text:
NEW LEFT 95 (Abbreviated: NK95 ) is a group of Lithuanian intellectuals and activists who launched their activities on 1 May 2007 with the declaration ‘New Left 95 Manifesto’, which brought together individual arguments on sociopolitical and cultural issues from the newer leftist perspective into the joint political stance of NK95. The preparation of the manifesto was coordinated by Dr Andrius Bielskis, a political philosopher with a PhD from Warwick University, who had returned to Lithuania after a lengthy spell of study and academic work in the UK in the summer of 2006.

During his presentation at the annual conference organized by “Santara Šviesa,” a mainstream liberal organization set up originally in the US by Valdas Adamkus, a former President of Lithuania, Andrius Bielskis urged for debate and political action to undo unjust political and social practices in Lithuania. The audience was left generally perplexed, but some younger participants, graduates of the Institute of Political Science and International Relations (TSPMI) in Vilnius, were inspired.

Already by December 2005 a group of Lithuanian university students along with a few other activists involved in the protest against the encroachment of privatization in public spaces in Vilnius (e.g. the movie theatre “Lietuva”) gathered at TSPMI for a conference where the Vilnius Leftist Club Manifesto was signed. This action paved a way for the initial consolidation of leftist activists.

During the autumn and winter 2006/2007, people from the two groups, joined by activists from other left-leaning groups and NGOs, came together, forming the core of the present day NK95. The final consolidation of the group came in June 2007, when the first NK95 conference was organized and set the tone for the further development. During the period of formation a virtual, email list based, organizational form was adopted as the most suitable for the formed community of practice.

The group now lists around 35/40 activists who each extend the reach of NK95 to many other groups and formally established organizations in Vilnius and other cities, thus sustaining a nationwide network for New Left public actions that are organized and coordinated by self-appointed and group-approved initiators of individual actions on an ad hoc basis which may involve also organizational gatherings, if required.

The main forms of action undertaken by NK95 activists are: formal statements (letters of opposition or support, declarations, signed public statements, group petitions or other group statements) and communications with a wider audience (press releases, posters, interviews, website, etc.).

The main objective of NK95, outside the most obvious, the popularization of the 45 theses of the NK95 manifesto, is to galvanize the political life in Lithuania by bringing to the fore of public debate leftist political values and ideas, with the hope that sooner or later the whole political mindset and with it political practice will shift leftwards, given the unforgiving social and political reality which demands a new left approach and ideas.

Thus, the group actively promotes the values of social justice, equality, individual and collective emancipation, as well as supporting a broader socially progressive agenda (e.g. gay rights). In order to achieve this aim two strategies are employed: 1) stirring up the debate by individual or group texts (mainly channeled through Internet news portals which allow more freedom of expression for non-staff writers as comparing to traditional media which are too corrupt), 2) organizing PR campaigns by indirect actions getting media and commentators involved in the cycle of self-denial, which helps to raise publicity for a particular issue. Another strategy for action which is being considered is organizing educational events, such as seminars, conferences or evening classes for the general public, where academic potential of NK is and can be tapped.

The first two pilot events organized under the banner of “New Left audience” featured Dr Kelvin Knight (London Metropolitan University, Britain) and Mr Svenn Arne Lie (Bergen University, Norway) as the main speakers, showing the potential of such form of public action because of the enormous interest received not only from the Lithuanian leftist organizations but also from the general public. Being aware of the limitations that any voluntary social formation faces as well as being dependent solely on individual goodwill and contribution of its members, NK95 has taken a course towards establishing international contacts at the international scene in order to be able to sustain its activism on the basis of co-sharing of resources via contact network. For that reason the Manifesto has been translated into German, English and French and contacts have been established with intellectuals from the UK and Norway as the first step towards the rebirth of the international New Left.

title: New Left 95

question: What does the text say about how people can join the New Left 95?

answer: No answer

critique: There is no evidence in the text - "New Left 95 Manifesto" that offers a guide to join NK95.

critique: There's no answer because the question is not answered in the text.

question: What does the text say about the main objective of the New Left 95?

answer: The main objectives of NK95, as stated in the text, is to galvanize the political life in Lithuania. The group aims to bring leftist political values and ideas to the fore, hoping to shift public debate leftwards. One of the strategies employed to achieve this is to educate the population, staging seminars and other events. The group actively promotes social justice, equality, individual, and collective emancipation. They also support a broader socially progressive agenda.

critique: NK95's main objective is to popularize the 45 theses of the NK95 manifesto.

critique: The answer should mention the 45 theses of the NK95 manifesto.

critique: "staging seminars and other events" is unnecessary.

critique: The group's main objective is to popularize the 45 theses of the NK95 manifesto.

critique: "The group actively promotes social justice, equality, individual, and collective emancipation. They also support a broader socially progressive agenda." - this sentence doesn't make any sense. Rewrite it.

question: What does the text say about the group's values?

answer: The group's main objective is to galvanize the political life in Lithuania by bringing to the fore leftist political values and ideas. The group actively promotes the values of social justice, equality, individual and collective emancipation, as well as supporting a broader socially progressive agenda.

critique: The answer should mention the group's values.

critique: The answer should probably include a quote from the text on these points.

critique: The answer should mention their leftist political values.

critique: The answer should mention the group's values explicitly.

critique: The answer does not mention the group's support for gay rights.


split: train

text:
BRYAN KEHL (born June 16, 1984) is an American football linebacker who is currently a free agent. He was drafted by the New York Giants in the fourth round of the 2008 NFL Draft. He played college football at Brigham Young University (BYU).

He has also been a member of the St. Louis Rams, Washington Redskins, and Kansas City Chiefs.

Kehl's biological father, Maurice Turner, played in the NFL for four years.[1] Kehl's brother, Billy Turner plays Guard for the Green Bay Packers. Kehl's biological mother, Amy Smith, got pregnant in 1984 in college at Utah State, she loved Turner, but marriage was not in their plans. Smith decided to give up Kehl for adoption.

College career

As a freshman Bryan was recruited by Utah, Oregon, Utah State, Harvard, Yale, Penn, BYU, and Idaho State. He eventually decided to play his college ball at Brigham Young University in 2002 while majoring in mechanical engineering and business. He played his freshman year as a reserve right outside linebacker before taking time off from school and football to participate in an LDS Church mission to Toronto for two years. His freshman year, he recorded 14 tackles, 6 of which were solo tackles in 11 games. He also earned the “prep team defensive player of the week award” versus Utah State along with letterman honors. In 2005 when he returned for his second year of college, Bryan played in 11 games as a backup right outside linebacker. He recorded 30 tackles, 15 of which were solo and received letterman honors. Some of these tackles included 4 which were in the Las Vegas Bowl against California. He also blocked a punt that propelled BYU to its only score against Boston College.

In 2006 when Bryan was a junior, he started as BYU's weakside linebacker. This season he was ranked third on the team with 70 total tackles, 30 of which were solo and 8 tackles for a total loss. He also had three sacks, a recovered fumble, and led BYU linebackers during the season with 6 pass break-ups. He was an honorable mention All-Mountain West and Academic All-Mountain West Conference honors recipient. In 2007 as a senior, Kehl received First-team All-Mountain West Conference honors. He was named the team's defensive MVP, one of the captains, and earned the Strength and Conditioning Award. He ended his senior year with a career-high 91 tackles, 52 of which were solo. He put up 11.5 stops behind the line of scrimmage and caused and recovered a fumble during his senior year. He deflected four passes and had an interception in three consecutive games, one of which was returned for a touchdown.

Professional career

Pre-draft

  ----------------------------------------------------- -------- -------------- --------------- --------------- --------- --------- -------- ------------------ ------ -----------
                _Pre-draft measureables_
                         Height
                         6-2¼ **
   _* represents NFL Combine_ **represents BYU Pro Day
  ----------------------------------------------------- -------- -------------- --------------- --------------- --------- --------- -------- ------------------ ------ -----------

New York Giants

Kehl was selected in the fourth round of the 2008 NFL Draft by the New York Giants. The Giants traded up (from 130 to 123 overall) by swapping picks with the Pittsburgh Steelers and giving up one of their sixth round picks (194 overall). He was placed second on the depth chart as weak side linebacker behind Gerris Wilkinson. Kehl made his first NFL start on October 26 for the injured Gerris Wilkinson when the Giants beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh. Bryan got his first interception of his NFL career in this game. He picked off Steeler's quarterback Ben Roethlisberger and ran it back for 17 yards.

Kehl was waived by the Giants on September 14, 2010.

St. Louis Rams

Kehl was claimed off waivers by the St. Louis Rams on September 15, 2010.

Washington Redskins

On April 23, 2012, Kehl signed with the Washington Redskins.[2] For the team's 3-4 defensive scheme, he switched from an outside linebacker to an inside linebacker to play a backup role to London Fletcher and Perry Riley.[3] Kehl was cut on August 31, 2012 for final cuts before the start of the 2012 season.[4]

Kansas City Chiefs

On October 2, 2012 Kehl was signed by the Chiefs. On November 27, 2012 Kehl was waived by the Chiefs after playing only 3 games for the team.

