.

answer: Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic Federal Election Commissioner, is asking President Trump to provide evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election.

text: It misses to mention that his allegations undermine people's faith in elections.

refinement: Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic Federal Election Commissioner, is asking President Trump to provide evidence of his charges of voter fraud in New Hampshire in the 2016 presidential election. She says that his allegations run the risk of undermining the people's faith in elections.

answer: Federal Election Commissioner Ellen Weintraub has asked President Trump to provide evidence of his claims of voter fraud in New Hampshire during the 2016 presidential election. She has warned that his allegations could undermine faith in democracy.

answer: CBS News reports on Ellen Weintraub's response to President Trump's accusations regarding voter fraud occurring during the presidential election of 2016. Weintraub is quoted asking Trump for evidence of said fraud and remarking on the fact that such accusations reduce the people's faith in democratically held elections.


text:
LYNWOOD MACPHERSON (born September 21, 1947) is a Canadian politician, farmer and businessman. He represented 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996 as a Liberal.[1]

MacPherson was born in 1947 in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.[2] A graduate of Montague Regional High School, he married Mary Patricia Evans in 1973.[3] Prior to entering politics, MacPherson was a tobacco farmer, and a shareholder and plant manager for Belfast Tobacco Growers Limited.[4]

MacPherson entered provincial politics in 1986, when he was elected a councillor for the electoral district of 4th Queens.[5] He was re-elected in the 1989[6] and 1993 elections.[7] On May 21, 1996, MacPherson was appointed to the Executive Council of Prince Edward Island as Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General.[8] In the 1996 election, MacPherson was defeated by former Progressive Conservative MLA Wilbur MacDonald in the new Belfast-Pownal Bay riding.[9]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

title: Lynwood MacPherson

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who is Lynwood MacPherson?

answer: Lynwood MacPherson is a Canadian politician and businessman from Prince Edward Island. He represented the electoral district of 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly from 1986 to 1996. He was appointed Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General in 1996, but was defeated in the 1996 election.

answer: Lynwood MacPherson is a Canadian politician and businessman who represented 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996.

answer: A Canadian politician

answer: He was a Representative for Charlottetown in the Legislative Assembly for Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996.

answer: He is a Canadian politician, farmer, and businessman.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When and where was MacPherson born?

answer: In Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island in 1947

text: The answer gives the year but not the date.

refinement: In Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island on September 21, 1947.

answer: MacPherson was born in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island on September 21, 1947.

answer: September 21 1947, in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.

answer: MacPherson was born on September 21, 1947, in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.

answer: He was born in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.

text: The date is missing.

refinement: He was born in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island on September 21, 1947.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

When did MacPherson go into politics?

answer: MacPherson entered provincial politics in 1986.

answer: MacPherson went into politics in 1986.

answer: 1986

text: Missing dot.

answer: 1986

text: Missing dot.

answer: MacPherson entered provincial politics in 1986.

question:
Answer the following question based on the above passage:

Who defeated him?

answer: Wilbur MacDonald defeated him in the 1996 election.

answer: Wilbur MacDonald.

answer: Progressive Conservative MLA Wilbur MacDonald

answer: The former Progressive Conservative MLA Wilbur MacDonald

answer: Wilbur MacDonald defeated Lynwood MacPherson in the 1996 election.

question: Write a ~3 sentence summary.

answer: Lynwood MacPherson is a former Prince Edward Island politician and businessman. He was first elected in 1986 and served as both a councillor and Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General. In 1996 he was defeated in the election, after which he retired from politics.

text: It is not stated he is a former politician.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson is a Prince Edward Island politician and businessman. He was first elected in 1986 and served as both a councillor and Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General. In 1996 he was defeated in the election, after which he retired from politics.

text: It is not stated he is retired from politics.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson is a Prince Edward Island politician and businessman. He was first elected in 1986 and served as both a councillor and Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General. In 1996 he was defeated in the election.

text: It should be 'councilor' instead of 'councillor'.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson is a Prince Edward Island politician and businessman. He was first elected in 1986 and served as both a councilor and Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General. In 1996 he was defeated in the election.

answer: Lynwood MacPherson is a former provincial politician who represented 4th Queens from 1986 to 1996. As Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General, MacPherson was appointed in 1996 but lost his seat in the election that year.

text: It is not stated he is a former politician.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson is a provincial politician who represented 4th Queens from 1986 to 1996. As Minister of Provincial Affairs and Attorney General, MacPherson was appointed in 1996 but lost his seat in the election that year.

answer: This article discusses Lynwood MacPherson, a Canadian politician, businessman, and farmer. He was a member of the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996 as a Liberal. MacPherson was born in 1947 in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.

answer: Lynwood MacPherson (born 1947) is a Canadian politician, businessman, and farmer. He was born in Prince Edward Island. He married Mary Patricia Evans in 1973.

text: More relevant data should be mentioned than his marriage and the place of birth.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson (born 1947) is a Canadian politician, businessman, and farmer. He represented 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996 as a Liberal.

answer: Lynwood MacPherson was a Liberal Canadian Politician representing 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of  Prince Edward Island. Prior to entering politics, he was a tobacco farmer and shareholder and plant manager for Belfast Tobacco Growers Limited. First entering politics in 1986 he served until 1996.

text: The answer does not explicitly say when he was representing 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island than mentiones 'First entering politics in 1986 he served until 1996.'. It should be reformulated.

refinement: Lynwood MacPherson was a Liberal Canadian Politician representing 4th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of  Prince Edward Island from 1986 to 1996. Prior to entering politics, he was a tobacco farmer and shareholder, and plant manager for Belfast Tobacco Growers Limited.