Second Stint with Redskins

On November 28, 2012, Kehl was claimed off waivers by the Redskins.[5] Set to be a free agent again for the 2013 season, the Redskins re-signed him to another one-year contract on March 14, 2013.[6] In the Week 6 game against the Dallas Cowboys, he tore the ACL in his left knee and was placed on injured reserve the next day.[7]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

title: Bryan Kehl

question: What does the text say about Bryan Kehl?

answer: Bryan Kehl has won some awards, including two BYU Defensive MVP Award (including one All-Mountain West) and several honorable mentions.

critique: The text does not say anything about awards Kehl won.

critique: The answer omits that Kehl was drafted by the New York Giants.

critique: The answer left out Kehl's playing career.

critique: The answer omits that Kehl is an American football linebacker.

critique: This response does not fully answer what the text says about Bryan Kehl.

critique: The answer omits Kehl's career as a professional football player.

critique: The text doesn't say he's won any awards.

question: What does the text say about Kehl's college career?

answer: Kehl went to Brigham Young University from 2002 to 2007 and majored in mechanical engineering and business. He didn't play his freshman year and took time off from school and football to join the LDS Church mission. He returned to play in 11 games as the backup right outside linebacker. In 2006, he started their weakside linebacker. In 2007, his senior year, he got first-team All-Mountain West honors, was named team's defensive MVP, one of their captains, and also earned the Strength and Conditioning Award. He retired with 91 tackles and a career high of 52 solo tackles.

critique: Kehl's last season is described incorrectly.

critique: The answer should mention that he was a junior in 2006.

critique: "He retired with 91 tackles and a career high of 52 solo tackles." - this part is inaccurate. Kehl didn't retire. He played his last season in 2007.

critique: Retired and departed are used incorrectly.

critique: The answer should mention his freshman year.

question: What does the text say about his teams?

answer: He was drafted by the New York Giants in the 2008 NFL Draft. He then went to the St. Louis Rams and the Washington Redskins where he signed a one-year contract. After he was waived by the Chiefs, the Redskins re-signed him to another one-year contract.

critique: The answer omits Kehl's time with the Kansas City Chiefs.

critique: The answer omits most of the details in the passage by focusing solely on his career with the Redskins.

critique: He also played for the Kansas City Chiefs.

critique: The answer omits his time with the Kansas City Chiefs.

question: What does the text say about Kehl's family?

answer: As a teenager, Kehl was recruited by numerous colleges to play football. His freshman year, he recorded 14 tackles, 6 of which were solo tackles in 11 games. He was recruited to play college football at Brigham Young University.

critique: The response does not provide the full answer to the question.


text:
The PUERTO RICANS FOR PUERTO RICO PARTY (, PPR) is a Puerto Rican political party. Founded in 2003, it was certified for the first time by the State Electoral Commission in May 2007.

History

In April 2007, it submitted the signatures required for certification by the State Electoral Commission.[1] Rogelio Figueroa is the president and co-founder of the party.

The party finally got its certification on Wednesday, May 9, 2007, when the president of the Electoral Commission gave his approval. During this process, two of the three commissioners of the currently registered political parties supported the PPR's certification.[2] Puerto Rican electoral law states that, if the commissioners don't reach a unanimous decision, the president of the Electoral Commission decides whether the party gets registered.

2008 election

The party had an ambitious agenda, attempting to run for nearly all elected positions, including governor, resident commissioner, and both state legislative houses (Senate and House of Representatives).

On the 2008 elections, the PPR candidate Rogelio Figueroa obtained 2.77% of the votes. Since electoral law requires over 3% of votes to maintain the party charter, this result meant that the party would be decertified, until they completed the certification process for the next elections.[3] Still, the party obtained more votes than the lead minority party, the Puerto Rican Independence Party, which has been running since 1946.

The aftermath

[Party headquarters in 2012] After the loss the party experienced internal struggles and dissent with many party officials and candidates breaking away from the party. Nevertheless, the party continues to operate as an independent entity and it is seeking to regain its Electoral Commission certification.

2012 election

For the 2012 elections, the party underwent a reorganization. After completing the certification process, they presented their candidacies.[4][5] Figueroa would run again for governor, while Dr. Sadiasept Guillont would run for Resident Commissioner. During his campaign, Figueroa attacked the alleged classism and social inequality of the current government.[6]

Platform

The PPR was originally organized as an ecological party, similar to green parties in Europe. It later broadened its platform and ideology to include economic issues, the political status of Puerto Rico, and citizen participation in government.

The position that PPR has taken on the issue of the political status of Puerto Rico has been a non-traditional one in Puerto Rican politics. The PPR's position is a neutral one. The party has not and will not take a side on the issue of Puerto Rico's status. In fact, candidates and officials of PPR are actually people with diverse opinions on what the future status of Puerto Rico should be. PPR has managed to enlist in one same party followers of Statehood, Independence, and Commonwealth. The party's stance is that the issue of the status of Puerto Rico should be discussed after bigger problems that affect Puerto Ricans' daily life are resolved.

[1] http://www.primerahora.com/noticia/politica/noticias/ppr_entregara_ultimos_endosos/49927 PRIMERA HORA ''“PPR entregará últimos endosos”' (“PPR to submit last endorsements”), retrieved May 12, 2007

[2] http://www.endi.com/noticia/politica/noticias/cee_certifica_al_ppr/211017 EL NUEVO DIA _“CEE certifica al PPR”_ (“State Electoral Commission certifies PPR”), retrieved May 12, 2007

[3] _Ley Electoral de Puerto Rico_

[4]

[5]

[6]

title: Puerto Ricans for Puerto Rico Party

question: What does the text say about the Puerto Ricans for Puerto Rico Party?

answer: The Puerto Ricans for Puerto Rico Party (PPR) is a Puerto Rican political party founded in 2003. The party was certified for the first time by the State Electoral Commission in May 2007. In April 2007, the party submitted the signatures required for certification. The party was certified on May 9, 2007.

critique: The answer gives a lot of extra information that is not useful for a basic understanding of the party.

critique: The answer should mention the party's platform.

critique: The certification process is not relevant to the question.

critique: The answer should mention the 2008 election.

critique: The answer does not mention what the party's platform is.

question: What does the text say about the history of the political party?

answer: The Puerto Ricans for Puerto Rico Party (PPR) was founded in 2003. It was certified for the first time by the State Electoral Commission in May 2007. In April 2007, the party submitted the signatures required for certification by the State Electoral Commission. The party finally got its certification on Wednesday, May 9, 2007. During this process, two of the three commissioners of the currently registered political parties supported the PPR's certification. The party had an ambitious agenda, attempting to run for nearly all elected positions, including governor, resident commissioner, and both state legislative houses (Senate and House of Representatives). On the 2008 elections, the PPR candidate Rogelio Figueroa obtained 2.77% of the votes. Since electoral law requires over 3% of votes to maintain the party charter, this result meant that the party would be decertified, until they completed the certification process for the next elections. After the loss the party experienced internal struggles and dissent with many party officials and candidates breaking away from the party. Nevertheless, the party continues to operate as an independent entity and is seeking to regain its Electoral Commission certification.

critique: The 2008 elections were in 2008. The remnant's answer covers pre-election processes as well as most of the party's lifespan.

critique: The response includes extraneous information not useful for the task.

critique: The details about the 2008 election are irrelevant.

question: What does the text say about the political party's aftermath?

answer: The PPR, a Puerto Rican political party, experienced internal struggles and dissent with many party officials and candidates breaking away from the party. The party continues to operate as an independent entity and is seeking to regain its Electoral Commission certification. The party underwent a reorganization for the 2012 elections. They presented their candidacies, with Figueroa running again for governor, and Guillont running for Resident Commissioner.

critique: The party's position on the issue of Puerto Rico's status is omitted.

critique: After the 2008 election, the party underwent a reorganization.

critique: The party's stance on the issue of the political status of Puerto Rico is omitted.

critique: The party's stance on the issue of Puerto Rico's status is omitted.

critique: The party is seeking to regain its certification. It is not trying to regain its certification.

question: What does the text say about the political party's platform?

answer: The party's platform was originally organized as an ecological party, similar to green parties in Europe. It later broadened its platform to include economic issues, the political status of Puerto Rico, and citizen participation in government. The party's stance is that the issue of the status of Puerto Rico should be discussed after bigger problems that affect Puerto Ricans' daily life are resolved.

critique: The party's stance is not the same as the platform.

critique: The party's stance on the issue of Puerto Rico's status is omitted.

critique: "The party's stance is that the issue of the status of Puerto Rico should be discussed after bigger problems that affect Puerto Ricans' daily life are resolved." - this is unnecessary information that should be deleted.

critique: The party's stance on the issue of the status of Puerto Rico is omitted.

critique: The party's stance is not part of the platform.

critique: The party's stance is not the platform, but an opinion on the platform.


text:
JULIAN DASHPER (29 February 1960 in Auckland, New Zealand – 30 July 2009), was regarded as one of New Zealand's most well known contemporary artists.

In 2001 he was awarded a senior Fulbright fellowship to be based as an artist in residence at the Chinati Foundation in Marfa, Texas. Dashper's work from the last 25 years has recently been the subject of a major touring retrospective in America (the first ever such exhibition for a resident New Zealand artist),[1] curated by Christopher Cook and David Raskin.[2]

Dashper's work focuses on the histories, theories and more general or popular ideas of abstraction (in particular abstract painting), conceptualism and minimalism as a working methodology. The geographical positioning of New Zealand globally and how this country receives and disseminates visual information is also a core subject in Dashper's work.[3] His practice manifests itself in various forms, including paintings, unique photographs of paintings, found objects which he infuses with abstract images, various multiples plus limited edition CD and 12" polycarbonate recordings of impromptu performances he has been involved with or heavily orchestrated. He has also produced a number of video works, some of which document or describe his installations, painting and audio recordings.[4] In 2016, arts organisation Circuit commissioned George Clark to curate a programme of moving image works, titled _This is not film-making_, which invited artists Gavin Hipkins, Juliet Carpenter and Gregory Kan, Daniel Malone, Louise Menzies and Nathan Gray to make works that respond to Dashper's own writings.[5]

Respectful, even affectionate references to local culture and art history are always present in Dashper's work, whilst his own adaptations of abstraction, conceptualism and minimalism fully acknowledge their lineage within international art. As curator (and director of the Adam Art Gallery in Wellington) Christina Barton expresses it, Dashper has _“the unique perspective of attending to an internationalist art history from a distance, enabling him to devise strategies to work around his geographical isolation whilst simultaneously articulating its effects.”_[6] Dashper is represented in all the major public collections in New Zealand: MCA, Sydney; Ludwig Forum für Internationale Kunst, Aachen, Germany; Sheldon Museum of Art, Lincoln, Nebraska; The University of Auckland Art Collection; Ulrich Museum of Art, Wichita, Kansas and the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam.

Visiting scholar at the University of Sydney in 2008, Dashper lived in Auckland and travelled regularly. His first New Zealand retrospective, _Julian Dashper: Professional Practice_, was held at the Gus Fisher Gallery in 2010.

[]

_UNTITLED (THE WARRIORS)_ 1998. Vinyl on drumheads with junior drumkit. Dimensions variable. Courtesy of the artist, Sue Crockford Gallery, Auckland and Kaliman Gallery, Sydney. Photo by Ashley Barber.

Copyright Julian Dashper

This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) who owns copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorise derivative works. Per § 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright. It is believed that the use of a picture to illustrate the three-dimensional work of art in question, to discuss the artistic genre or technique of the work of art or to discuss the artist or the school to which the artist belongs on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use as well as copyright information on the original artwork.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

title: Julian Dashper

question: How are digital images treated in the United States in terms of copyright and ownership?

answer: No answer

critique: No response is provided and a response needs to be written.

critique: The response misses to mention that pictures used to describe a three dimensional work of art are exempted per copyright law.

critique: The answer is not relevant to the question.

critique: The answer cannot be found by searching the document.

text: The response does not cover what is said in the article about ownership of images and the right to fair use as well as what constitutes fair usage of digital images.

category: accuracy

refinement: No answer


text:
A shocking secret CIA assessment has concluded that Russia interfered with the U.S. presidential election expressly to help Donald Trump win, according to an exclusive report Friday by The Washington Post.

Until now, intelligence sources have indicated that Russian hacking throughout the campaign that repeatedly exposed information overwhelmingly embarrassing for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was an effort to undermine Americans’ faith in their government.

Now the intelligence community has concluded that Russia was clearly after a Trump victory and manipulated information to that end, according to sources who spoke to the newspaper.

“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” a senior U.S. official briefed on the CIA assessment told The Washington Post. “That’s the consensus view.”

The Trump camp has dismissed the report — along with the credibility of the U.S. intelligence community. “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” said a statement by the Trump transition team. “The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s time to move on and ‘Make America great again.’”

(The claim that Trump had won one of the “biggest Electoral College victories in history” is simply not true. He ranks 44th out of 54 electoral votes of presidents since the 12th Amendment passed, Mother Jones reports.)

It’s no surprise Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted Trump in the White House. Trump praised the former KGB leader throughout the presidential campaign. He even called Putin a “more effective leader” than President Barack Obama.

Leaked information through hacking operations traced by U.S. intelligence to Russia was eerily silent on Trump and the Republican Party throughout the presidential campaign. Yet the same operations exposed troves of secret, sometimes embarrassing, personal communication involving Clinton and internal planning by the Democratic National Committee.

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russia hacked the Republican National Committee but chose not to release the information, according to a report in the New York Times late Friday.

In addition, intelligence officials discovered breaches by Russian government-linked hackers into the voter registration databases of at least two states.

Links to hackers and the Russian government were detected by U.S. intelligence earlier this year. But Trump dismissed a Russian hand in the operations. He again this week blasted the intelligence findings, even before the latest assessment emerged, as politically motivated and not based on hard evidence.

“I don’t believe it. I don’t believe [Russia] interfered,” Trump told Time magazine in his “Person of the Year” interview released Wednesday.

“That became a laughing point, not a talking point,” he added. “Any time I do something, they say, ‘Oh, Russia interfered.’”

The hacking, he said, “could be Russia, it could be China. And it could be some guy in his home in New Jersey.”

Yet at one point during the campaign in July, he appeared to appeal to Russia for hacking help, saying: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing” from Clinton’s email servers. The seeming request for a foreign government to breach U.S. internet security sparked a storm of controversy, and Trump later insisted he was only being “sarcastic.”

In a September intelligence briefing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) reportedly expressed suspicion about Russian links to campaign hacking. He hasn’t commented on The Washington Post’s report on the latest CIA information.

The chilling assessment that it’s “quite clear” Russia’s goal was to get Trump elected was shared with key senators last week in a Capitol Hill briefing, the Post reported. CIA officials cited a mounting body of evidence from several sources. Intelligence agencies have identified specific individuals with connections to the Russian government who are believed to have provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails, according to The Washington Post.

Obama has ordered a “full review” of Russian hacking in the campaign following pressure from Congress, the White House announced Friday. He expects to receive an intelligence report on any election interference before he leaves office. Congress will also be briefed on the report.

“We’ve seen in 2008, and this last election system, malicious cyber-activity,” Obama’s counterterrorism and homeland security adviser, Lisa Monaco, told reporters. “We may be crossing a new threshold, and it is incumbent upon us to take stock of that, to review, to conduct some after-action, to understand what has happened and to impart those lessons learned.”

_This article has been updated to include new details on where Trump ranks in electoral votes of presidents._

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

question: What is the role of Russia in the article?

answer: Russia is accused of hacking the U.S. election to help Donald Trump win.

critique: While this is the overall theme in the article it overlooks other angles of Russian involvement.

critique: The answer should include the fact that the Russians were accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

critique: The answer should include that the Russians are accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

critique: The answer should mention the previous belief about Russian hacking.

critique: The answer should mention that the Russians were accused of hacking both the Republican National Committee and the Democratic National Committee.

critique: The answer could be clearer in its pronoun use.

critique: The answer should mention the previous belief that the hacks were meant to undermine Americans' faith in their government.

question: What are the implications of the Russian hacking?

answer: The Russians are believed to have hacked the Republican National Committee but chose not to release the information.

critique: The answer does not address the question.

critique: This response is irrelevant to what is being asked.

critique: The answer is not related to the question.

critique: The answer should mention the implications of the hacks.

critique: The article does not say that the Russians hacked the Republican National Committee.

critique: This response does not fully answer the question.

question: Why was Trump able to get away with this?

answer: He had a lot of media coverage and was able to dismiss the credibility of many mainstream media outlets, getting away with saying outlandish things and dismissing seemingly credible information.

critique: This is not a reason why Trump was able to get away with this.

critique: It is not clear that Trump dismissed the credibility of mainstream media outlets.

critique: The answer is not related to the question.

critique: The author indicates Donald Trump was supported by the Russians explicitly to win the election, not that he dismissed the credibility of many mainstream media outlets, getting away with saying outlandish things and dismissing seemingly credible information.

critique: The answer should be more specific about the outlandish things Trump said.

text: While I would judge this answer to be accurate, this question is not addressed in the text

category: coherence

question: What does this article suggest about Trump's campaign?

answer: That it was helped by the Russians.

critique: The answer should be clearer about what it is saying.

critique: The answer should be more specific about the Russian involvement.

critique: The article does not say that Trump's campaign was helped by the Russians. It says that the Russians interfered in the election to help Trump win.

critique: The article does not explicitly state that Trump's campaign was helped by the Russians.

critique: The article does not say that the campaign was helped by the Russians.


text:
The DOMINICA GRAMMAR SCHOOL (DGS) is a public co-education secondary school in Roseau, Dominica, established in 1893, one of the oldest educational institutions on the island.[1] Contrary to its name, the school no longer functions as a traditional grammar school, as it has expanded its curriculum beyond its historical scope.

History

The birthplace of the Dominica Grammar School was in “Lagon”, Roseau. It was in the building known as No. 66 Queen Mary Street, now occupied by Mr Ashton Piper, Barrister-at-Law and Solicitor. Up to 1877, the plot of land measuring just over , at the corner of what was then Marlborough Street and Grandby Street, was vacant. It was purchased at public auction by a merchant named Henry Hamilton on behalf of his friend Alexander Robinson. The latter started to build on the plot of land in 1878.

The story goes that Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence, and his younger brother, Prince George, who later became King George V, visited Dominica in 1879 as naval cadets on HMS _Bacchante_ and were entertained at the Robinson house which was afterwards named “Clarence Hall”, in honor of its royal visitor. The name, however, appears to have fallen into disuse with the passage of time. Robinson probably occupied the building as a dwelling, but when the Government decided to open the Dominica Grammar School, the spacious stone building on Grandby Street was rented for that purpose and opened as a school on January 16, 1893. The property has been in the possession of the Piper family since 1924, when it was purchased by public auction by Augustus Piper. The building is said to have been extensively damaged by fire before it was acquired by Piper.

As of January 2014, the Principal of DGS is Alicia Jean Jacques.[2]

Curriculum

The school offers a range of academic and technical subjects aimed at catering to the increasing demands of its in excess of 1,000 student population. These include but are not limited to agricultural science, auto mechanics, home economics and management in addition to its traditional natural and social science offerings

Distinguished alumni

-   Pierre Charles - 6th Prime Minister of Dominica, attended 1967-70 before transferring to the Saint Mary's Academy.
-   Roosevelt Douglas - 5th Prime Minister of Dominica
-   Edison James - 4th Prime Minister of Dominica
-   Edward Scobie - historian and journalist
-   Liam Sebastien - Windward Islands cricketer.
-   Clarence Seignoret - former President of Dominica
-   Vernon Shaw - former President of Dominica
-   Grayson Shillingford - West Indies test cricketer
-   Roosevelt Skerrit - 7th Prime Minister of Dominica
-   Crispin Sorhaindo - former President of Dominica

Dominica Grammar School symbols

MOTTO: _Mens Sana in Corpore Sano_ (Latin for “A sound mind in a healthy body”)

PLEDGE: I pledge allegiance to the Dominica Grammar School, I promise to co-operate in promoting a healthy learning environment, I will strive for success and uphold the standards of the school, And under God persevere with a sound mind in a healthy body.

SONG: The greatest The greatest, the greatest of all builders Wrought with his mighty hand All that we see around us In sky, and sea, and land And land.

The mansion he made was perfect Nor could it be otherwise Built from his deep foundation Made visible by patience A school for human eyes.

Look then upon this building And emulate his deed And to his greater glory Evolve from it our creed.

The mansion he made was perfect Nor could it be otherwise Built from his deep foundation Made visible by patience A school for human eyes.

When childhood days are over Fare forth to wider lore Building on with the old school spirit Craftmen forever more.

The mansion he made was perfect Nor could it be otherwise Built from his deep foundation Made visible by patience A school for human eyes.

The student council

The school currently has a system in which a student council, which includes prefects and form representatives, is led by the headboy and headgirl of the school.

[1] “Dominica Grammar School prepares to celebrate 120 years” , Dominica Vibes, October 24, 2012.

[2] “Dominica Grammar School celebrates 121” , Dominica Vibes, January 16, 2014.

title: Dominica Grammar School

question: What is the Dominica Grammar School's role in mandating the official rules of the English language?

answer: No answer

critique: The question is asking for an inference. The school is not noted to be the arbiter of the English language, but it may be implied that the school has had a hand in the development of the language.

question: Summarize the history of the Dominica Grammar School's current building.

answer: The position of the then-vacant plot of land was purchased at a public auction by a merchant named Henry Hamilton on behalf of a friend. The friend started building in 1878 on the plot, and the school was opened in 1893. It is said that the building suffered damages due to fire before it was acquired by Augustus Piper, who was its owner until 1924. It is currently in possession of the Piper family.

critique: The answer should mention that the building was damaged by fire before it was acquired by Augustus Piper.

critique: It's omitted that the school was built on the plot of land.

critique: It is omitted that the building is still standing today.

critique: The answer should mention that the building was damaged by a fire before it was acquired by Piper.

critique: The answer should mention that the building was damaged by fire before it was acquired by Piper.

critique: The school was opened in 1893, not the building.


text:
Chloe’s emergency only cost $100, but it could’ve been a lot worse.

Source: Lacey Patterson

A few days after Lacey Patterson adopted Chloe, a two-month old kitten, from a local shelter near her home in Clearwater, Florida, the kitten started showing signs of a cold.

At first, the symptoms were mild: sneezing, a runny nose and watery eyes. But when the kitten started bleeding through her nose, Patterson knew it was time to take her to the vet.

Because it was a weekend and the kitten needed immediate attention, Patterson took her to BluePearl Veterinary Partners, an emergency vet in the area. Luckily, the vets there were able to see Chloe right away and prescribe antibiotics as a treatment plan. And, the cost of the visit was only $100, something that surprised Patterson.

"It was actually a lot cheaper than what I was expecting," said Patterson, a nursing student. "But also this wasn't anything complicated, there was no surgery involved."

Nearly 70 percent of households in the U.S. own a pet, according to a survey conducted by the American Pet Products Association. Of those pets, it is estimated that 1 in 3 will need emergency veterinary treatment every year.

Emergency treatment can be a huge added expense for pet owners. According to Petplan, a pet insurance company, the average cost of unexpected veterinary care for dogs and cats is between $800 and $1,500, depending on where you live.

Most Americans would be caught off guard by an unexpected $800 expense. Only 39 percent have enough in their savings to cover a $1,000 emergency, according to a survey by Bankrate.

"Out-of-pocket medical expenses is one of the leading causes of bankruptcy for people, and pets are one small version of that," said Eve Kaplan, a certified financial planner and investment advisor at Kaplan Financial Advisors in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey.

As veterinary medicine has improved, there are a lot of treatments available to help pets in emergencies. But everything comes with a price.

"I don't think I can emphasize this enough — it is so difficult for owners when they are not prepared for the cost of their pet," said Dr. Cathleen Meeks, a veterinarian at BluePearl's specialty and emergency pet hospital in Tampa, Florida.

Dr. Meeks always tries to work within the financial means of her clients.

Source: BluePearl Veterinary Partners

Part of the family budget

Most families do not consider the most common pets — dogs, cats and fish — to be a major expense. In 2015, those households with pets spent about $1,000 a year on them, with some $425 of that being for medical costs, according to data from Harris Interactive.

But emergency room visits can cost thousands of dollars, especially if surgery is needed.

Financial advisors recommend adding a line item to your family's monthly budget for your pets, and including them in the family emergency fund.

Kaplan says that families should earmark $5,000 to $10,000 in the family emergency fund for a pet.

"It's easy to say that you wouldn't put that much money into a dog or cat but when it's happening you don't even think about it," said Kaplan at Kaplan Financial Advisors. "It's a family member."

  I don't think I can emphasize this enough – it is so difficult for owners when they are not prepared for the cost of their pet

  Dr. Cathleen Meeks

  Veterinarian

Consider your options

Aside from having emergency funds built into your family budget, there are a few other resources to help with medical costs for a pet.

One is pet insurance, which is growing in popularity. Today, 2.1 million pets in North America are insured, according to the North American Pet Health Insurance Association.

"Sometimes pet insurance is really worth looking at," said Peter Creedon, a CFP at Crystal Brook Advisors in New York City. "You've got to look at your options and see if it is cost-effective for you."

If you do decide to get pet insurance, veterinarians advise getting it when your pet is young and healthy. As with human health insurance, pre-existing conditions factor in to most pet insurance plans.

CareCredit is another option to help with payments. It's a credit card that can be used for medical expenses, and most vets accept it. Cardholders who opened an account at a veterinary office used their card an average of 5.37 times for vet services in 2017, according to CareCredit.

"While costs can vary depending on the pet, CareCredit helps make it easier for consumers to say 'yes' to recommended treatment for their pet," said Boo Larsen, general manager of veterinary medicine for CareCredit.

  It's easy to say that you wouldn't put that much money into a dog or cat but when it's happening you don't even think about it. It's a family member.

  Eve Kaplan

  CFP and investment advisor

Prioritize prevention

One of the easiest ways to avoid a pet emergency is to take your pet to their veterinarian for annual checkups. They will make sure your pet gets the medical attention they need and that you have the information you need to keep your pet healthy.

"It really is our job to prepare people for what they're going to have to deal with," said Dr. Nan Boss, a veterinarian at Best Friends Veterinary Center in Grafton, Wisconsin.

Dr. Boss also said that she wishes people would consult veterinarians before getting a new pet.

"A lot of diseases we see are genetic," she said. There are some dog breeds that will need surgery down the road, she said, such bulldogs, which have problems with their soft palettes and knees.

In addition, it pays to be prepared for all kinds of emergencies. Not all pet emergencies are medical emergencies, said Tierra Bonaldi, a pet lifestyle expert at the APPA. Natural disasters are an emergency that often leave pet owners scrambling if they don't have a way to transport their pet.

Pet owners should also consider the cost of pet care if they travel or are unable to take care of their pet.

MORE FROM PERSONAL FINANCE:
The 10 best — and worst — places to retire
If you rent out your vacation house, don't forget to give the IRS a cut
Taxpayers who skipped filing their return face a higher penalty after June 14

Ways to save

Bonaldi said that although pet emergencies can be expensive, the cost of pet ownership doesn't have to be a burden, especially if you're responsible.

In addition, talk to your vet about your budget and what you can afford, emergency visit or not.

"It's kind of a taboo thing to ask an owner 'What can you afford to do?'" said Dr. Meeks in Florida. "But I do try to be honest and ask about what is within their financial means.

"Our job as a veterinarian is to give all the tests available so the owner can make a decision about what they want do to and can afford," she added.

In most cases, vets will be able to work with you to fit your budget and your pet's needs as best they can.

There are also ways to save outside of the vet's office, said Bonaldi at the APPA. Most pets don't need expensive toys or other accessories, so you certainly don't need to shell out for that fancy treat-dispensing camera.

"Pets are wonderful," Bonaldi said. "The benefits outweigh the expenses."

question: What does the text say about why pet insurance is a necessity for all pet owners?

answer: According to the text, the average cost of unexpected veterinary care for dogs and cats is between $800 and $1,500, depending on where you live. Most Americans would be caught off guard by an unexpected $800 expense. Only 39 percent have enough in their savings to cover a $1,000 emergency, according to a survey by Bankrate.

critique: According to the data hiked out, it is pretty clear that veterinary care doesn't guarantee a fix.

critique: The answer should mention the financial burden of emergency vet bills.

critique: The answer should mention that the article recommends pet owners to have a pet emergency fund.

critique: The answer can be more specific about the veterinary care costs.

question: What does the text say about why it is necessary to seek the advice of a vet before getting a pet?

answer: It is science's responsibility to recognize good personality traits in a dog and inform potential owners of these traits to help them decide if the dog can be accommodated. This helps avoid throwing allergies in the face of caring owners. Dogs also need to have a balanced diet and not too much or too little exercise. They need to be groomed, checked for parasites, and if this is not possible for any reason, the dog may be better off not getting a pet.

critique: The response does not answer the question.

question: What financial options should a person on a budget consider for vet treatment?

answer: A pet owner should consider pet insurance, CareCredit, and adding a line item to their family's monthly budget for their pets.

critique: The text mentions a family emergency fund as another workaround since it covers "all kinds of emergencies". The response omitted this way to save.


text:
It's a little dark but enjoy! Looking for lots of constructive criticism.

It's a little past four in the morning. A middle aged man, cigarette between his fingers, is walking down the street. He's dressed in dark clothes, his long hair is dripping from the light rain. His black shirt reflects both the darkness that he feels internally and sees in each unlit alleyway he passes. He had just gotten off work at a nearby gas station. Everyday he stands at the counter like a mindless robot, serving an endless stream of disgruntled customers. His name tag, which reads "Justin", fails to make the man feel any more human. The customers are typically assholes but the man has grown used to it by now. He's just relieved that the store wasn't robbed tonight. He still has the scars both mentally and physically from last time. The man takes a deep drag of his Marlboro as he runs his fingers along the sewn up gash on his cheek. He remembers staring down the barrel of the 12 gauge that disfigured him. "Fuck." The man tosses his jack and lights another.

It is a warm summer night, a soft drizzle sprinkles down on the concrete. The luminous full moon overhead and traffic lights light up the street. The dazzling array of colors play across the wet pavement like the dancing woman tattooed on his left arm. His pace is slow and relaxed, his hands in the pockets of his faded and worn shorts. While walking he discreetly scans his surroundings for the ever present danger that defines this neighborhood. He has been living here for almost all his life.

To his right is the playground where he used to play as a kid. His old favorite slide has long ago lost its vibrant yellow paint and is now a dull grey. The swings no longer exist and the jungle jim has been reduced to a rusted conglomeration of jagged metal. The current rain contributing to its continuing demise. He remembers being young and carefree, he remembers enjoying his life before it crumbled apart before his young eyes. His mom used to take him to this park. He would run and play as she socialized with other mothers. He used to play with other children on the soft grass for hours at a time. Sometimes he and his parents would have picnics under the beautiful blue sky. They would lay on their backs and gaze up at the billowing clouds. Everything seemed just about perfect. But it wasn't perfect. As they enjoyed themselves in a blissful ignorance, cancer was slowly spreading through his mother's bloodstream.

The man snaps back to reality. He is approaching an alley where he was mugged a few nights ago. As the gas station employee draws nearer, his heart speeds up. His hand clenches the razor sharp switchblade in his pocket. His tired eyes are fixed on alleyway as he continues to approach, drops of rain still dripping off his disheveled hair. He draws nearer and nearer. 20 feet. 10 feet. The moment of truth. Nothing. The man relaxes his tense muscles and let's go of his knife. He's all alone on the street. He likes the serenity of the normally bustling city in the early morning. Other than the man, there are no signs of life in this part of the sprawling concrete jungle.

Although his apartment is only a few blocks away, he decides to take a detour. He wants to see his old house again. The man takes a left down 5th. The rain is starting to pick up. The pitter patter sound of raindrops is gradually drowned out by sirens in the distance. The sirens grow louder and louder as two cruisers approach. The police lights reflect off the wet brick walls around the man in a flashing dualism of blue and red. The crown victorians tear down the street, splashing the man as they speed by. "Fuckin pigs." The man mutters. Another cigarette and the man reaches his old home.

He gazes on the vacant two story brick building in which he resided for the first decade of his life. There used to be a small garden in the front. The red and yellow flowers were often complemented by passing pedestrians.  Now the flower bed is filled with broken glass and various pieces of trash. Every window on the building is smashed. Wide cracks run down the front door. It is hanging on to the sad structure by one hinge. The man pushes the door back and walks inside. The interior is also filled with broken glass. Graffiti covers every wall that isn't destroyed. Glass crunches underfoot as he walks through the abandoned hallways and up the rickety staircase. The stairs creak and moan under the man's weight.

The man soon reaches his old bedroom. He runs his hand along the doorframe as he remembers barricading himself in the room when his drunk father tried to beat him. Sometimes the fortifications held up, sometimes they didn't. His father wasn't always a violent alcoholic. It started when leukemia stole his wife from him. He would beat his son in a drunken stupor until that chilly October day child services showed up. A concerned teacher called them after she noticed bruises constantly appearing on Justin's small body. Justin distinctly remembers being taken from the house by two government workers. His father just stood in the doorway, bottle in hand, as they bureaucrats put the young boy in the back of their white car. Justin was sobbing because he loved his father even after the regular verbal and physical abuse. He never saw his dad again after that day. He drifted from unloving foster home to foster home until he was an adult.

Suddenly a bolt of lightning lights up the room in a brilliant flash, followed by a loud boom of thunder. It's time for the man to go back to his apartment. He leaves his old home. As he's walking out, he wishes he could leave behind the bad memories that haunt both his memory and the house. Stepping outside into a dismal down pour, the man briskly makes his way back to his apartment. By the time he gets back he is soaking wet. The socks within his shoes are soggy and squeak each time he takes a step. He takes off his wet clothes and puts on a dry outfit. He turns on the TV but all he can hear is his neighbors. The walls are extremely thin. Every word of the couples heated argument can be heard. As well as the cry of an infant, distressed by his or her parents incessant fighting.

The man reaches under his old and uncomfortable couch, retrieving his dwindling stash. Another bolt of lightning cracks outside as he picks out a small amount of heroin from the tiny plastic bag. He readies the essentials: a spoon, cotton ball, syringe and lighter. Needle in mouth, he holds the green bic under the spoon. Once the dope is thoroughly heated, he takes the syringe from his mouth and draws in the powerful opiate. He postulates on the events of his life that have brought him to this point. A tear slides down the man's face and onto the bare floor. He knows he needs to stop using but nothing else numbs the pain.  Yet another crack of lightning.  He inserts the needle into this arm. Justin watches his blood mix with the drug, holding back more tears. Then he pushes the heroin into his bloodstream. After several seconds the world around him becomes exponentially more bearable. He is no longer aware of the torrential downpour outside and now frequent lightning. He is no longer aware of his obnoxious neighbors. Or his achy body. Or his hopeless situation. He drifts off into a realm of pure pleasure, temporarily permitted to escape the living hell in which he spends every sober moment of his waking life.

title: First time posting and first short story I've ever done

question: what kind of message is the writer trying to deliver?

answer: Addiction and depression are often destructive

critique: The answer should mention the man's childhood.

critique: The answer is not relevant to the question.

critique: It is not stated that the man is addicted and depressed.

critique: The answer is too vague. The writer is trying to deliver a message about depression and addiction.


text:
[A Flint water bill.]
LANSING — Without debate, the Michigan House of Representatives unanimously approved providing $30 million to Flint to help pay water bills for residents and businesses in the city.

The bill would give a credit that would be applied to how much water people consume — roughly 65% of the water portion of a resident's bill. Businesses would be eligible for credit of 20% of the water portion of their bills. Residents and business owners would still be responsible for paying the sewer portion of their bills.

Residents have long complained about having to pay for water they could not drink. A lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court this week seeks more than $150 million in refunds and compensation for damages for water that the plaintiffs allege was dangerous, undrinkable and unusable.

New Michael Moore documentary gets free Flint showings

Flint’s chief financial officer, Jody Lundquist, told House members Wednesday that without the financial support from the state, “the city’s water fund is projected to run out of cash by this summer. Even with the appropriation, if public confidence can

While Democrats offered amendments that would have doubled the amount from $30 million to $60 million to pay for entire water bills, along with $3.5 million in aid to help with nutritional needs of children and families and $55 million to kick-start the removal and replacement of lead pipes, all those proposals failed before the bills was unanimously approved by the House.

"$30 million will not solve the problem. It will not be a sufficient amount of money to recoup the users from April 2014 to April 2016," said state Rep. Sheldon Neeley, D-Flint. "This bill is going to be a start. We don't want to reject anything that's going to provide some level of relief from ratepayers."

The House did approve additional guidelines on how the money will be spent, including a provision that none of the money be used for administrative costs and that no water bills that were delinquent before April 2014 —  when the city switched from using water from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department that was drawn from Lake Huron to water from the Flint River — would be eligible for credits.

"It’s a big step now the third time that we’ve acted to send needed dollars to the city of Flint," said Speaker of the House Kevin Cotter, R-Mt. Pleasant, referring to $9.3 million approved last year to help the city connect back to Detroit's water system and the $28 million approved in January for a variety of services in Flint. "We're trying to be helpful where we can ... but no matter where we came down, there were going to be some that aren't going to be happy one way or another. It’s unfortunate that each time we act, its considered not enough."

The bill — SB 136 — has to go back to the Senate, which unanimously approved it two weeks ago, for concurrence in the changes made by the House. It's expected to be taken up on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Gov. Rick Snyder on Thursday announced $2 million in additional funding to help Flint address its water infrastructure needs, including replacement of lead service lines.

Snyder said in a news release the money will be available for the city to start removing priority lead service lines within the next 30 days.

Based on estimates Flint Mayor Karen Weaver has received from the Lansing Board of Water and Light, which is assisting with the replacement of lead service lines, that should cover several hundred homes, he said.

Snyder said the money will come in the form of a Financially Distressed Cities, Villages and Townships Grant intended to reimburse the city for its $2-million share of the cost of reconnecting to the Detroit water system in October.

“This funding continues Michigan’s substantial and coordinated response to the Flint water crisis,” Snyder said. “We continue to ensure every possible resource is being utilized so that Flint families have safe and reliable drinking water in their homes and schools.”

Flint's drinking water became contaminated with lead in April 2014 while the city was under the control of a state-appointed emergency manager and began drawing drinking water from the Flint River as a temporary cost-cutting measure.

Activists deliver petitions urging Snyder to resign

Flint crisis attracts celebrity cash � and scammers

_Contact Kathleen Gray: 517-372-8661, kgray99@freepress.com or on Twitter @michpoligal_

question: Is there any reason why the Michigan legislators approved $30 million to Flint without debate?

answer: The money was to help pay for water bills for their residents and businesses, and the money is going to come out of the state coffers.

critique: The answer is not specific about the reason for the lack of debate.

question: What are the reasons why some people find the government reaction to Flint water crisis inadequate?

answer: Some people believe that $30 million is not enough to solve the problem.

critique: The answer should include the other complaints about the bill.

question: What forced the Michigan State government to respond to the Flint water problem?

answer: A lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court this week seeks more than $150 million in refunds and compensation for damages for water that the plaintiffs allege was dangerous, undrinkable and unusable.

critique: The answer could refer to the complainants as "residents" instead of "the plaintiffs."

critique: The answer is not a direct response to the question.

critique: The answer should mention the water bill credit.

question: What are the guidelines set up by the state government around the funding providing for the Flint water crisis?

answer: The water fund is projected to run out of cash by summer. The money will be used for water bills and not for administrative costs.

critique: The response does not address the question. However, it does mention that the money for Flint is for water bills-owners are still responsible for the sewage portion of the bill.

critique: The answer given does not address the question.

critique: The first sentence is a bit misleading. It's not the water fund that is projected to run out of cash but the city's water fund.

critique: The answer does not mention the additional guidelines set up by the state government.

critique: The answer should mention the eligibility criteria.

critique: The guidelines are not explicitly stated.

critique: The answer should mention the eligibility criteria for the water bills.

critique: The answer does not mention the other guidelines set by the state government.


text:
“STRYCHNINE IN THE SOUP” is a short story by the British comic writer P. G. Wodehouse. A part of the Mr. Mulliner series, the story was first published in the US in _The American Magazine_ in December 1931 (as “A Missing Mystery”), and in the UK in _The Strand Magazine_ in March 1932.[1] It also appears in the collection _Mulliner Nights_ (1933).[2]

Plot

Cyril Mulliner, an interior decorator with a passion for mystery stories, finds a handful of his flesh being twisted by the lovely Amelia Bassett at a showing of _The Grey Vampire_ and the two fall instantly in love with each other. Fate, however, has thrown a spanner in the works, in the form of Amelia's mother, Lady Bassett, a well-known big game hunter and explorer, who objects to an interior decorator as a son-in-law, preferring that Amelia marry Lester Mapledurham (“pronounced 'Mum'”), another well-known big game hunter and explorer. The plot twists and turns (and thickens) but Cyril wins Amelia in the end, thanks to a wandering copy of the new Inspector Mould mystery, _Strychnine in the Soup_.

Publication history

In _The American Magazine_, the story was illustrated by Roy F. Spreter.[3] It was illustrated by Treyer Evans in the _Strand_.[4] The story was published in _Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine_ in February 1952.[5]

“Strychnine in the Soup” was collected in the _Mulliner Omnibus_, published in 1935 by Herbert Jenkins Limited, and in _The World of Mr. Mulliner_, published in the UK in 1972 by Barrie & Jenkins and issued in the US in 1974 by the Taplinger Publishing Company.[6] It was included in the 1939 collection _The Week-End Wodehouse_ (US edition), published by Doubleday, Doran & Co.[7] The story was featured in the 1949 collection _The Best of Wodehouse_, with stories selected by Scott Meredith and published by Pocket Books, New York. The collection generally included one story from each series, and “Strychnine in the Soup” was the only Mulliner story.[8] The story was collected in the 1960 book _The Most of P. G. Wodehouse_, published in October 1960 by Simon and Schuster, New York.[9] It was also included in _Wodehouse on Crime_, edited by D. R. Bensen and published by Ticknor & Fields, New York, in 1981.[10]

The story was included in the anthology _Treasury of Great Humor, Including Wit, Whimsy, and Satire from the Remote Past to the Present_, edited and with commentary by Louis Untermeyer, and published by McGraw-Hill, New York, in 1972.[11]

Adaptations

A BBC TV adaptation of the story aired on 9 April 1976 as part of the _Wodehouse Playhouse_ series.[12]

[1]

[2] McIlvaine (1990), pp. 63–64, A48.

[3] McIlvaine (1990), p. 144, D4.7.

[4] McIlvaine (1990), p. 186, D133.177.

[5] McIlvaine (1990), p. 149, D21.2.

[6] McIlvaine (1990), pp. 115–116, B5.

[7] McIlvaine (1990), pp. 116–117, B6a.

[8] McIlvaine (1990), p. 118, B8.

[9] McIlvaine (1990), pp. 120–121, B12.

[10] McIlvaine (1990), pp. 125–126, B23.

[11] McIlvaine (1990), p. 198, E128.

[12]

title: Strychnine in the Soup

question: Summarize the success of the story "Strychnine in the Soup".

answer: No answer

critique: The answer should mention the number of publications the story has been published in.


text:
"Wake up, Timothy.....Timothy, dear, wake up!"

“Ugh...what?”

“Wake up! We're leaving soon!”

	Timothy rose from his bead, still groggy. Beside him was his wife, already dressed. He glanced at his clock; 3:20 AM, it read.

“Margaret, what are you doing awake and dressed at three in the morning? Why are you waking me up?”, said Timothy, yawning.

“We're leaving soon!”

“Leaving where?”

“Oh...well, its a surprise, you'll just have to wait until Jeffery comes. Then we will leave!”, said Margaret. She seemed quite excited for this place they were going to.

“Who's Jeffery? Why do we have to wait for him?”

“Because he's the one taking us!”

“Margaret, I don't want to go anywhere. I want to sleep. I have work in the morning, how am I supposed to be on time if I don't get any sleep?”

“You don't need to worry about work, dear. Now get dressed! I'm going to go fix us some breakfast.”

	Margaret left the bedroom, and headed towards the kitchen. Timothy could hear her humming to herself happily as she prepared their food. As reluctant as he was, he got out of bed and dressed himself. He didn't want to go anywhere; but Margaret had been quite distant lately; not herself. This was the first time in weeks he had seen her happy. He decided he'd go along with it, for her sake. As he walked into the kitchen, Margaret stood at the stove smiling, frying some eggs.

“How would you like your eggs, dear?”

“Runny.”

	Timothy walked to the coffee maker, and began to make some coffee. He soon realized that Margaret had stopped humming; so he turned around. She was standing completely still, staring at him blankly.

“What are you looking at me like that for?”, he asked.

	No response.

“Margaret, what's wrong?”

“Oh, what?”, she said, as she snapped back into reality.

“You were staring at me.”

“Oh, sorry. Silly me, I guess I'm still a bit tired!” She resumed cooking the eggs and humming.

	Timothy finished brewing his coffee just as Margaret finished cooking the eggs. She prepared them plates, and they sat down to eat.

“So, where are we going?”, Timothy asked.

“I can't tell you, dear. Its a surprise.”

“What kind of surprise?”

“A special surprise, just for you.”

“A surprise? For me? It better be damn good if its at 3 AM in the morning. When are we leaving?”

“Oh, I don't know. As soon as Jeffery gets here.”

	About a half hour had passed, and they had both finished eating. Timothy was in the living room, fiddling with the T.V.. Margaret sat next to him, reading a book.

“Margaret, did you mess with the T.V.? Its just fuzzy white noise.”

“No dear, I didn't touch it.”

“Whatever. There's probably nothing good on, anyway. Can we leave yet?”

“No, not yet. We need to wait 'till Jeffery comes.”

“I think this Jeffery guy is a bit late.”, said Timothy, mildly annoyed.

	Another half hour passed, and at this point Timothy was laying on the floor, half asleep. His eyes became heavy, and soon the image of Margaret underneath the lamp had dimmed to blackness.

“Wake up, Timothy! Wake up! Timothy!”

	Timothy opened his eyes. He was back in his bed, with Margaret sitting on the bed next to him, with a worried look on her face.

“Timothy, you were talking in your sleep, and you're sweating.”

“What? How did I get in my bed? Is Jeffery here yet? He glanced at the clock; 5:48 AM.

“Who's Jeffery, Timothy?”

“Jeffery, Margaret. You know, he was going to take us to the surprise, remember? You woke me up at 3 AM!”

“What? I don't know a Jeffery, and I didn't wake you up. You must have been dreaming, that's probably why you were talking in your sleep.”

“Maybe...Margaret, I had a very strange dream. You woke me up, and we were going to go to my surprise, but you said we had to wait for Jeffery, and-”

“Oh, honey! You're cold!”

“I'm what?”, said Timothy, confused.

“You're cold! But you're sweating! I'm calling the doctor.”

Margaret left the bedroom, and he could soon hear her talking on the phone with the doctor. He touched his forehead; it was cold. Stone cold. So was his arm, and his leg, and the rest of his body. Ice cold. He shivered. The doorbell rang.

“Wow, that was fast!”, exclaimed Margaret.

Timothy could hear her answer the door.

“Who are you? You're not the doctor.”

“No, I'm not,” said a man with a raspy voice. “I'm here for Timothy.”

“He's in the bedroom...but who are you? What do you want?”

“I'm Jeffery,” he said, “The undertaker.”

title: Wait 'till Jeffery Comes

question: Summarize the twist ending.

answer: At first all the signs seem to be signals of a terrible impending forgetting and loss of sense of reality in Timothy. Margaret gets lost in a daze several times, insisting that they had to wait for "Jeffery" to arrive to take them to a special surprise. Timothy falls asleep, talking and just as strange, he is suddenly cold and Margaret calls the doctor, only to answer the doorbell to find Jeffery, the undertaker. The tone of the short story changes, moving out the rules of reality to imply that the narrator is dead. Certainly it is not mentioned, but Timothy was likely in his deathbed before nodding off. Jeffery arrived then to confirm that.

critique: Create coherence in the response by using past tense to describe Timothy's death.

critique: This is a big jump, and the last sentence is unnecessary.

critique: The response contains inaccurate information.

critique: The story doesn't change tone. It's not a twist ending.

critique: The second sentence is redundant and not important to the twist ending.

critique: "Margaret gets lost in a daze several times, insisting that they had to wait for "Jeffery" to arrive to take them to a special surprise." - Margaret gets lost in a daze only once, not several times. Rewrite this sentence.

critique: "The undertaker." - is misleading. The undertaker arrived to take Timothy away. Margaret called the undertaker to take Timothy to the hospital.

critique: "The tone of the short story changes, moving out the rules of reality to imply that the narrator is dead. Certainly it is not mentioned, but Timothy was likely in his deathbed before nodding off. Jeffery arrived then to confirm that." - this is inaccurate. The story does not change pace, and the narrator is not dead.

critique: The story doesn't change tone, it's just that Timothy is dead.

critique: The narrator is not in his deathbed. He is in bed, talking to Margaret.

critique: "Margaret gets lost in a daze several times, insisting that they had to wait for "Jeffery" to arrive to take them to a special surprise." - this never happened. Margaret was never in a daze. This line needs to be omitted.

critique: Timothy doesn't get lost in dazed; he just appeared to lose track and feel very tired.

text: The response misses to mention that Timothy has a vivid dream and when he wakes up, he waits for the doctor to come to check on him but he turns out to be dead as it is the undertaker who visits him.

category: coverage

refinement: At first all the signs seem to be signals of a terrible impending forgetting and loss of sense of reality in Timothy. Margaret gets lost in a daze several times, insisting that they had to wait for "Jeffery" to arrive to take them to a special surprise. Timothy falls asleep, talking and just as strange, he is suddenly cold and Margaret calls the doctor, only to answer the doorbell to find Jeffery, the undertaker. The tone of the short story changes, moving out the rules of reality to imply that the narrator is dead. Certainly it is not mentioned, but Timothy was likely in his deathbed before nodding off. Jeffery arrived then to confirm that.

question: Summarize Timothy's dream.

answer: Timothy dreams that his wife wakes him up to go on a trip and they wait around forever for someone called Jeffery. Eventually, Jeffery arrives and it turns out to be the undertaker.

critique: The response misses to mention that Timothy thinks he has been dreaming.

critique: The answer should mention that Timothy is dead.

critique: There is no evidence that the undertaker is called Jeffery.

critique: He's not waiting around for someone called Jeffery, he's waiting for Jeffery.

critique: The phrase "finally arrives" is a bit misleading because Jeffery doesn't take them anywhere. He is the undertaker.

critique: The narrator doesn't have a name and is not a character, it's a dream. He should be referred to with pronouns ('him' and 'he'), not with a name.

critique: "Timothy dreams that his wife wakes him up to go on a trip and they wait around forever for someone called Jeffery. Eventually, Jeffery arrives and it turns out to be the undertaker." - is incorrect. Timothy has a dream in which he and Margaret are waiting for Jeffery. It was not a dream about a trip. The answer should be rewritten.

critique: "they wait around" - remove "they" since this is incorrect since Timothy was alone

critique: Could include more details about the dream

critique: It would be more accurate to say that Timothy's wife says they will be going somewhere with a guy named Jeffery, but that Jeffery never shows up.

question: What does the story say about Timothy's cause of death?

answer: No answer

critique: The answer should offer some context around Timothy's manner of death -- why was he dead and in his bed?

critique: There is a clear answer to this question in the text.

critique: It is clear that Timothy dies while dreaming, and the narrator, Margaret, is worried that he is sick.

critique: Missing information which is stated in the story


text:
Doing the Dishes

With a sigh you look over at the mountain of distress that has accumulated in the kitchen sink. You did your best to only use paper plates, plastic forks, and solo cups, but the need for the stronger sturdier supplies couldn’t be avoided.  Through the chaos of the week you were forced to use actual glasses, plates, and utensils.  It started innocent enough; a surprise dip that needed a home, a cake that needed to be cut with a solid knife.  Before long the cabinet floodgates opened with plate after plate, glass after glass with the silverware drawer aiding in the onslaught. They all joined together to accumulate germs, caked food, and farms of bacteria, eventually creating a fortress in the sink.  Something had to be done, though you wished it never had come to this.

You slide up your sleeves and approach the mountain of dirt, grime, and germs.  For a moment you think about all the mouths, hands, food, and saliva that lie in wait on those burdensome dishes.  You shake the thought and turn on the water.  It flows freely from its spout, slowly warming up to you as you busy yourself with the disinfectant, pouring it all over the mess that is before you.

The water builds its heat, and the plates are nearly fully lathered up in the cleansing liquid signaling the beginning of the purge.  With your mind on the upcoming offensive strike, a slight excitement builds as you take out the brillo pad and charge into battle.  The plates don’t even put up a fight as the caked food bleeds away at your hand.  The caked residue flows freely off the plates, disappearing into the black hole that drains the sink.  Their grimy armor gives way to their shiny skin, soon finding a new home on the dishwasher rack.  As the battle rages with the plates and pans, they slowly reveal the frontline soldiers; the forks, spoons and knives.  However, they must wait their turn as the glasses continue to stand tall, rebelling against your wishes.

Without hesitation you pierce the glasses with your wiry weapon and scrape away the liquid that’s settled in side.  The glasses fall quickly, with the silverware soldiers lying in wait.  You grab the dishcloth, and begin wrapping them and stripping them of their infected skin, wiping them clean as you before tossing them into the dishwasher for the second cleansing.  The soldiers put up a fight, for each one needs to be dealt with individually.  It doesn’t matter - you are relentless, and once the last one is discarded you see one last rebellion, one last fight that you must win.

The drain is being held up by rebellious leftover food particles, leaving a pool of warm water that continues to grow.  A sly smile grows upon your lips as your hand reaches over to a switch that is close by.  Your finger flips up device and the drain begins to roar, slicing up and destroying anything that gets in its way.  You can almost hear the tiny bacterial screams and the food gives way quickly, and the water that was once held up flows freely down the sink.

With your primary offense successful, you look over to the dishwasher who holds a look of determination.  You feed the device its cleaning substance, and then close it. The dishes inside are worn and tired, unaware of the second purge that awaits them.  Confidently you turn the knob, and as you hear the water rushing towards the machine, you wipe your hands clean and relish in satisfaction of another successful battle against the dishes.

Though the battle was won, the war will never end.

title: [AA] Doing the Dishes (619)

question: What does the passage say about the narrator's preference for plastic dishes?

answer: The narrator tried to use only plastic ware and avoid using the actual utensils. But, they got overused. The narrator sighed and started to clean the plates and utensils. The narrator flipped on the switch which opened the drain, destroying any obstruction.

critique: The narrator's preference for plastic dishes is not mentioned.

critique: The response contains irrelevant information.


text:
The JUNIOR KANGAROOS side represents Australia in the sport of rugby league. They are commonly known as the JUNIOR KANGAROOS, after the native marsupial of that name.

Since 2019, they are an under-23 side, with players selected from the NRL. They are administered by the Australian Rugby League Commission.

History

Prior to 2010, the Junior Kangaroos was selected on an under-19 age basis. The best Australian players 19 years of age or younger, would represent the country against the likes of the Junior Kiwis, Papua New Guinea and Tonga, sometimes as curtain raisers to the senior Kangaroos games. Players such as Greg Bird, Matt Bowen, Justin Hodges, Luke Lewis, Jamie Lyon, Cameron Smith and Johnathan Thurston represented the Junior Kangaroos early in their careers and went on to play at the senior level for Australia. The last Junior Kangaroos side selected under the under 19 rules was in 2007. This would be the last Junior Kangaroos team until 2010.

In 2010, with the advent of the National Youth Competition, the Junior Kangaroos was switched to an under-20 team and played in a two Test series against the Junior Kiwis.[1][2][3][4] From 2011 to 2018, the Junior Kangaroos have faced the Junior Kiwis at the end of each season in a one off Test match, usually as a curtain raiser to a senior level Australia-New Zealand Test match.

In 2019, the ARL announced that Junior Kangaroos would be moving to an under-23 format and would play France at WIN Stadium.[5]

2010 series

1st Test

Played as a curtain raiser to the New Zealand-England Four Nations match.

2nd Test

Played as a curtain raiser to the New Zealand-Papua New Guinea Four Nations match.

2011 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Australia-New Zealand pre-Four Nations tournament match. Both coaches agreed to allow an 18th man be used during the match.

2012 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Australia-New Zealand end of year Test match.

2013 match

2014 match

2015 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Papua New Guinea-Fiji Melanesian Cup match and the Samoa-Tonga Polynesian Cup match.

2016 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Papua New Guinea-Fiji Melanesian Cup match and the Samoa-Tonga Polynesian Cup match.

2017 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the 2017 Anzac Test.

2018 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Australia-New Zealand end of year Test match.

2019 match

Played as a curtain raiser to the Australia-New Zealand Oceania Cup match.

Players

Captains

-   Ben Jones (2010)
-   Dale Finucane (2011)
-   Chad Townsend (2011)
-   Alex McKinnon (2012)
-   Mitchell Cornish (2013)
-   Michael Lichaa (2013)
-   Cameron McInnes (2014)
-   Matthew Lodge (2015)
-   Tevita Pangai Junior (2016)
-   Brodie Croft (2017)
-   Jake Clifford (2018)
-   David Fifita (2019)

Coaches

-   David Hamilton (2010)
-   Andrew Patmore (2011)
-   Kelly Egan (2012–2014)
-   Justin Holbrook (2015–2017)
-   Neil Henry (2018–present)

[1] https://www.nrl.com/news/2010/09/23/junior-kangaroos-squad-named/

[2] https://www.nrl.com/news/2010/10/05/junior-kangaroos--team-named/

[3] https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/junior-kangaroos-brimming-with-talent/story-e6frexnr-1225927422060?sv=7b43bf39faf3bb8719d5b136191f80bd

[4] https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/junior-kangaroos-squad-selected/news-story/b60a6c64d2eded2cb99347953842db5b

[5] https://www.melbournestorm.com.au/news/20192/10/07/junior-kangaroos-squad-announced/

title: Junior Kangaroos

question: What does the article say about the achievements of the Junior Kangaroos?

answer: In 2010, the Junior Kangaroos switched to an under-20 team and played a two-Test series against the Junior Kiwis. Since 2011, the Junior Kangaroos have faced the Junior Kiwis at the end of each season in a one-off Test match. The last Junior Kangaroos side selected under the under 19 rules was in 2007.

critique: The answer does not mention the Junior Kangaroos' achievements.

text: It is omitted that since 2019, they are an under-23 side, with players selected from the NRL.

question: What does the article say about the rules of junior rugby?

answer: No answer

critique: It is omitted that in 2010, the Junior Kangaroos switched to an under-20 team.

critique: The answer is incorrect. The article does mention the rules of junior rugby.

critique: The answer should mention that the article does not mention the rules.

critique: The answer should mention that the rules of junior rugby are not discussed in the article.


text:
The CIA conducted secret operations in Cambodia and Laos for eight years as part of the conflict against Communist North Vietnam.

1954

The National Intelligence Estimate projected relatively little Communist activity in Cambodia as Viet Minh withdraw. With outside help, the Cambodians should be able to build a security apparatus.[1]

1959

[Ngo Dinh Nhu meeting US Vice-President Lyndon Johnson in 1961] In December 1958 Ngo Dinh NhuNgo Dinh Diem's younger brother and chief adviserbroached the idea of orchestrating a coup to overthrow Cambodian leader Norodom Sihanouk.[2] Nhu contacted Dap Chhuon, Sihanouk's Interior Minister, who was known for his pro-American sympathies, to prepare for the coup against his boss.[3] Chhuon received covert financial and military assistance from Thailand, South Vietnam, and the CIA.[4] In January 1959 Sihanouk learned of the coup plans through intermediaries who were in contact with Chhuon.[5] The following month, Sihanouk sent the army to capture Chhuon, who was summarily executed as soon as he was captured, effectively ending the coup attempt.[6] Sihanouk then accused South Vietnam and the U.S. of orchestrating the coup attempt.[7] Six months later, on 31August 1959, a small packaged lacquer gift, which was fitted with a parcel bomb, was delivered to the royal palace. Norodom Vakrivan, the chief of protocol, was killed instantly when he opened the package. Sihanouk's parents, Suramarit and Kossamak, who were sitting in another room not far from Vakrivan, narrowly escaped unscathed. An investigation traced the origin of the parcel bomb to an American military base in Saigon.[8] While Sihanouk publicly accused Ngo Dinh Nhu of masterminding the bomb attack, he secretly suspected that the U.S. was also involved.[9] The incident deepened his distrust of the U.S.[10]

1969

President Richard Nixon asked Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Henry A. Kissinger to explore two potential CIA actions in Cambodia:

:#Creating covert paramilitary harassing operations directed against North Vietnamese Regular Forces in the sanctuary areas just over the Cambodian border

:#CIA capability for eliminating or reducing the arms traffic through Cambodia to communist forces in South Vietnam. After discussion in the 303 Committee, which was then the approval group for US covert actions, the committee endorsed the first, although the CIA recommended against it for two reasons. They believed it would take effort away from operations in South Vietnam, and also would have questionable effectiveness but high cost against the large North Vietnamese forces in Cambodia.

As far as the second, CIA has identified a number of Cambodian army officers who are actively involved in supporting communist forces in South Vietnam, but does not now have direct, secure and controlled access to any of these officers. They doubt any of the officers involved in the arms traffic would be now susceptible to bribery both because of the profits accruing to them from such operations as well as the personal political risks entailed in a relationship involving the United States. Further, they pointed out that if recent U.S. diplomatic approaches to Cambodia result in the formal resumption of full diplomatic relations, CIA will gain an operating base for improved intelligence collection and covert action. With such a base, they would have a better chance to convince Prince Sihanouk that it is in his best interest to make an honest effort to reduce or halt the arms traffic.

Kissinger recommended continuing to monitor rather than taking action. There is no record on file of a Presidential decision on these matters.[11]

1969

A February 19 memorandum from Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Henry Kissinger to President Richard Nixon proposed a bombing attack by B-52 aircraft against what was believed to be COSVN in Cambodia. In this discussion, specific CIA analysis was not discussed, but Kissinger indicated that he believed the target information to be correct:

  On February 18, 1969, Mr. H.A. Kissinger, Secretary of Defense Laird, Deputy Secretary of Defense Packard, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Wheeler, and Colonels Pursley and Haig met in the Secretary of Defense’s conference room and were briefed by a two-officer team from Saigon on the conduct of the proposed Arc Light strike against the reported location of COSVN Headquarters.[12]

Note that no intelligence personnel were present.

At an 11 October 1969 meeting with Nixon, Kissinger, United States Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird, Attorney General John Mitchell and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (i.e., no CIA personnel),[13] several pertinent observations were made.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) Earle Wheeler cited two COSVN Resolutions, with the inference that COSVN existed as an organizational entity. In the subsequent discussion of bombing options, there were no mention of COSVN's physical location.

1970

Prince Norodom Sihanouk was ousted by Lon Nol in March 1970. Sihanouk claimed in his 1973 book that the CIA engineered the coup.[14] While this allegation has never been substantiated, it may well be the case that the highest levels of the U.S. government were surprised by the coup: by 2013, there was a developing academic consensus that U.S. military intelligence was aware of and actively encouraged the plot to depose Sihanouk.[15]

1972

Senator Clifford P. Case sponsored a law effective December 1972 cutting off funds for CIA and private military company operations in Cambodia (see the Case–Church Amendment).[16]

1982

In December 1978, Vietnam invaded Cambodia and overthrew the genocidal Khmer Rouge regime, ending the Cambodian genocide and installing a new government led by Khmer Rouge defectors.[17] The Reagan administration authorized the provision of aid to a coalition called the Khmer People's National Liberation Front (KPNLF),[18] run by Son Sann. In 1989, Vietnamese forces were withdrawn from Cambodia, after having successfully quelled the uprising by Khmer Rouge and KPNLF insurgents.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

title: CIA activities in Cambodia

question: What does the text say about suspicions towards the U.S.?

answer: In 1969, a small-package lacquered gift was delivered to the royal palace of Cambodia. When Norodom Varkrivan, the chief of protocol, opened it, he was killed instantly. Sihanouk's parents, who were sitting in another room nearby, narrowly escaped. The items were traced back to an American military base in Saigon. In 1973, Sihanouk claimed the CIA engineered the coup that ousted him. In 1978, the Vietnam invaded Cambodia and overthrew the genocidal Khmer Rouge regime. In 1989, the Vietnamese forces were withdrawn from Cambodia after quelling an insurgence.

critique: The answer is irrelevant to the question.

critique: The text doesn't say anything about the Vietnam invasion.

critique: The response includes extraneous information not useful for the task.

critique: Solo does not mention conspiracy theories except for data point 6, which is about a potential CIA coup.

text: "In 1978, the Vietnam invaded Cambodia and overthrew the genocidal Khmer Rouge regime. In 1989, the Vietnamese forces were withdrawn from Cambodia after quelling an insurgence." - this is irrelevant and should be removed. The date "1969" is also incorrect. It should be August 31, 1959.

question: Summarize everything relating to South Vietnam.

answer: In December 1958 Ngo Dinh Nhu met with Lyndon Johnson to talk about overthrowing the Cambodian leader. In January 1959 Sihanouk learned of the coup plans through intermediaries. In February 1969 a bombing attack by B-52 aircraft against COSVN was proposed.

critique: The response misses to mention that Chhuon received covert financial and military assistance from Thailand, South Vietnam, and the CIA.

critique: The bombing attack was not proposed by South Vietnam.

critique:
di VNhong. di VN ch
en. Ngo Dinh Nhu's family was evacuated after the coup succeeded. It should be sufficiently accurate to chop the Vietnamese words altogether and replace them with English.

critique: The response is missing the part where Sihanouk accused South Vietnam and the U.S. of orchestrating the coup attempt.

critique: The response is missing the coup attempt in 1959.

critique: The bombing attack was proposed by Kissinger, not Nhu.

question: What does the text say about coups?

answer: The CIA conducted a coup in Cambodia in 1958 to overthrow Sihanouk. Sihanouk believed the U.S. had something to do with the coup. Sihanouk was ousted in a coup in 1970, this time he claimed the CIA engineered it.

critique: The CIA did not orchestrate the coup in 1958.

critique: The CIA did not conduct the initial coup attempt. Ngo Dinh Nhu, the brother of the President of South Vietnam, did.

critique: The CIA's nature of involvement in the coup is repressed.

question: What does the text say about protests?

answer: No answer

critique: The answer should mention the CIA's activities in Cambodia.

critique: The answer should mention that there are no protests mentioned in the text.

critique: The response is incorrect and there is no answer.